Depends on D89408.
This diff finally implements trace decoding!
The current interface is
$ trace load /path/to/trace/session/file.json
$ thread trace dump instructions
thread #1: tid = 3842849, total instructions = 22
[ 0] 0x40052d
[ 1] 0x40052d
...
[19] 0x400521
$ # simply enter, which is a repeat command
[20] 0x40052d
[21] 0x400529
...
This doesn't do any disassembly, which will be done in the next diff.
Changes:
- Added an IntelPTDecoder class, that is a wrapper for libipt, which is the actual library that performs the decoding.
- Added TraceThreadDecoder class that decodes traces and memoizes the result to avoid repeating the decoding step.
- Added a DecodedThread class, which represents the output from decoding and that for the time being only stores the list of reconstructed instructions. Later it'll contain the function call hierarchy, which will enable reconstructing backtraces.
- Added basic APIs for accessing the trace in Trace.h:
- GetInstructionCount, which counts the number of instructions traced for a given thread
- IsTraceFailed, which returns an Error if decoding a thread failed
- ForEachInstruction, which iterates on the instructions traced for a given thread, concealing the internal storage of threads, as plug-ins can decide to generate the instructions on the fly or to store them all in a vector, like I do.
- DumpTraceInstructions was updated to print the instructions or show an error message if decoding was impossible.
- Tests included
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89283
Make it possible to use a relative path in command script import to the
location of the file being sourced. This allows the user to put Python
scripts next to LLDB command files and importing them without having to
specify an absolute path.
To enable this behavior pass `-c` to `command script import`. The
argument can only be used when sourcing the command from a file.
rdar://68310384
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89334
Depends on D88841
As per the discussion in the RFC, we'll implement both
thread trace dump [instructions | functions]
This is the first step in implementing the "instructions" dumping command.
It includes:
- A minimal ProcessTrace plugin for representing processes from a trace file. I noticed that it was a required step to mimic how core-based processes are initialized, e.g. ProcessElfCore and ProcessMinidump. I haven't had the need to create ThreadTrace yet, though. So far HistoryThread seems good enough.
- The command handling itself in CommandObjectThread, which outputs a placeholder text instead of the actual instructions. I'll do that part in the next diff.
- Tests
{F13132325}
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88769
This reverts commit f775fe5964.
I fixed a return type error in the original patch that was causing a test failure.
Also added a REQUIRES: python to the shell test so we'll skip this for
people who build lldb w/o Python.
Also added another test for the error printing.
This is the first in a series of patches that will adds a new processor trace plug-in to LLDB.
The idea for this first patch to to add the plug-in interface with simple commands for the trace files that can "load" and "dump" the trace information. We can test the functionality and ensure people are happy with the way things are done and how things are organized before moving on to adding more functionality.
Processor trace information can be view in a few different ways:
- post mortem where a trace is saved off that can be viewed later in the debugger
- gathered while a process is running and allow the user to step back in time (with no variables, memory or registers) to see how each thread arrived at where it is currently stopped.
This patch attempts to start with the first solution of loading a trace file after the fact. The idea is that we will use a JSON file to load the trace information. JSON allows us to specify information about the trace like:
- plug-in name in LLDB
- path to trace file
- shared library load information so we can re-create a target and symbolicate the information in the trace
- any other info that the trace plug-in will need to be able to successfully parse the trace information
- cpu type
- version info
- ???
A new "trace" command was added at the top level of the LLDB commmands:
- "trace load"
- "trace dump"
I did this because if we load trace information we don't need to have a process and we might end up creating a new target for the trace information that will become active. If anyone has any input on where this would be better suited, please let me know. Walter Erquinigo will end up filling in the Intel PT specific plug-in so that it works and is tested once we can agree that the direction of this patch is the correct one, so please feel free to chime in with ideas on comments!
Reviewed By: clayborg
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85705
Make it possible to run the script command with a different language
than currently selected.
$ ./bin/lldb -l python
(lldb) script -l lua
>>> io.stdout:write("Hello, World!\n")
Hello, World!
When passing the language option and a raw command, you need to separate
the flag from the script code with --.
$ ./bin/lldb -l python
(lldb) script -l lua -- io.stdout:write("Hello, World!\n")
Hello, World!
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86996
Add a reproducer verifier that catches:
- Missing or invalid home directory
- Missing or invalid working directory
- Missing or invalid module/symbol paths
- Missing files from the VFS
The verifier is enabled by default during replay, but can be skipped by
passing --reproducer-no-verify.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86497
This patch adds the ability to use a custom interpreter with the
`platform shell` command. If the user set the `-s|--shell` option
with the path to a binary, lldb passes it down to the platform's
`RunShellProcess` method and set it as the shell to use in
`ProcessLaunchInfo to run commands.
