In the test, y1 is not reference compatible to y2 and we currently assume
the cast is ill-formed so we emit a diagnostic. Instead, in order to honour
the standard, if y1 it's not reference-compatible to y2 then it can't be
converted using a static_cast, and a reinterpret_cast should be tried instead.
Richard Smith provided the correct interpretation of the standard and
explanation about the subtle difference between "can't be cast" and "the cast
is ill-formed". The former applies in this case.
PR: 23802
llvm-svn: 241998
an existing using shadow declaration if they define entities of the same kind
in different namespaces.
We'd previously check this consistently if the using-declaration came after the
other declaration, but not if it came before.
llvm-svn: 241428
This patch fixes a crash caused by the following case:
template<typename T>
auto f(T x) {
auto g = [](auto ... args) {
auto h = [args...]() -> int {
return 0;
};
return h;
};
return g;
}
auto x = f(0)();
When the templated function 'f' is instantiated and the inner-most
lambda is transformed the ellipsis location on the captured variable
is lost. Then the lambda returned by 'f' is instantiated and the
tree transformer chokes on the invalid ellipsis location. The
problem is fixed by making a minor change to properly track the
ellipsis location.
This fixes PR23716.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10590
llvm-svn: 240740
In certain cases, the tree transform would introduce new TypoExprs while
trying one of the corrections, invalidating the unique_ptr in the state
reference, and also causing a TypoExpr to exist that will never be
corrected since it doesn't exist in the final corrected expression. The
simple solution to both problems is to temporarily disable typo
correction while handling potentially ambiguous typo corrections.
llvm-svn: 240734
Summary:
This patch reduces duplication in the template argument deduction code
for handling deduction from initializer lists in a function call. This
extends the fix for PR12119 to also apply to the case where the
corresponding parameter is a trailing parameter pack.
Test Plan:
A test for deduction from nested initializer lists where the
corresponding parameter is a trailing parameter pack is added in
`clang/test/SemaCXX/cxx0x-initializer-stdinitializerlist.cpp`.
Reviewers: fraggamuffin, rsmith
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10681
llvm-svn: 240612
Addresses a conflict with glibc's __nonnull macro by renaming the type
nullability qualifiers as follows:
__nonnull -> _Nonnull
__nullable -> _Nullable
__null_unspecified -> _Null_unspecified
This is the major part of rdar://problem/21530726, but does not yet
provide the Darwin-specific behavior for the old names.
llvm-svn: 240596
This generalizes the checking of null arguments to also work with
values of pointer-to-function, reference-to-function, and block
pointer type, using the nullability information within the underling
function prototype to extend non-null checking, and diagnoses returns
of 'nil' within a function with a __nonnull return type.
Note that we don't warn about nil returns from Objective-C methods,
because it's common for Objective-C methods to mimic the nil-swallowing
behavior of the receiver by checking ostensibly non-null parameters
and returning nil from otherwise non-null methods in that
case.
It also diagnoses (via a separate flag) conversions from nullable to
nonnull pointers. It's a separate flag because this warning can be noisy.
llvm-svn: 240153
Introduces the type specifiers __nonnull, __nullable, and
__null_unspecified that describe the nullability of the pointer type
to which the specifier appertains. Nullability type specifiers improve
on the existing nonnull attributes in a few ways:
- They apply to types, so one can represent a pointer to a non-null
pointer, use them in function pointer types, etc.
- As type specifiers, they are syntactically more lightweight than
__attribute__s or [[attribute]]s.
- They can express both the notion of 'should never be null' and
also 'it makes sense for this to be null', and therefore can more
easily catch errors of omission where one forgot to annotate the
nullability of a particular pointer (this will come in a subsequent
patch).
Nullability type specifiers are maintained as type sugar, and
therefore have no effect on mangling, encoding, overloading,
etc. Nonetheless, they will be used for warnings about, e.g., passing
'null' to a method that does not accept it.
This is the C/C++ part of rdar://problem/18868820.
llvm-svn: 240146
If definition of a class is unknown and out-of-line definition of its
member is encountered, do not parse the member declaration.
This change fixes PR18542.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8010
llvm-svn: 239483
Based on previous discussion on the mailing list, clang currently lacks support
for C99 partial re-initialization behavior:
Reference: http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-dev/2013-April/029188.html
Reference: http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/dr_253.htm
This patch attempts to fix this problem.
Given the following code snippet,
struct P1 { char x[6]; };
struct LP1 { struct P1 p1; };
struct LP1 l = { .p1 = { "foo" }, .p1.x[2] = 'x' };
// this example is adapted from the example for "struct fred x[]" in DR-253;
// currently clang produces in l: { "\0\0x" },
// whereas gcc 4.8 produces { "fox" };
// with this fix, clang will also produce: { "fox" };
Differential Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5789
llvm-svn: 239446
The machinery added to permit a static_cast from void-ptr to fn-ptr
unintentionally gets triggered for c-style casts and function-style
casts. The observable effect was a diagnostic issued inappropriately.
llvm-svn: 239382
It is safe to add a dll attribute if the base class template previously only had
an explicit instantiation declaration, or was implicitly instantiated.
I both those cases, the members would not have been codegenned yet. In the case
of explicit instantiation declaration this is natural, and for implicit
instantiations, codegen is deferred (see r225570).
This is work towards fixing PR23770.
llvm-svn: 239373
Don't warn about not being able to propagate dll attribute to a base class template
when that base already has a different attribute.
MSVC doesn't actually try to do this; the first attribute that was propagated
takes precedence, so Clang is already doing the right thing and there's no
need to warn.
