This is off by default. If you get a result and that
memory has memory tags, when --show-tags is given you'll
see the tags inline with the memory content.
```
(lldb) memory read mte_buf mte_buf+64 --show-tags
<...>
0xfffff7ff8020: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0d f0 fe ca 00 00 00 00 ................ (tag: 0x2)
<...>
(lldb) memory find -e 0xcafef00d mte_buf mte_buf+64 --show-tags
data found at location: 0xfffff7ff8028
0xfffff7ff8028: 0d f0 fe ca 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ (tags: 0x2 0x3)
0xfffff7ff8038: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ (tags: 0x3 0x4)
```
The logic for handling alignments is the same as for memory read
so in the above example because the line starts misaligned to the
granule it covers 2 granules.
Depends on D125089
Reviewed By: omjavaid
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125090
This reverts commit 3e928c4b9d.
This fixes an issue seen on Windows where we did not properly
get the section names of regions if they overlapped. Windows
has regions like:
[0x00007fff928db000-0x00007fff949a0000) ---
[0x00007fff949a0000-0x00007fff949a1000) r-- PECOFF header
[0x00007fff949a0000-0x00007fff94a3d000) r-x .hexpthk
[0x00007fff949a0000-0x00007fff94a85000) r-- .rdata
[0x00007fff949a0000-0x00007fff94a88000) rw- .data
[0x00007fff949a0000-0x00007fff94a94000) r-- .pdata
[0x00007fff94a94000-0x00007fff95250000) ---
I assumed that you could just resolve the address and get the section
name using the start of the region but here you'd always get
"PECOFF header" because they all have the same start point.
The usual command repeating loop used the end address of the previous
region when requesting the next, or getting the section name.
So I've matched this in the --all scenario.
In the example above, somehow asking for the region at
0x00007fff949a1000 would get you a region that starts at
0x00007fff949a0000 but has a different end point. Using the load
address you get (what I assume is) the correct section name.
This does 2 things:
* Moves it after the short options. Which makes sense given it's
a niche, default off option.
(if 2 files for one option seems a bit much, I am going to reuse
them for "memory find" later)
* Fixes the use of repeated commands. For example:
memory read buf --show-tags
<shows tags>
memory read
<shows tags>
Added tests for the repetition and updated existing help tests.
Reviewed By: omjavaid
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125089
This adds an option to the memory region command
to print all regions at once. Like you can do by
starting at address 0 and repeating the command
manually.
memory region [-a] [<address-expression>]
(lldb) memory region --all
[0x0000000000000000-0x0000000000400000) ---
[0x0000000000400000-0x0000000000401000) r-x <...>/a.out PT_LOAD[0]
<...>
[0x0000fffffffdf000-0x0001000000000000) rw- [stack]
[0x0001000000000000-0xffffffffffffffff) ---
The output matches exactly what you'd get from
repeating the command. Including that it shows
unmapped areas between the mapped regions.
(this is why Process GetMemoryRegions is not
used, that skips unmapped areas)
Help text has been updated to show that you can have
an address or --all but not both.
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111791
FixAnyAddress is to be used when we don't know or don't care
whether we're fixing a code or data address.
By using FixAnyAddress over the others, you document that no
specific choice was made.
On all existing platforms apart from Arm Thumb, you could use
either FixCodeAddress or FixDataAddress and be fine. Up until
now I've chosen to use FixDataAddress but if I had
chosen to use FixCodeAddress that would have broken Arm Thumb.
Hence FixAnyAddress, to give you the "safest" option when you're
in generic code.
Uses of FixDataAddress in memory region code have been changed
to FixAnyAddress. The functionality is unchanged.
Reviewed By: omjavaid, JDevlieghere
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124000
Given that you'd never find empty string, just error.
Also add a test that an invalid expr generates an error.
