Summary:
This will eventually allow traversal of an AST while ignoring invisible
AST nodes. Currently it depends on the available enum values for
TraversalKinds. That can be extended to ignore all invisible nodes in
the future.
Reviewers: klimek, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61837
I chatted with Reid offline, and we agreed that having a workaround here
would be appropriate until PR43879 is resolved.
The given transformation Works On My Machine(TM), and should hopefully
hold more broadly, but my fingers are crossed nonetheless. :)
Now that we've moved to C++14, we no longer need the llvm::make_unique
implementation from STLExtras.h. This patch is a mechanical replacement
of (hopefully) all the llvm::make_unique instances across the monorepo.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66259
llvm-svn: 368942
Summary:
This change updates `isDerivedFrom` to support Objective-C classes by
converting it to a polymorphic matcher.
Notes:
The matching behavior for Objective-C classes is modeled to match the
behavior of `isDerivedFrom` with C++ classes. To that effect,
`isDerivedFrom` matches aliased types of derived Objective-C classes,
including compatibility aliases. To achieve this, the AST visitor has
been updated to map compatibility aliases to their underlying
Objective-C class.
`isSameOrDerivedFrom` also provides similar behaviors for C++ and
Objective-C classes. The behavior that
`cxxRecordDecl(isSameOrDerivedFrom("X"))` does not match
`class Y {}; typedef Y X;` is mirrored for Objective-C in that
`objcInterfaceDecl(isSameOrDerivedFrom("X"))` does not match either
`@interface Y @end typedef Y X;` or
`@interface Y @end @compatibility_alias X Y;`.
Test Notes:
Ran clang unit tests.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, jordan_rose, rjmccall, klimek, alexfh, gribozavr
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, gribozavr
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60543
llvm-svn: 368632
Summary:
Changes:
- add an ast matcher for deductiong guide.
- allow isExplicit matcher for deductiong guide.
- add hasExplicitSpecifier matcher which give access to the expression of the explicit specifier if present.
Reviewers: klimek, rsmith, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: aaron.ballman, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61552
llvm-svn: 363855
Summary:
Make it usable outside of ASTMatchFinder. This will make it possible to
use this enum to control whether certain implicit nodes are skipped
while AST dumping for example.
Reviewers: klimek, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61836
llvm-svn: 360920
Summary:
isClassMessage is an equivalent to isInstanceMessage for ObjCMessageExpr, but matches message expressions to classes.
isClassMethod and isInstanceMethod check whether a method declaration (or definition) is for a class method or instance method (respectively).
Contributed by @mywman!
Reviewers: benhamilton, klimek, mwyman
Reviewed By: benhamilton, mwyman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60920
llvm-svn: 358904
Summary:
`OMPClause` is the base class, it is not descendant from **any**
other class, therefore for it to work with e.g.
`VariadicDynCastAllOfMatcher<>`, it needs to be handled here.
Reviewers: sbenza, bkramer, pcc, klimek, hokein, gribozavr, aaron.ballman, george.karpenkov
Reviewed By: gribozavr, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: guansong, jdoerfert, alexfh, ABataev, cfe-commits
Tags: #openmp, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57112
llvm-svn: 356675
Summary:
This allows ASTs to be merged when they contain ChooseExpr (the GNU
__builtin_choose_expr construction). This is needed, for example, for
cross-CTU analysis of C code that makes use of __builtin_choose_expr.
The node is already supported in the AST, but it didn't have a matcher
in ASTMatchers. So, this change adds the matcher and adds support to
ASTImporter.
This was originally reviewed and approved in
https://reviews.llvm.org/D58292 and submitted as r354832. It was
reverted in r354839 due to failures on the Windows CI builds.
This version fixes the test failures on Windows, which were caused by
differences in template expansion between versions of clang on different
OSes. The version of clang built with MSVC and running on Windows never
expands the template in the C++ test in ImportExpr.ImportChooseExpr in
clang/unittests/AST/ASTImporter.cpp, but the version on Linux does for
the empty arguments and -fms-compatibility.
So, this version of the patch drops the C++ test for
__builtin_choose_expr, since that version was written to catch
regressions of the logic for isConditionTrue() in the AST import code
for ChooseExpr, and those regressions are also caught by
ASTImporterOptionSpecificTestBase.ImportChooseExpr, which does work on
Windows.
Reviewers: shafik, a_sidorin, martong, aaron.ballman, rnk, a.sidorin
Subscribers: cfe-commits, jdoerfert, rnkovacs, aaron.ballman
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58663
llvm-svn: 354916
Summary:
This allows ASTs to be merged when they contain ChooseExpr (the GNU
__builtin_choose_expr construction). This is needed, for example, for
cross-CTU analysis of C code that makes use of __builtin_choose_expr.
The node is already supported in the AST, but it didn't have a matcher
in ASTMatchers. So, this change adds the matcher and adds support to
ASTImporter.
Reviewers: shafik, a_sidorin, martong, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: aaron.ballman, rnkovacs, jdoerfert, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58292
llvm-svn: 354832
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
Summary:
This assert catches places where the AST (as seen by RecursiveASTVisitor)
becomes disconnected due to incomplete traversal.
