Loop condition variables, eg.
while (shared_ptr<int> P = getIntPtr()) { ... })
weren't handled in r324794 because they don't go through the common
CFGBuilder::VisitDeclStmt method. Which means that they regressed
after r324800.
Fix the regression by duplicating the necessary construction context scan in
the loop visiting code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45706
llvm-svn: 330382
If a pointer cast fails (evaluates to an UnknownVal, i.e. not implemented in the
analyzer) and such cast is in fact the last use of the pointer, the pointer
symbol is no longer referenced by the program state and a leak is
(mis-)diagnosed.
"Escape" the pointer upon a failed cast, i.e. inform the checker that we can no
longer reliably track it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45698
llvm-svn: 330380
Function argument constructors (that are used for passing objects into functions
by value) are completely unlike temporary object constructors, but we were
treating them as such because they are also wrapped into a CXXBindTemporaryExpr.
This patch adds a partial construction context layer for call argument values,
but doesn't proceed to transform it into an actual construction context yet.
This is tells the clients that we aren't supporting these constructors yet.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45650
llvm-svn: 330377
r315736 added support for the misplaced CF_RETURNS_RETAINED annotation on
CFRetain() wrappers. It works by trusting the function's name (seeing if it
confirms to the CoreFoundation naming convention) rather than the annotation.
There are more false positives caused by users using a different naming
convention, namely starting the function name with "retain" or "release"
rather than suffixing it with "retain" or "release" respectively.
Because this isn't according to the naming convention, these functions
are usually inlined and the annotation is therefore ignored, which is correct.
But sometimes we run out of inlining stack depth and the function is
evaluated conservatively and then the annotation is trusted.
Add support for the "alternative" naming convention and test the situation when
we're running out of inlining stack depth.
rdar://problem/18270122
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45117
llvm-svn: 330375
Summary:
`this` pointer is not an l-value, although we have modeled `CXXThisRegion` for `this` pointer, we can only bind it once, which is when we start to inline method. And this patch fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35506.
In addition, I didn't find any other cases other than loop-widen that could invalidate `this` pointer.
Reviewers: NoQ, george.karpenkov, a.sidorin, seaneveson, szepet
Reviewed By: NoQ
Subscribers: xazax.hun, rnkovacs, cfe-commits, MTC
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45491
llvm-svn: 330095
Expression rearrangement in SValBuilder (see rL329780) crashes with an assert if the type of the integer is different from the type of the symbol. This fix adds a check that prevents rearrangement in such cases.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45557
llvm-svn: 330064
Since the range-based constraint manager (default) is weak in handling comparisons where symbols are on both sides it is wise to rearrange them to have symbols only on the left side. Thus e.g. A + n >= B + m becomes A - B >= m - n which enables the constraint manager to store a range m - n .. MAX_VALUE for the symbolic expression A - B. This can be used later to check whether e.g. A + k == B + l can be true, which is also rearranged to A - B == l - k so the constraint manager can check whether l - k is in the range (thus greater than or equal to m - n).
The restriction in this version is the the rearrangement happens only if both the symbols and the concrete integers are within the range [min/4 .. max/4] where min and max are the minimal and maximal values of their type.
The rearrangement is not enabled by default. It has to be enabled by using -analyzer-config aggressive-relational-comparison-simplification=true.
Co-author of this patch is Artem Dergachev (NoQ).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41938
llvm-svn: 329780
Found via codespell -q 3 -I ../clang-whitelist.txt
Where whitelist consists of:
archtype
cas
classs
checkk
compres
definit
frome
iff
inteval
ith
lod
methode
nd
optin
ot
pres
statics
te
thru
Patch by luzpaz! (This is a subset of D44188 that applies cleanly with a few
files that have dubious fixes reverted.)
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44188
llvm-svn: 329399
removeUnneededCalls() is responsible for removing path diagnostic pieces within
functions that don't contain "interesting" events. It makes bug reports
much tidier.
When a stack frame is known to be interesting, the function doesn't descend
into it to prune anything within it, even other callees that are totally boring.
Fix the function to prune boring callees in interesting stack frames.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45117
llvm-svn: 329102
Summary:
The original implementation in the `LoopUnrolling.cpp` didn't consider the case where the counter is unsigned. This case is only handled in `simpleCondition()`, but this is not enough, we also need to deal with the unsinged counter with the counter initialization.
Since `IntegerLiteral` is `signed`, there is a `ImplicitCastExpr<IntegralCast>` in `unsigned counter = IntergerLiteral`. This patch add the `ignoringParenImpCasts()` in the `IntegerLiteral` matcher.
