This reverts the functional changes of D103427 but keeps its tests, and
and reimplements the functionality by reusing the existing 32-bit
MASKMOVDQU and VMASKMOVDQU instructions as suggested by skan in review.
These instructions were previously predicated on Not64BitMode. This
reimplementation restores the disassembly of a class of instructions,
which will see a test added in followup patch D122449.
These instructions are in 64-bit mode special cased in
X86MCInstLower::Lower, because we use flags with one meaning for subtly
different things: we have an AdSize32 class which indicates both that
the instruction needs a 0x67 prefix and that the text form of the
instruction implies a 0x67 prefix. These instructions are special in
needing a 0x67 prefix but having a text form that does *not* imply a
0x67 prefix, so we encode this in MCInst as an instruction that has an
explicit address size override.
Note that originally VMASKMOVDQU64 was special cased to be excluded from
disassembly, as we cannot distinguish between VMASKMOVDQU and
VMASKMOVDQU64 and rely on the fact that these are indistinguishable, or
close enough to it, at the MCInst level that it does not matter which we
use. Because VMASKMOVDQU now receives special casing, even though it
does not make a difference in the current implementation, as a
precaution VMASKMOVDQU is excluded from disassembly rather than
VMASKMOVDQU64.
Reviewed By: RKSimon, skan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122540
1. Add comments to explain why we set `isAsmParserOnly` for XACQUIRE and XRELEASE
2. Check `X86Inst` in the constructor of `RecognizableInstrBase` so that
we can avoid the case where one of it's field is not initialized but
accessed by user. (e.g. in X86EVEX2VEXTablesEmitter.cpp)
3. Move `Rec` from `RecognizableInstrBase` to `RecognizableInstr` to reduce
size of `RecognizableInstrBase`
4. Remove out-of-date comments for shouldBeEmitted() (filter() was removed)
5. Add a basic field `IsAsmParserOnly` and remove the field
`ShouldBeEmitted` b/c we can deduce it w/ little overhead
In fact, an instruction can not be emitted to disassemble table when
`isAsmParserOnly` is true, so `isAsmParserOnly=true` implies
`ShouldBeEmitted=false`.
We check `isAsmParserOnly` in X86FoldTablesEmitter.cpp at a early stage
b/c none of them is foldable.
This change fixes the code violations flagged in AMD compute CodeQL scan -
Query Description: "Comparisons between types of different widths in a loop condition can cause the loop to behave unexpectedly."
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120355
Based on the output of include-what-you-use.
It's an utility directory, so no much impact on other code areas.
clang++ -E -Iinclude -I../llvm/include ../llvm/utils/TableGen/*.cpp -std=c++14 -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions | wc -l
before: 4327274
after: 4316190
Related discourse thread: https://llvm.discourse.group/t/include-what-you-use-include-cleanup
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118466
This is also a bug. The VK[1/2/4/8/16]PAIR here should be VK[1/2/4/8/16]Pair which has its
custom PrintMethod and ParserMatchClass. However we don't have any instructions using vvvv
and ModR/M.REG field so this issue is not exposed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109564
The maskmovdqu instruction is an odd one: it has a 32-bit and a 64-bit
variant, the former using EDI, the latter RDI, but the use of the
register is implicit. In 64-bit mode, a 0x67 prefix can be used to get
the version using EDI, but there is no way to express this in
assembly in a single instruction, the only way is with an explicit
addr32.
This change adds support for the instruction. When generating assembly
text, that explicit addr32 will be added. When not generating assembly
text, it will be kept as a single instruction and will be emitted with
that 0x67 prefix. When parsing assembly text, it will be re-parsed as
ADDR32 followed by MASKMOVDQU64, which still results in the correct
bytes when converted to machine code.
The same applies to vmaskmovdqu as well.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103427
These are documented as using modrm byte of 0xe8, 0xf0, and 0xf8
respectively. But hardware ignore bits 2:0. So 0xe9-0xef is treated
the same as 0xe8. Similar for the other two.
