Summary:
It's not necessary to use an 'l'(ell) modifier when referencing a label.
Treat block addresses and MBB references as if the modifier is used
anyway. This prevents us from generating references to ficticious
labels.
Reviewers: jyknight, nickdesaulniers, hfinkel
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71849
We use o suffix to indicate record form instuctions,
(as it is similar to dot '.' in mne?)
This was fine before, as we did not support XO-form.
However, with https://reviews.llvm.org/D66902,
we now have XO-form support.
It becomes confusing now to still use 'o' for record form,
and it is weird to have something like 'Oo' .
This patch rename all 'o' instructions to use '_rec' instead.
Also rename `isDot` to `isRecordForm`.
Reviewed By: #powerpc, hfinkel, nemanjai, steven.zhang, lkail
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70758
This would complain about invalid legalizer rules otherwise.
Mark some operations as unsupported for AMDGPU. This currently seems
to produce the same legalize error as when no rules are defined, but
eventually this should produce a proper user facing error.
The existing test only covered one case for r600. The use of
mul_legacy also looks suspicious to me, but leave it for now. The
patterns are also not making use of source modifiers.
A random set of attributes are implemented by llc/opt forcing the
string attributes on the IR functions before processing anything. This
would not happen for MIR functions, which have not yet been created at
this point.
Use a callback in the MIR parser, purely to avoid dealing with the
ugliness that the command line flags are in a .inc file, and would
require allowing access to these flags from multiple places (either
from the MIR parser directly, or a new utility pass to implement these
flags). It would probably be better to cleanup the flag handling into
a separate library.
This is in preparation for treating more command line flags with a
corresponding function attribute in a more uniform way. The fast math
flags in particular have a messy system where the command line flag
sets the behavior from a function attribute if present, and otherwise
the command line flag. This means if any other pass tries to inspect
the function attributes directly, it will be inconsistent with the
intended behavior. This is also inconsistent with the current behavior
of -mcpu and -mattr, which overwrites any pre-existing function
attributes. I would like to move this to consistenly have the command
line flags not overwrite any pre-existing attributes, and to always
ensure the command line flags are consistent with the function
attributes.
This patch adds widening which really just scalarizes because we don't have a strategy for the extra elements we would need to pad with.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72193
Summary:
This never really occurs in the current codegen, so only a MIR test is
possible.
Reviewers: ostannard, pcc
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72123
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D67148, we use isFloatTy to test floating
point type, otherwise we return GPRRC.
So 'double' will be classified as GPRRC, which is not accurate.
This patch covers other floating point types.
Reviewed By: #powerpc, nemanjai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71946
The segmented stack lowering code appears to be using ARM opcodes under
Thumb2. The MRC opcode will be the same for Thumb and ARM, but t2LDR
seems wrong. Either way, using the correct thumb vs arm opcodes is more
correct.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72074
We were previously unconditionally using the ARM::TRAP opcode, even
under Thumb. My understanding is that these are essentially the same
thing (they both result in a trap under Thumb), but the ARM::TRAP opcode
is marked as requiring IsARM, so it is more correct to use ARM::tTRAP.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72075
SUMMARY:
We currently emit a reference for function address constants as labels;
for example:
foo_ptr:
.long foo
however, there may be no such label in the case where the function is
undefined. Although the label exists when the function is defined, we
will (to be consistent) also use a csect reference in that case.
Reviewers: daltenty,hubert.reinterpretcast,jasonliu,Xiangling_L
Subscribers: cebowleratibm, wuzish, nemanjai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71144
Summary:
Running an end-to-end test last week I noticed that a lot of the ACLE
intrinsics that operate differently on vectors of signed and unsigned
integers were ending up generating the signed version of the
instruction unconditionally. This is because the IR intrinsics had no
way to distinguish signed from unsigned: the LLVM type system just
calls them both `v8i16` (or whatever), so you need either separate
intrinsics for signed and unsigned, or a flag parameter that tells
ISel which one to choose.
This patch fixes all the problems of that kind that I've noticed, by
adding an i32 flag parameter to many of the IR intrinsics which is set
to 1 for unsigned (matching the existing practice in cases where we
got it right), and conditioning all the isel patterns on that flag. So
the fundamental change is in `IntrinsicsARM.td`, changing the
low-level IR intrinsics API; there are knock-on changes in
`arm_mve.td` (adjusting code gen for the ACLE intrinsics to use the
modified API) and in `ARMInstrMVE.td` (adjusting isel to expect the
new unsigned flags). The rest of this patch is boringly updating tests.
