If building lld without x86 support, tests that require that support should
be treated as unsupported, not errors.
Tested using:
1. cmake '-DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD=AArch64;X86'
make check-lld
=>
Expected Passes : 1406
Unsupported Tests : 287
2. cmake '-DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD=AArch64'
make check-lld
=>
Expected Passes : 410
Unsupported Tests : 1283
Patch by Joel Jones
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47748
llvm-svn: 334095
On SPARC, .plt is both writeable and executable. The current way
sections are sorted means that lld puts it after .data/.bss. but it
really needs to be close to .test to make sure branches into .plt
don't overflow. I'd argue that because .bss is supposed to come last
on all architectures, we should change the default sort order such
that writable and executable sections come before sections that are
just writeable. read-only executable sections should still come after
sections that are just read-only of course. This diff makes this
change.
llvm-svn: 304008
Align to the large page size (known as a superpage or huge page).
FreeBSD automatically promotes large, superpage-aligned allocations.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27042
llvm-svn: 287782
We currently don't do a good job of diagnosing inputs that would require
dynamic relocations to be applied to read only segments.
I am about to improve lld in that area, but unfortunately we developed
tests that depend on the current behavior.
To make clear what is actually changing, this first patch just updates
tests to not depend on the current behavior. In most cases this just
means using a rw section instead of a ro one, but that unfortunately
changes many addresses.
llvm-svn: 268145
R_X86_64_SIZE64/R_X86_64_SIZE32 relocations were introduced in 0.98v of "System V Application Binary Interface x86-64" (http://www.x86-64.org/documentation/abi.pdf).
Calculation for them is Z + A, where:
Z - Represents the size of the symbol whose index resides in the relocation entry.
A - Represents the addend used to compute the value of the relocatable field.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15335
llvm-svn: 255332