Fixing this required adding 8 new formats to the X86 instructions
to convey this information. Could have gotten away with 3, but
adding all 8 made for a more logical conversion from format to
modrm encoding.
I renumbered the format encodings to keep the register modrm
formats grouped together.
isPrefix was added to support the patches to align branches.
it relies on a switch over instruction names.
This moves those opcodes to a new format so the information is
tablegen and we can just check for a specific value in some bits
in TSFlags instead.
I've left the other function in place for now so that the
existing patches in phabricator will still work. I'll work with
the owner to get them migrated.
This is how it should've been and brings it more in line with
std::string_view. There should be no functional change here.
This is mostly mechanical from a custom clang-tidy check, with a lot of
manual fixups. It uncovers a lot of minor inefficiencies.
This doesn't actually modify StringRef yet, I'll do that in a follow-up.
Summary:
Extend D71677 to apply to all branch-target operands, rather than special-casing call instructions.
Also add a regression test for llvm.org/PR44272, since this finishes fixing it.
Reviewers: thakis, rnk
Reviewed By: thakis
Subscribers: merge_guards_bot, hiraditya, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72417
Now that we've moved to C++14, we no longer need the llvm::make_unique
implementation from STLExtras.h. This patch is a mechanical replacement
of (hopefully) all the llvm::make_unique instances across the monorepo.
llvm-svn: 369013
The upper 4 bits of the immediate byte are used to encode a
register. We need to limit the explicit immediate to fit in the
remaining 4 bits.
Fixes PR42899.
llvm-svn: 368123
Summary:
This avoids needing an isel pattern for each condition code. And it removes translation switches for converting between Jcc instructions and condition codes.
Now the printer, encoder and disassembler take care of converting the immediate. We use InstAliases to handle the assembly matching. But we print using the asm string in the instruction definition. The instruction itself is marked IsCodeGenOnly=1 to hide it from the assembly parser.
Reviewers: spatel, lebedev.ri, courbet, gchatelet, RKSimon
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: MatzeB, qcolombet, eraman, hiraditya, arphaman, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60228
llvm-svn: 357802
Summary:
This avoids needing an isel pattern for each condition code. And it removes translation switches for converting between SETcc instructions and condition codes.
Now the printer, encoder and disassembler take care of converting the immediate. We use InstAliases to handle the assembly matching. But we print using the asm string in the instruction definition. The instruction itself is marked IsCodeGenOnly=1 to hide it from the assembly parser.
Reviewers: andreadb, courbet, RKSimon, spatel, lebedev.ri
Reviewed By: andreadb
Subscribers: hiraditya, lebedev.ri, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60138
llvm-svn: 357801
Summary:
Reorder the condition code enum to match their encodings. Move it to MC layer so it can be used by the scheduler models.
This avoids needing an isel pattern for each condition code. And it removes
translation switches for converting between CMOV instructions and condition
codes.
Now the printer, encoder and disassembler take care of converting the immediate.
We use InstAliases to handle the assembly matching. But we print using the
asm string in the instruction definition. The instruction itself is marked
IsCodeGenOnly=1 to hide it from the assembly parser.
This does complicate the scheduler models a little since we can't assign the
A and BE instructions to a separate class now.
I plan to make similar changes for SETcc and Jcc.
Reviewers: RKSimon, spatel, lebedev.ri, andreadb, courbet
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: gchatelet, hiraditya, kristina, lebedev.ri, jdoerfert, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60041
llvm-svn: 357800
Previously we had a regular form of the instruction used when the immediate was 0-7. And _alt form that allowed the full 8 bit immediate. Codegen would always use the 0-7 form since the immediate was always checked to be in range. Assembly parsing would use the 0-7 form when a mnemonic like vpcomtrueb was used. If the immediate was specified directly the _alt form was used. The disassembler would prefer to use the 0-7 form instruction when the immediate was in range and the _alt form otherwise. This way disassembly would print the most readable form when possible.
