DependentScopeDeclRefExpr support storing templateids. Unite the common
code paths between ActOnDeclarationNameExpr and ActOnTemplateIdExpr.
This gets us to a point where we don't need to store function templates in
the AST using TemplateNames, which is critical to ripping out OverloadedFunction.
Also resolves a few FIXMEs.
llvm-svn: 89785
rather than burying it in a CXXConditionDeclExpr (that occassionally
hides behind implicit conversions). Similar changes for
switch, while, and do-while will follow, then the removal of
CXXConditionDeclExpr. This commit is the canary.
llvm-svn: 89717
complaint to a warning and providing a helpful node in the case where
the "template<>" header is redundant because the corresponding
template-id refers to an explicit specialization. C++0x might still
change this behavior, and existing practice is all over the place on
the number of "template<>" headers actually needed.
llvm-svn: 89651
operand of an addressof operator, and so we should not treat it as an abstract
member-pointer expression and therefore suppress the implicit member access.
This is really a well-formedness constraint on expressions: a DeclRefExpr of
a FieldDecl or a non-static CXXMethodDecl (or template thereof, or unresolved
collection thereof) should not be allowed in an arbitrary location in the AST.
Arguably it shouldn't be allowed anywhere and we should have a different expr
node type for this. But unfortunately we don't have a good way of enforcing
this kind of constraint right now.
llvm-svn: 89578
type and fixes a long-standing code gen. crash reported in
at least two PRs and a radar. (radar 7405040 and pr5025).
There are couple of remaining issues that I would like for
Ted. and Doug to look at:
Ted, please look at failure in Analysis/MissingDealloc.m.
I have temporarily added an expected-warning to make the
test pass. This tests has a declaration of 'SEL' type which
may not co-exist with the new changes.
Doug, please look at a FIXME in PCHWriter.cpp/PCHReader.cpp.
I think the changes which I have ifdef'ed out are correct. They
need be considered for in a few Indexer/PCH test cases.
llvm-svn: 89561
into pretty much everything about overload resolution in order to wean
BuildDeclarationNameExpr off LookupResult::getAsSingleDecl(). Replace
UnresolvedFunctionNameExpr with UnresolvedLookupExpr, which generalizes the
idea of a non-member lookup that we haven't totally resolved yet, whether by
overloading, argument-dependent lookup, or (eventually) the presence of
a function template in the lookup results.
Incidentally fixes a problem with argument-dependent lookup where we were
still performing ADL even when the lookup results contained something from
a block scope.
Incidentally improves a diagnostic when using an ObjC ivar from a class method.
This just fell out from rewriting BuildDeclarationNameExpr's interaction with
lookup, and I'm too apathetic to break it out.
The only remaining uses of OverloadedFunctionDecl that I know of are in
TemplateName and MemberExpr.
llvm-svn: 89544
The following attributes are currently supported in C++0x attribute
lists (and in GNU ones as well):
- align() - semantics believed to be conformant to n3000, except for
redeclarations and what entities it may apply to
- final - semantics believed to be conformant to CWG issue 817's proposed
wording, except for redeclarations
- noreturn - semantics believed to be conformant to n3000, except for
redeclarations
- carries_dependency - currently ignored (this is an optimization hint)
llvm-svn: 89543
name 'T' is looked up in the expression
t.~T()
Previously, we weren't looking into the type of "t", and therefore
would fail when T actually referred to an injected-class-name. Fixes
PR5530.
llvm-svn: 89493
than tweaking existing ASTs, since we were (*gasp*) stomping on ASTs
within templates. I'm glad we found this little stick of TNT early...
llvm-svn: 89475
A::f
that occurs within a non-static member function with a type-dependent
"this", don't consider this to be a case for introduction of an
implicit "(*this)." to refer to a specific member function unless we
know (at template definition time) that A is a base class of *this.
There is some disagreement here between GCC, EDG, and Clang about the
handling of this case. I believe that Clang now has the correct,
literal interpretation of the standard, but have asked for
clarification (c++std-core-15483).
llvm-svn: 89425
appropriate lookup and simply can't resolve the referrent yet, and
"dependent scope" expressions, where we can't do the lookup yet because the
entity we need to look into is a dependent type.
llvm-svn: 89402
incomplete array initialization, where we have the following in a
template:
int a[] = { 1, 2, something-value-dependent };
// ...
sizeof(a);
The type of "a" appears to be a non-dependent IncompleteArrayType, but
treating it as such makes the sizeof(a) fail at template definition
time. We now correctly handle this by morphing the IncompleteArrayType
into a DependentSizedArrayType with a NULL expression, indicating that
its size has no corresponding expression (and, therefore, the type is
distinct from others).
llvm-svn: 89366
provide completion results before each keyword argument, e.g.,
[foo Method:arg WithArg1:arg1 WithArg2:arg2]
We now complete before "WithArg1" and before "WithArg2", in addition
to completing before "Method".
llvm-svn: 89290
declaration by providing patterns for "getter = <method>" and "setter
= <method>". As part of this, invented a new "pattern" result kind
that is merely a semantic string. The "pattern" result kind should
help with other kinds of code templates.
llvm-svn: 89277
Fariborz Jahanian