This allows us to better reason about status objects, like Clang's own
llvm::Optional (when its contents are trivially destructible), which are
often intended to be passed around by value.
We still don't inline constructors for temporaries in the general case.
<rdar://problem/11986434>
llvm-svn: 162681
The implicit global allocation functions do not have valid source locations,
but we still want to treat them as being "system header" functions for the
purposes of how they affect program state.
llvm-svn: 159160
Per Anna's comment, this is a better way to handle "to-do list"-type failures.
This way we'll know if any of the features get fixed; in an XFAIL file, /all/
the cases have to be fixed before lit would tell us anything.
llvm-svn: 158791
The default global placement new just returns the pointer it is given.
Note that other custom 'new' implementations with placement args are not
guaranteed to do this.
In addition, we need to invalidate placement args, since they may be updated by
the allocator function. (Also, right now we don't properly handle the
constructor inside a CXXNewExpr, so we need to invalidate the placement args
just so that callers know something changed!)
This invalidation is not perfect because CallOrObjCMessage doesn't support
CXXNewExpr, and all of our invalidation callbacks expect that if there's no
CallOrObjCMessage, the invalidation is happening manually (e.g. by a direct
assignment) and shouldn't affect checker-specific metadata (like malloc state);
hence the malloc test case in new-fail.cpp. But region values are now
properly invalidated, at least.
The long-term solution to this problem is to rework CallOrObjCMessage into
something more general, rather than the morass of branches it is today.
<rdar://problem/11679031>
llvm-svn: 158784
Holding the constructor directly makes no sense when list-initialized arrays come into play. The constructor is now held in a CXXConstructExpr, if construction is what is done. The new design can also distinguish properly between list-initialization and direct-initialization, as well as implicit default-initialization constructors and explicit value-initialization constructors. Finally, doing it this way removes redundance from the AST because CXXNewExpr doesn't try to handle both the allocation and the initialization responsibilities.
This breaks the static analysis of new expressions. I've filed PR12014 to track this.
llvm-svn: 150682
Jordan Rose