Summary:
When doing X86CondBrFolding::analyzeCompare, it will meet the SUB32ri instruction as below to use the global address for its operand,
%733:gr32 = SUB32ri %62:gr32(tied-def 0), @img2buf_normal, implicit-def $eflags
JNE_1 %bb.41, implicit $eflags
so the assertion "assert(MI.getOperand(ValueIndex).isImm() && "Expecting Imm operand")" is not correct and change the assert to if make X86CondBrFolding::analyzeCompare return false as not finding the compare for this
Patch by Jianping Chen
Reviewers: smaslov, LuoYuanke, liutianle, Jianping
Reviewed By: Jianping
Subscribers: lebedev.ri, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54250
llvm-svn: 348853
Rename the 'append_if' macro used in libunwind to 'unwind_append_if'.
Otherwise, when used in a combined LLVM+libunwind build, it overrides
the *incompatible* 'append_if' function from LLVM and breaks projects
following libunwind, e.g. OpenMP.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55476
llvm-svn: 348852
As discussed in D55494, we want to extend this to handle 8-bit
ops too, but that could be extended further to enable this on
32-bit systems too.
llvm-svn: 348851
Summary:
This function was named such because in the case of MachO files, the
mach header is located at this address. However all (most?) usages of
this function were not interested in that fact, but the fact that this
address is used as the base address for expressing various relative
addresses in the object file.
For other object file formats, this name is not appropriate (and it's
probably the reason why this function was not implemented in these
classes). In the ELF case the ELF header will usually end up at this
address, but this is a result of the linker optimizing the file layout
and not a requirement of the spec. For COFF files, I believe the is no
header located at this address either.
Reviewers: clayborg, jasonmolenda, amccarth, lemo, stella.stamenova
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55422
llvm-svn: 348849
Summary:
std::tuple marks its constructors as noexcept when the corresponding
memberwise constructors are noexcept too -- this commit improves std::pair
so that it behaves the same.
This is a re-application of r348824, which broke the build in C++03 mode
because a test was marked as supported in C++03 when it shouldn't be.
Note:
I did not add support in the explicit and non-explicit `pair(_Tuple&& __p)`
constructors because those are non-standard extensions, and supporting them
properly is tedious (we have to copy the rvalue-referenceness of the deduced
_Tuple&& onto the result of tuple_element).
<rdar://problem/29537079>
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: christof, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48669
llvm-svn: 348847
As discussed in:
D55494
...this code has been disabled/dead for a long time (the code references
Athlon and Pentium 4), and there's almost no chance that it will be used
given the last decade of uarch evolution. Also, in SDAG we promote 16-bit
ops to 32-bit, so there's almost no way to test this code any more.
llvm-svn: 348845
Summary:
All targets either just return false here or properly model `Fast`, so I
don't think there is any reason to prevent CodeGen from doing the right
thing here.
Subscribers: nemanjai, javed.absar, eraman, jsji, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55365
llvm-svn: 348843
Summary: A new check came in over the weekend; it should use our existing infrastructure for matching `absl::Duration` factories.
Patch by hwright.
Reviewers: JonasToth
Reviewed By: JonasToth
Subscribers: astrelni
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55541
llvm-svn: 348842
Summary:
Fix bug where we'd try symbolize a second time with the same arguments even though symbolization failed the first time.
This looks like a long standing typo given that the guard for trying
symbolization again is to only try it if symbolization failed using
`binary` and `original_binary != binary`.
Reviewers: kubamracek, glider, samsonov
Subscribers: #sanitizers, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55504
llvm-svn: 348841
Summary: Several tests re-implement these same prototypes (differently), so we can put them in a common location.
Patch by hwright.
Reviewers: JonasToth
Reviewed By: JonasToth
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55540
llvm-svn: 348840
Summary:
When eliminating a dead argument or return value in a function with
local linkage, all uses, including in dbg.value intrinsics, would be
replaced with null constants. This would mean that, for example for an
integer argument, the debug info would incorrectly express that the
value is 0. Instead, replace all uses with undef to indicate that the
argument/return value is optimized out.
Also, make sure that metadata uses of return values are rewritten even
if there are no non-metadata uses of the value.
As a bit of historical curiosity, the code that emitted null constants
was introduced in the initial check-in of the pass in 2003, before
'undef' values even existed in LLVM.
This fixes PR23260.
Reviewers: dblaikie, aprantl, vsk, djtodoro
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #debug-info
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55513
llvm-svn: 348837
Attribute 'dso_local' generated in bitcode from compiling
original C file but isn't needed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55521
llvm-svn: 348835
Summary:
std::tuple marks its constructors as noexcept when the corresponding
memberwise constructors are noexcept too -- this commit improves std::pair
so that it behaves the same.
Note:
I did not add support in the explicit and non-explicit `pair(_Tuple&& __p)`
constructors because those are non-standard extensions, and supporting them
properly is tedious (we have to copy the rvalue-referenceness of the deduced
_Tuple&& onto the result of tuple_element).
<rdar://problem/29537079>
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: christof, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48669
llvm-svn: 348824
Memoization dose not seem to be necessary, as other statement visitors
run just fine without it,
and in fact seems to be causing memory corruptions.
