Also fix slice wrappers drop_front and drop_back.
The unittests are pretty awkward, but do the job; alternatives
welcome!
..and yes, I do have ArrayRefs with more than 4 billion elements.
llvm-svn: 271546
We have it for StringRef but not ArrayRef, and ArrayRef has drop_back,
so I see no reason it shouldn't have drop_front. Splitting this out of a
change that I have that will use this funcitonality.
llvm-svn: 268434
The purpose is to allow templated wrapper to work with either
ArrayRef or any convertible operation:
template<typename Container>
void wrapper(const Container &Arr) {
impl(makeArrayRef(Arr));
}
with Container being a std::vector, a SmallVector, or an ArrayRef.
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 247214
For example of mingw-w64-g++-4.8.1,
llvm/unittests/ADT/ArrayRefTest.cpp: In member function 'virtual void {anonymous}::ArrayRefTest_AllocatorCopy_Test::TestBody()':
llvm/unittests/ADT/ArrayRefTest.cpp:56:40: internal compiler error: in count_type_elements, at expr.c:5523
} Array3Src[] = {{"hello"}, {"world"}};
^
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
llvm-svn: 244017
With initializer lists there is a really neat idiomatic way to write
this, 'ArrayRef.equals({1, 2, 3, 4, 5})'. Remove the equal method which
always had a hard limit on the number of arguments. I considered
rewriting it with variadic templates but that's not really a good fit
for a function with homogeneous arguments.
'ArrayRef == {1, 2, 3, 4, 5}' would've been even more awesome, but C++11
doesn't allow init lists with binary operators.
llvm-svn: 230907
This appears to have broken at least the windows build bots due to
compile errors in the predicate that didn't simply supress the overload.
I'm not sure what the fix is, and the bots have been broken for a long
time now so I'm just reverting until Michael can figure out a fix.
llvm-svn: 225064
checking whether the ArrayRef is equal to an explicit list of arguments.
This is particularly easy to implement even without variadic templates
because ArrayRef happens to be homogeneously typed. As a consequence we
can use a "clever" wrapper type and default arguments to capture in
a single method many arguments as well as *how many* arguments the user
specified.
Thanks to Dave Blaikie for helping me pull together this little helper.
Suggestions for how to improve or generalize it are of course welcome.
I'll be using it immediately in my follow-up patch. =D
llvm-svn: 214041
The slice(N, M) interface is powerful but not concise when wanting to
drop a few elements off of an ArrayRef, fix this by adding a drop_back
method.
llvm-svn: 212370
Ahmed Bougacha