Commit Graph

100 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Roman Lebedev a5baf86744 AMD BdVer2 (Piledriver) Initial Scheduler model
Summary:
# Overview
This is somewhat partial.
* Latencies are good {F7371125}
  * All of these remaining inconsistencies //appear// to be noise/noisy/flaky.
* NumMicroOps are somewhat good {F7371158}
  * Most of the remaining inconsistencies are from `Ld` / `Ld_ReadAfterLd` classes
* Actual unit occupation (pipes, `ResourceCycles`) are undiscovered lands, i did not really look there.
  They are basically verbatum copy from `btver2`
* Many `InstRW`. And there are still inconsistencies left...

To be noted:
I think this is the first new schedule profile produced with the new next-gen tools like llvm-exegesis!

# Benchmark
I realize that isn't what was suggested, but i'll start with some "internal" public real-world benchmark i understand - [[ https://github.com/darktable-org/rawspeed | RawSpeed raw image decoding library ]].
Diff (the exact clang from trunk without/with this patch):
```
Comparing /home/lebedevri/rawspeed/build-old/src/utilities/rsbench/rsbench to /home/lebedevri/rawspeed/build-new/src/utilities/rsbench/rsbench
Benchmark                                                                                        Time             CPU      Time Old      Time New       CPU Old       CPU New
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                             0.0000          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_mean                              -0.0607         -0.0604           234           219           233           219
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_median                            -0.0630         -0.0626           233           219           233           219
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_stddev                            +0.2581         +0.2587             1             2             1             2
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                             0.0000          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_mean                              -0.0770         -0.0767           144           133           144           133
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_median                            -0.0767         -0.0763           144           133           144           133
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_stddev                            -0.4170         -0.4156             1             0             1             0
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                          0.0000          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean                                           -0.0271         -0.0270           463           450           463           450
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median                                         -0.0093         -0.0093           453           449           453           449
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                         -0.7280         -0.7280            13             4            13             4
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                          0.0004          0.0004      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean                                           -0.0065         -0.0065           569           565           569           565
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median                                         -0.0077         -0.0077           569           564           569           564
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                         +1.0077         +1.0068             2             5             2             5
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                          0.0220          0.0199      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean                                           +0.0006         +0.0007           312           312           312           312
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median                                         +0.0031         +0.0032           311           312           311           312
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                         -0.7069         -0.7072             4             1             4             1
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                          0.0004          0.0004      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_mean                                           -0.0015         -0.0015           141           141           141           141
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_median                                         -0.0010         -0.0011           141           141           141           141
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                         -0.1486         -0.1456             0             0             0             0
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                          0.6139          0.8766      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean                                           -0.0008         -0.0005            60            60            60            60
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median                                         -0.0006         -0.0002            60            60            60            60
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                         -0.1467         -0.1390             0             0             0             0
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                          0.0137          0.0137      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean                                           +0.0002         +0.0002           275           275           275           275
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median                                         -0.0015         -0.0014           275           275           275           275
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                         +3.3687         +3.3587             0             2             0             2
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                     0.4041          0.3933      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_mean                                      +0.0004         +0.0004            67            67            67            67
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_median                                    -0.0000         -0.0000            67            67            67            67
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                    +0.1947         +0.1995             0             0             0             0
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                              0.0074          0.0001      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_mean                               -0.0092         +0.0074           547           542            25            25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_median                             -0.0054         +0.0115           544           541            25            25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_stddev                             -0.4086         -0.3486             8             5             0             0
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                        0.3320          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_mean                                         +0.0015         +0.0204           218           218            12            12
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_median                                       +0.0001         +0.0203           218           218            12            12
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                       +0.2259         +0.2023             1             1             0             0
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                      0.0000          0.0001      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_mean                                       -0.0209         -0.0179            96            94            90            88
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_median                                     -0.0182         -0.0155            95            93            90            88
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                     -0.6164         -0.2703             2             1             2             1
