We were not doing that for large shadow granularity. Also add more
stack frame layout tests for large shadow granularity.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39475
llvm-svn: 318581
Summary: For some irreducible CFG the domtree nodes might be dead, do not update domtree for dead nodes.
Reviewers: kuhar, dberlin, hfinkel
Reviewed By: kuhar
Subscribers: llvm-commits, mcrosier
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38960
llvm-svn: 316582
Summary:
If the extracted region has multiple exported data flows toward the same BB which is not included in the region, correct resotre instructions and PHI nodes won't be generated inside the exitStub. The solution is simply put the restore instructions right after the definition of output values instead of putting in exitStub.
Unittest for this bug is included.
Author: myhsu
Reviewers: chandlerc, davide, lattner, silvas, davidxl, wmi, kuhar
Subscribers: dberlin, kuhar, mgorny, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37902
llvm-svn: 315041
Summary:
And now that we no longer have to explicitly free() the Loop instances, we can
(with more ease) use the destructor of LoopBase to do what LoopBase::clear() was
doing.
Reviewers: chandlerc
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38201
llvm-svn: 314375
The fix is to avoid invalidating our insertion point in
replaceDbgDeclare:
Builder.insertDeclare(NewAddress, DIVar, DIExpr, Loc, InsertBefore);
+ if (DII == InsertBefore)
+ InsertBefore = &*std::next(InsertBefore->getIterator());
DII->eraseFromParent();
I had to write a unit tests for this instead of a lit test because the
use list order matters in order to trigger the bug.
The reduced C test case for this was:
void useit(int*);
static inline void inlineme() {
int x[2];
useit(x);
}
void f() {
inlineme();
inlineme();
}
llvm-svn: 313905
Summary:
See comment for why I think this is a good idea.
This change also:
- Removes an SCEV test case. The SCEV test was not testing anything useful (most of it was `#if 0` ed out) and it would need to be updated to deal with a private ~Loop::Loop.
- Updates the loop pass manager test case to deal with a private ~Loop::Loop.
- Renames markAsRemoved to markAsErased to contrast with removeLoop, via the usual remove vs. erase idiom we already have for instructions and basic blocks.
Reviewers: chandlerc
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37996
llvm-svn: 313695
There is no situation where this rarely-used argument cannot be
substituted with a DIExpression and removing it allows us to simplify
the DWARF backend. Note that this patch does not yet remove any of
the newly dead code.
rdar://problem/33580047
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35951
llvm-svn: 309426
Summary:
This is an addon to the change rl304488 cloning fixes. (Originally rl304226 reverted rl304228 and reapplied rl304488 https://reviews.llvm.org/D33655)
rl304488 works great when DILocalVariables that comes from the inlined function has a 'unique-ed' type, but,
in the case when the variable type is distinct we will create a second DILocalVariable in the scope of the original function that was inlined.
Consider cloning of the following function:
```
define private void @f() !dbg !5 {
%1 = alloca i32, !dbg !11
call void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata i32* %1, metadata !14, metadata !12), !dbg !18
ret void, !dbg !18
}
!14 = !DILocalVariable(name: "inlined", scope: !15, file: !6, line: 5, type: !17) ; came from an inlined function
!15 = distinct !DISubprogram(name: "inlined", linkageName: "inlined", scope: null, file: !6, line: 8, type: !7, isLocal: true, isDefinition: true, scopeLine: 9, isOptimized: false, unit: !0, variables: !16)
!16 = !{!14}
!17 = distinct !DICompositeType(tag: DW_TAG_structure_type, name: "some_struct", size: 32, align: 32)
```
Without this fix, when function 'f' is cloned, we will create another DILocalVariable for "inlined", due to its type being distinct.
