ASSOCIATED() must be false for zero-sized arrays, and the
strides on a dimension are irrelevant when the extent is unitary.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127793
Overflow detection in the folding of int/nint/ceiling is
incorrectly signalling overflow when a negative argument yields
a zero result.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127785
There's a few (3) cases where Fortran allows two distinct symbols to have
the same name in the same scope. Module file output copes with only two of
them. The third involves a separate module procedure that isn't separate:
both the procedure and its declared interface appear in the same (sub)module.
Fix to ensure that the interface is included in the module file output, so
that the module file reader doesn't suffer a bogus error about a "separate
module procedure without an interface".
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127784
Fortran does have negative unit numbers -- they show up in child I/O
subroutines for defined I/O and for OPEN(NEWUNIT=) -- but the runtime
needs to catch the cases where a negative unit number that wasn't
generated by the runtime is passed in for OPEN or for an I/O statement
that would ordinarily create an anonymous "fort.NNN" file for a
hitherto unseen unit.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127788
A message has a %s string substitution in it but somebody (probably me)
forgot to pass the argument that defines it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127794
The prescanner does not support VMS Fortran listing control directives
(%LIST, %NOLIST, %EJECT) or continuation lines on INCLUDE lines.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127791
When an I/O data transfer statement uses an ASSIGN'ed FORMAT that
has not been ASSIGN'ed to a FORMAT statement, the runtime receives
a zero-length format string. Distinguish this case from the general
error message about missing parentheses.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127797
The predicate that determines image control statements needs
to distinguish STOP (which is) from ERROR STOP (which isn't).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127796
NCOPIES= is currently a std::size_t in the API. If a negative value is
used, the memory allocation will fail. Change it to be a signed integer,
and crash with a message instead if it be negative.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127795
I'm emitting "x'y" because the space-separated apostrophes are
misinterpreted as being adjacent repeated quotation marks.
Fix to ensure no space skipping is applied when checking for
repeated quotation marks.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127792
When generic resolution finds its specific procedure in a module,
and that specific procedure is not use-associated into the local scope
(perhaps because it was PRIVATE, perhaps because the generic was
use-associated with ONLY:), we create a new use-association with
a renaming. The name constructed for this renaming needs to be
additionally qualified with the module name of the specific procedure
in order to avoid clashing with another specific of the same name
that may have previously been use-associated in the same way from
a distinct module.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127790
Position inquiries need to account for offsets in records to be
accurate in the case of non-advancing I/O.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127789
There's code in EditCharacterInput() that causes that template function
to silently return false if it is invoked at the end of the input file.
This overrides other checks that properly call SignalEnd() later.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127786
A REWIND of a unit that's in the middle of a record due to a READ
or WRITE statement with ADVANCE='NO' needs to reset the left tab
limit so that the next transfer takes place at the beginning of
the first record.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127783
When an unconnected unit number is used in a BACKSPACE statement
with ERR=, IOSTAT=, &/or IOMSG= control specifiers, don't crash,
but let the program deal with the error.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127782
Fix some mismatch in format used in the file and reduce the diff with fir-dev
to be able to finish the upstreaming on this file.
This patch is part of the upstreaming effort from fir-dev branch.
Reviewed By: PeteSteinfeld, kiranchandramohan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127849
For BIND(C) statement, two common block with the same name can have the
same bind name. Fix the regression failure by adding this check. Also add
the regression tests.
Co-authored-by: Jean Perier <jperier@nvidia.com>
Reviewed By: clementval
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127841
As OpenMP 5.0, for firstprivate, lastprivate, copyin, and copyprivate
clauses, if the list item is a polymorphic variable with the allocatable
attribute, the behavior is unspecified.
Reviewed By: kiranchandramohan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127601
Add failed_images to the list of intrinsic functions. Add a
semantics test for failed_images.
Reviewed By: jeanPerier
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126805
num_images had previously been added to the list of intrinsics
before the type team_type had been implemented. Now that team_type
is implemented, add the num_images call that has the team argument.
