In processRelocAux(), our handling of 1) link-time constant and 2) weak
undef is the same, so put them together to simplify the logic.
This moves the weak undef code around. The result is that: in a writable
section (or -z notext), we will no longer emit dynamic relocations for
weak undefined symbols.
The new behavior seems to match GNU linkers, and improves consistency
with the case of a readonly section.
The condition `!Config->Shared` was there probably because it is common
for a -shared link not to specify full dependencies. Keep it now but we
may revisit the decision in the future.
gABI says:
> The behavior of weak symbols in areas not specified by this document is
> implementation defined. Weak symbols are intended primarily for use in
> system software. Applications using weak symbols are unreliable since
> changes in the runtime environment might cause the execution to fail.
Reviewed By: ruiu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63003
llvm-svn: 363399
This patch adds new command line option `--undefined-glob` to lld.
That option is a variant of `--undefined` but accepts wildcard
patterns so that all symbols that match with a given pattern are
handled as if they were given by `-u`.
`-u foo` is to force resolve symbol foo if foo is not a defined symbol
and there's a static archive that contains a definition of symbol foo.
Now, you can specify a wildcard pattern as an argument for `--undefined-glob`.
So, if you want to include all JNI symbols (which start with "Java_"), you
can do that by passing `--undefined-glob "Java_*"` to the linker, for example.
In this patch, I use the same glob pattern matcher as the version script
processor is using, so it does not only support `*` but also `?` and `[...]`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63244
llvm-svn: 363396
If .sdata is absent, linker synthesized __global_pointer$ gets a section index of SHN_ABS.
(ld.bfd has a similar issue: binutils PR24678)
Scrt1.o may use `lla gp, __global_pointer$` to reference the symbol PC
relatively. In -pie/-shared mode, lld complains if a PC relative
relocation references an absolute symbol (SHN_ABS) but ld.bfd doesn't:
ld.lld: error: relocation R_RISCV_PCREL_HI20 cannot refer to lute symbol: __global_pointer$
Let the reference of __global_pointer$ to force creation of .sdata to
fix the problem. This is similar to _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_, which forces
creation of .got or .got.plt .
Also, change the visibility from STV_HIDDEN to STV_DEFAULT and don't
define the symbol for -shared. This matches ld.bfd, though I don't
understand why it uses STV_DEFAULT.
Reviewed By: ruiu, jrtc27
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63132
llvm-svn: 363351
PDBs may not necessarily contain an IPI stream. Handle this case
gracefully.
The test case was verified to work with MS link.exe.
Patch by Vladimir Panteleev, with a small simplification
Reviewed By: rnk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63178
llvm-svn: 363213
An unrecognized signature (magic) at the beginning of a debug section
should not be a fatal error; it only means that the debug information
is in a format that is not supported by LLD. This can be due to it
being in CodeView versions 3 or earlier. These can occur in old import
libraries from legacy SDKs.
The test case was verified to work with MS link.exe.
Patch by Vladimir Panteleev!
Reviewed By: rnk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63177
llvm-svn: 363212
R_RISCV_{ADD,SET,SUB}* are used for local label computation.
Add a new RelExpr member R_RISCV_ADD to represent them.
R_RISCV_ADD is treated as a link-time constant because otherwise
R_RISCV_{ADD,SET,SUB}* are not allowed in -pie/-shared mode.
In glibc Scrt1.o, .rela.eh_frame contains such relocations.
Because .eh_frame is not writable, we get this error:
ld.lld: error: can't create dynamic relocation R_RISCV_ADD32 against symbol: .L0 in readonly segment; recompil object files with -fPIC or pass '-Wl,-z,notext' to allow text relocations in the output
>>> defined in ..../riscv64-linux-gnu/lib/Scrt1.o
With D63076 and this patch, I can run -pie/-shared programs linked against glibc.
Note llvm-mc cannot currently produce R_RISCV_SET* so they are not tested.
Reviewed By: ruiu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63183
llvm-svn: 363128
Summary:
clang (as of 2019-06-12) / gcc (as of 8.2.1) PPC64 may emit a .rela.toc
which references an embedded switch table in a discarded .rodata/.text
section. The .toc and the .rela.toc are incorrectly not placed in the
comdat.
Technically a relocation from outside the group is not allowed by the ELF spec:
> A symbol table entry with STB_LOCAL binding that is defined relative
> to one of a group's sections, and that is contained in a symbol table
> section that is not part of the group, must be discarded if the group
> members are discarded. References to this symbol table entry from
> outside the group are not allowed.
