This re-applies r268760, reverted in r268794.
Fixes http://llvm.org/PR27670
The original imp-defs assertion was way overzealous: forward all
implicit operands, except imp-defs of the new super-reg def (r268787
for GR64, but also possible for GR16->GR32), or imp-uses of the new
super-reg use.
While there, mark the source use as Undef, and add an imp-use of the
old source reg: that should cover any case of dead super-regs.
At the stage the pass runs, flags are unlikely to matter anyway;
still, let's be as correct as possible.
Also add MIR tests for the various interesting cases.
Original commit message:
Codesize is less (16) or equal (8), and we avoid partial
dependencies.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19999
llvm-svn: 268831
Instead of passing around sizes and asking for subregs, we can check
the subreg indices we care about: sub_8bit_hi and sub_8bit.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20006
llvm-svn: 268753
Remove the AddPristinesAndCSRs parameters from
addLiveIns()/addLiveOuts().
We need to respect pristine registers after prologue epilogue insertion,
Seeing that we got this wrong in at least two commits already, we should
rather pay the small price to query MachineFrameInfo for it.
There are three cases that did not set AddPristineAndCSRs to true even
after register allocation:
- ExecutionDepsFix: live-out registers are used as a hint that the
register is used soon. This is not true for pristine registers so
use the new addLiveOutsNoPristines() to maintain this behaviour.
- SystemZShortenInst: Not setting AddPristineAndCSRs to true looks like
a bug, should do the right thing automatically now.
- StackMapLivenessAnalysis: Not adding pristine registers looks like a
bug to me. Added a FIXME comment but maintain the current behaviour
as a change may need to get coordinated with GC runtimes.
llvm-svn: 268336
We run after PEI, so we need to AddPristinesAndCSRs.
In practice, that makes no difference here, because we only ask about
liveness of super-registers of defined GR8/GR16 registers, so they
can't be pristine. Still, it's the correct thing to do.
Thanks to Quentin for noticing!
Follow-up to r267495.
llvm-svn: 267658
Kill-flags, which computeRegisterLiveness uses, are not reliable.
LivePhysRegs is.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19472
llvm-svn: 267495
Summary:
This adds the same checks that were added in r264593 to all
target-specific passes that run after register allocation.
Reviewers: qcolombet
Subscribers: jyknight, dsanders, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18525
llvm-svn: 265313
Ahmed Bougacha