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                     0.0000          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_mean                                      -0.0098         -0.0098           176           175           176           175
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_median                                    -0.0126         -0.0126           176           174           176           174
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                    +6.9789         +6.9157             0             2             0             2
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                 0.0000          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_mean                  -0.0237         -0.0238           474           463           474           463
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_median                -0.0267         -0.0267           473           461           473           461
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_stddev                +0.7179         +0.7178             3             5             3             5
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                   0.6837          0.6554      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_mean                    -0.0014         -0.0013          1375          1373          1375          1373
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_median                  +0.0018         +0.0019          1371          1374          1371          1374
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_stddev                  -0.7457         -0.7382            11             3            10             3
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                        0.0000          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean                                         -0.0080         -0.0289            22            22            10            10
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median                                       -0.0070         -0.0287            22            22            10            10
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                       +1.0977         +0.6614             0             0             0             0
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                       0.0000          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean                                        +0.0132         +0.0967            35            36            10            11
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median                                      +0.0132         +0.0956            35            36            10            11
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                      -0.0407         -0.1695             0             0             0             0
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                      0.0000          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean                                       +0.0331         +0.1307            13            13             6             6
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median                                     +0.0430         +0.1373            12            13             6             6
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                     -0.9006         -0.8847             1             0             0             0
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                            0.0016          0.0010      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_mean                                             -0.0023         -0.0024           395           394           395           394
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_median                                           -0.0029         -0.0030           395           394           395           393
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                           -0.0275         -0.0375             1             1             1             1
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                          0.0232          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_mean                                           -0.0047         +0.0039           114           113            28            28
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_median                                         -0.0050         +0.0037           114           113            28            28
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                         -0.0599         -0.2683             1             1             0             0
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                          0.0000          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_mean                           +0.0206         +0.0207           405           414           405           414
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_median                         +0.0204         +0.0205           405           414           405           414
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_stddev                         +0.2155         +0.2212             1             1             1             1
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                         0.0000          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_mean                          -0.0109         -0.0108           147           145           147           145
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_median                        -0.0104         -0.0103           147           145           147           145
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_stddev                        -0.4919         -0.4800             0             0             0             0
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                         0.0000          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_mean                                          -0.0149         -0.0147           220           217           220           217
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_median                                        -0.0173         -0.0169           221           217           220           217
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                        +1.0337         +1.0341             1             3             1             3
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                         0.0001          0.0001      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_mean                                          -0.0019         -0.0019           194           193           194           193
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_median                                        -0.0021         -0.0021           194           193           194           193
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                        -0.4441         -0.4282             0             0             0             0
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                0.0000          0.4263      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_mean                                 +0.0258         -0.0006            81            83            19            19
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_median                               +0.0235         -0.0011            81            82            19            19
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_stddev                               +0.1634         +0.1070             1             1             0             0
```
{F7443905}
If we look at the `_mean`s, the time column, the biggest win is `-7.7%` (`Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2`),
and the biggest loose is `+3.3%` (`Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2`);
Overall: mean `-0.7436%`, median `-0.23%`, `cbrt(sum(time^3))` = `-8.73%`
Looks good so far i'd say.

llvm-exegesis details:
{F7371117} {F7371125}
{F7371128} {F7371144} {F7371158}

Reviewers: craig.topper, RKSimon, andreadb, courbet, avt77, spatel, GGanesh

Reviewed By: andreadb

Subscribers: javed.absar, gbedwell, jfb, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52779

llvm-svn: 345463
2018-10-27 20:46:30 +00:00
Roman Lebedev a51921877a [NFC][X86] Baseline tests for AMD BdVer2 (Piledriver) Scheduler model
Adding the baseline tests in a preparatory NFC commit,
so that the actual commit shows the *diff*.

Yes, i'm aware that a few of these codegen-based sched tests
are testing wrong instructions, i will fix that afterwards.

