The following was found by a customer and is accepted by the other primary
C++ compilers, but fails to compile in Clang:
namespace sss {
double foo(int, double);
template <class T>
T foo(T); // note: target of using declaration
} // namespace sss
namespace oad {
void foo();
}
namespace oad {
using ::sss::foo;
}
namespace sss {
using oad::foo; // note: using declaration
}
namespace sss {
double foo(int, double) { return 0; }
template <class T>
T foo(T t) { // error: declaration conflicts with target of using
return t;
}
} // namespace sss
I believe the issue is that MergeFunctionDecl() was calling
checkUsingShadowRedecl() but only considering a FunctionDecl as a
possible shadow and not FunctionTemplateDecl. The changes in this patch
largely mirror how variable declarations were being handled by also
catching FunctionTemplateDecl.
Other compilers accept invalid code here that we reject, and we need a
better error message to try to convince users that the code is really
incorrect. Consider:
class Foo {
typedef MyIterHelper<Foo> iterator;
friend class iterator;
};
Previously our wording was "elaborated type refers to a typedef".
"elaborated type" isn't widely known terminology, so the new diagnostic
says "typedef 'iterator' cannot be referenced with class specifier".
Reviewers: rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25216
llvm-svn: 289259
Summary:
Once a base class has been made invalid (by a static_assert for example) all using-member declarations in the derived classes will result in a "not a base class" diagnostic. This diagnostic is very misleading and should not be emitted.
This change is needed to help libc++ produce reasonable diagnostics in `std::optional` and `std::variant`.
Reviewers: rsmith, majnemer, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25430
llvm-svn: 283755
This is a fix for https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=25561 which was a
crash on invalid. Change the handling of invalid decls to have a catch-all
case to prevent unexpecting decls from triggering an assertion.
llvm-svn: 265467
therefore not creating ElaboratedTypes, which are still pretty-printed
with the written tag).
Most of these testcase changes were done by script, so don't feel too
sorry for my fingers.
llvm-svn: 98149
- This is designed to make it obvious that %clang_cc1 is a "test variable"
which is substituted. It is '%clang_cc1' instead of '%clang -cc1' because it
can be useful to redefine what gets run as 'clang -cc1' (for example, to set
a default target).
llvm-svn: 91446
two classes, one for typenames and one for values; this seems to have some
support from Doug if not necessarily from the extremely-vague-on-this-point
standard. Track the location of the 'typename' keyword in a using-typename
decl. Make a new lookup result for unresolved values and deal with it in
most places.
llvm-svn: 89184
Aaron Ballman