In case a PHI node follows an error block we can assume that the incoming value
can only come from the node that is not an error block. As a result, conditions
that seemed non-affine before are now in fact affine.
This is a recommit of r312663 after fixing
test/Isl/CodeGen/phi_after_error_block_outside_of_scop.ll
llvm-svn: 314075
This reverts commit
r312410 - [ScopDetect/Info] Look through PHIs that follow an error block
The commit caused generation of invalid IR due to accessing a parameter
that does not dominate the SCoP.
llvm-svn: 312663
In case a PHI node follows an error block we can assume that the incoming value
can only come from the node that is not an error block. As a result, conditions
that seemed non-affine before are now in fact affine.
llvm-svn: 312410
In the following loop:
int i;
for (i = 0; i < func(); i+=1)
;
SCoP:
for (int j = 0; j<n; j+=1)
S(i, j)
The value i is synthesizable in the SCoP that includes only the j-loop.
This is because i is fixed within the SCoP, it is irrelevant whether
it originates from another loop.
This fixes a strange case where a PHI was synthesiable in a SCoP,
but not its incoming value, triggering an assertion.
This should fix MultiSource/Applications/sgefa/sgefa of the
perf-x86_64-penryn-O3-polly-before-vectorizer-unprofitable buildbot.
llvm-svn: 309109
We need to relax constraints on invariant loads so that they do not
create fake RAW dependences. So, we do not consider invariant loads as
scalar dependences in a region.
During these changes, it turned out that we do not consider `llvm::Value`
replacements correctly within `PPCGCodeGeneration` and `ISLNodeBuilder`.
The replacements dictated by `ValueMap` were not being followed in all
places. This was fixed in this commit. There is no clean way to decouple
this change because this bug only seems to arise when the relaxed
version of invariant load hoisting was enabled.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35120
llvm-svn: 307907
In r304074 we introduce a patch to accept results from side effect free
functions into SCEV modeling. This causes rejection of cases where the
call is happening outside the SCoP. This patch checks if the call is
outside the Region and treats the results as a parameter (SCEVType::PARAM)
to the SCoP instead of returning SCEVType::INVALID.
Patch by Sameer Abu Asal.
llvm-svn: 305423
Certain affine memory accesses which we model today might contain products of
parameters which we might combined into a new parameter to be able to create an
affine expression that represents these memory accesses. Especially in the
context of OpenCL, this approach looses information as memory accesses such as
A[get_global_id(0) * N + get_global_id(1)] are assumed to be linear. We
correctly recover their multi-dimensional structure by assuming that parameters
that are the result of a function call at IR level likely are not parameters,
but indeed induction variables. The resulting access is now
A[get_global_id(0)][get_global_id(1)] for an array A[][N].
llvm-svn: 304075
Side-effect free function calls with only constant parameters can be easily
re-generated and consequently do not prevent us from modeling a SCEV. This
change allows array subscripts to reference function calls such as
'get_global_id()' as used in OpenCL.
We use the function name plus the constant operands to name the parameter. This
is possible as the function name is required and is not dropped in release
builds the same way names of llvm::Values are dropped. We also provide more
readable names for common OpenCL functions, to make it easy to understand the
polyhedral model we generate.
llvm-svn: 304074
Unsigned operations are often useful to support but the heuristics are
not yet tuned. This options allows to disable them if necessary.
llvm-svn: 288521
LLVM's coding guideline suggests to not use @brief for one-sentence doxygen
comments to improve readability. Switch this once and for all to ensure people
do not copy @brief comments from other parts of Polly, when writing new code.
llvm-svn: 280468
The existing code would add the operands in the wrong order, and eventually
crash because the SCEV expression doesn't exactly match the parameter SCEV
expression in SCEVAffinator::visit. (SCEV doesn't sort the operands to
getMulExpr in general.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23592
llvm-svn: 279087
For llvm the memory accesses from nonaffine loops should be visible,
however for polly those nonaffine loops should be invisible/boxed.