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123793
Currently, all data buffers are assumed to be writable. This is a
problem on macOS where it's not allowed to load unsigned binaries in
memory as writable. To be more precise, MAP_RESILIENT_CODESIGN and
MAP_RESILIENT_MEDIA need to be set for mapped (unsigned) binaries on our
platform.
Binaries are mapped through FileSystem::CreateDataBuffer which returns a
DataBufferLLVM. The latter is backed by a llvm::WritableMemoryBuffer
because every DataBuffer in LLDB is considered to be writable. In order
to use a read-only llvm::MemoryBuffer I had to split our abstraction
around it.
This patch distinguishes between a DataBuffer (read-only) and
WritableDataBuffer (read-write) and updates LLDB to use the appropriate
one.
rdar://74890607
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122856
Applied modernize-use-equals-default clang-tidy check over LLDB.
This check is already present in the lldb/.clang-tidy config.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121844
Applied modernize-use-default-member-init clang-tidy check over LLDB.
It appears in many files we had already switched to in class member init but
never updated the constructors to reflect that. This check is already present in
the lldb/.clang-tidy config.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121481
This way if you have a long stack, you can issue "thread backtrace --count 10"
and then subsequent <Return>-s will page you through the stack.
This took a little more effort than just adding the repeat command, since
the GetRepeatCommand API was returning a "const char *". That meant the command
had to keep the repeat string alive, which is inconvenient. The original
API returned either a nullptr, or a const char *, so I changed the private API to
return an llvm::Optional<std::string>. Most of the patch is propagating that change.
Also, there was a little thinko in fetching the repeat command. We don't
fetch repeat commands for commands that aren't being added to history, which
is in general reasonable. And we don't add repeat commands to the history -
also reasonable. But we do want the repeat command to be able to generate
the NEXT repeat command. So I adjusted the logic in HandleCommand to work
that way.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119046
This reverts commit 0df522969a.
Additional checks are added to fix the detection of the last memory region
in GetMemoryRegions or repeating the "memory region" command when the
target has non-address bits.
Normally you keep reading from address 0, looking up each region's end
address until you get LLDB_INVALID_ADDR as the region end address.
(0xffffffffffffffff)
This is what the remote will return once you go beyond the last mapped region:
[0x0000fffffffdf000-0x0001000000000000) rw- [stack]
[0x0001000000000000-0xffffffffffffffff) ---
Problem is that when we "fix" the lookup address, we remove some bits
from it. On an AArch64 system we have 48 bit virtual addresses, so when
we fix the end address of the [stack] region the result is 0.
So we loop back to the start.
[0x0000fffffffdf000-0x0001000000000000) rw- [stack]
[0x0000000000000000-0x0000000000400000) ---
To fix this I added an additional check for the last range.
If the end address of the region is different once you apply
FixDataAddress, we are at the last region.
Since the end of the last region will be the last valid mappable
address, plus 1. That 1 will be removed by the ABI plugin.
The only side effect is that on systems with non-address bits, you
won't get that last catch all unmapped region from the max virtual
address up to 0xf...f.
[0x0000fffff8000000-0x0000fffffffdf000) ---
[0x0000fffffffdf000-0x0001000000000000) rw- [stack]
<ends here>
Though in some way this is more correct because that region is not
just unmapped, it's not mappable at all.
No extra testing is needed because this is already covered by
TestMemoryRegion.py, I simply forgot to run it on system that had
both top byte ignore and pointer authentication.
This change has been tested on a qemu VM with top byte ignore,
memory tagging and pointer authentication enabled.
Reviewed By: omjavaid
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115508
This adds an option --show-tags to "memory read".
(lldb) memory read mte_buf mte_buf+32 -f "x" -s8 --show-tags
0x900fffff7ff8000: 0x0000000000000000 0x0000000000000000 (tag: 0x0)
0x900fffff7ff8010: 0x0000000000000000 0x0000000000000000 (tag: 0x1)
Tags are printed on the end of each line, if that
line has any tags associated with it. Meaning that
untagged memory output is unchanged.