For https://reviews.llvm.org/D52779

llvm-svn: 345462
2018-10-27 20:36:11 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim aabd99c27a [X86] PUSH/POP 'mem-mem' instructions are not RMW - these are 2 different addresses
This patch adds a 'WriteCopy' [WriteLoad, WriteStore] schedule sequence instead to better model the behaviour

Found by @andreadb during llvm-mca testing on btver2 which was crashing on "zero uop" WriteRMW only instructions

llvm-svn: 343708
2018-10-03 19:02:38 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim e0d2019052 [X86][Btver2] Fix BT(C|R|S)mr & BT(C|R|S)mi schedule latency + uop counts
Match AMD Fam16h SOG + llvm-exegesis tests

llvm-svn: 343494
2018-10-01 16:31:30 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim f21083870d [X86] Fix scheduler class for BTmi instructions
This wasn't treated as a folded load instruction

llvm-svn: 343424
2018-09-30 20:19:16 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim 17e5981ebf [X86][Btver2] Fix BSF/BSR schedule
Double throughput to account for 2 pipes + fix BSF's latency/uop counts

Match AMD Fam16h SOG + llvm-exegesis tests

llvm-svn: 343311
2018-09-28 10:26:48 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim 19952add7c [X86] Added missing RCL/RCR schedule overrides to the generic SNB model
The SandyBridge model was missing schedule values for the RCL/RCR values - instead using the (incredibly optimistic) WriteShift (now WriteRotate) defaults.

I've added overrides with more realistic (slow) values, based on a mixture of Agner/instlatx64 numbers and what later Intel models do as well.

This is necessary to allow WriteRotate to be updated to remove other rotate overrides.

It'd probably be a good idea to investigate a WriteRotateCarry class at some point but its not high priority given the unusualness of these instructions.

llvm-svn: 342842
2018-09-23 17:40:24 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim 2d0f20cc04 [X86] Handle COPYs of physregs better (regalloc hints)
Enable enableMultipleCopyHints() on X86.

Original Patch by @jonpa:

While enabling the mischeduler for SystemZ, it was discovered that for some reason a test needed one extra seemingly needless COPY (test/CodeGen/SystemZ/call-03.ll). The handling for that is resulted in this patch, which improves the register coalescing by providing not just one copy hint, but a sorted list of copy hints. On SystemZ, this gives ~12500 less register moves on SPEC, as well as marginally less spilling.

Instead of improving just the SystemZ backend, the improvement has been implemented in common-code (calculateSpillWeightAndHint(). This gives a lot of test failures, but since this should be a general improvement I hope that the involved targets will help and review the test updates.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38128

llvm-svn: 342578
2018-09-19 18:59:08 +00:00
Andrew V. Tischenko 62f7a3207b [X86] Improved sched model for X86 CMPXCHG* instructions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50070 

llvm-svn: 341024
2018-08-30 06:26:00 +00:00
Clement Courbet 7b9913fb9f [X86] Add sched class WriteLAHFSAHF and fix values.
Summary:
I ran llvm-exegesis on SKX, SKL, BDW, HSW, SNB.
Atom is from Agner and SLM is a guess.
I've left AMD processors alone.

Reviewers: RKSimon, craig.topper

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48079

llvm-svn: 335097
2018-06-20 06:13:39 +00:00
Clement Courbet 0d9da88d18 [X86] Fix NOOP sched overrides on BDW/HSW/SKL.
Summary: Noop certainly does not use resources.

Reviewers: RKSimon, craig.topper, andreadb

Subscribers: gbedwell, llvm-commits, gchatelet

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48028

llvm-svn: 334927
2018-06-18 06:48:22 +00:00
Clement Courbet 7db69cc08a [X86] Fix skylake server scheduling info.
Summary:
This fixes most of the scheduling info for SKX vector operations.
I had to split a lot of the YMM/ZMM classes into separate classes for YMM and ZMM.