```
define private void @f.1() !dbg !23 {
%1 = alloca i32, !dbg !26
call void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata i32* %1, metadata !28, metadata !12), !dbg !30
ret void, !dbg !30
}
!14 = !DILocalVariable(name: "inlined", scope: !15, file: !6, line: 5, type: !17)
!15 = distinct !DISubprogram(name: "inlined", linkageName: "inlined", scope: null, file: !6, line: 8, type: !7, isLocal: true, isDefinition: true, scopeLine: 9, isOptimized: false, unit: !0, variables: !16)
!16 = !{!14}
!17 = distinct !DICompositeType(tag: DW_TAG_structure_type, name: "some_struct", size: 32, align: 32)
;
!28 = !DILocalVariable(name: "inlined", scope: !15, file: !6, line: 5, type: !29) ; OOPS second DILocalVariable
!29 = distinct !DICompositeType(tag: DW_TAG_structure_type, name: "some_struct", size: 32, align: 32)
```
Now we have two DILocalVariable for "inlined" within the same scope. This result in assert in AsmPrinter/DwarfDebug.h:131: void llvm::DbgVariable::addMMIEntry(const llvm::DbgVariable &): Assertion `V.Var == Var && "conflicting variable"' failed.
(Full example: See: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33492)
In this change we prevent duplication of types so that when a metadata for DILocalVariable is cloned it will get uniqued to the same metadate node as an original variable.
Reviewers: loladiro, dblaikie, aprantl, echristo
Reviewed By: loladiro
Subscribers: EricWF, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35106
llvm-svn: 307418
clang-format (https://reviews.llvm.org/D33932) to keep primary headers
at the top and handle new utility headers like 'gmock' consistently with
other utility headers.
No other change was made. I did no manual edits, all of this is
clang-format.
This should allow other changes to have more clear and focused diffs,
and is especially motivated by moving some headers into more focused
libraries.
llvm-svn: 304786
Summary:
This problem stems from the fact that instructions are allocated using new
in LLVM, i.e. there is no relationship that can be derived by just looking
at the pointer value.
This interface dispatches to appropriate dominance check given 2 instructions,
i.e. in case the instructions are in the same basic block, ordered basicblock
(with instruction numbering and caching) are used. Otherwise, dominator tree
is used.
This is a preparation patch for https://reviews.llvm.org/D32720
Reviewers: dberlin, hfinkel, davide
Subscribers: davide, mgorny, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33380
llvm-svn: 304764
This was rL304226, reverted in 304228 due to a clang assertion failure
on the build bots. That problem should have been addressed by clang
commit rL304470.
llvm-svn: 304488
Summary:
In rL302576, DISubprograms gained the constraint that a !dbg attachments to functions must
have a 1:1 mapping to DISubprograms. As part of that change, the function cloning support
was adjusted to attempt to enforce this invariant during cloning. However, there
were several problems with the implementation. Part of these were fixed in rL304079.
However, there was a more fundamental problem with these changes, namely that it
bypasses the matadata value map, causing the cloned metadata to be a mix of metadata
pointing to the new suprogram (where manual code was added to fix those up) and the
old suprogram (where this was not the case). This mismatch could cause a number of
different assertion failures in the DWARF emitter. Some of these are given at
https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues/22069, but some others have been observed
as well. Attempt to rectify this by partially reverting the manual DI metadata fixup,
and instead using the standard value map approach. To retain the desired semantics
of not duplicating the compilation unit and inlined subprograms, explicitly freeze
these in the value map.
Reviewers: dblaikie, aprantl, GorNishanov, echristo
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33655
llvm-svn: 304226
Summary:
Implements PR889
Removing the virtual table pointer from Value saves 1% of RSS when doing
LTO of llc on Linux. The impact on time was positive, but too noisy to
conclusively say that performance improved. Here is a link to the
spreadsheet with the original data:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1F4FHir0qYnV0MEp2sYYp_BuvnJgWlWPhWOwZ6LbW7W4/edit?usp=sharing
This change makes it invalid to directly delete a Value, User, or
Instruction pointer. Instead, such code can be rewritten to a null check
and a call Value::deleteValue(). Value objects tend to have their
lifetimes managed through iplist, so for the most part, this isn't a big
deal. However, there are some places where LLVM deletes values, and
those places had to be migrated to deleteValue. I have also created
llvm::unique_value, which has a custom deleter, so it can be used in
place of std::unique_ptr<Value>.