Update the semantics tests for num_images.
Reviewed By: craig.rasmussen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126734
This patch is part of the upstreaming effort from fir-dev branch.
Reviewed By: jeanPerier
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127738
Co-authored-by: Eric Schweitz <eschweitz@nvidia.com>
Lowering was crashing with "fatal internal error: node has not been analyzed"
if a PDT with initial component value was defined inside an internal
procedure. This is because the related expression cannot be analyzed
without the component values (which happens at the instatiation).
These expression do not need to be visited (the instantiations, if any
will be). Use the form of GetExpr that tolerates the parse tree expression
to not be analyzed into an evaluate::Expr when looking through the
symbols used in an internal procedure.
Note that the PDTs TODO will then fire (it happens after the PFT
analysis) as expected if the derived type is used.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127735
Codegen does not support fir.addressof of functions returning derived
types, arrays are descriptors inside GlobalOp region.
This is because the abstract-result-opt is required to rewrite such
functions (a hidden argument must be added), but this pass is meant to
run in GlobalOp currently.
Such fir.address_of may be created when lowering procedure pointers
initial value (TODO), or when creating derived type descriptors for
types with bindings.
Add a TODO in lowering until abstract-result-opt is modified to run
on GlobalOp too.
This patch is part of the upstreaming effort from fir-dev branch.
Reviewed By: jeanPerier
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127722
As Fortran 2018 C802 and C873, if bind name is specified, there can only
be only one entity. The check for common block is missed before. As
Fortran 2018 8.5.5 point 2, the bind name is one identifier, which is
unique. That is, one entity can not have multiple bind names. Also add
this check.
Reviewed By: klausler, Jean Perier
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126961
After a recoverable error condition in a READ statement with ADVANCE='NO',
skip the remainder of the current record.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127433
Per 7.11.1p1 - All [ieee_arithmetic and ieee_exceptions] functions are
pure and all the subroutines are impure unless otherwise stated. Most of
these functions are elemental (and not impure), which implies pure.
Several of the remaining non-elemental functions are missing pure prefixes;
add them.
The code for scanning BOZ input allows for blanks and tabs to appear,
but can hang if they do and the BOZ input value is not followed by
extra valid digits; the repositioning for the second sweep simply
needed to be done in units of character, not valid digits.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127431
f18 was treating "f() = 1" as a statement function definition
if it could be viewed as being in the specification part and
"f" was a USE-associated function returning a data pointer.
(The non-USE-associated case is fine.) Fix to allow for "f"
to be USE associated.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127430
Handle the case of a non-generic procedure that is USE associated
into a scope that has a generic interface of the same name with an
appropriate error rather than crashing.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127429
When Ew.dEe or Gw.dEe output has an exponent requiring more than 'e'
digits, the whole output field must overflow to asterisks. The runtime
was detecting short fields and padding them with zeroes, but not
overflow.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127428
The test for an overflow during decimal->binary conversion was taking
place too late, causing the data not to be rescanned from the beginning.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127427
There were cases where E0.d output editing (or G0.d editing that is converted
to E0.d) would emit one or more leading blank characters; fix them.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127426
FIR models Fortran intrinsic types with deliberate KIND values. Like
Fortran, COMPLEX and REAL have related KINDs in FIR. Lowering now
converts REAL types to floating point (MLIR) up front. This patch moves
the code to convert from FIR RealType to MLIR FloatType out of codegen
and into the builder, allowing FIR ComplexTypes to have their element
type returned as an MLIR FloatType.
We should consider whether to replace fir::ComplexType with
mlir::ComplexType at some point. I believe these types are presently
used to convey distinctins in the target ABIs in the Tilikum bridge
however.
This patch is part of the upstreaming effort from fir-dev branch.
Reviewed By: PeteSteinfeld
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127636
Co-authored-by: Eric Schweitz <eschweitz@nvidia.com>
This patch is part of the upstreaming effort from fir-dev branch.
