Found via codespell -q 3 -I ../clang-whitelist.txt
Where whitelist consists of:
archtype
cas
classs
checkk
compres
definit
frome
iff
inteval
ith
lod
methode
nd
optin
ot
pres
statics
te
thru
Patch by luzpaz! (This is a subset of D44188 that applies cleanly with a few
files that have dubious fixes reverted.)
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44188
llvm-svn: 329399
Check whether we are comparing the same entity, not merely the same
declaration, and don't assume that weak declarations resolve to distinct
entities.
llvm-svn: 321976
are expanded from macros (and if so, omit the warning). Previously we were just looking at the
location of the binary expression.
Fixes <rdar://problem/8435950>.
llvm-svn: 114044
around by exempting enums from the check, but this doesn't handle a lot of
cases. A better approach is to directly check if the operator comes from
a macro expansion.
I've removed a reference to the rdar that originally led to the enum
suppression when removing it's overly contrived test case. Let me know if that
number or a more reasilistic test case involving enums is still needed.
llvm-svn: 108128
unevaluated contexts, because they only matter for code that will
actually be evaluated at runtime.
As part of this, I had to extend PartialDiagnostic to support fix-it
hints.
llvm-svn: 93266
- This is designed to make it obvious that %clang_cc1 is a "test variable"
which is substituted. It is '%clang_cc1' instead of '%clang -cc1' because it
can be useful to redefine what gets run as 'clang -cc1' (for example, to set
a default target).
llvm-svn: 91446
"x == x" and "x != x". We emit a warning for these since they always evaluate
to a constant value and often indicate a logical error.
Added test case for this check.
llvm-svn: 43450
Alexander Kornienko