I had to add the "DerivedUser" Deleter escape hatch for MemorySSA, which
derives from User outside of lib/IR. Code in IR cannot include MemorySSA
headers or call the MemoryAccess object destructors without introducing
a circular dependency, so we need some level of indirection.
Unfortunately, no class derived from User may have any virtual methods,
because adding a virtual method would break User::getHungOffOperands(),
which assumes that it can find the use list immediately prior to the
User object. I've added a static_assert to the appropriate OperandTraits
templates to help people avoid this trap.
Reviewers: chandlerc, mehdi_amini, pete, dberlin, george.burgess.iv
Reviewed By: chandlerc
Subscribers: krytarowski, eraman, george.burgess.iv, mzolotukhin, Prazek, nlewycky, hans, inglorion, pcc, tejohnson, dberlin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31261
llvm-svn: 303362
As recently discussed on llvm-dev [1], this patch makes it illegal for
two Functions to point to the same DISubprogram and updates
FunctionCloner to also clone the debug info of a function to conform
to the new requirement. To simplify the implementation it also factors
out the creation of inlineAt locations from the Inliner into a
general-purpose utility in DILocation.
[1] http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-May/112661.html
<rdar://problem/31926379>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32975
This reapplies r302469 with a fix for a bot failure (reparentDebugInfo
now checks for the case the orig and new function are identical).
llvm-svn: 302576
This caused PR32977.
Original commit message:
> Make it illegal for two Functions to point to the same DISubprogram
>
> As recently discussed on llvm-dev [1], this patch makes it illegal for
> two Functions to point to the same DISubprogram and updates
> FunctionCloner to also clone the debug info of a function to conform
> to the new requirement. To simplify the implementation it also factors
> out the creation of inlineAt locations from the Inliner into a
> general-purpose utility in DILocation.
>
> [1] http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-May/112661.html
> <rdar://problem/31926379>
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32975
llvm-svn: 302533
As recently discussed on llvm-dev [1], this patch makes it illegal for
two Functions to point to the same DISubprogram and updates
FunctionCloner to also clone the debug info of a function to conform
to the new requirement. To simplify the implementation it also factors
out the creation of inlineAt locations from the Inliner into a
general-purpose utility in DILocation.
[1] http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-May/112661.html
<rdar://problem/31926379>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32975
llvm-svn: 302469
This should simplify the call sites, which typically want to tweak one
attribute at a time. It should also avoid creating ephemeral
AttributeLists that live forever.
llvm-svn: 300718
Analysis, it has Analysis passes, and once NewGVN is made an Analysis,
this removes the cross dependency from Analysis to Transform/Utils.
NFC.
llvm-svn: 299980
Summary:
This class is a list of AttributeSetNodes corresponding the function
prototype of a call or function declaration. This class used to be
called ParamAttrListPtr, then AttrListPtr, then AttributeSet. It is
typically accessed by parameter and return value index, so
"AttributeList" seems like a more intuitive name.
Rename AttributeSetImpl to AttributeListImpl to follow suit.
It's useful to rename this class so that we can rename AttributeSetNode
to AttributeSet later. AttributeSet is the set of attributes that apply
to a single function, argument, or return value.
Reviewers: sanjoy, javed.absar, chandlerc, pete
Reviewed By: pete
Subscribers: pete, jholewinski, arsenm, dschuff, mehdi_amini, jfb, nhaehnle, sbc100, void, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31102
llvm-svn: 298393
Users often call getArgumentList().size(), which is a linear way to get
the number of function arguments. arg_size(), on the other hand, is
constant time.