Reviewers: szepet, a.sidorin, NoQ, george.karpenkov
Reviewed By: szepet, george.karpenkov
Subscribers: xazax.hun, rnkovacs, cfe-commits, MTC
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45086
llvm-svn: 328919
C++ structured bindings for non-tuple-types are defined in a peculiar
way, where the resulting declaration is not a VarDecl, but a
BindingDecl.
That means a lot of existing machinery stops working.
rdar://36912381
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44956
llvm-svn: 328910
Otherwise the default triple for x86-windows-msvc2015 auto-inserts
__attribute__((thiscall)) to some calls.
Fixes the respective buildbot.
llvm-svn: 328903
Pointer arithmetic on null or undefined pointers results in null or undefined
pointers. This is obvious for undefined pointers; for null pointers it follows
from our incorrect-but-somehow-working approach that declares that 0 (Loc)
doesn't necessarily represent a pointer of numeric address value 0, but instead
it represents any pointer that will cause a valid "null pointer dereference"
issue when dereferenced.
For now we've been seeing through pointer arithmetic at the original dereference
expression, i.e. in bugreporter::getDerefExpr(), but not during further
investigation of the value's origins in bugreporter::trackNullOrUndefValue().
The patch fixes it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45071
llvm-svn: 328896
Sometimes template instantiation causes CXXBindTemporaryExpr to be missing in
its usual spot. In CFG, temporary destructors work by relying on
CXXBindTemporaryExprs, so they won't work in this case.
Avoid the crash and notify the clients that we've encountered an unsupported AST
by failing to provide the ill-formed construction context for the temporary.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44955
llvm-svn: 328895
Not enough work has been done so far to ensure correctness of construction
contexts in the CFG when C++17 copy elision is in effect, so for now we
should drop construction contexts in the CFG and in the analyzer when
they seem different from what we support anyway.
This includes initializations with conditional operators and return values
across multiple stack frames.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44854
llvm-svn: 328893
Extended the matched assignment operators when checking for bound changes in a body of the loop by using the freshly added isAssignmentOperator matcher.
This covers all the (current) possible assignments, tests added as well.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38921
llvm-svn: 328619
Changes the analyzer to believe that methods annotated with _Nonnull
from system frameworks indeed return non null objects.
Local methods with such annotation are still distrusted.
rdar://24291919
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44341
llvm-svn: 328282
When a temporary is constructed with a proper construction context, it should
be safe to inline the destructor. We have added suppressions for some of the
common false positives caused by such inlining, so there should be - and from my
observations there indeed is - more benefit than harm from enabling destructor
inlining.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44721
llvm-svn: 328258
CXXCtorInitializer-based constructors are also affected by the C++17 mandatory
copy elision, like variable constructors and return value constructors.
Extend r328248 to support those.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44763
llvm-svn: 328255
Function return values can be constructed directly in variables or passed
directly into return statements, without even an elidable copy in between.
This is how the C++17 mandatory copy elision AST behaves. The behavior we'll
have in such cases is the "old" behavior that we've had before we've
implemented destructor inlining and proper lifetime extension support.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44755
llvm-svn: 328253
In C++17 copy elision is mandatory for variable and return value constructors
(as long as it doesn't involve type conversion) which results in AST that does
not contain elidable constructors in their usual places. In order to provide
construction contexts in this scenario we need to cover more AST patterns.
This patch makes the CFG prepared for these scenarios by:
- Fork VariableConstructionContext and ReturnedValueConstructionContext into
two different sub-classes (each) one of which indicates the C++17 case and
contains a reference to an extra CXXBindTemporaryExpr.
- Allow CFGCXXRecordTypedCall element to accept VariableConstructionContext and
ReturnedValueConstructionContext as its context.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44597
llvm-svn: 328248
If a memory region (or an SVal that represents a pointer to that memory region)
is a (direct or indirect, not necessarily proper) sub-region of a SymbolicRegion
then it is said to have a symbolic base.
For now SVal::symbol_iterator explores the symbol within a symbolic region
only when the SVal represents a pointer to the symbolic region itself,
not to any of its sub-regions.
This behavior is not indended by any user of symbol_iterator; all users who
cared about such behavior were expecting the iterator to descend into the
symbolic base of an arbitrary region, find the parent symbol of the symbolic
base region, and iterate over that symbol. Lack of such behavior resulted in
bugs demonstarted by the test cases.
Hence the decision to change the API to behave more intuitively.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44347
llvm-svn: 328247
r326249 wasn't quite enough because we often run out of inlining stack depth
limit and for that reason fail to see the atomics we're looking for.
