if the type's declaration was previously instantiated in an unimported module.
(For an imported type definition, this already worked, because the source
location is set to the location of the definition, but for locally-instantiated
type definitions, it did not.)
llvm-svn: 203425
handling C++11 default initializers. Without this, other parts of Sema (such as
lambda capture) would think the default initializer is part of the surrounding
function scope.
llvm-svn: 199453
For an init capture, process the initialization expression
right away. For lambda init-captures such as the following:
const int x = 10;
auto L = [i = x+1](int a) {
return [j = x+2,
&k = x](char b) { };
};
keep in mind that each lambda init-capture has to have:
- its initialization expression executed in the context
of the enclosing/parent decl-context.
- but the variable itself has to be 'injected' into the
decl-context of its lambda's call-operator (which has
not yet been created).
Each init-expression is a full-expression that has to get
Sema-analyzed (for capturing etc.) before its lambda's
call-operator's decl-context, scope & scopeinfo are pushed on their
respective stacks. Thus if any variable is odr-used in the init-capture
it will correctly get captured in the enclosing lambda, if one exists.
The init-variables above are created later once the lambdascope and
call-operators decl-context is pushed onto its respective stack.
Since the lambda init-capture's initializer expression occurs in the
context of the enclosing function or lambda, therefore we can not wait
till a lambda scope has been pushed on before deciding whether the
variable needs to be captured. We also need to process all
lvalue-to-rvalue conversions and discarded-value conversions,
so that we can avoid capturing certain constant variables.
For e.g.,
void test() {
const int x = 10;
auto L = [&z = x](char a) { <-- don't capture by the current lambda
return [y = x](int i) { <-- don't capture by enclosing lambda
return y;
}
};
If x was not const, the second use would require 'L' to capture, and
that would be an error.
Make sure TranformLambdaExpr is also aware of this.
Patch approved by Richard (Thanks!!)
http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2092
llvm-svn: 196454
We would fail to instantiate them when the surrounding function was
instantiated. Instantiate the class and add it's members to the list of
pending instantiations, they should be resolved when we are finished
with the function's body.
This fixes PR9685.
llvm-svn: 195827
A previous attempt http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-commits/Week-of-Mon-20130930/090049.html resulted in PR 17476, and was reverted,
The original TransformLambdaExpr (pre generic-lambdas) transformed the TypeSourceInfo of the Call operator in its own instantiation scope via TransformType. This resulted in the parameters of the call operator being mapped to their transformed counterparts in an instantiation scope that would get popped off.
Then a call to TransformFunctionParameters would add the parameters and their transformed mappings (but newly created ones!) to the current instantiation scope. This would result in a disconnect between the new call operator's TSI parameters and those used to construct the call operator declaration. This was ok in the non-generic lambda world - but would cause issues with nested transformations (when non-generic and generics were interleaved) in the generic lambda world - that I somewhat kludged around initially - but this resulted in PR17476.
The new approach seems cleaner. We only do the transformation of the TypeSourceInfo - but we make sure to do it in the current instantiation scope so we don't lose the untransformed to transformed mappings of the ParmVarDecls when they get created.
Another attempt caused a test to fail (http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-commits/Week-of-Mon-20131021/091533.html) and also had to be reverted - my apologies - in my haste, i did not run all the tests - argh!
Now all the tests seem to pass - but a Fixme has been added - since I suspect Richard will find the fix a little inelegant ;) I shall try and work on a more elegant fix once I have had a chance to discuss with Richard or Doug at a later date.
Hopefully the third time;s a charm *fingers crossed*
This does not yet include capturing.
Please see test file for examples.
This patch was LGTM'd by Doug:
http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1784
llvm-svn: 193230
They were causing CodeGenCXX/mangle-exprs.cpp to fail.
Revert "Remove the circular reference to LambdaExpr in CXXRecordDecl."
Revert "Again: Teach TreeTransform and family how to transform generic lambdas nested within templates and themselves."
llvm-svn: 193226
lambdas nested within templates and themselves.
A previous attempt http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-commits/Week-of-Mon-20130930/090049.html resulted in PR 17476, and was reverted,
The original TransformLambdaExpr (pre generic-lambdas) transformed the TypeSourceInfo of the Call operator in its own instantiation scope via TransformType. This resulted in the parameters of the call operator being mapped to their transformed counterparts in an instantiation scope that would get popped off.
Then a call to TransformFunctionParameters would add the parameters and their transformed mappings (but newly created ones!) to the current instantiation scope. This would result in a disconnect between the new call operator's TSI parameters and those used to construct the call operator declaration. This was ok in the non-generic lambda world - but would cause issues with nested transformations (when non-generic and generics were interleaved) in the generic lambda world - that I somewhat kludged around initially - but this resulted in PR17476.
The new approach seems cleaner. We only do the transformation of the TypeSourceInfo - but we make sure to do it in the current instantiation scope so we don't lose the untransformed to transformed mappings of the ParmVarDecls when they get created.
This does not yet include capturing.
Please see test file for examples.
This patch was LGTM'd by Doug:
http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1784
llvm-svn: 193216
The bool conversion operator on InstantiatingTemplate never added value and
only served to obfuscate the template instantiation routines.
This replaces the conversion and its callers with an explicit isInvalid()
function to make it clear what's going on at a glance.
llvm-svn: 192177
This does not yet include capturing (that is next).
Please see test file for examples.