Reviewers: dmgreen, miyuki, MarkMurrayARM
Reviewed By: dmgreen
Subscribers: kristof.beyls, hiraditya, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72270
Summary:
The ACLE intrinsics with `gather_base` or `scatter_base` in the name
are wrappers on the MVE load/store instructions that take a vector of
base addresses and an immediate offset. The immediate offset can be up
to 127 times the alignment unit, and it can be positive or negative.
At the MC layer, we got that right. But in the Sema error checking for
the wrapping intrinsics, the offset was erroneously constrained to be
positive.
To fix this I've adjusted the `imm_mem7bit` class in the Tablegen that
defines the intrinsics. But that causes integer literals like
`0xfffffffffffffe04` to appear in the autogenerated calls to
`SemaBuiltinConstantArgRange`, which provokes a compiler warning
because that's out of the non-overflowing range of an `int64_t`. So
I've also tweaked `MveEmitter` to emit that as `-0x1fc` instead.
Updated the tests of the Sema checks themselves, and also adjusted a
random sample of the CodeGen tests to actually use negative offsets
and prove they get all the way through code generation without causing
a crash.
Reviewers: dmgreen, miyuki, MarkMurrayARM
Reviewed By: dmgreen
Subscribers: kristof.beyls, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72268
Summary:
Due to a copy-paste error in the isel patterns, the predicated version
of this intrinsic was expanding to the `VMAXNMT.F32` instruction
instead of `VMAXNMT.F16`. Similarly for vminnm.
Reviewers: dmgreen, miyuki, MarkMurrayARM
Reviewed By: dmgreen
Subscribers: kristof.beyls, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72269
This assumed a 32-bit extract size, which would produce invalid copies
with 64-bit extracts. Handle the easy case. Ideally we would have a
way to get the proper subreg index for any 32-bit offset, but there
should probably be a tablegenerated way of getting the subreg index
for any size and offset.
Summary:
Make `AAMDNodes`' `getAAMetadata()` and `setAAMetadata()` to take `!tbaa.struct`
into account as well as `!tbaa`. This impacts llvm.org/pr42022.
This is a temprorary fix needed to keep `!tbaa.struct` tag by SROA pass.
New field `TBAAStruct` should be deleted when `!tbaa` tag replaces `!tbaa.struct`.
Merging two `!tbaa.struct`'s to one is conservatively considered to be `nullptr`
(giving `MayAlias`) -- this could be enhanced, but relying on the said future
replacement.
Reviewers: RKSimon, spatel, vporpo
Subscribers: hiraditya, kosarev, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70924
This is the DAG node for SIGN_EXTEND_INREG :
t21: v4i32 = sign_extend_inreg t18, ValueType:ch:v4i16
It has two operands. The first one is the value it want to extend, and the second
one is the type to specify how to extend the value. For this example, it means
that, it is signed extend the t18(v4i32) from v4i16 to v4i32. That is
the semantics of c code:
vector int foo(vector int m) {
return m << 16 >> 16;
}
And it could be any vector type that hardware support the operation, though
the type 'v4i16' is NOT legal for the target. When we are trying to combine
the srl + sra, what we did now is calling the TLI.isOperationLegal(), which
will also check the legality of the type. That doesn't make sense.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70230
Summary:
Based on Simon's D52965, but improved to handle strict fp and improve some of the shuffling.
Rather than use v2i1/v4i1 and let type legalization continue, just generate all the code with legal types and use an explicit shuffle.
I also added an explicit setcc to the v4i64 code to match the semantics of vselect which doesn't just use the sign bit. I'm also using a v4i64->v4i32 truncate instead of the shuffle in Simon's original code. With the setcc this will become a pack.
Future work can look into using X86ISD::BLENDV and a different shuffle that only moves the sign bit.
Reviewers: RKSimon, spatel
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71956
Summary:
In addMustTailToCoroResumes, we set musttail on those resume instructions that are followed by a ret instruction. This is done by simplifyTerminatorLeadingToRet which replace a sequence of branches leading to a ret with a clone of the ret.