Don't report errors to work around the bug.
This should fix the ppc64le-lld-multistage-test bot while linking llvm-tblgen:
ld.lld: error: relocation refers to a discarded section: .rodata._ZNK4llvm3MVT13getSizeInBitsEv
>>> defined in utils/TableGen/CMakeFiles/llvm-tblgen.dir/CodeGenRegisters.cpp.o
>>> referenced by CodeGenRegisters.cpp
>>> utils/TableGen/CMakeFiles/llvm-tblgen.dir/CodeGenRegisters.cpp.o:(.toc+0x0)
Some other PPC specific sections may have similar problems. We can blacklist more
section names when problems occur.
// A simple program that reproduces the bug.
// Note .rela.toc (outside the group) references a section symbol (STB_LOCAL) in a group.
void puts(const char *);
struct A {
void foo(int a) {
switch (a) {
case 0: puts("0"); break;
case 1: puts("1"); puts("1"); break;
case 2: puts("2"); break;
case 3: puts("3"); puts("4"); break;
case 4: puts("4"); break;
case 5: puts("5"); puts("5"); break;
case 6: puts("6"); break;
}
}
int a;
};
void foo(A x) { x.foo(x.a); }
Reviewers: ruiu, sfertile, espindola
Reviewed By: ruiu
Subscribers: emaste, nemanjai, arichardson, kbarton, jsji, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63182
llvm-svn: 363126
Summary: Deduplicate S_CONSTANTS when linking, if they have the same value.
Reviewers: rnk
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63151
llvm-svn: 363089
Users are exepcted to pass all .res files to the linker, which then
merges all the resource in all .res files into a tree structure and then
converts the final tree structure to a .obj file with .rsrc$01 and
.rsrc$02 sections and then links that.
If the user instead passes several .obj files containing such resources,
the correct thing to do would be to have custom code to merge the trees
in the resource sections instead of doing normal section merging -- but
link.exe rejects if multiple resource obj files are passed in with
LNK4078, so let lld-link do that too instead of silently writing broken
.rsrc sections in that case.
The only real way to run into this is if users manually convert .res
files to .obj files by running cvtres and then handing the resulting
.obj files to lld-link instead, which in practice likely never happens.
(lld-link is slightly stricter than link.exe now: If link.exe is passed
one .obj file created by cvtres, and a .res file, for some reason it
just emits a warning instead of an error and outputs strange looking
data. lld-link now errors out on mixed input like this.)
One way users could accidentally run into this is the following
scenario: If a .res file is passed to lib.exe, then lib.exe calls
cvtres.exe on the .res file before putting it in the output .lib.
(llvm-lib currently doesn't do this.)
link.exe's /wholearchive seems to only add obj files referenced from the
static library index, but lld-link current really adds all files in the
archive. So if lld-link /wholearchive is used with .lib files produced
by lib.exe and .res files were among the files handed to lib.exe, we
previously silently produced invalid output, but now we error out.
link.exe's /wholearchive semantics on the other hand mean that it
wouldn't load the resource object files from the .lib file at all.
Since this scenario is probably still an unlikely corner case,
the difference in behavior here seems fine -- and lld-link might have to
change to use link.exe's /wholearchive semantics in the future anyways.
Vaguely related to PR42180.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63109
llvm-svn: 363078
So that R_RISCV_PCREL_LO12_[IS] are considered as link-time constants in
-pie mode, otherwise there are bogus errors:
ld.lld: error: can't create dynamic relocation R_RISCV_PCREL_LO12_I against symbol: .L0 in readonly segment; recompile object files with -fPIC or pass '-Wl,-z,notext' to allow text relocations in the output
Reviewed By: ruiu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63123
llvm-svn: 363064
The current rule is loose: `!Sym.IsPreemptible || Expr == R_GOT`.
When the symbol is non-preemptable, this allows absolute relocation
types with smaller numbers of bits, e.g. R_X86_64_{8,16,32}. They are
disallowed by ld.bfd and gold, e.g.
ld.bfd: a.o: relocation R_X86_64_8 against `.text' can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC
This patch:
a) Add TargetInfo::SymbolicRel to represent relocation types that resolve to a
symbol value (e.g. R_AARCH_ABS64, R_386_32, R_X86_64_64).
As a side benefit, we currently (ab)use GotRel (R_*_GLOB_DAT) to resolve
GOT slots that are link-time constants. Since we now use Target->SymbolRel
to do the job, we can remove R_*_GLOB_DAT from relocateOne() for all targets.