In general, the fact that arguments are stored in an iplist is an
implementation detail, so I've removed it from the Function interface
and moved all other users to the argument container APIs (arg_begin(),
arg_end(), args(), arg_size()).
Reviewed By: chandlerc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31052
llvm-svn: 298010
Add updater to passes that now need it.
Move around code in MemorySSA to expose needed functions.
Summary: Mostly cleanup
Reviewers: george.burgess.iv
Subscribers: llvm-commits, Prazek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30221
llvm-svn: 295887
Summary:
This lets one add aliasing stores to the updater.
(i'm next going to move the creation/etc functions to the updater)
Reviewers: george.burgess.iv
Subscribers: llvm-commits, Prazek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30154
llvm-svn: 295677
Summary:
JumpThreading for guards feature has been reverted at https://reviews.llvm.org/rL295200
due to the following problem: the feature used the following algorithm for detection of
diamond patters:
1. Find a block with 2 predecessors;
2. Check that these blocks have a common single parent;
3. Check that the parent's terminator is a branch instruction.
The problem is that these checks are insufficient. They may pass for a non-diamond
construction in case if those two predecessors are actually the same block. This may
happen if parent's terminator is a br (either conditional or unconditional) to a block
that ends with "switch" instruction with exactly two branches going to one block.
This patch re-enables the JumpThreading for guards and fixes this issue by adding the
check that those found predecessors are actually different blocks. This guarantees that
parent's terminator is a conditional branch with exactly 2 different successors, which
is now ensured by assertions. It also adds two more tests for this situation (with parent's
terminator being a conditional and an unconditional branch).
Patch by Max Kazantsev!
Reviewers: anna, sanjoy, reames
Reviewed By: sanjoy
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30036
llvm-svn: 295410
Summary:
This patch allows JumpThreading also thread through guards.
Virtually, guard(cond) is equivalent to the following construction:
if (cond) { do something } else {deoptimize}
Yet it is not explicitly converted into IFs before lowering.
This patch enables early threading through guards in simple cases.
Currently it covers the following situation:
if (cond1) {
// code A
} else {
// code B
}
// code C
guard(cond2)
// code D
If there is implication cond1 => cond2 or !cond1 => cond2, we can transform
this construction into the following:
if (cond1) {
// code A
// code C
} else {
// code B
// code C
guard(cond2)
}
// code D
Thus, removing the guard from one of execution branches.
Patch by Max Kazantsev!
Reviewers: reames, apilipenko, igor-laevsky, anna, sanjoy
Reviewed By: sanjoy
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29620
llvm-svn: 294617
into CRTP base classes.
This can sometimes happen and not cause an immediate failure when the
derived class is, itself, a template. You can end up essentially calling
methods on the wrong derived type but a type where many things will
appear to "work".
To fail fast and with a clear error message we can use a static_assert,
but we have to stash that static_assert inside a method body or nested
type that won't need to be completed while building the base class. I've
tried to pick a reasonably small number of places that seemed like they
would definitely get triggered on use.
This is the last of the patch series defending against this that I have
planned, so far no bugs other than the original were found.
llvm-svn: 294275
Summary: Extend the MemorySSAUpdater API to allow movement to arbitrary places
Reviewers: davide, george.burgess.iv
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29239
llvm-svn: 293363
insertUse, moveBefore and moveAfter operations.
Summary:
This creates a basic MemorySSA updater that handles arbitrary
insertion of uses and defs into MemorySSA, as well as arbitrary
movement around the CFG. It replaces the current splice API.
It can be made to handle arbitrary control flow changes.
Currently, it uses the same updater algorithm from D28934.
The main difference is because MemorySSA is single variable, we have
the complete def and use list, and don't need anyone to give it to us
as part of the API. We also have to rename stores below us in some
cases.
