The test is trying to avoid saying aligned_alloc on Windows' UCRT, which does not (and can not) implement aligned_alloc. However, it's testing for c1xx, meaning clang on Windows will fail this test when using the UCRT.
llvm-svn: 344829
In this example, the ctor of G runs in the main thread in the expression G(), and also in the copy ctor of G() in the DECAY_COPY inside std::thread. The main thread destroys the G() instance at the semicolon, and the started thread destroys the G() after it returns. Thus there is a race between the threads on the n_alive variable.
The fix is to join with the background thread before attempting to destroy the G in the main thread.
llvm-svn: 344820
Revert r344535 "Wrap up the new chrono literals in an #ifdef..."
Revert r344546 "Mark a couple of test cases as 'C++17-only'..."
Some of the buildbot failures were masked by another error,
and this one was probably missed.
llvm-svn: 344580
While __cplusplus was only used a few dozen times, TEST_STD_VAR is used
more than 2000 times. So we replace the former by the latter for
consistency in the tests. There should be no functional change.
llvm-svn: 344194
Summary:
Scoped capabilities need to be annotated as such, otherwise the thread
safety analysis won't work as intended.
Fixes PR39234.
Reviewers: ldionne
Reviewed By: ldionne
Subscribers: christof, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53049
llvm-svn: 344096
PR38682 added a test to check for a race condition in std::future.
Part of the fix is part of the dylib, but there is no released version
of mac OS X that ships a dylib containing the fix. Hence, this test can
(and sometimes does) when testing on OS X. This commit marks the test
as unsupported to avoid spurious failures.
llvm-svn: 344053
Debian build bots are running Clang 4, which apparently does not support
the "deprecated" attribute properly. Clang pretends to support the attribute,
but the attribute doesn't do anything.
(live example: https://wandbox.org/permlink/0De69aXns0t1D59r)
On a separate note, I'm not sure I understand why we're even running the
libc++ tests under Clang-4. Is this a configuration we support? I can
understand that libc++ should _build_ with Clang 4, but it's not clear
to me that new libc++ headers should be usable under older compilers
like that.
llvm-svn: 342854
Summary:
These deprecation warnings are opt-in: they are only enabled when the
_LIBCXX_DEPRECATION_WARNINGS macro is defined, which is not the case
by default. Note that this is a first step in the right direction, but
I wasn't able to get an exhaustive list of all deprecated components
per standard, so there's certainly stuff that's missing. The list of
components this commit marks as deprecated is:
in C++11:
- auto_ptr, auto_ptr_ref
- binder1st, binder2nd, bind1st(), bind2nd()
- pointer_to_unary_function, pointer_to_binary_function, ptr_fun()
- mem_fun_t, mem_fun1_t, const_mem_fun_t, const_mem_fun1_t, mem_fun()
- mem_fun_ref_t, mem_fun1_ref_t, const_mem_fun_ref_t, const_mem_fun1_ref_t, mem_fun_ref()
in C++14:
- random_shuffle()
in C++17:
- unary_negate, binary_negate, not1(), not2()
<rdar://problem/18168350>
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: christof, dexonsmith, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48912
llvm-svn: 342843
One of the SIMD tests attempted to left shift a value by 42, which
is UB when the left hand side is a 32 bit integer type.
This patch adjusts the test to use the value 4 instead of 42.
llvm-svn: 342820
In rL342814, i have committed a blind fix to unbreak the asan buildbot,
but as it was later discussed, the leak is intentional,
so we can not fix the failure that way.
So this reverts the leak 'fix',
and simply disables the test in the presence of ASAN.
llvm-svn: 342819
Summary:
The `[[nodiscard]]` attribute is intended to help users find bugs where
function return values are ignored when they shouldn't be. After C++17 the
C++ standard has started to declared such library functions as `[[nodiscard]]`.
However, this application is limited and applies only to dialects after C++17.
Users who want help diagnosing misuses of STL functions may desire a more
liberal application of `[[nodiscard]]`.
For this reason libc++ provides an extension that does just that! The
extension must be enabled by defining `_LIBCPP_ENABLE_NODISCARD`. The extended
applications of `[[nodiscard]]` takes two forms:
1. Backporting `[[nodiscard]]` to entities declared as such by the
standard in newer dialects, but not in the present one.
2. Extended applications of `[[nodiscard]]`, at the libraries discretion,
applied to entities never declared as such by the standard.
Users may also opt-out of additional applications `[[nodiscard]]` using
additional macros.
Applications of the first form, which backport `[[nodiscard]]` from a newer
dialect may be disabled using macros specific to the dialect it was added. For
example `_LIBCPP_DISABLE_NODISCARD_AFTER_CXX17`.
Applications of the second form, which are pure extensions, may be disabled
by defining `_LIBCPP_DISABLE_NODISCARD_EXT`.
This patch was originally written by me (Roman Lebedev),
then but then reworked by Eric Fiselier.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, thakis, EricWF
Reviewed By: thakis, EricWF
Subscribers: llvm-commits, mclow.lists, lebedev.ri, EricWF, rjmccall, Quuxplusone, cfe-commits, christof
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45179
llvm-svn: 342808
This reverts r342566 as it causes on bots linker errors like
> Undefined symbols for architecture i386:
> "std::__1::basic_ostream<char, std::__1::char_traits<char> >::operator<<(std::nullptr_t)", referenced from:
llvm-svn: 342599
type.
Libc++ correctly asserts that a set of visitors for a variant all
return the same type. However, we use the visitation machinary to
perform relational operations. This causes a static assertion when
some of the alternatives relops return a UDT which is implicitly
convertible to bool instead of 'bool' exactly.
llvm-svn: 342560
Summary:
This commit fixes a regression introduced in r316095, where we don't match
inverted character classes when there's no negated characrers in the []'s.
rdar://problem/43060054
Reviewers: mclow.lists, timshen, EricWF
Subscribers: christof, dexonsmith, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50534
llvm-svn: 340609
Summary:
The state associated to the future was set in one thread (with synchronization)
but read in another thread without synchronization, which led to a data race.
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38181
rdar://problem/42548261
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: christof, dexonsmith, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51170
llvm-svn: 340608
Marshall Clow