Reviewed By: jeanPerier, PeteSteinfeld
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127634
Co-authored-by: Eric Schweitz <eschweitz@nvidia.com>
The restrictions on the relationship between a "kP" scale factor
and a Ew.d/Dw.d/Gw.d significant digit count are not enforced for
output editing when there is no nonzero scale factor in effect.
(An error message about a bad scale factor is confusing if no kP
control edit descriptor has been used.) Document this usage in
Extensions.md.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127435
The scope model used for branch target checking treats a label
on an END SELECT statement as if it were in the previous CASE block.
This makes it illegal to GO TO that label from within any earlier
CASE block in that statement. Fix by treating the CASE blocks as
nested scopes within the scope of the SELECT construct.
Also, add a "warning:" tag to related warning messages.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127425
The calculation of the source index was incorrect when a CSHIFT shift
count value is negative, for the implementation of CSHIFT for arrays
with rank >= 2. (The vector CSHIFT is fine.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127424
When an I/O statement is known to be in a recoverable error state,
it shouldn't cause a crash later in execution because it's not in
an expected non-erroneous processing state. Add checking for the
ErroneousIoStatementState variant on paths that might otherwise
lead to runtime crashes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127423
The little state machine in GetNextDataEdit() wasn't transitioning
properly from reading the imaginary part of the number back to the
real part for the next iteration of a repeated value.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127422
Track pending "asynchronous" I/O operation IDs so that WAIT statements can
report errors about bad ID numbers.
Lowering will need to extended to call GetAsynchronousId() for a READ or
WRITE statement with ID=n.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127421
When nonadvancing output uses T/TL control edit descriptors to reposition
the record, don't reset the position to the furthest point written at
the end of the write.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127420
Add TODO for KIND=2 so the user is notified correctly.
This patch is part of the upstreaming effort from fir-dev branch.
Reviewed By: jeanPerier, PeteSteinfeld
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127619
Co-authored-by: Peter Steinfeld <psteinfeld@nvidia.com>
Loop variables of a worksharing loop and sequential loops in parallel
region are privatised by default. These variables are marked with
OmpPreDetermined. Skip explicit privatisation of these variables.
Note: This is part of upstreaming from the fir-dev branch of
https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18-llvm-project.
Reviewed By: Leporacanthicus
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127249
Co-authored-by: Jean Perier <jperier@nvidia.com>
Co-authored-by: Mats Petersson <mats.petersson@arm.com>
Add TODO for half-precision for reduction.
This patch is part of the upstreaming effort from fir-dev branch.
Reviewed By: jeanPerier, PeteSteinfeld
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127622
Co-authored-by: Eric Schweitz <eschweitz@nvidia.com>
The pass was raising TODOs when a function both had a fir.boxproc<> argument
and a fir.type<> argument (even if the fir.type<> did not contain a
fir.boxproc itself).
Prevent the TODO from firing when a fir.type<> does not actually contain
a fir.boxproc. Add the location for the remaining TODO (it will be
needed when procedure pointer components are supported in lowering).
FYI, I actually tried to just implement the TODO, but I there is a funny
issue. When creating the new fir::RecordType, since the name and context
are the same as the type being translated, fir::RecordType:get just
returns the existing type, and there is no way to change it (finalize()
does nothing since it is already finalized). So this will require to add
the ability to mutate the existing type, and I am not sure what are the
MLIR constraints here, so I escaped and left the TODO for that case.
This patch is part of the upstreaming effort from fir-dev branch.
Reviewed By: jeanPerier, PeteSteinfeld
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127633
Co-authored-by: Jean Perier <jperier@nvidia.com>
ALLOCATE statement allows reversed bounds (see Fortran 2018 9.7.1.2
point 1) in which case the extents are zero.
The same applies for the character length provided in the type spec that
can be negative. In which case the new length is zero.
Use genMaxWithZero to deal with these cases.
This patch is part of the upstreaming effort from fir-dev branch.
Reviewed By: jeanPerier, PeteSteinfeld
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127617
Co-authored-by: Jean Perier <jperier@nvidia.com>
Peter Klausler