The before/after llvm-exegesis analysis are in the phabricator diff.

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47721

llvm-svn: 334407
2018-06-11 14:37:53 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim 59e915c691 [X86] Fix schedule-x86_64.s tests to use different registers in reg-reg cases
Same fix as rL334110: I noticed while working on zero-idiom + dependency-breaking support (PR36671) that most of our binary instruction schedule tests were reusing the same src registers, which would cause the tests to fail once we enable scalar zero-idiom support on btver2.

llvm-svn: 334302
2018-06-08 16:40:15 +00:00
Sanjay Patel 59313be8d3 [CodeGen] assume max/default throughput for unspecified instructions
This is a fix for the problem arising in D47374 (PR37678):
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37678

We may not have throughput info because it's not specified in the model 
or it's not available with variant scheduling, so assume that those
instructions can execute/complete at max-issue-width.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47723

llvm-svn: 334055
2018-06-05 23:34:45 +00:00
Clement Courbet 07c9ec6f2e [X86][Sched] Add InstRW for CLC on Intel after SNB.
Summary:
After SNB, Intel CPUs can rename CF independently of other EFLAGS,
so the renamer can zero it for free. Note that STC still consumes resources.

To reproduce: `$ llvm-exegesis -mode=uops -opcode-name=CLC`

On SNB:
```
---
key:
  opcode_name:     CLC
  mode:            uops
  config:          ''
cpu_name:        sandybridge
llvm_triple:     x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
num_repetitions: 10000
measurements:
  - { key: '3', value: 0.0014, debug_string: SBPort0 }
  - { key: '4', value: 0.0013, debug_string: SBPort1 }
  - { key: '5', value: 0.0003, debug_string: SBPort4 }
  - { key: '6', value: 0.0029, debug_string: SBPort5 }
  - { key: '10', value: 0.0003, debug_string: SBPort23 }
error:           ''
info:            'instruction is serial, repeating a random one.
Snippet:
CLC
'
...
```

On HSW:
```
---
key:
  opcode_name:     CLC
  mode:            uops
  config:          ''
cpu_name:        haswell
llvm_triple:     x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
num_repetitions: 10000
measurements:
  - { key: '3', value: 0.001, debug_string: HWPort0 }
  - { key: '4', value: 0.0009, debug_string: HWPort1 }
  - { key: '5', value: 0.0004, debug_string: HWPort2 }
  - { key: '6', value: 0.0006, debug_string: HWPort3 }
  - { key: '7', value: 0.0002, debug_string: HWPort4 }
  - { key: '8', value: 0.0012, debug_string: HWPort5 }
  - { key: '9', value: 0.0022, debug_string: HWPort6 }
  - { key: '10', value: 0.0001, debug_string: HWPort7 }
error:           ''
info:            'instruction is serial, repeating a random one.
Snippet:
CLC
'
...

```

Reviewers: craig.topper, RKSimon

Subscribers: gchatelet, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47362

llvm-svn: 333392
2018-05-29 06:19:39 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim b5741f5c3d [X86][BtVer2] ADC/SBB take 2cy on an ALU pipe, not 1cy like ADD/SUB
llvm-svn: 332616
2018-05-17 15:43:23 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim 2864b46469 [X86] Split off WriteIMul64 from WriteIMul schedule class (PR36931)
This fixes a couple of BtVer2 missing instructions that weren't been handled in the override.

NOTE: There are still a lot of overrides that still need cleaning up!
llvm-svn: 331770
2018-05-08 14:55:16 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim 2580554333 [X86] Split WriteIDiv into div/idiv 8/16/32/64 implementations (PR36930)
I've created the necessary classes but there are still a lot of overrides that need cleaning up.

NOTE: The Znver1 model was missing some div/idiv variants in the instregex patterns and wasn't setting the resource cycles at all in the overrides.
llvm-svn: 331767
2018-05-08 13:51:45 +00:00
Craig Topper b5f2659130 [X86] Correct the scheduling data for register forms of XCHG and XADD on Intel CPUs.
The XCHG16rr/XCHG32rr/XCHG64rr instructions should be 3 uops just like XCHG8rr. I believe they're just implemented as 3 move uops with a temporary register.

