new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the
computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic
information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an
expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit
callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow.
Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the
diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit
better than before. Some examples:
p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct
Derived'
cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base'
Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to
...
^ ~
p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to
a value of
type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers
Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}}
^ ~~
p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class
'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base':
struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base
struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base
Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from
...
^~~~~~~
p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long'
cannot bind to
a value of unrelated type 'int'
long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type
...
^ ~
p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct
Base' cannot
bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base'
Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to
...
^ ~~~~~~
p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field
'i'
int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot
...
^ ~~~~~~
p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here
int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}}
^
llvm-svn: 90992
print exception specifications on function types and
declarations. Fixes <rdar://problem/7450999>.
There is some poor source-location information here, because we don't
track locations of the types in exception specifications. Filed PR5719.
Failures during template instantiation of the signature of a function
or function template have wrong point-of-instantiation location
information. I'll tackle that with a separate commit.
llvm-svn: 90863
temporaries that are within our current evaluation context. That way,
nested evaluation contexts (e.g., within a sizeof() expression) won't
see temporaries from outer contexts. Also, make sure to push a new
evaluation context when instantiating the initializer of a variable;
this may be an unevaluated context or a potentially-evaluated context,
depending on whether it's an in-class initializer or not. Fixes PR5672.
llvm-svn: 90460
results in them (which we were doing intentionally as a stopgap). Fix
an DeclContext lookup-table ordering problem which was causing UsingDecls to
show up incorrectly when looking for ordinary results. And oh hey
Clang-Code-Syntax passes now.
llvm-svn: 90367
implicit member access to a specific declaration, go ahead and create
it as a DeclRefExpr or a MemberExpr (with implicit CXXThisExpr base) as
appropriate. Otherwise, create an UnresolvedMemberExpr or
DependentScopeMemberExpr with a null base expression.
By representing implicit accesses directly in the AST, we get the ability
to correctly delay the decision about whether it's actually an instance
member access or not until resolution is complete. This permits us
to correctly avoid diagnosing the 'problem' of 'MyType::foo()'
where the relationship to the type isn't really known until instantiation.
llvm-svn: 90266
ValueDecl, because that isn't always the case in ill-formed
code. Diagnose a common mistake (forgetting to provide a template
argument list for a class template, PR5655) and dyn_cast so that we
handle the general problem of referring to a non-value declaration
gracefully.
llvm-svn: 90239
Create a new UnresolvedMemberExpr for these lookups. Assorted hackery
around qualified member expressions; this will all go away when we
implement the correct (i.e. extremely delayed) implicit-member semantics.
llvm-svn: 90161
maintains a stack of evaluation contexts rather than having the parser
do it. This change made it simpler to track in which contexts
temporaries were created, so that we could...
"Forget" about temporaries created within unevaluated contexts, so
that we don't build a CXXExprWithTemporaries and, therefore, destroy
the integral-constness of our expressions. Fixes PR5609.
llvm-svn: 89908
the linkage of a declaration. Switch the lame (and completely wrong)
NamedDecl::hasLinkage() over to using the new NamedDecl::getLinkage(),
along with the "can this declaration be a template argument?" check
that started all of this.
Fixes -fsyntax-only for PR5597.
llvm-svn: 89891
complaint to a warning and providing a helpful node in the case where
the "template<>" header is redundant because the corresponding
template-id refers to an explicit specialization. C++0x might still
change this behavior, and existing practice is all over the place on
the number of "template<>" headers actually needed.
llvm-svn: 89651
than tweaking existing ASTs, since we were (*gasp*) stomping on ASTs
within templates. I'm glad we found this little stick of TNT early...
llvm-svn: 89475
A::f
that occurs within a non-static member function with a type-dependent
"this", don't consider this to be a case for introduction of an
implicit "(*this)." to refer to a specific member function unless we
know (at template definition time) that A is a base class of *this.
There is some disagreement here between GCC, EDG, and Clang about the
handling of this case. I believe that Clang now has the correct,
literal interpretation of the standard, but have asked for
clarification (c++std-core-15483).
llvm-svn: 89425
incomplete array initialization, where we have the following in a
template:
int a[] = { 1, 2, something-value-dependent };
// ...
sizeof(a);
The type of "a" appears to be a non-dependent IncompleteArrayType, but
treating it as such makes the sizeof(a) fail at template definition
time. We now correctly handle this by morphing the IncompleteArrayType
into a DependentSizedArrayType with a NULL expression, indicating that
its size has no corresponding expression (and, therefore, the type is
distinct from others).
llvm-svn: 89366
Also, make the "don't know how to instantiate a particular kind of
declaration" diagnostic nicer, so we don't have to trap Clang in a
debugger to figure out what went wrong.
llvm-svn: 89050
like a copy constructor to the overload set, just ignore it. This
ensures that we don't try to use such a constructor as a copy
constructor *without* triggering diagnostics at the point of
declaration.