Making it print the actual parent-less node is a lot more helpful - it's
possible to work out which part of the tree wasn't traversed.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56395
llvm-svn: 350612
Summary:
Much like hasArg for various call expressions, this allows LibTooling users to
match against a member of an initializer list.
This is currently being used as part of the abseil-duration-scale clang-tidy
check.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56090
llvm-svn: 350523
Summary:
The crux of the issue that is being fixed is that lookup could not find
previous decls of a friend class. The solution involves making the
friend declarations visible in their decl context (i.e. adding them to
the lookup table).
Also, we simplify `VisitRecordDecl` greatly.
This fix involves two other repairs (without these the unittests fail):
(1) We could not handle the addition of injected class types properly
when a redecl chain was involved, now this is fixed.
(2) DeclContext::removeDecl failed if the lookup table in Vector form
did not contain the to be removed element. This caused troubles in
ASTImporter::ImportDeclContext. This is also fixed.
Reviewers: a_sidorin, balazske, a.sidorin
Subscribers: rnkovacs, dkrupp, Szelethus, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53655
llvm-svn: 349349
Summary:
This change adds a new AST matcher for block expressions.
Test Notes:
Ran the clang unit tests.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55546
llvm-svn: 349004
Summary:
Currently the Clang AST doesn't store information about how the callee of a CallExpr was found. Specifically if it was found using ADL.
However, this information is invaluable to tooling. Consider a tool which renames usages of a function. If the originally CallExpr was formed using ADL, then the tooling may need to additionally qualify the replacement.
Without information about how the callee was found, the tooling is left scratching it's head. Additionally, we want to be able to match ADL calls as quickly as possible, which means avoiding computing the answer on the fly.
This patch changes `CallExpr` to store whether it's callee was found using ADL. It does not change the size of any AST nodes.
Reviewers: fowles, rsmith, klimek, shafik
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: aaron.ballman, riccibruno, calabrese, titus, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55534
llvm-svn: 348977
Summary:
The goal is to allow analyses such as clang-tidy checks to run on a
subset of the AST, e.g. "only on main-file decls" for interactive tools.
Today, these become "problematically global" by running RecursiveASTVisitors
rooted at the TUDecl, or by navigating up via ASTContext::getParent().
The scope is restricted using a set of top-level-decls that RecursiveASTVisitors
should be rooted at. This also applies to the visitor that populates the
parent map, and so the top-level-decls are considered to have no parents.
This patch makes the traversal scope a mutable property of ASTContext.
The more obvious way to do this is to pass the top-level decls to
relevant functions directly, but this has some problems:
- it's error-prone: accidentally mixing restricted and unrestricted
scopes is a performance trap. Interleaving multiple analyses is
common (many clang-tidy checks run matchers or RAVs from matcher callbacks)
- it doesn't map well to the actual use cases, where we really do want
*all* traversals to be restricted.
- it involves a lot of plumbing in parts of the code that don't care
about traversals.
This approach was tried out in D54259 and D54261, I wanted to like it
but it feels pretty awful in practice.
Caveats: to get scope-limiting behavior of RecursiveASTVisitors, callers
have to call the new TraverseAST(Ctx) function instead of TraverseDecl(TU).
I think this is an improvement to the API regardless.
Reviewers: klimek, ioeric
Subscribers: mgorny, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54309
llvm-svn: 346847
Summary:
Compound literals, enums, file-scoped arrays, etc. require their
initializers and size specifiers to be constant. Wrap the initializer
expressions in a ConstantExpr so that we can easily check for this later
on.
Reviewers: rsmith, shafik
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits, jyknight, nickdesaulniers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53921
llvm-svn: 346455
Summary: This is necessary for clang-query to be able to handle comments.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52751
llvm-svn: 343665
There are a few leftovers of rC343147 that are not (\w+)\.begin but in
the form of ([-[:alnum:]>.]+)\.begin or spanning two lines. Change them
to use the container form in this commit. The 12 occurrences have been
inspected manually for safety.
llvm-svn: 343425
Summary:
The new matchers can be used to check if an expression is type-, value- or instantiation-dependent
in a templated context.
These matchers are used in a clang-tidy check and generally useful as the
problem of unresolved templates occurs more often in clang-tidy and they
provide an easy way to check for this issue.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, alexfh, klimek
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51880
llvm-svn: 341958
Summary:
Currently there are several issues with the import of class template
specializations. (1) Different TUs may have class template specializations
with the same template arguments, but with different set of instantiated
MethodDecls and FieldDecls. In this patch we provide a fix to merge these
methods and fields. (2) Currently, we search the partial template
specializations in the set of simple specializations and we add partial
specializations as simple specializations. This is bad, this patch fixes it.
Reviewers: a_sidorin, xazax.hun, r.stahl
Subscribers: rnkovacs, dkrupp, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50451
llvm-svn: 340402
ObjCIvarExpr is *not* a subclass of MemberExpr, and a separate matcher
is required to support it.
Adding a hasDeclaration support as well, as it's not very useful without
it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49701
llvm-svn: 338137
Summary:
This patch introduces a new matcher for `DecltypeType` and its underlying type
in order to fix a bug in clang-tidy, see https://reviews.llvm.org/D48717 for more.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, alexfh, NoQ, dcoughlin
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48759
llvm-svn: 337703
Stephen Kelly