storing an i170 on a 32 bit machine. This is first
promoted to a trunc-i170 store of an i256. On a
little-endian machine this expands to a store of
an i128 and a trunc-i42 store of an i128. The
trunc-i42 store is further expanded to a trunc-i42
store of an i64, then to a store of an i32 and a
trunc-i10 store of an i32. At this point the operand
type is legal (i32) and expansion stops (legalization
of the trunc-i10 needs to be handled in LegalizeDAG.cpp).
On big-endian machines the high bits are stored first,
and some bit-fiddling is needed in order to generate
aligned stores.
llvm-svn: 43499
offload to getStore rather than trying to handle
both cases at once (the assertions for example
assume the store really is truncating).
llvm-svn: 43498
transformation. Previously, it's restricted by ensuring the number of load uses
is one. Now the restriction is loosened up by allowing setcc uses to be
"extended" (e.g. setcc x, c, eq -> setcc sext(x), sext(c), eq).
llvm-svn: 43465
of offset and the alignment of ptr if these are both powers of
2. While the ptr alignment is guaranteed to be a power of 2,
there is no reason to think that offset is. For example, if
offset is 12 (the size of a long double on x86-32 linux) and
the alignment of ptr is 8, then the alignment of ptr+offset
will in general be 4, not 8. Introduce a function MinAlign,
lifted from gcc, for computing the minimum guaranteed alignment.
I've tried to fix up everywhere under lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/.
I also changed some places that weren't wrong (because both values
were a power of 2), as a defensive change against people copying
and pasting the code.
Hopefully someone who cares about alignment will review the rest
of LLVM and fix up the remaining places. Since I'm on x86 I'm
not very motivated to do this myself...
llvm-svn: 43421
FE.
- Explicitly pass in the alignment of the load & store.
- XFAIL 2007-10-23-UnalignedMemcpy.ll because llc has a bug that crashes on
unaligned pointers.
llvm-svn: 43398
have their own custom memcpy lowering code. This code needs to be factored out
into a target-independent lowering method with hooks to the backend. In the
meantime, just call memcpy if we're trying to copy onto a stack.
llvm-svn: 43262
operations so they work right for integers with funky
bit-widths. For example, consider extending i48 to i64
on a 32 bit machine. The i64 result is expanded to 2 x i32.
We know that the i48 operand will be promoted to i64, then
also expanded to 2 x i32. If we had the expanded promoted
operand to hand, then expanding the result would be trivial.
Unfortunately at this stage we can only get hold of the
promoted operand. So instead we kind of hand-expand, doing
explicit shifting and truncating to get the top and bottom
halves of the i64 operand into 2 x i32, which are then used
to expand the result. This is harmless, because when the
promoted operand is finally expanded all this bit fiddling
turns into trivial operations which are eliminated either
by the expansion code itself or the DAG combiner.
llvm-svn: 43223
Turn a store folding instruction into a load folding instruction. e.g.
xorl %edi, %eax
movl %eax, -32(%ebp)
movl -36(%ebp), %eax
orl %eax, -32(%ebp)
=>
xorl %edi, %eax
orl -36(%ebp), %eax
mov %eax, -32(%ebp)
This enables the unfolding optimization for a subsequent instruction which will
also eliminate the newly introduced store instruction.
llvm-svn: 43192
asserts in later checks rather than producing
the ordinary load it is supposed to. Avoid all
such hassles by directly returning an ordinary
load in this case.
llvm-svn: 43174
To do this it is necessary to add a "always inline" argument to the
memcpy node. For completeness I have also added this node to memmove
and memset. I have also added getMem* functions, because the extra
argument makes it cumbersome to use getNode and because I get confused
by it :-)
llvm-svn: 43172
Duncan Sands