There are some cases where the mul sequence is smaller, but for the most part,
using a div is preferable. This does not apply to vectors, since x86 doesn't
have vector idiv, and a vector mul/shifts sequence ought to be smaller than a
scalarized division.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12082
llvm-svn: 245431
This was done with the following sed invocation to catch label lines demarking function boundaries:
sed -i '' "s/^;\( *\)\([A-Z0-9_]*\):\( *\)test\([A-Za-z0-9_-]*\):\( *\)$/;\1\2-LABEL:\3test\4:\5/g" test/CodeGen/*/*.ll
which was written conservatively to avoid false positives rather than false negatives. I scanned through all the changes and everything looks correct.
llvm-svn: 186258
PR 14848. The lowered sequence is based on the existing sequence the target-independent
DAG Combiner creates for the scalar case.
Patch by Zvi Rackover.
llvm-svn: 171953
Simon Pilgrim