Note that not all the Platforms support running shell commands with
custom interpreters (i.e. RemoteGDBServer is only expected to use the
default shell).
This patch also makes some refactoring and cleanups, like swapping
CString for StringRef when possible and updating `SBPlatformShellCommand`
with new methods and a new constructor.
rdar://67759256
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86667
Signed-off-by: Med Ismail Bennani <medismail.bennani@gmail.com>
Add a reproducer verifier that catches:
- Missing or invalid home directory
- Missing or invalid working directory
- Missing or invalid module/symbol paths
- Missing files from the VFS
The verifier is enabled by default during replay, but can be skipped by
passing --reproducer-no-verify.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86497
file:line:column form that we use to print out locations. Since we
print them this way it makes sense we also accept that form.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83975
This patch introduces the `(-h|--host)` option to the `platform shell`
command. It allows the user to run shell commands from the host platform
(always available) without putting lldb in the background.
Since the default behaviour of `platform shell` is to run the command of
the selected platform, having such a choice can be quite handy when
debugging remote targets, for instances.
This patch also introduces a `shell` alias, to improve the command
discoverability and make it more convenient to use for the user.
rdar://62856024
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79659
Signed-off-by: Med Ismail Bennani <medismail.bennani@gmail.com>
This recommits f665e80c02 which was reverted in 1cbd1b8f69 for breaking
TestFoundationDisassembly.py. The fix is to use --force in the test to avoid
bailing out on large functions.
I have also doubled the large function limit to 8000 bytes (~~ 2000 insns), as
the foundation library contains a lot of large-ish functions. The intent of this
feature is to prevent accidental disassembling of enormous (multi-megabyte)
"functions", not to get in people's way.
The original commit message follows:
If we have a binary without symbol information (and without
LC_FUNCTION_STARTS, if on a mac), then we have to resort to using
heuristics to determine the function boundaries. However, these don't
always work, and so we can easily end up thinking we have functions
which are several megabytes in size. Attempting to (accidentally)
disassemble these can take a very long time spam the terminal with
thousands of lines of disassembly.
This patch works around that problem by adding a sanity check to the
disassemble command. If we are about to disassemble a function which is
larger than a certain threshold, we will refuse to disassemble such a
function unless the user explicitly specifies the number of instructions
to disassemble, uses start/stop addresses for disassembly, or passes the
(new) --force argument.
The threshold is currently fairly aggressive (4000 bytes ~~ 1000
instructions). If needed, we can increase it, or even make it
configurable.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79789
Summary:
If we have a binary without symbol information (and without
LC_FUNCTION_STARTS, if on a mac), then we have to resort to using
heuristics to determine the function boundaries. However, these don't
always work, and so we can easily end up thinking we have functions
which are several megabytes in size. Attempting to (accidentally)
disassemble these can take a very long time spam the terminal with
thousands of lines of disassembly.
This patch works around that problem by adding a sanity check to the
disassemble command. If we are about to disassemble a function which is
larger than a certain threshold, we will refuse to disassemble such a
function unless the user explicitly specifies the number of instructions
to disassemble, uses start/stop addresses for disassembly, or passes the
(new) --force argument.
The threshold is currently fairly aggressive (4000 bytes ~~ 1000
instructions). If needed, we can increase it, or even make it
configurable.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79789
that were not reported by the OS plugin. To facilitate this, move
adding/updating the ThreadPlans for a Thread to the ThreadPlanStackMap.
Also move dumping thread plans there as well.
Added some tests for "thread plan list" and "thread plan discard" since
I didn't seem to have written any originally.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76814
This patch changes the way the StackFrame Recognizers match a certain
frame.
Until now, recognizers could be registered with a function
name but also an alternate symbol.
This change is motivated by a test failure for the Assert frame
recognizer on Linux. Depending the version of the libc, the abort
function (triggered by an assertion), could have more than two
signatures (i.e. `raise`, `__GI_raise` and `gsignal`).
Instead of only checking the default symbol name and the alternate one,
lldb will iterate over a list of symbols to match against.
rdar://60386577
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76188
Signed-off-by: Med Ismail Bennani <medismail.bennani@gmail.com>
Global properties are shared between debugger instances and
if a test doesn't clear changes in settings it made,
this leads to side effects in other tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75537
Currently, in macOS, when a process crashes, lldb halts inside the
implementation disassembly without yielding any useful information.
The only way to get more information is to detach from the process, then wait
for ReportCrash to generate a report, find the report, then see what error
message was included in it. Instead of waiting for this to happen, lldb could
locate the error_string and make it available to the user.
