Offsets past the range of single-slash encoding are encoded as base64,
padded to 6 characters, and prefixed with two slashes. This encoding is
undocumented but used by MSVC.
llvm-svn: 201940
This patch removes most of the trivial cases of weak vtables by pinning them to
a single object file. The memory leaks in this version have been fixed. Thanks
Alexey for pointing them out.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2068
Reviewed by Andy
llvm-svn: 195064
This reverts commit r190888, to fix PR17967. The original change wasn't
the right way to get @feat.00 into the object file. The right fix is to
make @feat.00 be a global symbol.
llvm-svn: 195053
This change is incorrect. If you delete virtual destructor of both a base class
and a subclass, then the following code:
Base *foo = new Child();
delete foo;
will not cause the destructor for members of Child class. As a result, I observe
plently of memory leaks. Notable examples I investigated are:
ObjectBuffer and ObjectBufferStream, AttributeImpl and StringSAttributeImpl.
llvm-svn: 194997
This patch removes most of the trivial cases of weak vtables by pinning them to
a single object file.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2068
Reviewed by Andy
llvm-svn: 194865
Summary:
We indicate that the object files are safe by emitting a @feat.00
absolute address symbol. The address is presumably interpreted as a
bitfield of features that the compiler would like to enable. Bit 0 is
documented in the PE COFF spec to opt in to "registered SEH", which is
what /safeseh enables.
LLVM's object files are safe by default because LLVM doesn't know how to
produce SEH handlers.
Reviewers: Bigcheese
CC: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1691
llvm-svn: 190898
In particular, this means we emit non-external symbols defined to
variables, such as aliases or absolute addresses.
This is needed to implement /safeseh, and it appears there was some
confusion about what symbols to emit previously.
llvm-svn: 190888
This is consistent with the ELF object writer.
Add some COFF tests that relocate against an alias.
Reviewers: espindola
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1079
llvm-svn: 186341
Add support for the COFF relocation types IMAGE_REL_I386_DIR32NB and
IMAGE_REL_AMD64_ADDR32NB for 32- and 64-bit respectively. These are
similar to normal 4-byte relocations except that they do not include
the base address of the image.
Image-relative relocations are used for debug information (32-bit) and
SEH unwind tables (64-bit).
A new MCSymbolRef variant called 'VK_COFF_IMGREL32' is introduced to
specify such relocations. For AT&T assembly, this variant can be accessed
using the symbol suffix '@imgrel'.
llvm-svn: 179240
Sooooo many of these had incorrect or strange main module includes.
I have manually inspected all of these, and fixed the main module
include to be the nearest plausible thing I could find. If you own or
care about any of these source files, I encourage you to take some time
and check that these edits were sensible. I can't have broken anything
(I strictly added headers, and reordered them, never removed), but they
may not be the headers you'd really like to identify as containing the
API being implemented.
Many forward declarations and missing includes were added to a header
files to allow them to parse cleanly when included first. The main
module rule does in fact have its merits. =]
llvm-svn: 169131
This needs a test, but it will take some time to figure
out the best way to get an input that will produce > 2^16 relocs.
Patch by Graydon Hoare!
llvm-svn: 152787
actuall addresses in a .o file, so it is better to let the MachO writer compute
it.
This is good for two reasons. First, areas that shouldn't care about
addresses now don't have access to it. Second, the layout of each section
is independent. I should use this in a subsequent commit to speed it up.
Most of the patch is just removing the section address computation. The two
interesting parts are the change on how we handle padding in the end
of sections and how MachO can get the address of a-b when a and b are in
different sections.
Since now the expression evaluation normally doesn't know the section address,
it will think that a-b needs relocation and let the MachO writer know. Once
it has computed the section addresses, it calls back the expression evaluation
with the section addresses to resolve these expressions.
The remaining problem is the handling of padding. Currently it will create
a special alignment fragment at the end. Since that fragment doesn't update
the alignment of the section, it needs the real address to be computed.
Since now the layout will not compute a-b with a and b in different sections,
the only effect that the special alignment fragment has is update the
address size of the section. This can also be done by the MachO writer.
llvm-svn: 121076
Nico Rieck