However it forgets to remove corresponding PHI values that come from basic block of replaced branch, and may cause jumpthreading pass hangs (https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43720)
This patch fix this issue
Test Plan:
cppcoro library with O3+flto
check-llvm
Reviewers: modocache, GorNishanov, lewissbaker
Reviewed By: modocache
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, EricWF, hiraditya, dexonsmith, jfb, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71826
Patch by junparser (JunMa)!
Attempt to use combineLogicBlendIntoConditionalNegate for (select M, (sub 0, X), X) -> (sub (xor X, M), M)
We limit this to cases that can't easily replace the VSELECT with a shuffle (non-constant masks) or where a BLENDV is likely to occur (which tends to result in slower codegen).
This adds extra scalar handling to isFMAFasterThanFMulAndFAdd, allowing
the target independent code to handle more folds in more situations (for
example if the fast math flags are present, but the global
AllowFPOpFusion option isnt). It also splits apart the HasSlowFPVMLx
into HasSlowFPVFMx, to allow VFMA and VMLA to be controlled separately
if needed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72139
The code here isn't great in all caess. Particularly v4f64->v4i32
on 64-bit AVX targets. But there is some improvement in some
configurations.
There's definitely some issues with computeNumSignBits with
X86ISD::STRICT_FCMP. As well as not being able to propagate sign
bits through merge_values nodes that get created during custom
legalization.
This produces more intelligible looking results, more comparabble to
the DAG output in the simplest cases. This is probably wrong in
complex control flow, but RegBankSelect doesn't attempt analyzing if
this is on a masked path for selecting the bank yet.
Summary:
For artificial cases (huge array, few usages), Global SRA optimization creates
a lot of redundant data. It creates an instance of GlobalVariable for each array
element. For huge array, that means huge compilation time and huge memory usage.
Following example compiles for 10 minutes and requires 40GB of memory.
namespace {
char LargeBuffer[64 * 1024 * 1024];
}
int main ( void ) {
LargeBuffer[0] = 0;
printf("\n ");
return LargeBuffer[0] == 0;
}
The fix is to avoid Global SRA for large arrays.
Reviewers: craig.topper, rnk, efriedma, fhahn
Reviewed By: rnk
Subscribers: xbolva00, lebedev.ri, lkail, merge_guards_bot, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71993
This patch attempts to peek through vectors based on the demanded bits/elt of a particular ISD::EXTRACT_VECTOR_ELT node, allowing us to avoid dependencies on ops that have no impact on the extract.
In particular this helps remove some unnecessary scalar->vector->scalar patterns.
The wasm shift patterns are annoying - @tlively has indicated that the wasm vector shift codegen are to be refactored in the near-term and isn't considered a major issue.
Reapplied after reversion at rL368660 due to PR42982 which was fixed at rGca7fdd41bda0.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65887
This represents a more realistic version of the code being tested.
The cmov converter doesn't look at the code after the loop so
it doesn't matter for what's being tested.
But as noted in this twitter thread https://twitter.com/trav_downs/status/1213311159413161987
gcc can turn the previous MaxIndex code into the MaxValue code. So
returning the index makes it a distinct case.
All the windows bots are failing match-tree.td and there's no obvious cause that
I can see. It's not just the %p formatting problem. My best guess is that
there's an ordering issue too but I'll need further information to figure that
out. Revert while I'm investigating.
This reverts commit 64f1bb5cd2 and 77d4b5f5fe
Static archives contain object files which contain sections pointing to
external remark files.
When static archives are shipped without the remark files, dsymutil
shouldn't generate an error.
Instead, generate a warning to inform the user that remarks for that
library won't be available in the .dSYM.
Summary:
GIMatchTree's job is to build a decision tree by zipping all the
GIMatchDag's together.
Each DAG is added to the tree builder as a leaf and partitioners are used
to subdivide each node until there are no more partitioners to apply. At
this point, the code generator is responsible for testing any untested
predicates and following any unvisited traversals (there shouldn't be any
of the latter as the getVRegDef partitioner handles them all).