Add a more straightforward false positive suppression that is based on the name
of the class. I.e. if we're releasing a pointer in a destructor of a "something
shared/intrusive/reference/counting something ptr/pointer something", then any
use-after-free or double-free that occurs later would likely be a false
positive.
rdar://problem/38013606
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44281
llvm-svn: 328066
When the loop has a null terminator statement and sets 'widen-loops=true', 'invalidateRegions' will constructs the 'SymbolConjured' with null 'Stmt'. And this will lead to a crash in 'IteratorChecker.cpp'. This patch use 'dyn_cast_or_null<>' instead of 'dyn_cast<>' in IteratorChecker.cpp.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44606
llvm-svn: 327962
Also use the opportunity to clean up the code and remove unnecessary duplication.
rdar://37625895
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44594
llvm-svn: 327926
For other regions, the error message contains a good indication of the
problem, and there, in general, nothing helpful we can print.
Error pointer to the problematic expression seems enough.
rdar://37323555
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44409
llvm-svn: 327727
Call expressions that return objects by an lvalue reference or an rvalue
reference have a value type in the AST but wear an auxiliary flag of being an
lvalue or an xvalue respectively.
Use the helper method for obtaining the actual return type of the function.
Fixes a crash.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44273
llvm-svn: 327352
Properly perform destruction and lifetime extension of such temporaries.
C++ object-type return values of conservatively evaluated functions are now
represented as compound values of well-defined temporary object regions. The
function creates a region that represents the temporary object and will later
be used for destruction or materialization, invalidates it, and returns the
invalidated compound value of the object.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44131
llvm-svn: 327348
This patch uses the newly added CFGCXXRecordTypedCall element at the call site
of the caller to construct the return value within the callee directly into the
caller's stack frame. This way it is also capable of populating the temporary
destructor and lifetime extension maps for the temporary, which allows
temporary destructors and lifetime extension to work correctly.
This patch does not affect temporaries that were returned from conservatively
evaluated functions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44124
llvm-svn: 327345
This patch adds a new CFGStmt sub-class, CFGCXXRecordTypedCall, which replaces
the regular CFGStmt for the respective CallExpr whenever the CFG has additional
information to provide regarding the lifetime of the returned value.
This additional call site information is represented by a ConstructionContext
(which was previously used for CFGConstructor elements) that provides references
to CXXBindTemporaryExpr and MaterializeTemporaryExpr that surround the call.
This corresponds to the common C++ calling convention solution of providing
the target address for constructing the return value as an auxiliary implicit
argument during function call.
One of the use cases for such extra context at the call site would be to perform
any sort of inter-procedural analysis over the CFG that involves functions
returning objects by value. In this case the elidable constructor at the return
site would construct the object explained by the context at the call site, and
its lifetime would also be managed by the caller, not the callee.
The extra context would also be useful for properly handling the return-value
temporary at the call site, even if the callee is not being analyzed
inter-procedurally.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44120
llvm-svn: 327343
This patch adds two new CFG elements CFGScopeBegin and CFGScopeEnd that indicate
when a local scope begins and ends respectively. We use first VarDecl declared
in a scope to uniquely identify it and add CFGScopeBegin and CFGScopeEnd elements
into corresponding basic blocks.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D16403
llvm-svn: 327258
mprotect() allows setting memory access flags similarly to mmap(),
causing similar security issues if these flags are needlessly broad.
Patch by David Carlier!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44250
llvm-svn: 327098
Implicit constructor conversions such as A a = B() are represented by
surrounding the constructor for B() with an ImplicitCastExpr of
CK_ConstructorConversion kind, similarly to how explicit constructor conversions
are surrounded by a CXXFunctionalCastExpr. Support this syntax pattern when
extracting the construction context for the implicit constructor that
performs the conversion.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44051
llvm-svn: 327096
Previously, iteration through nil objects which resulted from
objc-messages being set to nil were modeled incorrectly.
There are a couple of notes about this patch:
In principle, ExprEngineObjC might be left untouched IFF osx.loops
checker is enabled.
I however think that we should not do something
completely incorrect depending on what checkers are left on.
We should evaluate and potentially remove altogether the isConsumedExpr
performance heuristic, as it seems very fragile.
rdar://22205149
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44178
llvm-svn: 326982
Proper modeling still remains to be done.
Note that BindingDecl#getHoldingVar() is almost always null, and this
should probably be handled by dealing with DecompositionDecl beforehand.
rdar://36852163
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44183
llvm-svn: 326951
Artem Dergachev