This fixes llvm.org/PR28245
Cointributed-by: Huihui Zhang <huihuiz@codeaurora.org>
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21591
llvm-svn: 274842
llvm commonly adds a comment to the closing brace of a namespace to indicate
which namespace is closed. clang-tidy provides with llvm-namespace-comment
a handy tool to check for this habit. We use it to ensure we consitently use
namespace comments in Polly.
There are slightly different styles in how namespaces are closed in LLVM. As
there is no large difference between the different comment styles we go for the
style clang-tidy suggests by default.
To reproduce this fix run:
for i in `ls tools/polly/lib/*/*.cpp`; \
clang-tidy -checks='-*,llvm-namespace-comment' -p build $i -fix \
-header-filter=".*"; \
done
This cleanup was suggested by Eugene Zelenko <eugene.zelenko@gmail.com> in
http://reviews.llvm.org/D21488 and was split out to increase readability.
llvm-svn: 273621
IntToPtr and PtrToInt instructions are basically no-ops that we can handle as
such. In order to generate them properly as parameters we had to improve the
ScopExpander, though the change is the first in the direction of a more
aggressive scalar synthetization.
This patch was originally contributed by Johannes Doerfert in r271888, but was
in conflict with the revert in r272483. This is a recommit with some minor
adjustment to the test cases to take care of differing instruction names.
llvm-svn: 272485
The recent expression type changes still need more discussion, which will happen
on phabricator or on the mailing list. The precise list of commits reverted are:
- "Refactor division generation code"
- "[NFC] Generate runtime checks after the SCoP"
- "[FIX] Determine insertion point during SCEV expansion"
- "Look through IntToPtr & PtrToInt instructions"
- "Use minimal types for generated expressions"
- "Temporarily promote values to i64 again"
- "[NFC] Avoid unnecessary comparison for min/max expressions"
- "[Polly] Fix -Wunused-variable warnings (NFC)"
- "[NFC] Simplify min/max expression generation"
- "Simplify the type adjustment in the IslExprBuilder"
Some of them are just reverted as we would otherwise get conflicts. I will try
to re-commit them if possible.
llvm-svn: 272483
IntToPtr and PtrToInt instructions are basically no-ops that we can handle as
such. In order to generate them properly as parameters we had to improve the
ScopExpander, though the change is the first in the direction of a more
aggressive scalar synthetization.
llvm-svn: 271888
Truncate operations are basically modulo operations, thus we can model
them that way. However, for large types we assume the operand to fit
in the new type size instead of introducing a modulo with a very large
constant.
llvm-svn: 269300
The assumption attached to an llvm.assume in the SCoP needs to be
combined with the domain of the surrounding statement but can
nevertheless be used to refine the context.
This fixes the problems mentioned in PR27067.
llvm-svn: 269060
After zero-extend operations and unsigned comparisons we now allow
unsigned divisions. The handling is basically the same as for signed
division, except the interpretation of the operands. As the divisor
has to be constant in both cases we can simply interpret it as an
unsigned value without additional complexity in the representation.
For the dividend we could choose from the different representation
schemes introduced for zero-extend operations but for now we will
simply use an assumption.
llvm-svn: 268032
Additive expressions can have constant factors too that we can extract
and thereby simplify the internal representation. For now we do
compute the gcd of all constant factors but only extract the same
(possibly negated) factor if there is one.
llvm-svn: 267445
A zero-extended value can be interpreted as a piecewise defined signed
value. If the value was non-negative it stays the same, otherwise it
is the sum of the original value and 2^n where n is the bit-width of
the original (or operand) type. Examples:
zext i8 127 to i32 -> { [127] }
zext i8 -1 to i32 -> { [256 + (-1)] } = { [255] }
zext i8 %v to i32 -> [v] -> { [v] | v >= 0; [256 + v] | v < 0 }
However, LLVM/Scalar Evolution uses zero-extend (potentially lead by a
truncate) to represent some forms of modulo computation. The left-hand side
of the condition in the code below would result in the SCEV
"zext i1 <false, +, true>for.body" which is just another description
of the C expression "i & 1 != 0" or, equivalently, "i % 2 != 0".
for (i = 0; i < N; i++)
if (i & 1 != 0 /* == i % 2 */)
/* do something */
If we do not make the modulo explicit but only use the mechanism described
above we will get the very restrictive assumption "N < 3", because for all
values of N >= 3 the SCEVAddRecExpr operand of the zero-extend would wrap.