Note that the leaves don't always fit into partitions cleanly and the
partitions may overlap as a result. This is resolved by cloning the leaf
into every partition it belongs to. One example of this is a rule that can
match one of N opcodes. The leaf for this rule would end up in N partitions
when processed by the opcode partitioner. A similar example is the
getVRegDef partitioner where having rules (add $a, $b), and (add ($a, $b), $c)
will result in the former being in the partition for successfully
following the vreg-def and failing to do so as it doesn't care which
happens.
Depends on D69151
Reviewers: bogner, volkan
Reviewed By: volkan
Subscribers: lkail, mgorny, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69152
This uses an alternative implementation of this conversion derived
from our v2i32->v2f32 handling. We can zero extend the v2i32 to
v2i64, or it with the bit representation of 2.0^52 which will give
us 2.0^52 plus the 32-bit integer since double's mantissa is 52 bits.
Then we just need to subtract 2.0^52 as a double and let the floating
point unit normalize the remaining bits into a valid double.
This is less instructions then our previous code, but does require
a port 5 shuffle for the zero extend or unpack.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71945
When the "disable-tail-calls" attribute was added, checks were added for
it in various backends. Now this code has proliferated, and it is
something the target is responsible for checking. Move that
responsibility back to the ISels (fast, global, and SD).
There's no major functionality change, except for targets that never
implemented this check.
This LLVM attribute was originally added in
d9699bc7bd (2015).
Reviewers: echristo, MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72118
Name: (X & (- Y)) - X -> - (X & (Y - 1)) (PR44448)
%negy = sub i8 0, %y
%unbiasedx = and i8 %negy, %x
%r = sub i8 %unbiasedx, %x
=>
%ymask = add i8 %y, -1
%xmasked = and i8 %ymask, %x
%r = sub i8 0, %xmasked
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/OIpla
This decreases use count of %x, may allow us to
later hoist said negation even further,
and results in marginally nicer X86 codegen.
See
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44448https://reviews.llvm.org/D71499
If we replace a function with a new one because we rewrite the
signature, dead users may still refer to the old version. With this
patch we reuse the code that deals with dead functions, which the old
versions are, to avoid problems.
An inbounds GEP results in poison if the value is not "inbounds", not in
UB. We accidentally derived nonnull and dereferenceable from these
inbounds GEPs even in the absence of accesses that would make the poison
to UB.
The fold 'A - (A & (B - 1))' -> 'A & (0 - B)'
added in 8dab0a4a7d
is too specific. It should/can just be 'A - (A & B)' -> 'A & (~B)'
Even if we don't manage to fold `~` into B,
we have likely formed `ANDN` node.
Also, this way there's less similar-but-duplicate folds.
Name: X - (X & Y) -> X & (~Y)
%o = and i32 %X, %Y
%r = sub i32 %X, %o
=>
%n = xor i32 %Y, -1
%r = and i32 %X, %n
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/kOUl
See
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44448https://reviews.llvm.org/D71499
The fold 'A - (A & (B - 1))' -> 'A & (0 - B)'
added in 8dab0a4a7d
is too specific. It should just be 'A - (A & B)' -> 'A & (~B)',
but we currently fail to sink that '~' into `(B - 1)`.
Name: ~(X - 1) -> (0 - X)
%o = add i32 %X, -1
%r = xor i32 %o, -1
=>
%r = sub i32 0, %X
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/rjU
The fold 'A - (A & (B - 1))' -> 'A & (0 - B)'
added in 8dab0a4a7d
is too specific. It should just be 'A - (A & B)' -> 'A & (~B)',
but we currently fail to sink that '~' into `(B - 1)`.
Name: ~(X - 1) -> (0 - X)
%o = add i32 %X, -1
%r = xor i32 %o, -1
=>
%r = sub i32 0, %X
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/rjU
While we do manage to fold integer-typed IR in middle-end,
we can't do that for the main motivational case of pointers.
There is @llvm.ptrmask() intrinsic which may or may not be helpful,
but i'm not sure it is fully considered canonical yet,
not everything is fully aware of it likely.
Name: PR44448 ptr - (ptr & C) -> ptr & (~C)
%bias = and i32 %ptr, C
%r = sub i32 %ptr, %bias
=>
%r = and i32 %ptr, ~C
See
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44448https://reviews.llvm.org/D71499
Name: PR44448 ptr - (ptr & C) -> ptr & (~C)
%bias = and i32 %ptr, C
%r = sub i32 %ptr, %bias
=>
%r = and i32 %ptr, ~C
The main motivational pattern involes pointer-typed values,
so this transform can't really be done in middle-end.