Tags are printed based on the granule(s) of memory that
a line covers. So you may have lines with 1 tag, with many
tags, no tags or partially tagged lines.
In the case of partially tagged lines, untagged granules
will show "<no tag>" so that the ordering is obvious.
For example, a line that covers 2 granules where the first
is not tagged:
(lldb) memory read mte_buf-16 mte_buf+16 -l32 -f"x" --show-tags
0x900fffff7ff7ff0: 0x00000000 <...> (tags: <no tag> 0x0)
Untagged lines will just not have the "(tags: ..." at all.
Though they may be part of a larger output that does have
some tagged lines.
To do this I've extended DumpDataExtractor to also print
memory tags where it has a valid execution context and
is asked to print them.
There are no special alignment requirements, simply
use "memory read" as usual. All alignment is handled
in DumpDataExtractor.
We use MakeTaggedRanges to find all the tagged memory
in the current dump, then read all that into a MemoryTagMap.
The tag map is populated once in DumpDataExtractor and re-used
for each subsequently printed line (or recursive call of
DumpDataExtractor, which some formats do).
Reviewed By: omjavaid
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107140
This removes the non-address bits before we try to use
the addresses.
Meaning that when results are shown, those results won't
show non-address bits either. This follows what "memory read"
has done. On the grounds that non-address bits are a property
of a pointer, not the memory pointed to.
I've added testing and merged the find and read tests into one
file.
Note that there are no API side changes because "memory find"
does not have an equivalent API call.
Reviewed By: omjavaid
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117299
Addresses on AArch64 can have top byte tags, memory tags and pointer
authentication signatures in the upper bits.
While testing memory tagging I found that memory read couldn't
read a range if the two addresses had different tags. The same
could apply to signed pointers given the right circumstance.
(lldb) memory read mte_buf_alt_tag mte_buf+16
error: end address (0x900fffff7ff8010) must be greater than the start
address (0xa00fffff7ff8000).
Or it would try to read a lot more memory than expected.
(lldb) memory read mte_buf mte_buf_alt_tag+16
error: Normally, 'memory read' will not read over 1024 bytes of data.
error: Please use --force to override this restriction just once.
error: or set target.max-memory-read-size if you will often need a
larger limit.
Fix this by removing non address bits before we calculate the read
range. A test is added for AArch64 Linux that confirms this by using
the top byte ignore feature.
This means that if you do read with a tagged pointer the output
does not include those tags. This is potentially confusing but I think
overall it's better that we don't pretend that we're reading memory
from a range that the process is unable to map.
(lldb) p ptr1
(char *) $4 = 0x3400fffffffff140 "\x80\xf1\xff\xff\xff\xff"
(lldb) p ptr2
(char *) $5 = 0x5600fffffffff140 "\x80\xf1\xff\xff\xff\xff"
(lldb) memory read ptr1 ptr2+16
0xfffffffff140: 80 f1 ff ff ff ff 00 00 38 70 bc f7 ff ff 00 00 ........8p......
Reviewed By: omjavaid, danielkiss
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103626
Also add tests to check that we print the warning in the right
circumstances.
Reviewed By: labath
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114877
Certain commands like 'memory write', 'register read' etc all use
the OptionGroupFormat options but the help usage text for those
options is not customized to those commands.
One such example is:
(lldb) help memory read
-s <byte-size> ( --size <byte-size> )
The size in bytes to use when displaying with the selected format.
(lldb) help memory write
-s <byte-size> ( --size <byte-size> )
The size in bytes to use when displaying with the selected format.
This patch allows such commands to overwrite the help text for the options
in the OptionGroupFormat group as needed and fixes help text of memory write.
llvm.org/pr49018.
Reviewed By: DavidSpickett
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114448
Currently the 'memory write' command allows specifying the values when
writing the file contents to memory but the values are actually ignored. This
patch fixes that by erroring out when values are specified in such cases.