This patch addresses this issue by enabling the user to fetch extended
crash information for crashed processes using `process status --verbose`.
Depending on the platform, this will try to gather different crash information
into an structured data dictionnary. This dictionnary is generic and extensible,
as it contains an array for each different type of crash information.
On Darwin Platforms, lldb will iterate over each of the target's images,
extract their `__crash_info` section and generated a StructuredData::Array
containing, in each entry, the module spec, its UUID, the crash messages
and the abort cause. The array will be inserted into the platform's
`m_extended_crash_info` dictionnary and `FetchExtendedCrashInformation` will
return its JSON representation like this:
```
{
"crash-info annotations": [
{
"abort-cause": 0,
"image": "/usr/lib/system/libsystem_malloc.dylib",
"message": "main(76483,0x1000cedc0) malloc: *** error for object 0x1003040a0: pointer being freed was not allocated",
"message2": "",
"uuid": "5747D0C9-900D-3306-8D70-1E2EA4B7E821"
},
...
],
...
}
```
This crash information can also be fetched using the SB API or lldb-rpc protocol
using SBTarget::GetExtendedCrashInformation().
rdar://37736535
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74657
Signed-off-by: Med Ismail Bennani <medismail.bennani@gmail.com>
We were incorrectly parsing the -C argument to breakpoint set as the
column breakpoint, even though according to the help this should be the
breakpoint command. This fixes that by renaming the option to -u, adding
it to help, and adding a test case.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73284
Currently, there is no option to delete all the watchpoint without LLDB
asking for a confirmation. Besides making the watchpoint delete command
homogeneous with the breakpoint delete command, this option could also
become handy to trigger automated watchpoint deletion i.e. using
breakpoint actions.
rdar://42560586
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72096
Signed-off-by: Med Ismail Bennani <medismail.bennani@gmail.com>
Currently, there is no option to delete all the watchpoint without LLDB
asking for a confirmation. Besides making the watchpoint delete command
homogeneous with the breakpoint delete command, this option could also
become handy to trigger automated watchpoint deletion i.e. using
breakpoint actions.
rdar://42560586
Signed-off-by: Med Ismail Bennani <medismail.bennani@gmail.com>
This patch hooks the reproducer infrastructure with the signal handlers.
When lldb crashes with reproducers capture enabled, it will now generate
the reproducer and print a short message the standard out. This doesn't
affect the pretty stack traces, which are still printed before.
This patch also introduces a new reproducer sub-command that
intentionally raises a given signal to test the reproducer signal
handling.
Currently the signal handler is doing too much work. Instead of copying
over files into the reproducers in the signal handler, we should
re-invoke ourselves with a special command line flag that looks at the
VFS mapping and performs the copy.
This is a NO-OP when reproducers are disabled.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70474
Summary: This option was added downstream in swift-lldb. This upstreams this option as it seems useful and also adds the missing tests.
Reviewers: #lldb, kwk, labath
Reviewed By: kwk, labath
Subscribers: labath, kwk, abidh, JDevlieghere, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb, #upstreaming_lldb_s_downstream_patches
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69944
For example, it is pretty easy to write a breakpoint command that implements "stop when my caller is Foo", and
it is pretty easy to write a breakpoint command that implements "stop when my caller is Bar". But there's no
way to write a generic "stop when my caller is..." function, and then specify the caller when you add the
command to a breakpoint.
With this patch, you can pass this data in a SBStructuredData dictionary. That will get stored in
the PythonCommandBaton for the breakpoint, and passed to the implementation function (if it has the right
signature) when the breakpoint is hit. Then in lldb, you can say:
(lldb) break com add -F caller_is -k caller_name -v Foo
More generally this will allow us to write reusable Python breakpoint commands.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68671
Summary:
For context: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68293
We need a way to show all the processes on android regardless of the user id.
When you run `platform process list`, you only see the processes with the same user as the user that launched lldb-server. However, it's quite useful to see all the processes, though, and it will lay a foundation for full apk debugging support from lldb.
Before:
```
PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME
====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================
3234 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android adbd
8034 3234 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh
9096 3234 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh
9098 9096 aarch64-unknown-linux-android lldb-server
(lldb) ^D
```
Now:
```
(lldb) platform process list -x
205 matching processes were found on "remote-android"
PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME
====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================
1 0 init
524 1 init
525 1 init
531 1 ueventd
568 1 logd
569 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android servicemanager
570 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android hwservicemanager
571 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android vndservicemanager
577 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android qseecomd
580 577 aarch64-unknown-linux-android qseecomd
...