This patch was LGTM'd by Doug:
http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1784http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-commits/Week-of-Mon-20130930/090048.html
When I first committed this patch - a bunch of buildbots were unable to compile the code that VS2010 seemed to compile. Seems like there was a dependency on Sema/Template.h which VS did not seem to need, but I have now added for the other compilers. It still compiles on Visual Studio 2010 - lets hope the buildbots remain quiet (please!)
llvm-svn: 191879
This does not yet include capturing (that is next).
Please see test file for examples.
This patch was LGTM'd by Doug:
http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1784
llvm-svn: 191875
template and defined outside it, don't instantiate it twice when instantiating
the surrounding class template specialization. That would cause us to reject
the code because we think two partial specializations instantiated to produce
the same signature.
llvm-svn: 191418
Summary:
- lambdas, blocks or captured statements in templates were not
handled which causes codegen crashes.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1628
llvm-svn: 190784
This change unifies the logic for template instantiation of methods and
functions declared with typedefs.
It ensures that SubstFunctionType() always fills the Params out param
with non-null ParmVarDecls or returns null.
Reviewers: rsmith
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1135
llvm-svn: 187528
sufficient to only consider names visible at the point of instantiation,
because that may not include names that were visible when the template was
defined. More generally, if the instantiation backtrace goes through a module
M, then every declaration visible within M should be available to the
instantiation. Any of those declarations might be part of the interface that M
intended to export to a template that it instantiates.
The fix here has two parts:
1) If we find a non-visible declaration during name lookup during template
instantiation, check whether the declaration was visible from the defining
module of all entities on the active template instantiation stack. The defining
module is not the owning module in all cases: we look at the module in which a
template was defined, not the module in which it was first instantiated.
2) Perform pending instantiations at the end of a module, not at the end of the
translation unit. This is general goodness, since it significantly cuts down
the amount of redundant work that is performed in every TU importing a module,
and also implicitly adds the module containing the point of instantiation to
the set of modules checked for declarations in a lookup within a template
instantiation.
There's a known issue here with template instantiations performed while
building a module, if additional imports are added later on. I'll fix that
in a subsequent commit.
llvm-svn: 187167
This patch essentially removes all the FIXMEs following calls to DeduceTemplateArguments() that want to keep track of deduction failure info.
llvm-svn: 186730
When we see a pack, and replace it with a template argument which is
also a pack, we want to use the pack pattern, not the expanded pack.
The caller should take care of expanding the pack afterwards.
Fixes PR16646.
llvm-svn: 186713
does not substitute a sizeof-pack expression.
The solution is proposed by Richard Smith.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D869
llvm-svn: 186306
places which weren't setting it up properly. This allows us to get the right
cv-qualifiers for 'this' when it appears outside a method body in a class
template.
llvm-svn: 183483
MSVC provides __wchar_t. This is the same as the built-in wchar_t type
from C++, but it is also available with -fno-wchar and in C.
The commit changes ASTContext to have two different types for this:
- WCharTy is the built-in type used for wchar_t in C++ and __wchar_t.
- WideCharTy is the type of a wide character literal. In C++ this is
the same as WCharTy, and in C it is an integer type compatible with
the type in <stddef.h>.
This fixes PR15815.
llvm-svn: 181587
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-x86_64-darwin10-gdb went back green
before it processed the reverted 178663, so it could not have been the culprit.
Revert "Revert 178663."
This reverts commit 4f8a3eb2ce5d4ba422483439e20c8cbb4d953a41.
llvm-svn: 178682
For variables and functions clang used to store two storage classes. The one
"as written" in the code and a patched one, which, for example, propagates
static to the following decls.
This apparently is from the days clang lacked linkage computation. It is now
redundant and this patch removes it.
llvm-svn: 178663
This was causing correctness issues for ARC and the static analyzer when a
function template has "consumed" Objective-C object parameters (i.e.
parameters that will be released by the function before returning).
The fix is threefold:
(1) Actually copy over the attributes from old ParmVarDecls to new ones.
(2) Have Sema::BuildFunctionType only work for building FunctionProtoTypes,
which it was doing anyway. This allows us to pass an ExtProtoInfo
instead of a plain ExtInfo and several flags.
(3) Drop param attributes as part of StripImplicitInstantiation, which is
used when an implicit instantiation is followed by an explicit one.
<rdar://problem/12685622>
llvm-svn: 176728
The TypeLoc hierarchy used the llvm::cast machinery to perform undefined
behavior by casting pointers/references to TypeLoc objects to derived types
and then using the derived copy constructors (or even returning pointers to
derived types that actually point to the original TypeLoc object).
Some context is in this thread:
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2012-December/056804.html
Though it's spread over a few months which can be hard to read in the mail
archive.
llvm-svn: 175462
copy-list-initialization (and doesn't add an additional copy step):
Fill in the ListInitialization bit when creating a CXXConstructExpr. Use it
when instantiating initializers in order to correctly handle instantiation of
copy-list-initialization. Teach TreeTransform that function arguments are
initializations, and so need this special treatment too. Finally, remove some
hacks which were working around SubstInitializer's shortcomings.
llvm-svn: 170489
uncovered.
This required manually correcting all of the incorrect main-module
headers I could find, and running the new llvm/utils/sort_includes.py
script over the files.
I also manually added quite a few missing headers that were uncovered by
shuffling the order or moving headers up to be main-module-headers.
llvm-svn: 169237
Richard Smith