Alternatively, we can make the modulo in the operand explicit in the
resulting piecewise function and thereby avoid the assumption on N. For the
example this would result in the following piecewise affine function:
{ [i0] -> [(1)] : 2*floor((-1 + i0)/2) = -1 + i0;
[i0] -> [(0)] : 2*floor((i0)/2) = i0 }
To this end we can first determine if the (immediate) operand of the
zero-extend can wrap and, in case it might, we will use explicit modulo
semantic to compute the result instead of emitting non-wrapping assumptions.
Note that operands with large bit-widths are less likely to be negative
because it would result in a very large access offset or loop bound after the
zero-extend. To this end one can optimistically assume the operand to be
positive and avoid the piecewise definition if the bit-width is bigger than
some threshold (here MaxZextSmallBitWidth).
We choose to go with a hybrid solution of all modeling techniques described
above. For small bit-widths (up to MaxZextSmallBitWidth) we will model the
wrapping explicitly and use a piecewise defined function. However, if the
bit-width is bigger than MaxZextSmallBitWidth we will employ overflow
assumptions and assume the "former negative" piece will not exist.
llvm-svn: 267408
In r247147 we disabled pointer expressions because the IslExprBuilder did not
fully support them. This patch reintroduces them by simply treating them as
integers. The only special handling for pointers that is left detects the
comparison of two address_of operands and uses an unsigned compare.
llvm-svn: 265894
This reverts commit 2879c53e80e05497f408f21ce470d122e9f90f94.
Additionally, it adds SDiv and SRem instructions to the set of values
discovered by the findValues function even if we add the operands to
be able to recompute the SCEVs. In subfunctions we do not want to
recompute SDiv and SRem instructions but pass them instead as they
might have been created through the IslExprBuilder and are more
complicated than simple SDiv/SRem instructions in the code.
llvm-svn: 265873
The findValues() function did not look through div & srem instructions
that were part of the argument SCEV. However, in different other
places we already look through it. This mismatch caused us to preload
values in the wrong order.
llvm-svn: 265775
Index calculations can use the last value that come out of a loop.
Ideally, ScalarEvolution can compute that exit value directly without
depending on the loop induction variable, but not in all cases.
This changes isAffine to not consider such loop exit values as affine to
avoid that SCEVExpander adds uses of the original loop induction
variable.
This fix is analogous to r262404 that applies to general uses of loop
exit values instead of index expressions and loop bouds as in this
patch.
This reduces the number of LNT test-suite fails with
-polly-position=before-vectorizer -polly-unprofitable
from 10 to 8.
llvm-svn: 262665
The scope will be required in the following fix. This commit separates
the large changes that do not change behaviour from the small, but
functional change.
llvm-svn: 262664
Polly recognizes affine loops that ScalarEvolution does not, in
particular those with loop conditions that depend on hoisted invariant
loads. Check for SCEVAddRec dependencies on such loops and do not
consider their exit values as synthesizable because SCEVExpander would
generate them as expressions that depend on the original induction
variables. These are not available in generated code.
llvm-svn: 262404
So far we separated constant factors from multiplications, however,
only when they are at the outermost level of a parameter SCEV. Now,
we also separate constant factors from the parameter SCEV if the
outermost expression is a SCEVAddRecExpr. With the changes to the
SCEVAffinator we can now improve the extractConstantFactor(...)
function at will without worrying about any other code part. Thus,
if needed we can implement a more comprehensive
extractConstantFactor(...) function that will traverse the SCEV
instead of looking only at the outermost level.