Note that we *do* diagnose such copy constructors when explicitly
written by the user (e.g., as an explicit specialization).
llvm-svn: 88733
non-type template parameters or constants of pointer-to-member
type. Once checked, be sure to retain those pointer-to-member
constants as expressions if they are dependent, or as declarations if
they are not dependent.
llvm-svn: 87010
member type (e.g., T Class::*Member), build a pointer-to-member
constant expression. Previously, we we just building a simple
declaration reference expression, which meant that the expression was
not treated as a pointer to member.
llvm-svn: 87000
- Comparing template parameter lists to determine if we have a redeclaration
- Comparing template parameter lists to determine if we have equivalent
template template parameters
- Comparing template parameter lists to determine whether a template
template argument is valid for a given template template parameter.
Previously, we did not distinguish between the last two cases, which
got us into trouble when we were looking for exact type matches
between the types of non-type template parameters that were dependent
types. Now we do, so we properly delay checking of template template
arguments until instantiation time.
Also, fix an accidental fall-through in a case statement that was
causing crashes.
llvm-svn: 86992
template template parameter.
When building a template-id type, check whether the template-name
itself is dependent (even if the template arguments are not!) and
handle it as a template-id type.
llvm-svn: 86913
annotation token, because some of the tokens we're annotating might
not be in the set of cached tokens (we could have consumed them
unconditionally).
Also, move the tentative parsing from ParseTemplateTemplateArgument
into the one caller that needs it, improving recovery.
llvm-svn: 86904
permits, among other things, ripping apart and reconstructing
templates via partial specialization:
template<typename T>
struct DeepRemoveConst { typedef T type; };
template<typename T>
struct DeepRemoveConst<const T> {
typedef typename DeepRemoveConst<T>::type type;
};
template<template<typename> class TT, typename T>
struct DeepRemoveConst<TT<T> > {
typedef TT<typename DeepRemoveConst<T>::type> type;
};
Also, fix a longstanding thinko in the code handling partial ordering
of class template partial specializations. We were performing the
second deduction without clearing out the results of the first
deduction. It's amazing we got through so much code with such a
horrendous error :(
llvm-svn: 86893
with its corresponding template parameter. This can happen when we
performed some substitution into the default template argument and
what we had doesn't match any more, e.g.,
template<int> struct A;
template<typename T, template<T> class X = A> class B;
B<long> b;
Previously, we'd emit a pretty but disembodied diagnostic showing how
the default argument didn't match the template parameter. The
diagnostic was good, but nothing tied it to the *use* of the default
argument in "B<long>". This commit fixes that.
Also, tweak the counting of active template instantiations to avoid
counting non-instantiation records, such as those we create for
(surprise!) checking default arguments, instantiating default
arguments, and performing substitutions as part of template argument
deduction.
llvm-svn: 86884
template template parameter, substitute any prior template arguments
into the template template parameter. This, for example, allows us to
properly check the template template argument for a class such as:
template<typename T, template<T Value> class X> struct Foo;
The actual implementation of this feature was trivial; most of the
change is dedicated to giving decent diagnostics when this
substitution goes horribly wrong. We now get a note like:
note: while substituting prior template arguments into template
template parameter 'X' [with T = float]
As part of this change, enabled some very pedantic checking when
comparing template template parameter lists, which shook out a bug in
our overly-eager checking of default arguments of template template
parameters. We now perform only minimal checking of such default
arguments when they are initially parsed.
llvm-svn: 86864
nested-name-specifiers so that they don't gobble the template name (or
operator-function-id) unless there is also a
template-argument-list. For example, given
T::template apply
we would previously consume both "template" and "apply" as part of
parsing the nested-name-specifier, then error when we see that there
is no "<" starting a template argument list. Now, we parse such
constructs tentatively, and back off if the "<" is not present. This
allows us to parse dependent template names as one would use them for,
e.g., template template parameters:
template<typename T, template<class> class X = T::template apply>
struct MetaSomething;
Also, test default arguments for template template parameters.
llvm-svn: 86841
parameters. Rather than storing them as either declarations (for the
non-dependent case) or expressions (for the dependent case), we now
(always) store them as TemplateNames.
The primary change here is to add a new kind of TemplateArgument,
which stores a TemplateName. However, making that change ripples to
every switch on a TemplateArgument's kind, also affecting
TemplateArgumentLocInfo/TemplateArgumentLoc, default template
arguments for template template parameters, type-checking of template
template arguments, etc.
This change is light on testing. It should fix several pre-existing
problems with template template parameters, such as:
- the inability to use dependent template names as template template
arguments
- template template parameter default arguments cannot be
instantiation
However, there are enough pieces missing that more implementation is
required before we can adequately test template template parameters.
llvm-svn: 86777
templates. The instantiation of these default arguments must be (and
now, is) delayed until the template argument is actually used, at
which point we substitute all levels of template arguments
concurrently.
llvm-svn: 86578
Eli Friedman