23816 979 com.android.providers.calendar
24600 979 com.verizon.mips.services
27888 979 com.hualai
28043 2378 com.android.chrome:sandboxed_process0
31449 979 com.att.shm
31779 979 com.samsung.android.authfw
31846 979 com.samsung.android.server.iris
32014 979 com.samsung.android.MtpApplication
32045 979 com.samsung.InputEventApp
```
Reviewers: labath,xiaobai,aadsm,clayborg
Subscribers:
> llvm-svn: 374584
llvm-svn: 374631
Summary:
For context: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68293
We need a way to show all the processes on android regardless of the user id.
When you run `platform process list`, you only see the processes with the same user as the user that launched lldb-server. However, it's quite useful to see all the processes, though, and it will lay a foundation for full apk debugging support from lldb.
Before:
```
PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME
====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================
3234 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android adbd
8034 3234 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh
9096 3234 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh
9098 9096 aarch64-unknown-linux-android lldb-server
(lldb) ^D
```
Now:
```
(lldb) platform process list -x
205 matching processes were found on "remote-android"
PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME
====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================
1 0 init
524 1 init
525 1 init
531 1 ueventd
568 1 logd
569 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android servicemanager
570 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android hwservicemanager
571 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android vndservicemanager
577 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android qseecomd
580 577 aarch64-unknown-linux-android qseecomd
...
23816 979 com.android.providers.calendar
24600 979 com.verizon.mips.services
27888 979 com.hualai
28043 2378 com.android.chrome:sandboxed_process0
31449 979 com.att.shm
31779 979 com.samsung.android.authfw
31846 979 com.samsung.android.server.iris
32014 979 com.samsung.android.MtpApplication
32045 979 com.samsung.InputEventApp
```
Reviewers: labath,xiaobai,aadsm,clayborg
Subscribers:
> llvm-svn: 374584
llvm-svn: 374626
Summary:
For context: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68293
We need a way to show all the processes on android regardless of the user id.
When you run `platform process list`, you only see the processes with the same user as the user that launched lldb-server. However, it's quite useful to see all the processes, though, and it will lay a foundation for full apk debugging support from lldb.
Before:
```
PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME
====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================
3234 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android adbd
8034 3234 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh
9096 3234 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh
9098 9096 aarch64-unknown-linux-android lldb-server
(lldb) ^D
```
Now:
```
(lldb) platform process list -x
205 matching processes were found on "remote-android"
PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME
====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================
1 0 init
524 1 init
525 1 init
531 1 ueventd
568 1 logd
569 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android servicemanager
570 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android hwservicemanager
571 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android vndservicemanager
577 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android qseecomd
580 577 aarch64-unknown-linux-android qseecomd
...
23816 979 com.android.providers.calendar
24600 979 com.verizon.mips.services
27888 979 com.hualai
28043 2378 com.android.chrome:sandboxed_process0
31449 979 com.att.shm
31779 979 com.samsung.android.authfw
31846 979 com.samsung.android.server.iris
32014 979 com.samsung.android.MtpApplication
32045 979 com.samsung.InputEventApp
```
Reviewers: labath,xiaobai,aadsm,clayborg
Subscribers:
> llvm-svn: 374584
llvm-svn: 374622
Summary:
For context: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68293
We need a way to show all the processes on android regardless of the user id.
When you run `platform process list`, you only see the processes with the same user as the user that launched lldb-server. However, it's quite useful to see all the processes, though, and it will lay a foundation for full apk debugging support from lldb.
Before:
```
PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME
====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================
3234 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android adbd
8034 3234 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh
9096 3234 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh
9098 9096 aarch64-unknown-linux-android lldb-server
(lldb) ^D
```
Now:
```
(lldb) platform process list -x
205 matching processes were found on "remote-android"
PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME
====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================
1 0 init
524 1 init
525 1 init
531 1 ueventd
568 1 logd
569 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android servicemanager
570 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android hwservicemanager
571 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android vndservicemanager
577 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android qseecomd
580 577 aarch64-unknown-linux-android qseecomd
...
23816 979 com.android.providers.calendar
24600 979 com.verizon.mips.services
27888 979 com.hualai
28043 2378 com.android.chrome:sandboxed_process0
31449 979 com.att.shm
31779 979 com.samsung.android.authfw
31846 979 com.samsung.android.server.iris
32014 979 com.samsung.android.MtpApplication
32045 979 com.samsung.InputEventApp
```
Reviewers: labath,xiaobai,aadsm,clayborg
Subscribers:
> llvm-svn: 374584
llvm-svn: 374620
Summary:
For context: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68293
We need a way to show all the processes on android regardless of the user id.