(This is a step towards fixing PR21718.)
llvm-svn: 239372
It's better not to rely on the diagnostics engine to pretty print the
argument to decltype. Instead, exercise the functionality in
DeclPrinterTest.
llvm-svn: 239197
We would crash in the DeclPrinter trying to pretty-print the
static_assert message. C++1z-style assertions don't have a message so
we would crash.
This fixes PR23756.
llvm-svn: 239170
The MSVC 2013 and 2015 implementation of std::atomic is specialized for
pointer types. The member functions are implemented using a static_cast
from void-ptr to function-ptr which is not allowed in the standard.
Permit this conversion if -fms-compatibility is present.
This fixes PR23733.
llvm-svn: 238877
this fixes http://llvm.org/PR17424
fillAttributedTypeLoc() function is only called with AttributeLists of either
DeclarationChunk (which is used for each type in a declarator being parsed) or
DeclSpec (which captures information about declaration specifiers).
As C++11 attributes actually appertain to declarators, they are moved straight
to the declarator’s attr list in distributeFunctionTypeAttrFromDeclSpec()
function.
'Put them wherever you like' semantics is not supported for C++11 attributes
(but is allowed for GNU attributes, for example). So when we meet an attribute
while parsing the declaration, we cannot be sure if it appertains to either
DeclarationChunk or DeclSpec.
This investigation correlates with the history of changes of SemaType.cpp:
• Asserts in fillAttributedTypeLoc() were added on 3 Mar 2011 in r126986
(http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-commits/Week-of-Mon-
20110228/039638.html);
• Distributing C++11 attrs to the declarator was added on 14 Jan 2013
in r172504 (http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-commits/Week-of-Mon-
20130114/071830.html).
Considering all written above I changed asserts in fillAttributedTypeLoc()
to nullptr checks.
This fixes PR17424 and related assertion on
[[gnu::fastcall]] void __stdcall foo();
Author: Alexey Frolov
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9288
llvm-svn: 238550
When checking if a function is noreturn, consider a codepath to be noreturn if
the path destroys a class and the class destructor, base class destructors, or
member field destructors are marked noreturn.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9454
llvm-svn: 238382
Note: __declspec is also temporarily enabled when compiling for a CUDA target because there are implementation details relying on __declspec(property) support currently. When those details change, __declspec should be disabled for CUDA targets.
llvm-svn: 238238
Emit warning when operand to `delete` is allocated with `new[]` or
operand to `delete[]` is allocated with `new`.
rev 2 update:
`getNewExprFromInitListOrExpr` should return `dyn_cast_or_null`
instead of `dyn_cast`, since `E` might be null.
Reviewers: rtrieu, jordan_rose, rsmith
Subscribers: majnemer, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4661
llvm-svn: 237608
The error has the form ... 'int' ... 'const int' ... dropped qualifiers. At
first glance, it appears that the const qualifier is added. Reverse the types
so that the second type is less qualified than the first.
llvm-svn: 237482
This reverts commit 742dc9b6c9686ab52860b7da39c3a126d8a97fbc.
This is generating multiple segfaults in our internal builds.
Test case coming up shortly.
llvm-svn: 237391
Emit warning when operand to `delete` is allocated with `new[]` or
operand to `delete[]` is allocated with `new`.
Reviewers: rtrieu, jordan_rose, rsmith
Subscribers: majnemer, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4661
llvm-svn: 237368
A LambdaCapture does not have sufficient information
to correctly determine whether it is an init-capture or not.
Doing so requires knowledge held in the LambdaExpr itself.
It the case of a nested capture of an init-capture it is not
sufficient to check (as LambdaCapture::isInitCapture did)
whether the associated VarDecl was from an init-capture.
This patch moves isInitCapture to LambdaExpr and updates
Capture->isInitCapture() to Lambda->isInitCapture(Capture).
llvm-svn: 236760
This is needed to prevent a TypoExpr from being corrected to a variable
when the TypoExpr is a subexpression of that variable's initializer.
Also exclude more keywords from the correction candidate pool when the
subsequent token is .* or ->* since keywords like "new" or "return"
aren't valid on the left side of those operators.
Fixes PR23140.
llvm-svn: 236519
The LHS was already being corrected before being set to ExprError when
the RHS is invalid, but when it was present the middle of a ternary
expression would be dropped in the error paths.
Fixes PR23350.
llvm-svn: 236347
-Wpessimizing-move warns when a call to std::move would prevent copy elision
if the argument was not wrapped in a call. This happens when moving a local
variable in a return statement when the variable is the same type as the
return type or using a move to create a new object from a temporary object.
-Wredundant-move warns when an implicit move would already be made, so the
std::move call is not needed, such as when moving a local variable in a return
that is different from the return type.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7633
llvm-svn: 236075
Previously we'd try to perform checks on the captures from the middle of
parsing the lambda's body, at the point where we detected that a variable
needed to be captured. This was wrong in a number of subtle ways. In
PR23334, we couldn't correctly handle the list of potential odr-uses
resulting from the capture, and our attempt to recover from that resulted
in a use-after-free.
We now defer building the initialization expression until we leave the lambda
body and return to the enclosing context, where the initialization does the
right thing. This patch only covers lambda-expressions, but we should apply
the same change to blocks and captured statements too.
llvm-svn: 235921
We could probably make this work if we cared enough. However, we are
far outside any language rules at this point.
This fixes PR21834.
llvm-svn: 235818
For example, a function taking a parameter with internal linkage will
itself have internal linkage since it cannot be called outside the
translation unit.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9182
llvm-svn: 235471
Davide Italiano