A trailing deferred region isn't necessary in a function that ends with
this pattern:
...
else {
...
return;
}
Special-case this pattern so that the closing curly brace of the
function isn't marked as uncovered. This issue came up in PR34962.
llvm-svn: 315982
This makes it possible to view sub-line region counts for the l.h.s of
&& and || expressions in coverage reports.
It also fixes PR33465, which shows an example of incorrect coverage
output for an assignment statement containing '||'.
llvm-svn: 315979
As a special case, throw away deferred regions for trailing returns.
This allows the closing curly brace to have a count, and is less
distracting.
llvm-svn: 313603
This patch teaches the preprocessor to report more precise source ranges for
code that is skipped due to conditional directives.
The new behavior includes the '#' from the opening directive and the full text
of the line containing the closing directive in the skipped area. This matches
up clang's behavior (we don't IRGen the code between the closing "endif" and
the end of a line).
This also affects the code coverage implementation. See llvm.org/PR34166 (this
also happens to be rdar://problem/23224058).
The old behavior (report the end of the skipped range as the end
location of the 'endif' token) is preserved for indexing clients.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36642
llvm-svn: 312947
The current coverage implementation doesn't handle region termination
very precisely. Take for example an `if' statement with a `return':
void f() {
if (true) {
return; // The `if' body's region is terminated here.
}
// This line gets the same coverage as the `if' condition.
}
If the function `f' is called, the line containing the comment will be
marked as having executed once, which is not correct.
The solution here is to create a deferred region after terminating a
region. The deferred region is completed once the start location of the
next statement is known, and is then pushed onto the region stack.
In the cases where it's not possible to complete a deferred region, it
can safely be dropped.
Testing: lit test updates, a stage2 coverage-enabled build of clang
This is a reapplication but there are no changes from the original commit.
With D36813, the segment builder in llvm will be able to handle deferred
regions correctly.
llvm-svn: 312818
The code after a noreturn call doesn't execute.
The pattern in the testcase is pretty common in LLVM (a switch with
a default case that calls llvm_unreachable).
The original version of this patch was reverted in r309995 due to a
crash. This version includes a fix for that crash (testcase in
test/CoverageMapping/md.cpp).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36250
llvm-svn: 310406
This reverts commit r310010. I don't think there's anything wrong with
this commit, but it's causing clang to generate output that llvm-cov
doesn't do a good job with and the fix isn't immediately clear.
See Eli's comment in D36250 for more context.
I'm reverting the clang change so the coverage bot can revert back to
producing sensible output, and to give myself some time to investigate
what went wrong in llvm.
llvm-svn: 310154
The current coverage implementation doesn't handle region termination
very precisely. Take for example an `if' statement with a `return':
void f() {
if (true) {
return; // The `if' body's region is terminated here.
}
// This line gets the same coverage as the `if' condition.
}
If the function `f' is called, the line containing the comment will be
marked as having executed once, which is not correct.
The solution here is to create a deferred region after terminating a
region. The deferred region is completed once the start location of the
next statement is known, and is then pushed onto the region stack.
In the cases where it's not possible to complete a deferred region, it
can safely be dropped.
Testing: lit test updates, a stage2 coverage-enabled build of clang
llvm-svn: 310010
The code after a noreturn call doesn't execute.
The pattern in the testcase is pretty common in LLVM (a switch with
a default case that calls llvm_unreachable).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36250
llvm-svn: 309995
We never overwrite the end location of a region, so we would end up with
an overly large region when we reused the switch's region.
It's possible this code will be substantially rewritten in the near
future to deal with fallthrough more accurately, but this seems like
an improvement on its own for now.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34801
llvm-svn: 309901
The fixed code is basically identical to the same loop below, which
might indicate an opportunity for refactoring. I just wanted to fix
the use-of-temporary issue.
Caught by adding a similar check to StringRef as r283798 did for
ArrayRef. I'll be upstreaming that soon.
Reviewed by Vedant Kumar as https://reviews.llvm.org/D26317.
llvm-svn: 286122
This patch fixes a regression introduced in r262697 that changed the way the
coverage regions for switches are constructed. The PGO instrumentation counter
for a switch statement refers to the counter at the exit of the switch.
Therefore, the coverage region for the switch statement should cover the code
that comes after the switch, and not the switch statement itself.
rdar://28480997
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24981
llvm-svn: 282554
In most cases these code regions are just redundant, but sometimes they
could be assigned to the counter of the parent code region instead of
the counter of the nested block.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23987
llvm-svn: 280199
If there were several nested statements arranged in a way that all of them
end up with the same macro, then the expansion of this macro was assigned
with all the corresponding counters of these statements.