Reviewed By: DavidSpickett
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114544
Modify OpenOptions enum to open the future path into synchronizing
vFile:open bits with GDB. Currently, LLDB and GDB use different flag
models effectively making it impossible to match bits. Notably, LLDB
uses two bits to indicate read and write status, and uses union of both
for read/write. GDB uses a value of 0 for read-only, 1 for write-only
and 2 for read/write.
In order to future-proof the code for the GDB variant:
1. Add a distinct eOpenOptionReadWrite constant to be used instead
of (eOpenOptionRead | eOpenOptionWrite) when R/W access is required.
2. Rename eOpenOptionRead and eOpenOptionWrite to eOpenOptionReadOnly
and eOpenOptionWriteOnly respectively, to make it clear that they
do not mean to be combined and require update to all call sites.
3. Use the intersection of all three flags when matching against
the three possible values.
This commit does not change the actual bits used by LLDB.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106984
This new command looks much like "memory read"
and mirrors its basic behaviour.
(lldb) memory tag read new_buf_ptr new_buf_ptr+32
Logical tag: 0x9
Allocation tags:
[0x900fffff7ffa000, 0x900fffff7ffa010): 0x9
[0x900fffff7ffa010, 0x900fffff7ffa020): 0x0
Important proprties:
* The end address is optional and defaults to reading
1 tag if ommitted
* It is an error to try to read tags if the architecture
or process doesn't support it, or if the range asked
for is not tagged.
* It is an error to read an inverted range (end < begin)
(logical tags are removed for this check so you can
pass tagged addresses here)
* The range will be expanded to fit the tagging granule,
so you can get more tags than simply (end-begin)/granule size.
Whatever you get back will always cover the original range.
Reviewed By: omjavaid
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97285
Add a new feature to process save-core on Darwin systems -- for
lldb to create a user process corefile with only the dirty (modified
memory) pages included. All of the binaries that were used in the
corefile are assumed to still exist on the system for the duration
of the use of the corefile. A new --style option to process save-core
is added, so a full corefile can be requested if portability across
systems, or across time, is needed for this corefile.
debugserver can now identify the dirty pages in a memory region
when queried with qMemoryRegionInfo, and the size of vm pages is
given in qHostInfo.
Create a new "all image infos" LC_NOTE for Mach-O which allows us
to describe all of the binaries that were loaded in the process --
load address, UUID, file path, segment load addresses, and optionally
whether code from the binary was executing on any thread. The old
"read dyld_all_image_infos and then the in-memory Mach-O load
commands to get segment load addresses" no longer works when we
only have dirty memory.
rdar://69670807
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88387
This is part 2, covering the commands source.
Some uses remain where it's tricky to see what the
logic is or they are not used with AppendError.
Reviewed By: teemperor
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104448
This converts a default constructor's member initializers into C++11
default member initializers. This patch was automatically generated with
clang-tidy and the modernize-use-default-member-init check.
$ run-clang-tidy.py -header-filter='lldb' -checks='-*,modernize-use-default-member-init' -fix
This is a mass-refactoring patch and this commit will be added to
.git-blame-ignore-revs.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103483
Commiting this patch for Augusto Noronha who is getting set
up still.
This patch changes Target::ReadMemory so the default behavior
when a read is in a Section that is read-only is to fetch the
data from the local binary image, instead of reading it from
memory. Update all callers to use their old preferences
(the old prefer_file_cache bool) using the new API; we should
revisit these calls and see if they really intend to read
live memory, or if reading from a read-only Section would be
equivalent and important for performance-sensitive cases.
rdar://30634422
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100338
The memory read --outfile command should truncate the output when unless
--append-outfile. Fix the bug and add a test.
rdar://76062318
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99890
The current API for printing errors/warnings/messages from LLDB commands
sometimes adds newlines behind the messages for the caller. However, this
happens unconditionally so when the caller already specified a trailing newline
in the error message (or is trying to print a generated error message that ends
in a newline), LLDB ends up printing both the automatically added newline and
the one that was in the error message string. This leads to all the randomly
appearing new lines in error such as:
```
(lldb) command a
error: 'command alias' requires at least two arguments
(lldb) apropos a b
error: 'apropos' must be called with exactly one argument.