R_*_GLOB_DAT cannot be used as static relocation types.
b) Change the condition to `!Sym.IsPreemptible && Type != Target->SymbolicRel || Expr == R_GOT`.
Some tests are caught by the improved error checking (ld.bfd/gold also
issue errors on them). Many misuse .long where .quad should be used
instead.
Reviewed By: ruiu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63121
llvm-svn: 363059
The previous name "%lib" doesn't trigger any actual replacement. It
creates the file "./tools/lld/test/ELF/%lib.o" in the test directory.
llvm-svn: 362988
Fix buildbot failure on native AArch64 buildbot that does not have X86
backend compiled in.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63071
llvm-svn: 362926
This is implemented by the lld-link option -include:, just like
--require-defined. Contrary to --require-defined, the -u/--undefined
option allows the symbol to remain undefined in the end.
This should fix PR42121.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62876
llvm-svn: 362882
This works like /include, but is not fatal if the requested symbol
wasn't found. This allows implementing the GNU ld option -u.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62976
llvm-svn: 362881
Summary:
When handling exports from the command line or from .def files, the
linker does a "fuzzy" string lookup to allow finding mangled symbols.
However, when the symbol is re-exported under a new name, the linker has
to transfer the decorations from the exported symbol over to the new
name. This is implemented by taking the mangled symbol that was found in
the object and replacing the original symbol name with the export name.
Before this patch, LLD implemented the fuzzy search by adding an
undefined symbol with the unmangled name, and then during symbol
resolution, checking if similar mangled symbols had been added after the
last round of symbol resolution. If so, LLD makes the original symbol a
weak alias of the mangled symbol. Later, to get the original symbol
name, LLD would look through the weak alias and forward it on to the
import library writer, which copies the symbol decorations. This
approach doesn't work when bar is itself a weak alias, as is the case in
asan. It's especially bad when the aliasee of bar contains the string
"bar", consider "bar_default". In this case, we would end up exporting
the symbol "foo_default" when we should've exported just "foo".
To fix this, don't look through weak aliases to find the mangled name.
Save the mangled name earlier during fuzzy symbol lookup.
Fixes PR42074
Reviewers: mstorsjo, ruiu
Subscribers: thakis, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62984
llvm-svn: 362849
We create several types of synthetic sections for loadable partitions, including:
- The dynamic symbol table. This allows code outside of the loadable partitions
to find entry points with dlsym.
- Creating a dynamic symbol table also requires the creation of several other
synthetic sections for the partition, such as the dynamic table and hash table
sections.
- The partition's ELF header is represented as a synthetic section in the
combined output file, and will be used by llvm-objcopy to extract partitions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62350
llvm-svn: 362819
Branch Target Identification (BTI) and Pointer Authentication (PAC) are
architecture features introduced in v8.5a and 8.3a respectively. The new
instructions have been added in the hint space so that binaries take
advantage of support where it exists yet still run on older hardware. The
impact of each feature is:
BTI: For executable pages that have been guarded, all indirect branches
must have a destination that is a BTI instruction of the appropriate type.
For the static linker, this means that PLT entries must have a "BTI c" as
the first instruction in the sequence. BTI is an all or nothing
property for a link unit, any indirect branch not landing on a valid
destination will cause a Branch Target Exception.
PAC: The dynamic loader encodes with PACIA the address of the destination
that the PLT entry will load from the .plt.got, placing the result in a
subset of the top-bits that are not valid virtual addresses. The PLT entry
may authenticate these top-bits using the AUTIA instruction before
branching to the destination. Use of PAC in PLT sequences is a contract
between the dynamic loader and the static linker, it is independent of
whether the relocatable objects use PAC.
BTI and PAC are independent features that can be combined. So we can have
several combinations of PLT:
- Standard with no BTI or PAC
- BTI PLT with "BTI c" as first instruction.
- PAC PLT with "AUTIA1716" before the indirect branch to X17.
- BTIPAC PLT with "BTI c" as first instruction and "AUTIA1716" before the
first indirect branch to X17.
The use of BTI and PAC in relocatable object files are encoded by feature
bits in the .note.gnu.property section in a similar way to Intel CET. There
is one AArch64 specific program property GNU_PROPERTY_AARCH64_FEATURE_1_AND
and two target feature bits defined:
- GNU_PROPERTY_AARCH64_FEATURE_1_BTI
-- All executable sections are compatible with BTI.
