Without any conversion, this is pretty straightforward. Most of the
fields can be zeros. The order is:
- field offset or pointer
- nonvirtual adjustment (for MI functions)
- vbptr offset (for unspecified)
- virtual adjustment offset (for virtual inheritance)
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D699
llvm-svn: 180985
Summary:
Like Itanium, comparisons are basically bitwise comparisons of the two
values, with an exception for null member function pointers. If two
function pointers are null, only the function pointer field matters for
comparison purposes. The rest of the bits can be arbitrary. We take
advantage of this in isZeroInitializable(), and it may matter once we
start emitting conversions.
Reviewers: rjmccall
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D695
llvm-svn: 180800
Summary:
Handles all inheritance models for both data and function member
pointers.
Also implements isZeroInitializable() and refactors some of the null
member pointer code.
MSVC supports converting member pointers through virtual bases, which
clang does not (yet?) support. Implementing that extension is covered
by http://llvm.org/15713
Reviewers: rjmccall
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D613
llvm-svn: 179305
Summary:
For non-dynamic classes (no virtual bases), member data pointers are
simple offsets from the base of the record. Dynamic classes use an
aggregate for member data pointers and are therefore currently
unsupported.
Unlike Itanium, the ms ABI uses 0 to represent null for polymorphic
classes. Non-polymorphic classes use -1 like Itanium, since 0 is a
valid field offset.
Reviewers: rjmccall
CC: timurrrr, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D558
llvm-svn: 177753
Reid Kleckner