Previously, we used VLD1.32 in all cases, however there are both 16 and 64-bit
accesses being selected, so we need to use an appropriate width load in those
cases.
llvm-svn: 161748
- FCMOV only supports a subset of X86 conditions. Skip boolean
simplification if X86 condition is not valid for FCMOV.
- add a minimal test case for PR13577.
llvm-svn: 161732
Not only look for the comment near the declaration itself, but also walk the
redeclaration chain: the previous declaration might have had a documentation
comment.
llvm-svn: 161722
FeatureFastUAMem for Nehalem, Westmere and Sandy Bridge.
FeatureFastUAMem is already on if we pass in nehalem or westmere as a command
argument.
rdar: 7252306
llvm-svn: 161717
Fixed an issue that could cause references the shared data for an object file to stay around longer than intended and could cause memory bloat when debugging multiple times.
llvm-svn: 161716
Detect when there is not enough available ILP, so if-conversion can't
speculate instructions for free.
Compute the lengthening of the critical path when inserting a select
instruction that depends on the condition as well as both sides of the
if.
Reject conversions that would stretch the critical path by more than
half a mispredict penalty.
llvm-svn: 161713
Trace::getResourceLength() computes the number of cycles required to
execute the trace when ignoring data dependencies. The number can be
compared to the critical path to estimate the trace ILP.
Trace::getPHIDepth() computes the data dependency depth of a PHI in a
trace successor that isn't necessarily part of the trace.
llvm-svn: 161711
This was causing a crash when we tried to re-apply a base object region to
itself. It probably also caused incorrect offset calculations in RegionStore.
PR13569 / <rdar://problem/12076683>
llvm-svn: 161710
This mostly affects pure virtual methods, but would also affect parent
methods defined inline in the header when analyzing the child's source file.
llvm-svn: 161709
This check is also accessible through the debug.ExprInspection checker.
Like clang_analyzer_eval, you can use it to test the analyzer engine's
current state; the argument should be true or false to indicate whether or
not you expect the function to be inlined.
When used in the positive case (clang_analyzer_checkInlined(true)), the
analyzer prints the message "TRUE" if the function is ever inlined. However,
clang_analyzer_checkInlined(false) should never print a message; this asserts
that there should be no paths on which the current function is inlined, but
then there are no paths on which to print a message! (If the assertion is
violated, the message "FALSE" will be printed.)
This asymmetry comes from the fact that the only other chance to print a
message is when the function is analyzed as a top-level function. However,
when we do that, we can't be sure it isn't also inlined elsewhere (such as
in a recursive function, or if we want to analyze in both general or
specialized cases). Rather than have all checkInlined calls have an appended,
meaningless "FALSE" or "TOP-LEVEL" case, there is just no message printed.
void clang_analyzer_checkInlined(int);
For debugging purposes only!
llvm-svn: 161708
Alexey Samsonov