AArch64 uses $d* and $x* to interleave between text and data.
llvm-objdump didn't know about this so it ended up printing garbage.
This patch is a first step towards a solution of the problem.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13360
llvm-svn: 249083
Add support to the indexed instrprof reader and writer for the format
that will be used for value profiling.
Patch by Betul Buyukkurt, with minor modifications.
llvm-svn: 248833
PDB files have a lot of noise in them, with hundreds (or thousands)
of symbols from system libraries and compiler generated types. If
you're only looking for a specific type, this can be problematic.
This CL allows you to display *only* types, variables, or compilands
matching a particular pattern. These filters can even be combined
with exclude filters. Include-only filters are given priority, so
that first the set of items to display is limited only to those that
match the include filters, and then the set of exclude filters is
applied to those. If there are no include filters specified, then
it means "display everything".
llvm-svn: 248822
The fuzzer argument parser will ignore all options starting with '--' so
operation mode options should begin with '--' and fuzzer options should begin
with '-'. Fuzzer arguments must still follow --fuzzer-args so that they escape
the parsing performed by the CommandLine library.
llvm-svn: 248671
This patch extends llvm-dsymutil's ODR type uniquing machinery to also
resolve forward decls for types defined in clang modules.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D13038
llvm-svn: 248398
Summary:
For fixed length instructions, we can use -max_len to limit the fuzzer to a
single instruction. This doesn't work for variable length instruction sets
since a 4-byte input could consist of one 4-byte instruction or two 2-byte
instructions.
This patch adds a --insn-limit to llvm-mc-fuzzer to limit the input in
terms of instructions processed.
Reviewers: kcc
Subscribers: kcc, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12960
llvm-svn: 248253
This reverts commit r247898 (which reverted r247894).
Patch fixed to address two issues exposed by buildbots:
- unused variable warning in NDEBUG mode
- std::initializer_list lifetime issue causing test failures
Original Summary:
Support for including the function bitcode indices in the Value Symbol
Table. This requires writing the VST after the function blocks, which in
turn requires a new VST forward declaration record encoding the offset of
the full VST (which is backpatched to contain the offset after the VST
is written).
This patch also enables the lazy function reader to use the new function
indices out of the VST. This support will be used by ThinLTO as well, which
will be in a follow on patch. Backwards compatibility with older bitcode
files is maintained.
A new test is also included.
The bitcode format (used for the lazy reader as well as the upcoming
ThinLTO patches) came out of discussions with Duncan and others and is
described here:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B036uwnWM6RWdnBLakxmeDdOeXc/view
Reviewers: dexonsmith, davidxl, joker.eph
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12536
llvm-svn: 247927
Temporarily revert to fix some buildbot issues. One is a minor issue
with a variable unused in NDEBUG mode. More concerning are some test
failures on win7 that I need to dig into.
This reverts commit 4e66a74543459832cfd571db42b4543580ae1d1d.
llvm-svn: 247898
Summary:
Support for including the function bitcode indices in the Value Symbol
Table. This requires writing the VST after the function blocks, which in
turn requires a new VST forward declaration record encoding the offset of
the full VST (which is backpatched to contain the offset after the VST
is written).
This patch also enables the lazy function reader to use the new function
indices out of the VST. This support will be used by ThinLTO as well, which
will be in a follow on patch. Backwards compatibility with older bitcode
files is maintained.
A new test is also included.
The bitcode format (used for the lazy reader as well as the upcoming
ThinLTO patches) came out of discussions with Duncan and others and is
described here:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B036uwnWM6RWdnBLakxmeDdOeXc/view
Reviewers: dexonsmith, davidxl, joker.eph
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12536
llvm-svn: 247894
Summary:
Only the disassembler is supported in this patch but it has already found a few
issues in the Mips disassembler (mostly invalid instructions being successfully
disassembled).
Reviewers: kcc
Subscribers: russell.gallop, silvas, kcc, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12723
llvm-svn: 247786
We already fail with 'No such file or directory' when we try to open
the file -- if that doesn't exist. Also add a test to verify this behavior.
llvm-svn: 247744
The verifier currently runs three times in LTO: (1) after parsing, (2)
at the beginning of the optimization pipeline, and (3) at the end of it.
The first run is important, since we're not sure where the bitcode comes
from and it's nice to validate it, but in release builds the extra runs
aren't appropriate.
This commit:
- Allows these runs to be disabled in LTOCodeGenerator.
- Adds command-line options to llvm-lto.
- Adds command-line options to libLTO.dylib, and disables the verifier
by default in release builds (based on NDEBUG).
This shaves about 3.5% off the runtime of ld64 when linking
verify-uselistorder with -flto -g.
rdar://22509081
llvm-svn: 247729
Summary:
This is the first patch in the series to migrate Triple's (which are ambiguous)
to TargetTuple's (which aren't).
For the moment, TargetTuple simply passes all requests to the Triple object it
holds. Once it has replaced Triple, it will start to implement the interface in
a more suitable way.
This change makes some changes to the public C++ API. In particular,
InitMCSubtargetInfo(), createMCRelocationInfo(), and createMCSymbolizer()
now take TargetTuples instead of Triples. The other public C++ API's have
been left as-is for the moment to reduce patch size.
This commit also contains a trivial patch to clang to account for the C++ API
change. Thanks go to Pavel Labath for fixing LLDB for me.
Reviewers: rengolin
Subscribers: jyknight, dschuff, arsenm, rampitec, danalbert, srhines, javed.absar, dsanders, echristo, emaste, jholewinski, tberghammer, ted, jfb, llvm-commits, rengolin
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10969
llvm-svn: 247692
Summary:
This is the first patch in the series to migrate Triple's (which are ambiguous)
to TargetTuple's (which aren't).
For the moment, TargetTuple simply passes all requests to the Triple object it
holds. Once it has replaced Triple, it will start to implement the interface in
a more suitable way.
This change makes some changes to the public C++ API. In particular,
InitMCSubtargetInfo(), createMCRelocationInfo(), and createMCSymbolizer()
now take TargetTuples instead of Triples. The other public C++ API's have
been left as-is for the moment to reduce patch size.
This commit also contains a trivial patch to clang to account for the C++ API
change.
Reviewers: rengolin
Subscribers: jyknight, dschuff, arsenm, rampitec, danalbert, srhines, javed.absar, dsanders, echristo, emaste, jholewinski, tberghammer, ted, jfb, llvm-commits, rengolin
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10969
llvm-svn: 247683
Change the output of llvm-cov s.t it does not truncate function names
and file paths when printing coverage reports.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12647
rdar://22531141
llvm-svn: 247635
Summary: This change generalizes symlink generation and makes symlinks to tools obey LLVM_TOOLCHAIN_TOOLS. It makes it so that if you exclude llvm-ar from LLVM_TOOLCHAIN_TOOLS you don't end up with broken symlinks to llvm-lib and llvm-ranlib in your install.
Reviewers: bogner, chapuni, rafael
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12864
llvm-svn: 247632
This is required because ExternalProject_Add requires all targets specified in the DEPENDS argument must exist before calling ExternalProject_Add.
llvm-svn: 247592
This is a follow up to r247518.
As a general note, I think we could do a much better job testing for
error conditions in tools. I already anticipated in a previous mail,
but while implementing this I noticed that the code coverage we have
for error checking is pretty low. I can arbitrarily remove checks from
several tools and the suite still passes.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12846
llvm-svn: 247582
Before we just printed on stderr the program name. Now at least we
print the name of the file that doesn't exist. There's probably room
for improvement of error handling in llvm-mc (and the tools in general),
but still this is a step forward.
llvm-svn: 247518