The assembly parsing for things like vpcomtrueb relied on splitting the mnemonic into 3 pieces. A "vpcom" prefix, an immediate representing the "true", and a suffix of "b". The tablegenerated printing code would similarly print a "vpcom" prefix, decode the immediate into a string, and then print "b".
The _alt form on the other hand parsed and printed like any other instruction with no specialness.
With this patch we drop to one form and solve the disassembly printing issue by doing custom printing when the immediate is 0-7. The parsing code has been tweaked to turn "vpcomtrueb" into "vpcomb" and then the immediate for the "true" is inserted either before or after the other operands depending on at&t or intel syntax.
I'd rather not do the custom printing, but I tried using an InstAlias for each possible mnemonic for all 8 immediates for all 16 combinations of element size, signedness, and memory/register. The code emitted into printAliasInstr ended up checking the number of operands, the register class of each operand, and the immediate for all 256 aliases. This was repeated for both the at&t and intel printer. Despite a lot of common checks between all of the aliases, when compiled with clang at least this commonality was not well optimized. Nor do all the checks seem necessary. Since I want to do a similar thing for vcmpps/pd/ss/sd which have 32 immediate values and 3 encoding flavors, 3 register sizes, etc. This didn't seem to scale well for clang binary size. So custom printing seemed a better trade off.
I also considered just using the InstAlias for the matching and not the printing. But that seemed like it would add a lot of extra rows to the matcher table. Especially given that the 32 immediates for vpcmpps have 46 strings associated with them.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59398
llvm-svn: 356343
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
The behavior in 64-bit mode is different between Intel and AMD CPUs. Intel ignores the 0x66 prefix. AMD does not. objump doesn't ignore the 0x66 prefix. Since LLVM aims to match objdump behavior, we should do the same.
While I was trying to fix this I had change brtarget16/32 to use ENCODING_IW/ID instead of ENCODING_Iv to get the 0x66+REX.W case to act sort of sanely. It's still wrong, but that's a problem for another day.
The change in encoding exposed the fact that 16-bit mode disassembly of relative jumps was creating JMP_4 with a 2 byte immediate. It should have been JMP_2. From just printing you can't tell the difference, but if you dumped the encoding it wouldn't have matched what we started with.
While fixing that, it exposed that jo/jno opcodes were missing from the switch that this patch deleted and there were no test cases for them.
Fixes PR38537.
llvm-svn: 339622
EVEX makes heavy use of the VEX.W bit to indicate 64-bit element vs 32-bit elements. Many of the VEX instructions were split into 2 versions with different masking granularity.
The EVEX->VEX table generate can collapse the two versions if the VEX version uses is tagged as VEX_WIG. But if the VEX version is instead marked VEX.W==0 we can't combine them because we don't know if there is also a VEX version with VEX.W==1.
This patch adds a new VEX_W1X tag that indicates the EVEX instruction encodes with VEX.W==1, but is safe to convert to a VEX instruction with VEX.W==0.
This allows us to remove a bunch of manual EVEX->VEX table entries. We may want to look into splitting up the VEX_WPrefix field which would simplify the disassembler.
llvm-svn: 335017
The index size is represented by the letter after the 'v'. The number represents the memory size. If an 'x' appears after the number its means the index register can be from VR128X/VR256X instead of VR128/VR256.
As vy512mem uses a VR256X index it should have an x.
And vz256mem uses a VR512 index so it shouldn't have an x.
I admit these names kind of suck and are confusing.
llvm-svn: 334120
Previously for instructions like fxsave we would print "opaque ptr" as part of the memory operand. Now we print nothing.
We also no longer accept "opaque ptr" in the parser. We still accept any size to be specified for these instructions, but we may want to consider only parsing when no explicit size is specified. This what gas does.
llvm-svn: 331243
Harald van Dijk