When you run `platform process list`, you only see the processes with the same user as the user that launched lldb-server. However, it's quite useful to see all the processes, though, and it will lay a foundation for full apk debugging support from lldb.
Before:
```
PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME
====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================
3234 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android adbd
8034 3234 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh
9096 3234 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh
9098 9096 aarch64-unknown-linux-android lldb-server
(lldb) ^D
```
Now:
```
(lldb) platform process list -x
205 matching processes were found on "remote-android"
PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME
====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================
1 0 init
524 1 init
525 1 init
531 1 ueventd
568 1 logd
569 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android servicemanager
570 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android hwservicemanager
571 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android vndservicemanager
577 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android qseecomd
580 577 aarch64-unknown-linux-android qseecomd
...
23816 979 com.android.providers.calendar
24600 979 com.verizon.mips.services
27888 979 com.hualai
28043 2378 com.android.chrome:sandboxed_process0
31449 979 com.att.shm
31779 979 com.samsung.android.authfw
31846 979 com.samsung.android.server.iris
32014 979 com.samsung.android.MtpApplication
32045 979 com.samsung.InputEventApp
```
Reviewers: labath,xiaobai,aadsm,clayborg
Subscribers:
> llvm-svn: 374584
llvm-svn: 374609
Summary:
For context: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68293
We need a way to show all the processes on android regardless of the user id.
When you run `platform process list`, you only see the processes with the same user as the user that launched lldb-server. However, it's quite useful to see all the processes, though, and it will lay a foundation for full apk debugging support from lldb.
Before:
```
PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME
====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================
3234 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android adbd
8034 3234 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh
9096 3234 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh
9098 9096 aarch64-unknown-linux-android lldb-server
(lldb) ^D
```
Now:
```
(lldb) platform process list -x
205 matching processes were found on "remote-android"
PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME
====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================
1 0 init
524 1 init
525 1 init
531 1 ueventd
568 1 logd
569 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android servicemanager
570 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android hwservicemanager
571 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android vndservicemanager
577 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android qseecomd
580 577 aarch64-unknown-linux-android qseecomd
...
23816 979 com.android.providers.calendar
24600 979 com.verizon.mips.services
27888 979 com.hualai
28043 2378 com.android.chrome:sandboxed_process0
31449 979 com.att.shm
31779 979 com.samsung.android.authfw
31846 979 com.samsung.android.server.iris
32014 979 com.samsung.android.MtpApplication
32045 979 com.samsung.InputEventApp
```
Reviewers: labath,xiaobai,aadsm,clayborg
Subscribers:
llvm-svn: 374584
Summary:
For context: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68293
We need a way to show all the processes on android regardless of the user id.
When you run `platform process list`, you only see the processes with the same user as the user that launched lldb-server. However, it's quite useful to see all the processes, though, and it will lay a foundation for full apk debugging support from lldb.
Before:
```
PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME
====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================
3234 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android adbd
8034 3234 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh
9096 3234 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh
9098 9096 aarch64-unknown-linux-android lldb-server
(lldb) ^D
```
Now:
```
(lldb) platform process list -x
205 matching processes were found on "remote-android"
PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME
====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================
1 0 init
524 1 init
525 1 init
531 1 ueventd
568 1 logd
569 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android servicemanager
570 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android hwservicemanager
571 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android vndservicemanager
577 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android qseecomd
580 577 aarch64-unknown-linux-android qseecomd
...
23816 979 com.android.providers.calendar
24600 979 com.verizon.mips.services
27888 979 com.hualai
28043 2378 com.android.chrome:sandboxed_process0
31449 979 com.att.shm
31779 979 com.samsung.android.authfw
31846 979 com.samsung.android.server.iris
32014 979 com.samsung.android.MtpApplication
32045 979 com.samsung.InputEventApp
```
Reviewers: labath,xiaobai,aadsm,clayborg
Subscribers:
llvm-svn: 373931
Use this in the scripted breakpoint command. Added some tests for parsing
the key/value options. This uncovered a bug in handling parsing errors mid-line.
I also fixed that bug.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68363
llvm-svn: 373673
This adds a reproducer dump commands which makes it possible to inspect
a reproducer from inside LLDB. Currently it supports the Files, Commands
and Version providers. I'm planning to add support for the GDB Remote
provider in a follow-up patch.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67474
llvm-svn: 371909
We dynamically allocate the option validator which means we
can't mark this list of OptionDefinitions as constexpr. It's also
more complicated than necessary.
llvm-svn: 367102
Vedant Kumar