Four test cases were affected. One did not change much and the other
three were simplified.
llvm-svn: 260859
If an llvm.assume dominates the SCoP entry block and the assumed condition
can be expressed as an affine inequality we will now add it to the context.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14413
llvm-svn: 252851
This patch allows invariant loads to be used in the SCoP description,
e.g., as loop bounds, conditions or in memory access functions.
First we collect "required invariant loads" during SCoP detection that
would otherwise make an expression we care about non-affine. To this
end a new level of abstraction was introduced before
SCEVValidator::isAffineExpr() namely ScopDetection::isAffine() and
ScopDetection::onlyValidRequiredInvariantLoads(). Here we can decide
if we want a load inside the region to be optimistically assumed
invariant or not. If we do, it will be marked as required and in the
SCoP generation we bail if it is actually not invariant. If we don't
it will be a non-affine expression as before. At the moment we
optimistically assume all "hoistable" (namely non-loop-carried) loads
to be invariant. This causes us to expand some SCoPs and dismiss them
later but it also allows us to detect a lot we would dismiss directly
if we would ask e.g., AliasAnalysis::canBasicBlockModify(). We also
allow potential aliases between optimistically assumed invariant loads
and other pointers as our runtime alias checks are sound in case the
loads are actually invariant. Together with the invariant checks this
combination allows to handle a lot more than LICM can.
The code generation of the invariant loads had to be extended as we
can now have dependences between parameters and invariant (hoisted)
loads as well as the other way around, e.g.,
test/Isl/CodeGen/invariant_load_parameters_cyclic_dependence.ll
First, it is important to note that we cannot have real cycles but
only dependences from a hoisted load to a parameter and from another
parameter to that hoisted load (and so on). To handle such cases we
materialize llvm::Values for parameters that are referred by a hoisted
load on demand and then materialize the remaining parameters. Second,
there are new kinds of dependences between hoisted loads caused by the
constraints on their execution. If a hoisted load is conditionally
executed it might depend on the value of another hoisted load. To deal
with such situations we sort them already in the ScopInfo such that
they can be generated in the order they are listed in the
Scop::InvariantAccesses list (see compareInvariantAccesses). The
dependences between hoisted loads caused by indirect accesses are
handled the same way as before.
llvm-svn: 249607
The support for modulo expressions is not comlete and makes the new
domain generation harder. As the currently broken domain generation
needs to be replaced, we will first swap in the new, fixed domain
generation and make it compatible with the modulo expressions later.
llvm-svn: 247278
The support for pointer expressions is broken as it can only handle
some patterns in the IslExprBuilder. We should to treat pointers in
expressions the same as integers at some point and revert this patch.
llvm-svn: 247147
Remainder operations with constant divisor can be modeled as quasi-affine
expression. This patch adds support for detecting and modeling them. We also
add a test that ensures they are correctly code generated.
This patch was extracted from a larger patch contributed by Johannes Doerfert
in http://reviews.llvm.org/D5293
llvm-svn: 240518
Upcoming revisions of isl require us to include header files explicitly, which
have previously been already transitively included. Before we add them, we sort
the existing includes.
Thanks to Chandler for sort_includes.py. A simple, but very convenient script.
llvm-svn: 236930
In the lnt benchmark MultiSource/Benchmarks/MallocBench/gs/gs with
scalar and PHI modeling we detected the multidimensional accesses
with sizes variant in the SCoP. This will check the sizes for validity.
llvm-svn: 236395
As soon as one operand of the product is invalid, the entire product is invalid.
This happens for example if one of the operands is not loop-invariant.
This fixes http://llvm.org/PR23125
Reported-by: Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia <jeremyhu@apple.com
llvm-svn: 234119
This will strip the constant factor of a parameter befor we add it to
the SCoP. As a result the access functions are simplified, e.g., for
the attached test case.
llvm-svn: 233501
Tobias Grosser