This reapplies "[analyzer] Make ObjCDeallocChecker path sensitive." (r261917)
with a fix for an error on some bots about specializing a template
from another namespace.
llvm-svn: 261929
Convert the ObjCDeallocChecker to be path sensitive. The primary
motivation for this change is to prevent false positives when -dealloc calls
helper invalidation methods to release instance variables, but it additionally
improves precision when -dealloc contains control flow. It also reduces the need
for pattern matching. The check for missing -dealloc methods remains AST-based.
Part of rdar://problem/6927496
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17511
llvm-svn: 261917
Previously the ObjC Dealloc Checker only checked classes with ivars, not
retained properties, which caused three bugs:
- False positive warnings about a missing -dealloc method in classes with only
ivars.
- Missing warnings about a missing -dealloc method on classes with only
properties.
- Missing warnings about an over-released or under-released ivar associated with
a retained property in classes with only properties.
The fix is to check only classes with at least one retained synthesized
property.
This also exposed a bug when reporting an over-released or under-released
property that did not contain a synthesize statement. The checker tried to
associate the warning with an @synthesize statement that did not exist, which
caused an assertion failure in debug builds. The fix is to fall back to the
@property statement in this case.
A patch by David Kilzer!
Part of rdar://problem/6927496
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5023
llvm-svn: 258896
- This is designed to make it obvious that %clang_cc1 is a "test variable"
which is substituted. It is '%clang_cc1' instead of '%clang -cc1' because it
can be useful to redefine what gets run as 'clang -cc1' (for example, to set
a default target).
llvm-svn: 91446
type and fixes a long-standing code gen. crash reported in
at least two PRs and a radar. (radar 7405040 and pr5025).
There are couple of remaining issues that I would like for
Ted. and Doug to look at:
Ted, please look at failure in Analysis/MissingDealloc.m.
I have temporarily added an expected-warning to make the
test pass. This tests has a declaration of 'SEL' type which
may not co-exist with the new changes.
Doug, please look at a FIXME in PCHWriter.cpp/PCHReader.cpp.
I think the changes which I have ifdef'ed out are correct. They
need be considered for in a few Indexer/PCH test cases.
llvm-svn: 89561
Devin Coughlin