Auto-generated patch based on clang-tidy readability-identifier-naming.
Only some manual cleanup for `extern "C"` declarations and a GTest change was required.
I'm not sure if this cleanup is actually very useful. It cleans up clang-tidy findings to the number of warnings from clang-tidy should be lower. Since it was easy to do and required only little cleanup I thought I'd upload it for discussion.
One pattern that keeps recurring: Test **matchers** are also supposed to start with a lowercase letter as per LLVM convention. However GTest naming convention for matchers start with upper case. I would propose to keep stay consistent with the GTest convention there. However that would imply a lot of `//NOLINT` throughout these files.
To re-product this patch run:
```
run-clang-tidy -checks="-*,readability-identifier-naming" -fix -format ./clang-tools-extra/clangd
```
To convert the macro names, I was using this script with some manual cleanup afterwards:
https://gist.github.com/ChristianKuehnel/a01cc4362b07c58281554ab46235a077
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115634
Summary: Every call to a main like function in llvm and clang lib violates the naming convention for parameters. This prevents clang-tidy warning on such breaches.
Reviewers: alexfh, hokein
Reviewed By: hokein
Subscribers: merge_guards_bot, aheejin, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73715
Summary:
Some tidy checks have too many hits in the codebase, making it hard to spot
other results from clang-tidy, therefore rendering the tool less useful.
Two checks were disabled:
- misc-non-private-member-variable-in-classes in the whole LLVM monorepo,
it is very common to have those in LLVM and the style guide does not forbid
them.
- readability-identifier-naming in the clang subtree. There are thousands of
violations in 'Sema.h' alone.
Before the change, 'Sema.h' had >1000 tidy warnings, after the change the number
dropped to 3 warnings (unterminated namespace comments).
Reviewers: alexfh, hokein
Reviewed By: hokein
Subscribers: llvm-commits, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57573
llvm-svn: 352862