It's fishy to be changing the `std::vector<>` owned by the iterator, and
no one actual does it, so I'm going to remove the ability in a
subsequent commit. First, update the users.
<rdar://problem/14292693>
llvm-svn: 207252
Also updated as many loops as I could find using df_begin/idf_begin -
strangely I found no uses of idf_begin. Is that just used out of tree?
Also a few places couldn't use df_begin because either they used the
member functions of the depth first iterators or had specific ordering
constraints (I added a comment in the latter case).
Based on a patch by Jim Grosbach. (Jim - you just had iterator_range<T>
where you needed iterator_range<idf_iterator<T>>)
llvm-svn: 206016
No functional change. Updated loops from:
for (I = scc_begin(), E = scc_end(); I != E; ++I)
to:
for (I = scc_begin(); !I.isAtEnd(); ++I)
for teh win.
llvm-svn: 200789
trees into the Support library.
These are all expressed in terms of the generic GraphTraits and CFG,
with no reliance on any concrete IR types. Putting them in support
clarifies that and makes the fact that the static analyzer in Clang uses
them much more sane. When moving the Dominators.h file into the IR
library I claimed that this was the right home for it but not something
I planned to work on. Oops.
So why am I doing this? It happens to be one step toward breaking the
requirement that IR verification can only be performed from inside of
a pass context, which completely blocks the implementation of
verification for the new pass manager infrastructure. Fixing it will
also allow removing the concept of the "preverify" step (WTF???) and
allow the verifier to cleanly flag functions which fail verification in
a way that precludes even computing dominance information. Currently,
that results in a fatal error even when you ask the verifier to not
fatally error. It's awesome like that.
The yak shaving will continue...
llvm-svn: 199095
directory. These passes are already defined in the IR library, and it
doesn't make any sense to have the headers in Analysis.
Long term, I think there is going to be a much better way to divide
these matters. The dominators code should be fully separated into the
abstract graph algorithm and have that put in Support where it becomes
obvious that evn Clang's CFGBlock's can use it. Then the verifier can
manually construct dominance information from the Support-driven
interface while the Analysis library can provide a pass which both
caches, reconstructs, and supports a nice update API.
But those are very long term, and so I don't want to leave the really
confusing structure until that day arrives.
llvm-svn: 199082
subsequent changes are easier to review. About to fix some layering
issues, and wanted to separate out the necessary churn.
Also comment and sink the include of "Windows.h" in three .inc files to
match the usage in Memory.inc.
llvm-svn: 198685
We were calling llvm_unreachable() when failing to optimize the
branch into if case. However, it is still possible for us
to structurize the CFG by duplicating blocks even if this optimization
fails.
Reviewed-by: Vincent Lejeune<vljn at ovi.com>
llvm-svn: 192813
Iterator of std::vector may be implemented as a raw pointer. In
this case begin iterators are rvalues and cannot be incremented.
For example, this is the case with STDCXX implementation of vector.
Patch by Konstantin Tokarev <annulen@yandex.ru>.
llvm-svn: 189911
We were using two instructions for similar purpose : break and
predicated break. Only predicated_break was emitted and it was
lowered at R600ControlFlowFinalizer to JUMP;CF_BREAK;POP.
This commit simplify the situation by making AMDILCFGStructurizer
emit IF_PREDICATE;BREAK;ENDIF; instead of predicated_break (which
is now removed).
There is no functionality change.
llvm-svn: 187510
utils/sort_includes.py script.
Most of these are updating the new R600 target and fixing up a few
regressions that have creeped in since the last time I sorted the
includes.
llvm-svn: 171362
This patch replaces the control flow handling with a new
pass which structurize the graph before transforming it to
machine instruction. This has a couple of different advantages
and currently fixes 20 piglit tests without a single regression.
It is now a general purpose transformation that could be not
only be used for SI/R6xx, but also for other hardware
implementations that use a form of structurized control flow.
v2: further cleanup, fixes and documentation
Patch by: Christian König
Signed-off-by: Christian König <deathsimple@vodafone.de>
Reviewed-by: Tom Stellard <thomas.stellard@amd.com>
Tested-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
llvm-svn: 170591