We need to know whether or not a given basic block is in a loop for the analysis
to be correct.
Loop information may be incomplete on irreducible CFGs, therefore we may
generate incorrect code if we use it in those situations.
This fixes PR25988.
llvm-svn: 257012
The MachineVerifier wants to check that the register operands of an
instruction belong to the instruction's register class. RIP-relative
control flow instructions violated this by referencing RIP. While this
was fixed for SysV, it was never fixed for Win64.
llvm-svn: 254315
- Strenghten the logic to be sure we hoist the restore point out of the current
loop. (The fixes a bug with infinite loop, added as part of the patch.)
- Walk over the exit blocks of the current loop to conver to the desired restore
point in one iteration of the update loop.
llvm-svn: 247958
Currently, when lowering switch statement and a new basic block is built for jump table / bit test header, the edge to this new block is not assigned with a correct weight. This patch collects the edge weight from all its successors and assign this sum of weights to the edge (and also the other fall-through edge). Test cases are adjusted accordingly.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12166#fae6eca7
llvm-svn: 246104
points.
There is an infinite loop that can occur in Shrink Wrapping while searching
for the Save/Restore points.
Part of this search checks whether the save/restore points are located in
different loop nests and if so, uses the (post) dominator trees to find the
immediate (post) dominator blocks. However, if the current block does not have
any immediate (post) dominators then this search will result in an infinite
loop. This can occur in code containing an infinite loop.
The modification checks whether the immediate (post) dominator is different from
the current save/restore block. If it is not, then the search terminates and the
current location is not considered as a valid save/restore point for shrink wrapping.
Phabricator: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11607
llvm-svn: 244247
With this patch the x86 backend is now shrink-wrapping capable
and this functionality can be tested by using the
-enable-shrink-wrap switch.
The next step is to make more test and enable shrink-wrapping by
default for x86.
Related to <rdar://problem/20821487>
llvm-svn: 238293
Kevin B. Smith