- GNU_PROPERTY_AARCH64_FEATURE_1_PAC
-- All executable sections have return address signing enabled.
Due to the properties of FEATURE_1_AND the static linker can tell when all
input relocatable objects have the BTI and PAC feature bits set. The static
linker uses this to enable the appropriate PLT sequence.
Neither -> standard PLT
GNU_PROPERTY_AARCH64_FEATURE_1_BTI -> BTI PLT
GNU_PROPERTY_AARCH64_FEATURE_1_PAC -> PAC PLT
Both properties -> BTIPAC PLT
In addition to the .note.gnu.properties there are two new command line
options:
--force-bti : Act as if all relocatable inputs had
GNU_PROPERTY_AARCH64_FEATURE_1_BTI and warn for every relocatable object
that does not.
--pac-plt : Act as if all relocatable inputs had
GNU_PROPERTY_AARCH64_FEATURE_1_PAC. As PAC is a contract between the loader
and static linker no warning is given if it is not present in an input.
Two processor specific dynamic tags are used to communicate that a non
standard PLT sequence is being used.
DTI_AARCH64_BTI_PLT and DTI_AARCH64_BTI_PAC.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62609
llvm-svn: 362793
When a function is excluded via comdat we shouldn't add it to the
final list of init functions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62983
llvm-svn: 362769
Many -static/-no-pie/-shared/-pie applications linked against glibc or musl
should work with this patch. This also helps FreeBSD PowerPC64 to migrate
their lib32 (PR40888).
* Fix default image base and max page size.
* Support new-style Secure PLT (see below). Old-style BSS PLT is not
implemented, so it is not suitable for FreeBSD rtld now because it doesn't
support Secure PLT yet.
* Support more initial relocation types:
R_PPC_ADDR32, R_PPC_REL16*, R_PPC_LOCAL24PC, R_PPC_PLTREL24, and R_PPC_GOT16.
The addend of R_PPC_PLTREL24 is special: it decides the call stub PLT type
but it should be ignored for the computation of target symbol VA.
* Support GNU ifunc
* Support .glink used for lazy PLT resolution in glibc
* Add a new thunk type: PPC32PltCallStub that is similar to PPC64PltCallStub.
It is used by R_PPC_REL24 and R_PPC_PLTREL24.
A PLT stub used in -fPIE/-fPIC usually loads an address relative to
.got2+0x8000 (-fpie/-fpic code uses _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_ relative
addresses).
Two .got2 sections in two object files have different addresses, thus a PLT stub
can't be shared by two object files. To handle this incompatibility,
change the parameters of Thunk::isCompatibleWith to
`const InputSection &, const Relocation &`.
PowerPC psABI specified an old-style .plt (BSS PLT) that is both
writable and executable. Linkers don't make separate RW- and RWE segments,
which causes all initially writable memory (think .data) executable.
This is a big security concern so a new PLT scheme (secure PLT) was developed to
address the security issue.
TLS will be implemented in D62940.
glibc older than ~2012 requires .rela.dyn to include .rela.plt, it can
not handle the DT_RELA+DT_RELASZ == DT_JMPREL case correctly. A hack
(not included in this patch) in LinkerScript.cpp addOrphanSections() to
work around the issue:
if (Config->EMachine == EM_PPC) {
// Older glibc assumes .rela.dyn includes .rela.plt
Add(In.RelaDyn);
if (In.RelaPlt->isLive() && !In.RelaPlt->Parent)
In.RelaDyn->getParent()->addSection(In.RelaPlt);
}
Reviewed By: ruiu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62464
llvm-svn: 362721
We were not previously testing the comdat exclusion in bitcode objects
because we were linking two copies of the .bc file and the
`linkonce_odr` linkage type was removing the duplicate `_start` at
the LTO stage.
Now we link an bitcode and non-bitcode version both of which contains a
copy of _start. We link them in both orders, which means this test will
fail if comdat exclusion is not working correctly in bitcode parsing.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62923
llvm-svn: 362650
With r362638, llc doesn't support -relocation-model=pic with non-Emscripten
triples. Update these tests in lld which use -relocation-model=pic to also
use Emscripten triples.
llvm-svn: 362645
Although many relocatable objects will have a single
GNU_PROPERTY_X86_FEATURE_1_AND in the .note.gnu.property section it is
permissible to have more than one, and there are tests in ld.bfd that use
it. The behavior that ld.bfd follows is to set the feature bit for a
relocatable object if any of the GNU_PROPERTY_X86_FEATURE_1_AND
have the feature bit set.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62862
llvm-svn: 362591
The age field is only there to say how many times an OBJ or a PDB was incrementally linked. It shouldn't be used to validate the link between the OBJ and the PDB.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62837
llvm-svn: 362572
Summary:
With -r or --emit-relocs, we warn `STT_SECTION symbol should be defined`
on relocations to discarded section symbol. This was added as an error
in rLLD319404, but was not so effective before D61583 (it turned the
error to a warning).
