http://rise4fun.com/Alive/i8Q
A narrow bitwise logic op is obviously better than math for value tracking,
and zext is better than sext. Typically, the 'not' will be folded into an
icmp predicate.
The IR difference would even survive through codegen for x86, so we would see
worse code:
https://godbolt.org/g/C14HMF
one_or_zero(int, int): # @one_or_zero(int, int)
xorl %eax, %eax
cmpl %esi, %edi
setle %al
retq
one_or_zero_alt(int, int): # @one_or_zero_alt(int, int)
xorl %ecx, %ecx
cmpl %esi, %edi
setg %cl
movl $1, %eax
subl %ecx, %eax
retq
llvm-svn: 306243
This is another step towards favoring 'not' ops over random 'xor' in IR:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32706
This transformation may have occurred in longer IR sequences using computeKnownBits,
but that could be much more expensive to calculate.
As the scalar result shows, we do not currently favor 'not' in all cases. The 'not'
created by the transform is transformed again (unnecessarily). Vectors don't have
this problem because vectors are (wrongly) excluded from several other combines.
llvm-svn: 302659
We currently only fold scalar add of constants into selects. This improves this to support vectors too.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31683
llvm-svn: 299847
Changing to 'or' (rather than 'xor' when no wrapping flags are set)
allows icmp simplifies to happen as expected.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29729
llvm-svn: 295574
The change to InstCombine in:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D29729
...exposes this missing fold in InstSimplify, so adding this
first to avoid a regression.
llvm-svn: 295573
The code comments didn't match the code logic, and we didn't actually distinguish the fake unary (not/neg/fneg)
operators from arguments. Adding another level to the weighting scheme provides more structure and can help
simplify the pattern matching in InstCombine and other places.
I fixed regressions that would have shown up from this change in:
rL290067
rL290127
But that doesn't mean there are no pattern-matching logic holes left; some combines may just be missing regression tests.
Should fix:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=28296
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27933
llvm-svn: 294049
We can perform the following:
(add (zext (add nuw X, C1)), C2) -> (zext (add nuw X, C1+C2))
This is only possible if C2 is negative and C2 is greater than or equal to negative C1.
llvm-svn: 290927
This removes the restriction for the icmp constant, but as noted by the FIXME comments,
we still need to change individual checks for binop operand constants.
llvm-svn: 277629
Remove && from the end of the lines to prevent tests from throwing run
lines into the background. Also, clean up places where the same command
is run multiple times by using a temporary file.
llvm-svn: 36142
This feature is needed in order to support shifts of more than 255 bits
on large integer types. This changes the syntax for llvm assembly to
make shl, ashr and lshr instructions look like a binary operator:
shl i32 %X, 1
instead of
shl i32 %X, i8 1
Additionally, this should help a few passes perform additional optimizations.
llvm-svn: 33776
Update these tests to not use the same name even though the type of the
value differs. After PR411 hits, type planes will be gone and it will be
illegal for a name to be used twice, regardless of type.
llvm-svn: 33660
Remove "target endian/pointersize" or add "target datalayout" to make
the test parse properly or set the datalayout because defaults changes.
For PR645:
Make global names use the @ prefix.
For llvm-upgrade changes:
Fix test cases or completely remove use of llvm-upgrade for test cases
that cannot survive the new renaming or upgrade capabilities.
llvm-svn: 33533
Sanjay Patel