As a result, the wrong counter value was shown for the macro in llvm-cov.
This patch fixes the issue by preventing adding a counter for an expanded
source range if it already has an assigned counter, which is expected
to come from the most specific statement.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23160
llvm-svn: 279962
After r275121, we stopped mapping regions from system headers. Lambdas
declared in regions belonging to system headers started producing empty
coverage mappings, since the files corresponding to their spelling locs
were being ignored.
The coverage reader doesn't know what to do with these empty mappings.
This commit makes sure that we don't produce them and adds a test. I'll
make the reader stricter in a follow-up commit.
llvm-svn: 276716
This fixes the issue of having duplicate entries for the same file in a
coverage report s.t none of the entries actually displayed the correct
coverage information.
llvm-svn: 275913
Do not assign source regions located within system headers file ID's,
and do not construct counter mapping regions out of them.
This makes coverage reports less cluttered and less mysterious. E.g
using the "assert" macro doesn't cause assert.h to appear in reports,
and it no longer shows the "assertion failed" branch as an uncovered
region.
It also makes coverage mapping sections a bit smaller (e.g a 1%
reduction in a stage2 build of bin/llvm-as).
llvm-svn: 275121
This reverts commit 161ff9db3a3d0d62880d1cb18d58182cd3034912 (r273056).
This is breaking stage2 instrumented builds with "malformed coverage
data" errors.
llvm-svn: 274104
Push a new region for the try block and propagate execution counts
through it. This ensures that catch statements get a region counter
distinct from the try block's counter.
llvm-svn: 273463
We have an assertion failure if, for example, the definition of an unused
inline function starts in one macro and ends in another. This patch fixes
the issue by finding the common ancestor of the start and end locations
of that function's body and changing the locations accordingly.
Thanks to NAKAMURA Takumi for helping with fixing the test failure on Windows.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20997
llvm-svn: 271995
We have an assertion failure if, for example, the definition of an unused
inline function starts in one macro and ends in another. This patch fixes
the issue by finding the common ancestor of the start and end locations
of that function's body and changing the locations accordingly.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20997
llvm-svn: 271969
I added this call in r271308. It's redundant because it's dominated by a
call to extendRegion().
Thanks to Justin Bogner for pointing this out!
llvm-svn: 271331
The issue happened when a macro contained a full for or
while statement, which body ended at the end of the macro.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19725
llvm-svn: 268511
While pushing switch statements onto the region stack we neglected to
specify their start/end locations. This results in a crash (PR26825) if
we end up in nested macro expansions without enough information to
handle the relevant file exits.
I added a test in switchmacro.c and fixed up a bunch of incorrect CHECK
lines that specify strange end locations for switches.
llvm-svn: 262697
When handling 'if' statements, we crash if the condition and the consequent
branch are spanned by a single macro expansion.
The crash occurs because of a sanity 'reset' in popRegions(): if an expansion
exactly spans an entire region, we set MostRecentLocation to the start of the
expansion (its 'include location'). This ensures we don't handleFileExit()
ourselves out of the expansion before we're done processing all of the regions
within it. This is tested in test/CoverageMapping/macro-expressions.c.
This causes a problem when an expansion spans both the condition and the
consequent branch of an 'if' statement. MostRecentLocation is updated to the
start of the 'if' statement in popRegions(), so the file for the expansion
isn't exited by the time we're done handling the statement. We then crash with
'fatal: File exit not handled before popRegions'.
The fix for this is to detect these kinds of expansions, and conservatively
update MostRecentLocation to the end of expansion region containing the
conditional. I've added tests to make sure we don't have the same problem with
other kinds of statements.
rdar://problem/23630316
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16934
llvm-svn: 260129
Replace a string append operation in addFunctionMappingRecord with a
vector append. The existing behavior is quadratic in the worst case:
this patch makes it linear.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16395
llvm-svn: 258424
Coverage mapping data may reference names of functions
that are skipped by FE (e.g, unused inline functions). Since
those functions are skipped, normal instr-prof function lowering
pass won't put those names in the right section, so special
handling is needed to walk through coverage mapping structure
and recollect the references.
With this patch, only names that are skipped are processed. This
simplifies the lowering code and it no longer needs to make
assumptions coverage mapping data layout. It should also be
more efficient.
llvm-svn: 257092
This is one last remaining instrumentatation related structure
that needs to be migrate to use the centralized template
definition. With this change, instrumentation code
related to coverage module header will be kept in sync
with the coverage mapping reader. The remaining code
which makes implicit assumption about covmap control
structure layout in the the lowering pass will cleaned
up in a different patch. This patch is not intended to
have no functional change.
llvm-svn: 256714
Vedant Kumar