all missed!
Thanks to Alex Bradbury for pointing this out, and the fact that I never
added the intended `legacy` anchor to the developer policy. Add that
anchor too. With hope, this will cause the links to all resolve
successfully.
llvm-svn: 351731
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
endings. We already used them in some cases, and this makes things
consistent. This will also simplify updating the licenses in these
files.
llvm-svn: 351632
This installs the new developer policy and moves all of the license
files across all LLVM projects in the monorepo to the new license
structure. The remaining projects will be moved independently.
Note that I've left odd formatting and other idiosyncracies of the
legacy license structure text alone to make the diff easier to read.
Critically, note that we do not in any case *remove* the old license
notice or terms, as that remains necessary until we finish the
relicensing process.
I've updated a few license files that refer to the LLVM license to
instead simply refer generically to whatever license the LLVM project is
under, basically trying to minimize confusion.
This is really the culmination of so many people. Chris led the
community discussions, drafted the policy update and organized the
multi-year string of meeting between lawyers across the community to
figure out the strategy. Numerous lawyers at companies in the community
spent their time figuring out initial answers, and then the Foundation's
lawyer Heather Meeker has done *so* much to help refine and get us ready
here. I could keep going on, but I just want to make sure everyone
realizes what a huge community effort this has been from the begining.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56897
llvm-svn: 351631
This is triggering on a pattern that's both too broad (const
std::string& members can be used safely) and too narrow (std::string is
not the only class with this problem). It has a very low true positive
rate, just remove it until we find a better solution for dangling string
references.
llvm-svn: 329292
The package that strong name signs the 3rd party references
spams a ton of output to the log, making the build really ugly.
Make this quiet.
llvm-svn: 283261
For now this only adds the UI necessary to configure clang-tidy
settings graphically, and it enables reading in and saving out
of .clang-tidy files. It does not actually run clang-tidy on
any source files yet.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23848
llvm-svn: 280840
Chandler Carruth