If we go that direction in that patch, i will merge all the updater
implementations (using an updater_traits or something to provide the
get* functions we use, called read*/write* in that patch).
Sadly, the current SSAUpdater algorithm is way too slow to use for
what we are doing here.
I have updated the tests we have to basically build memoryssa
incrementally using the updater api, and make sure it still comes out
the same.
Reviewers: george.burgess.iv
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29047
llvm-svn: 293356
Summary:
This is the first in a series of patches to add a simple, generalized updater to MemorySSA.
For MemorySSA, every def is may-def, instead of the normal must-def.
(the best way to think of memoryssa is "everything is really one variable, with different versions of that variable at different points in the program).
This means when updating, we end up having to do a bunch of work to touch defs below and above us.
In order to support this quickly, i have ilist'd all the defs for each block. ilist supports tags, so this is quite easy. the only slightly messy part is that you can't have two iplists for the same type that differ only whether they have the ownership part enabled or not, because the traits are for the value type.
The verifiers have been updated to test that the def order is correct.
Reviewers: george.burgess.iv
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29046
llvm-svn: 293085
This adds the last remaining core feature of the loop pass pipeline in
the new PM and removes the last of the really egregious hacks in the
LICM tests.
Sadly, this requires really substantial changes in the unittests in
order to provide and maintain simplified loops. This is particularly
hard because for example LoopSimplify will try to fold undef branches to
an ideal direction and simplify the loop accordingly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28766
llvm-svn: 292709
mark it as never invalidated in the new PM.
The old PM already required this to work, and after a discussion with
Hal this seems to really be the only sensible answer. The cache
gracefully degrades as the IR is mutated, and most things which do this
should already be incrementally updating the cache.
This gets rid of a bunch of logic preserving and testing the
invalidation of this analysis.
llvm-svn: 292039
the latter to the Transforms library.
While the loop PM uses an analysis to form the IR units, the current
plan is to have the PM itself establish and enforce both loop simplified
form and LCSSA. This would be a layering violation in the analysis
library.
Fundamentally, the idea behind the loop PM is to *transform* loops in
addition to running passes over them, so it really seemed like the most
natural place to sink this was into the transforms library.
We can't just move *everything* because we also have loop analyses that
rely on a subset of the invariants. So this patch splits the the loop
infrastructure into the analysis management that has to be part of the
analysis library, and the transform-aware pass manager.
This also required splitting the loop analyses' printer passes out to
the transforms library, which makes sense to me as running these will
transform the code into LCSSA in theory.
I haven't split the unittest though because testing one component
without the other seems nearly intractable.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28452
llvm-svn: 291662
After r289755, the AssumptionCache is no longer needed. Variables affected by
assumptions are now found by using the new operand-bundle-based scheme. This
new scheme is more computationally efficient, and also we need much less
code...
llvm-svn: 289756
This way it will be easier to expand DIFile (e.g., to contain checksum) without the need to modify the createCompileUnit() API.
Reviewers: llvm-commits, rnk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27762
llvm-svn: 289702
This is pure refactoring. NFC.
This change moves the FunctionComparator (together with the GlobalNumberState
utility) in to a separate file so that it can be used by other passes.
For example, the SwiftMergeFunctions pass in the Swift compiler:
https://github.com/apple/swift/blob/master/lib/LLVMPasses/LLVMMergeFunctions.cpp
Details of the change:
*) The big part is just moving code out of MergeFunctions.cpp into FunctionComparator.h/cpp
*) Make FunctionComparator member functions protected (instead of private)
so that a derived comparator class can use them.
Following refactoring helps to share code between the base FunctionComparator
class and a derived class:
*) Add a beginCompare() function
*) Move some basic function property comparisons into a separate function compareSignature()
*) Do the GEP comparison inside cmpOperations() which now has a new
needToCmpOperands reference parameter
https://reviews.llvm.org/D25385
llvm-svn: 286632
Adrian Prantl