Just removing it instead of investigating the root cause.
rdar://45945002
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54921
llvm-svn: 348822
This is currently a diagnostics, but might be upgraded to an error in the future,
especially if we introduce os_return_on_success attributes.
rdar://46359592
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55530
llvm-svn: 348820
Summary:
This patch supports `.eventtype` directive printing and parsing in the
same syntax with `.functype`.
Reviewers: aardappel, sbc100
Subscribers: dschuff, sbc100, jgravelle-google, sunfish, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55353
llvm-svn: 348818
This change makes DT_SONAME treated as an optional trait for ELF TextAPI
stubs. This change accounts for the fact that shared objects aren't
guaranteed to have a DT_SONAME entry. Tests have been updated to check
for correct behavior of an optional soname.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55533
llvm-svn: 348817
Summary:
- Unify mixed argument names (`Symbol` and `Sym`) to `Sym`
- Changed `MCSymbolWasm*` argument of `emit***` functions to `const
MCSymbolWasm*`. It seems not very intuitive that emit function in the
streamer modifies symbol contents.
- Moved empty function bodies to the header
- clang-format
Reviewers: aardappel, dschuff, sbc100
Subscribers: jgravelle-google, sunfish, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55347
llvm-svn: 348816
https://reviews.llvm.org/D55294
Previously MachineIRBuilder::buildInstr used to accept variadic
arguments for sources (which were either unsigned or
MachineInstrBuilder). While this worked well in common cases, it doesn't
allow us to build instructions that have multiple destinations.
Additionally passing in other optional parameters in the end (such as
flags) is not possible trivially. Also a trivial call such as
B.buildInstr(Opc, Reg1, Reg2, Reg3)
can be interpreted differently based on the opcode (2defs + 1 src for
unmerge vs 1 def + 2srcs).
This patch refactors the buildInstr to
buildInstr(Opc, ArrayRef<DstOps>, ArrayRef<SrcOps>)
where DstOps and SrcOps are typed unions that know how to add itself to
MachineInstrBuilder.
After this patch, most invocations would look like
B.buildInstr(Opc, {s32, DstReg}, {SrcRegs..., SrcMIBs..});
Now all the other calls (such as buildAdd, buildSub etc) forward to
buildInstr. It also makes it possible to build instructions with
multiple defs.
Additionally in a subsequent patch, we should make it possible to add
flags directly while building instructions.
Additionally, the main buildInstr method is now virtual and other
builders now only have to override buildInstr (for say constant
folding/cseing) is straightforward.
Also attached here (https://reviews.llvm.org/F7675680) is a clang-tidy
patch that should upgrade the API calls if necessary.
llvm-svn: 348815
Not sure how I missed that in my testing, but obvious enough - this
causes segfaults when attempting to dereference the Error in end
iterators.
llvm-svn: 348814
m_loc_is_constant_data was uninitialized, so unless someone
explicitly called SetLocIsConstantData(), this would be UB.
I think every existing call-site would always call the proper
function to initialize the value, so there were no existing
bugs, but I encountered this when I tried to use it without
calling this function and encountered this.
llvm-svn: 348813
Using an Error as an out parameter from an indirect operation like
iteration as described in the documentation (
http://llvm.org/docs/ProgrammersManual.html#building-fallible-iterators-and-iterator-ranges
) seems to be a little fussy - so here's /one/ possible solution, though
I'm not sure it's the right one.
Alternatively such APIs may be better off being switched to a standard
algorithm style, where they take a lambda to do the iteration work that
is then called back into (eg: "Error e = obj.for_each_note([](const
Note& N) { ... });"). This would be safer than having an unwritten
assumption that the user of such an iteration cannot return early from
the inside of the function - and must always exit through the gift
shop... I mean error checking. (even though it's guaranteed that if
you're mid-way through processing an iteration, it's not in an error
state).
Alternatively we'd need some other (the super untrustworthy/thing we've
generally tried to avoid) error handling primitive that actually clears
the error state entirely so it's safe to ignore.
Fleshed this solution out a bit further during review - it now relies on
op==/op!= comparison as the equivalent to "if (Err)" testing the Error.
So just like an Error must be checked (even if it's in a success state),
the Error hiding in the iterator must be checked after each increment
(including by comparison with another iterator - perhaps this could be
constrained to only checking if the iterator is compared to the end
iterator? Not sure it's too important).
So now even just creating the iterator and not incrementing it at all
should still assert because the Error has not been checked.
Reviewers: lhames, jakehehrlich
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55235
llvm-svn: 348811
Mucking about simplifying a test case ( https://reviews.llvm.org/D55261 ) I stumbled across something I've hit before - that LLVM's (GCC's does too, FWIW) assembly output includes a hardcode length for a DWARF unit in its header. Instead we could emit a label difference - making the assembly easier to read/edit (though potentially at a slight (I haven't tried to observe it) performance cost of delaying/sinking the length computation into the MC layer).
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, probinson, ABataev
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55281
llvm-svn: 348806
Craig Topper