XADD is probably 2 moves and an add also using a temporary register.

Change the latency for both from 2 cycles to 3 cycles. Only 2 of the uops are serialized in their execution, the move into the temporary and the move out of the temporary. The move from one GPR to the other should be able to go in parallel with this if there are ALU resources available.

llvm-svn: 330349
2018-04-19 18:00:17 +00:00
Craig Topper f846e2d1b1 [X86] Scrub scheduling information for MUL/IMUL on Intel CPUs.
This removes a bunch of unnecessary InstRW overrides. It also cleans up the missing information from the Sandy Bridge model. Other fixes to other models.

llvm-svn: 330308
2018-04-19 05:34:05 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim 8fc2b49620 [X86][Atom] Convert Atom scheduler model to SchedRW (PR32431)
Atom is the only x86 target that still uses schedule itineraries, if we can remove this then we can begin the work on removing x86 itineraries. I've also found that it will help with PR36550.

I've focussed on matching the existing model as closely as possible (relying on the schedule tests), PR36895 indicated a lot of these were incorrect but we can just as easily fix these after this patch as before. Hopefully we can get llvm-exegesis to help here,

There are a few instructions that rely on itinerary scheduling (mainly push/pop/return) of multiple resource stages, but I don't think any of these are show stoppers.

There are also a few codegen changes that seem related to the post-ra scheduler acting a little differently, I haven't tracked these down but they don't seem critical.

NOTE: I don't have access to any Atom hardware, so this hasn't been tested in the wild.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45486

llvm-svn: 329837
2018-04-11 18:23:01 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim 3a8fc92865 [X86] Added missing AAD/AAM immediate schedule tests
Added some more TODOs for missing instructions

llvm-svn: 329626
2018-04-09 21:46:57 +00:00
Craig Topper b7baa358f6 [X86] Add SchedWrites for CMOV and SETCC. Use them to remove InstRWs.
Summary:
Cmov and setcc previously used WriteALU, but on Intel processors at least they are more restricted than basic ALU ops.

This patch adds new SchedWrites for them and removes the InstRWs. I had to leave some InstRWs for CMOVA/CMOVBE and SETA/SETBE because those have an extra uop relative to the other condition codes on Intel CPUs.

The test changes are due to fixing a missing ZnAGU dependency on the memory form of setcc.

Reviewers: RKSimon, andreadb, GGanesh

Reviewed By: RKSimon

Subscribers: GGanesh, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45380

llvm-svn: 329539
2018-04-08 17:53:18 +00:00
Craig Topper f0d042619b [X86] Attempt to model basic arithmetic instructions in the Haswell/Broadwell/Skylake scheduler models without InstRWs
Summary:
This patch removes InstRW overrides for basic arithmetic/logic instructions. To do this I've added the store address port to RMW. And used a WriteSequence to make the latency additive. It does not cover ADC/SBB because they have different latency.

Apparently we were inconsistent about whether the store has latency or not thus the test changes.

I've also left out Sandy Bridge because the load latency there is currently 4 cycles and should be 5.

Reviewers: RKSimon, andreadb

Reviewed By: andreadb

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45351

llvm-svn: 329416
2018-04-06 16:16:48 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim 8a83f16ccd [X86][SandyBridge] SBWriteResPair +5cy Memory Folds
As mentioned on D44647, this patch increases the default memory latency to +5cy , which more closely matches what most custom cases are doing for reg-mem instructions.

I've bumped LoadLatency, ReadAfterLd and WriteLoad values to 5cy to be consistent.

As Sandy Bridge is currently our default generic model, this affects a lot of scheduling tests...