(lldb) why is there an empty line behind the second error?
```
This code adds a check that only appends the new line if the passed message
doesn't already contain a trailing new line.
Also removes the AppendRawWarning which had only one caller and doesn't serve
any purpose now.
Reviewed By: #lldb, mib
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96947
This extends the "memory region" command to
show tagged regions on AArch64 Linux when the MTE
extension is enabled.
(lldb) memory region the_page
[0x0000fffff7ff8000-0x0000fffff7ff9000) rw-
memory tagging: enabled
This is done by adding an optional "flags" field to
the qMemoryRegion packet. The only supported flag is
"mt" but this can be extended.
This "mt" flag is read from /proc/{pid}/smaps on Linux,
other platforms will leave out the "flags" field.
Where this "mt" flag is received "memory region" will
show that it is enabled. If it is not or the target
doesn't support memory tagging, the line is not shown.
(since majority of the time tagging will not be enabled)
Testing is added for the existing /proc/{pid}/maps
parsing and the new smaps parsing.
Minidump parsing has been updated where needed,
though it only uses maps not smaps.
Target specific tests can be run with QEMU and I have
added MTE flags to the existing helper scripts.
Reviewed By: labath
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87442
This reverts commit c65627a1fe.
The test immediately after the new invalid symbol test was
failing on Windows. This was because when we called
VirtualQueryEx to get the region info for 0x0,
even if it succeeded we would call GetLastError.
Which must have picked up the last error that was set while
trying to lookup "not_an_address". Which happened to be 2.
("The system cannot find the file specified.")
To fix this only call GetLastError when we know VirtualQueryEx
has failed. (when it returns 0, which we were also checking for anyway)
Also convert memory region to an early return style
to make the logic clearer.
Reviewed By: labath, stella.stamenova
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88229
Previously when <addr> in "memory region <addr>" didn't
parse correctly, we'd print an error then also ask lldb-server
for a region containing LLDB_INVALID_ADDRESS.
(lldb) memory region not_an_address
error: invalid address argument "not_an_address"...
error: Server returned invalid range
Only send the command to lldb-server if the address
parsed correctly.
(lldb) memory region not_an_address
error: invalid address argument "not_an_address"...
Reviewed By: labath
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87694
Summary:
A *.cpp file header in LLDB (and in LLDB) should like this:
```
//===-- TestUtilities.cpp -------------------------------------------------===//
```
However in LLDB most of our source files have arbitrary changes to this format and
these changes are spreading through LLDB as folks usually just use the existing
source files as templates for their new files (most notably the unnecessary
editor language indicator `-*- C++ -*-` is spreading and in every review
someone is pointing out that this is wrong, resulting in people pointing out that this
is done in the same way in other files).
This patch removes most of these inconsistencies including the editor language indicators,
all the different missing/additional '-' characters, files that center the file name, missing
trailing `===//` (mostly caused by clang-format breaking the line).
Reviewers: aprantl, espindola, jfb, shafik, JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Subscribers: dexonsmith, wuzish, emaste, sdardis, nemanjai, kbarton, MaskRay, atanasyan, arphaman, jfb, abidh, jsji, JDevlieghere, usaxena95, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73258
Summary: This removes most of unnecessary includes in the `source/Commands` directory. This was generated by IWYU and a script that fixed all the bogus reports from IWYU. Patch is tested on Linux and macOS.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Subscribers: krytarowski, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71489
Summary:
The permissions in a memory region have ternary states (yes, no, don't
know), but the memory region command only prints in binary, treating
"don't know" as "yes", which is particularly confusing as for instance
the unwinder will treat an unknown value as "no".