Relocations from .eh_frame .debug* .zdebug* .gcc_except_table to
discarded .text are very common and somewhat expected. Don't warn/error
on them. As a reference, ld.bfd has a similar logic in
_bfd_elf_default_action_discarded() to allow these cases.
Delete invalid-undef-section-symbol.test because what it intended to
check is now covered by the updated comdat-discarded-reloc.s
Delete relocatable-eh-frame.s because we allow relocations from
.eh_frame as a special case now.
Reviewers: grimar, phosek, ruiu, espindola
Reviewed By: ruiu
Subscribers: emaste, arichardson, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62840
llvm-svn: 362497
Summary:
- Fixes inline call frame line table display in windbg.
- Improve llvm-pdbutil to dump extra file ids.
- Warn on unknown subsections so we don't have this kind of bug in the
future.
Reviewers: inglorion, akhuang, aganea
Subscribers: eraman, zturner, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62701
llvm-svn: 362429
We need to have all input files ready before doing debuginfo type merging.
This patch is moving the late PDB type server discovery much earlier in the process, when the explicit inputs (OBJs, LIBs) are loaded.
The short term goal is to parallelize type merging.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60095
llvm-svn: 362393
The following abstract relocation types (RelExpr) are PPC64 ELFv2 ABI specific,
not used by PPC32. So rename them to prevent confusion when the PPC32 port is improved.
* R_PPC_CALL R_PPC_CALL_PLT:
R_PPC_CALL_PLT represents R_PPC64_REL14 and R_PPC64_REL24.
If the function is not preemptable, R_PPC_CALL_PLT can be optimized to R_PPC_CALL:
the formula adjusts the symbol VA from the global entry point to the local entry point.
* R_PPC_TOC: represents R_PPC64_TOC. We don't have a test. Add one to ppc64-relocs.s
Rename it to R_PPC64_TOCBASE because `@tocbase` is the assembly form.
Reviewed By: ruiu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62800
llvm-svn: 362359
In ELF v2 ABI, R_PPC64_GOT_DTPREL16* are not relaxed.
This family of relocation types are used for variables outside of 2GiB
of the TLS block. 2 instructions cannot materialize a DTPREL offset that
is not 32-bit.
Reviewed By: ruiu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62737
llvm-svn: 362357
Fixes the remaining issue of PR41673 after D61186: with `/DISCARD/ { ... } :NONE`,
we may create an output section named `/DISCARD/`.
Note, if an input section is named `/DISCARD/`, ld.bfd discards it but
lld keeps it. It is probably not worth copying this behavior as it is unrealistic.
Reviewed By: ruiu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62768
llvm-svn: 362356
(1) {gcc,clang} -fuse-ld=bfd -pie -fPIE -nostdlib a.c => .interp created
(2) {gcc,clang} -fuse-ld=lld -pie -fPIE -nostdlib a.c => .interp not created
(3) {gcc,clang} -fuse-ld=lld -pie -fPIE -nostdlib a.c a.so => .interp created
The inconsistency of (2) is due to the condition `!Config->SharedFiles.empty()`.
To make lld behave more like ld.bfd, we could change the condition to:
Config->HasDynSymTab && !Config->DynamicLinker.empty() && Script->needsInterpSection();
However, that would bring another inconsistency as can be observed with:
(4) {gcc,clang} -fuse-ld=bfd -no-pie -nostdlib a.c => .interp not created
So instead, use `!Config->DynamicLinker.empty() && Script->needsInterpSection()`,
which is both simple and consistent in these cases.
The inconsistency of (4) likely originated from ld.bfd and gold's choice to have a default --dynamic-linker.
Their condition to create .interp is ANDed with (not -shared).
Since lld doesn't have a default --dynamic-linker,
compiler drivers (gcc/clang) don't pass --dynamic-linker for -shared,
and direct ld users are not supposed to specify --dynamic-linker for -shared,
we do not need the condition !Config->Shared.
Reviewed By: ruiu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62765
llvm-svn: 362355
Martin Storsjo