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44654

llvm-svn: 329388
2018-04-06 11:00:51 +00:00
Craig Topper fbe3132f67 [X86] Separate CDQ and CDQE in the scheduler model.
According to Agner's data, CDQE is closer to CWDE.

llvm-svn: 329354
2018-04-05 21:56:19 +00:00
Craig Topper 3b0b96c591 [X86] Add LEAVE instruction to the scheduler models using the same data as LEAVE64. Make LEAVE/LEAVE64 more correct on Sandy Bridge.
This is the 32-bit mode version of LEAVE64. It should be at least somewhat similar to LEAVE64.

The Sandy Bridge version was missing a load port use.

llvm-svn: 329347
2018-04-05 21:16:26 +00:00
Craig Topper c6bb36a3d0 [X86] Remove some InstRWs for plain store instructions on Sandy Bridge.
We were forcing the latency of these instructions to 5 cycles, but every other scheduler model had them as 1 cycle. I'm sure I didn't get everything, but this gets a big portion.

llvm-svn: 329339
2018-04-05 20:04:06 +00:00
Craig Topper 15303dda0d [X86] Revert r329251-329254
It's failing on the bots and I'm not sure why.

This reverts:

[X86] Synchronize the SchedRW on some EVEX instructions with their VEX equivalents.
[X86] Use WriteFShuffle256 for VEXTRACTF128 to be consistent with VEXTRACTI128 which uses WriteShuffle256.
[X86] Remove some InstRWs for plain store instructions on Sandy Bridge.
[X86] Auto-generate complete checks. NFC

llvm-svn: 329256
2018-04-05 05:19:36 +00:00
Craig Topper 5c36557426 [X86] Auto-generate complete checks. NFC
llvm-svn: 329251
2018-04-05 04:41:59 +00:00
Craig Topper 498875fab0 [X86] Separate BSWAP32r and BSWAP64r scheduling data in SandyBridge/Haswell/Broadwell/Skylake scheduler models.
The BSWAP64r version is 2 uops and BSWAP32r is only 1 uop. The regular expressions also looked for a non-existant BSWAP16r.

llvm-svn: 329211
2018-04-04 17:54:19 +00:00
Craig Topper caec723a1a [X86] Add an itinerary to BTR64rr.
llvm-svn: 328956
2018-04-02 01:12:34 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim f6440b6fb1 Fix newlines. NFCI.
llvm-svn: 328583
2018-03-26 21:07:59 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim f33d905293 [X86] Add WriteBitScan/WriteLZCNT/WriteTZCNT/WritePOPCNT scheduler classes (PR36881)
Give the bit count instructions their own scheduler classes instead of forcing them into existing classes.

These were mostly overridden anyway, but I had to add in costs from Agner for silvermont and znver1 and the Fam16h SoG for btver2 (Jaguar).

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44879

llvm-svn: 328566
2018-03-26 18:19:28 +00:00
Craig Topper 4a3be6e578 [X86] Correct the scheduling data for some of the 32 and 64 bit multiplies to as best as I understand how they are implemented.
llvm-svn: 328231
2018-03-22 19:22:51 +00:00
Craig Topper 4778fa7e8a [X86] Fix the SchedRW for memory forms of CMP and TEST.
They were incorrectly marked as RMW operations. Some of the CMP instrucions worked, but the ones that use a similar encoding as RMW form of ADD ended up marked as RMW.

TEST used the same tablegen class as some of the CMPs.

llvm-svn: 327947
2018-03-20 03:55:17 +00:00
Craig Topper 3e9462607e [X86] Add TEST16mi/TEST32mi/TEST64mi32 to the Sandybridge/Haswell/Broadwell/Skylake scheduler models.
Move it from a load+store group on SNB to a load only group, the same group as CMP.

llvm-svn: 327944
2018-03-20 03:02:03 +00:00
Craig Topper 7c90e29cf8 [X86] Add ROR/ROL/SHR/SAR by 1 instructions to the Sandy Bridge scheduler model.
I assume these match the generic immediate version like they do in the other models.

