1. Require hotness on all remark lines with -verify.
3. Fix the samplePGO file to actually produce hotness on each line.
The second remark has hotness 60 rather 30 which I don't quite understand but
testing this is strictly better than before. It also unblocks the commit of
D40678.
llvm-svn: 319577
Summary:
Un-revert https://reviews.llvm.org/D34868, but with a slight tweak to the
documentation to fix an error -- I had used the wrong syntax for a link.
llvm-svn: 306948
Summary:
Depends on https://reviews.llvm.org/D34867.
Add a Clang frontend option to enable optimization remark hotness
thresholds, which were added to LLVM in https://reviews.llvm.org/D34867.
This prevents diagnostics that do not meet a minimum hotness
threshold from being output. When generating optimization remarks for large
codebases with a ton of cold code paths, this option can be used
to limit the optimization remark output at a reasonable size.
Discussion of this change can be read here:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-June/114377.html
Reviewers: anemet, davidxl, hfinkel
Reviewed By: anemet
Subscribers: fhahn, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34868
llvm-svn: 306945
Summary:
Prior to this change, using `-fdiagnostics-show-hotness` with a sampling
profile specified via `-fprofile-sample-use=` would result in the Clang
frontend emitting a warning: "argument '-fdiagnostics-show-hotness' requires
profile-guided optimization information". Of course, a sampling profile
*is* profile-guided optimization information, so the warning is misleading.
Furthermore, despite the warning, hotness was displayed based on the data in
the sampling profile.
Prevent the warning from being emitted when a sampling profile is used, and
add a test that verifies this.
Reviewers: anemet, davidxl
Reviewed By: davidxl
Subscribers: danielcdh, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34082
llvm-svn: 306079
Adam Nemet