See
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44448https://reviews.llvm.org/D71499
The patch makes sure that the LastThrowing pointer does not point to any instruction deleted by call to DeleteDeadInstruction.
While iterating through the instructions the pass maintains a pointer to the lastThrowing Instruction. A call to deleteDeadInstruction deletes a dead store and other instructions feeding the original dead instruction which also become dead. The instruction pointed by the lastThrowing pointer could also be deleted by the call to DeleteDeadInstruction and thus it becomes a dangling pointer. Because of this, we see an error in the next iteration.
In the patch, we maintain a list of throwing instructions encountered previously and use the last non deleted throwing instruction from the container.
Reviewers: fhahn, bcahoon, efriedma
Reviewed By: fhahn
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65326
As shown in P44383:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44383
...we can't safely propagate a vector constant through this icmp fold
if that vector constant contains undefined elements.
We know that each defined element of the constant is safe though, so
find the first of those and replicate it into the formerly undef lanes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72101
The V5 directory and filename tables had checks in to make sure we
hadn't read past the end of the line table prologue. Since previous
changes to the data extractor class ensure we never read past the end,
these checks are now redundant, so this patch removes them.
There is still a check to show that the whole prologue remains within
the prologue length.
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71768
This removes the need to duplicate the LASTONLY check pattern and the
last part of the NONFATAL pattern in the modified test.
Reviewed By: MaskRay, JDevlieghere
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71757
The line tables in debug_line_malformed.s had contents that varied more
than was necessary for the testing, making it harder to follow what was
important. This patch normalises them so that they all share
more-or-less the same body. Additionally, it makes the testing for what
was printed more consistent, to show that the right parts of the line
table prologue and body are/are not parsed and printed.
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71755
Some of the tables in debug_line_malformed.s were not being checked in
the NONFATAL checks in debug_line_invalid.test (only the warnings coming
from them were being checked). This made the test harder to follow.
Additionally, a later change will change the way the errors are handled
such that more of the line table will be printed. That will require
checks for these tables (or something equivalent) so that the difference
in behaviour can be observed. This patch adds checks for the three
tables that were missing checks.
Reviewed By: MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71753
While we do manage to fold integer-typed IR in middle-end,
we can't do that for the main motivational case of pointers.
There is @llvm.ptrmask() intrinsic which may or may not be helpful,
but i'm not sure it is fully considered canonical yet,
not everything is fully aware of it likely.
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/ZVdp
Name: ptr - (ptr & (alignment-1)) -> ptr & (0 - alignment)
%mask = add i64 %alignment, -1
%bias = and i64 %ptr, %mask
%r = sub i64 %ptr, %bias
=>
%highbitmask = sub i64 0, %alignment
%r = and i64 %ptr, %highbitmask
See
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44448https://reviews.llvm.org/D71499
Summary: This patch is related to https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42967 and it fixes llvm-size's sysv format output by adding a blank line between archieve members
Reviewers: jhenderson, Jim, MaskRay
Reviewed By: jhenderson, Jim, MaskRay
Subscribers: MaskRay, Jim, rupprecht, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71957
Summary:
We previously disabled this under fast math due to aggressive
reassociation by the machine combiner. But I think we can work
around this by using a FSUB instead of FADD for the first
operation.
This matches the similar algorithm we do for uint_to_fp i64->f64
in TargetLowering::expandUINT_TO_FP. If reassociation hasn't
been a problem for that, hopefully its not a problem here.
Reviewers: RKSimon, spatel, scanon
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71968
For now, we didn't set the default operation action for SIGN_EXTEND_INREG for
vector type, which is 0 by default, that is legal. However, most target didn't
have native instructions to support this opcode. It should be set as expand by
default, as what we did for ANY_EXTEND_VECTOR_INREG.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70000
Summary:
After bugfix the undef value case here, we used more operations to implement inserting vxi1 sub vector into vXi1 vector, I optimize it by use less operations.
The history information at https://reviews.llvm.org/D68311
Reviewers: craig.topper, LuoYuanke, yubing, annita.zhang, pengfei, LiuChen3, RKSimon
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Patch by Xiang Zhang (xiangzhangllvm)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71917
Matt Arsenault