This patch makes is so that we distinguish all three states when
printing the values, using "?" to indicate the lack of information. It
is implemented via a special argument to the format provider for the
OptionalBool enumeration.
Reviewers: clayborg, jingham
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69106
Summary:
This patch re-types everywhere that passes a File::OpenOptions
as a uint32_t so it actually uses File::OpenOptions.
It also converts some OpenOptions related functions that fail
by returning 0 or NULL into llvm::Expected
split off from https://reviews.llvm.org/D68737
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, jasonmolenda, labath
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68853
llvm-svn: 374817
Summary:
This patch converts FileSystem::Open from this prototype:
Status
Open(File &File, const FileSpec &file_spec, ...);
to this one:
llvm::Expected<std::unique_ptr<File>>
Open(const FileSpec &file_spec, ...);
This is beneficial on its own, as llvm::Expected is a more modern
and recommended error type than Status. It is also a necessary step
towards https://reviews.llvm.org/D67891, and further developments
for lldb_private::File.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, jasonmolenda, labath
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: mgorny, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67996
llvm-svn: 373003
The StringRef should always be identical to the C string, so we
might as well just create the StringRef from the C-string. This
might be slightly slower until we implement the storage of ArgEntry
with a string instead of a std::unique_ptr<char[]>. Until then we
have to do the additional strlen on the C string to construct the
StringRef.
llvm-svn: 371842
Summary:
We currently have a bunch of code that is supposed to handle invalid command options, but
all this code is unreachable because invalid options are already handled in `Options::Parse`.
The only way we can reach this code is when we declare but then not implement an option
(which will be made impossible with D65386, which is also when we can completely remove
the `default` cases).
This patch replaces all this code with `llvm_unreachable` to make clear this is dead code
that can't be reached.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66522
llvm-svn: 369625
Summary:
Right now our CommandOptions.inc only generates the initializer for the options list but
not the array declaration boilerplate around it. As the array definition is identical for all arrays,
we might as well also let the CommandOptions.inc generate it alongside the initializers.
This patch will also allow us to generate additional declarations related to that option list in
the future (e.g. a enum class representing the specific options which would make our
handling code less prone).
This patch also fixes a few option tables that didn't follow our naming style.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Subscribers: abidh, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65331
llvm-svn: 367186
Summary:
PersistentStateExpressions (e.g. ClangPersistentVariables) have the
ability to define types using expressions that persist throughout the
debugging session. GetCompilerTypeFromPersistentDecl is a useful
operation to have if you need to use any of those persistently declared types,
like in CommandObjectMemory.
This decouples clang from CommandObjectMemory and decouples Plugins from
Commands in general.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62797
llvm-svn: 363183
A lot of comments in LLDB are surrounded by an ASCII line to delimit the
begging and end of the comment.
Its use is not really consistent across the code base, sometimes the
lines are longer, sometimes they are shorter and sometimes they are
omitted. Furthermore, it looks kind of weird with the 80 column limit,
where the comment actually extends past the line, but not by much.
Furthermore, when /// is used for Doxygen comments, it looks
particularly odd. And when // is used, it incorrectly gives the
impression that it's actually a Doxygen comment.
I assume these lines were added to improve distinguishing between
comments and code. However, given that todays editors and IDEs do a
great job at highlighting comments, I think it's worth to drop this for
the sake of consistency. The alternative is fixing all the
inconsistencies, which would create a lot more churn.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60508
llvm-svn: 358135
Unlike std::make_unique, which is only available since C++14,
std::make_shared is available since C++11. Not only is std::make_shared
a lot more readable compared to ::reset(new), it also performs a single
heap allocation for the object and control block.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57990
llvm-svn: 353764
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
David Spickett