llvm-svn: 327943
2018-03-20 03:01:59 +00:00
Craig Topper 5e65996fac [X86] Remove OUT32rr/OUT8rr/OUT32ri/OUT8ri from Sandybridge scheduler model.
PR35590 was already filed for this information being wrong. It's probably better to default to WriteSystem behavior instead of using something completely wrong.

llvm-svn: 327882
2018-03-19 19:00:35 +00:00
Craig Topper b4c7873f8c [X86] Add JCXZ/JECXZ to Sandybridge/Haswell/Broadwell/Skylake scheduler models.
JRCXZ was already present, but not the others.

We never codegen this instruction so this doesn't affect much just trying to get them all into a single generated scheduler class in the output.

llvm-svn: 327881
2018-03-19 19:00:32 +00:00
Craig Topper afabf36505 [X86] Correct regular expression in Zen scheduler model that was excluding JECXZ instruction.
The regex was looking for JECXZ_32 or JECXZ_64, but their is just one instruction called JECXZ. They used to exist as separate instructions, but were merged over 3 years ago.

llvm-svn: 327880
2018-03-19 19:00:29 +00:00
Craig Topper 5ccd87233f [X86] Make the multiply and divide itineraries more consistent.
Sometimes we used the same itinerary for MEM and REG forms, but that seems inconsistent with our usual usage.

We also used the MUL8 itinerary for MULX32/64 which was also weird.

The test changes are because we were using IIC_IMUL32_RR and IIC_IMUL64_RR instead of IIC_IMUL32_REG/IIC_IMUL64_REG for the 32 and 64 bit multiplies that produce double width result.

llvm-svn: 327866
2018-03-19 16:38:33 +00:00
Sanjay Patel 05daae75ad [x86] put nops into the WriteNop class and customize for Jaguar
1. Given that we already have a classification bucket with 'nop' in the name, 
   that's where 'nop' belongs. Right now, it's only used for prefix bytes and 'pause'.
2. Make the latency of this class '1' for Jaguar to tell the scheduler (and presumably 
   llvm-mca) how to model the resource requirements better even though a nop has no 
   dependencies.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44608

llvm-svn: 327853
2018-03-19 14:26:50 +00:00
Craig Topper d10ceffa5f [X86] Add ADD16i16/ADD32i32/ADD64i32 and similar to the scheduler models to match ADD8i8.
Also move ADC8i8 and SBB8i8 in the Sandy Bridge model to the same class as ADC8ri and SBB8ri. That seems more accurate since its the 8i8 is just the register forced to AL instead of coming from modrm.

llvm-svn: 327820
2018-03-19 04:21:40 +00:00
Craig Topper 2d451e73f9 [X86] Fix a bunch of overlapping regular expressions in the scheduler models.
llvm-svn: 327787
2018-03-18 08:38:06 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim 23578e7d3c [X86][Btver2] Add correct mul/imul schedule costs
Integer multiply is performed on the JMul function unit and i64 requires double pumping

llvm-svn: 327707
2018-03-16 14:01:01 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim d30df5769e [X86][Btver2] Remove JAny resource, and map system/microcoded instructions to JALU pipes
Simplifies throughput to the issue width (1/2) instead of permitting any pipe (1/6)

llvm-svn: 327632
2018-03-15 15:12:12 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim 69a4132f63 [X86] Regenerate schedule tests with zero latency comments
llvm-svn: 327628
2018-03-15 14:30:59 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim 3d4c86d399 [X86][Btver2] Split i8/i16/i32/i64 div/idiv costs
We were assuming a mixture of 32/64 division costs.

llvm-svn: 327407
2018-03-13 15:22:24 +00:00
Craig Topper a08f83bac3 [X86] Reverse the operand order of invlpga in at&t syntax to match gas.
llvm-svn: 325190
2018-02-14 23:53:21 +00:00