This is a preparatory rename of the developer facing reproducer flags.
reproducer-skip-version-check -> reproducer-no-version-check
reproducer-auto-generate -> reproducer-generate-on-quit
After 61d5b0e663 more shell test are expected to exit with a non-zero
status code. Because the exit status is computed in the driver and not
behind the SB API layer, reproducers don't know about it and always
return 0 unless replay failed.
This discrepancy means that these tests don't work with lldb-repro.py
and skipping them for this reason would be a pity. To solve this
problem, the script now serializes the exit code during capture and
returns that during replay.
These is an assert that ensures that replay exits with a zero exit
status to prevent replay failures from being silently ignored.
Summary: Currently, lldb-repro is placed in the wrong location for multi-configuration generators. For example, in the case of VS, it is placed in a directory $(Configuration) instead of in each of Debug, Release, etc.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Subscribers: mgorny, lldb-commits, asmith
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74148
The CMakeLists.txt had a typo which meant that check-lldb-repro was
capturing twice instead of capturing and then replaying. This also
uncovered a missing import in lldb-repro.py. This patch fixes both
issues.
Because of the way the Python hash function works, it's not guaranteed
to be the same. This was causing a lot of reproducers to be generated
for the same tests, even though the CWD or arguments didn't change.
Switching to an MD5 hash should fix that.
This patch introduces a small new utility (lldb-repro) to transparently
capture and replay debugger sessions through the command line driver.
Its used to test the reproducers by running the test suite twice.
During the first run, it captures a reproducer for every lldb invocation
and saves it to a well-know location derived from the arguments and
current working directory. During the second run, the test suite is run
again but this time every invocation of lldb replays the previously
recorded session.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72823
Jonas Devlieghere