that function, and apart from being slow, this is unnecessary: ADL can trigger
instantiations that are not permitted here. The standard isn't *completely*
clear here, but this seems like the intent, and in any case this approach is
permitted by [temp.inst]p7.
llvm-svn: 218330
r218053: Use exceptions() instead of getNumExceptions()/getExceptionType() to avoid
r218011: Work around MSVC parser bug by putting redundant braces around the body of
r217997: Skip parens when detecting whether we're instantiating a function declaration.
r217995: Instantiate exception specifications when instantiating function types (other
The Windows build was broken for 16 hours and no one had any good ideas of how to
fix it. Reverting for now to make the builders green. See the cfe-commits thread [1] for
more info.
This was the build error (from [2]):
C:\bb-win7\ninja-clang-i686-msc17-R\llvm-project\clang\lib\Sema\SemaTemplateInstantiate.cpp(1590) : error C2668: '`anonymous-namespace'::TemplateInstantiator::TransformFunctionProtoType' : ambiguous call to overloaded function
C:\bb-win7\ninja-clang-i686-msc17-R\llvm-project\clang\lib\Sema\SemaTemplateInstantiate.cpp(1313): could be 'clang::QualType `anonymous-namespace'::TemplateInstantiator::TransformFunctionProtoType<clang::Sema::SubstFunctionDeclType::<lambda_756edcbe7bd5c7584849a6e3a1491735>>(clang::TypeLocBuilder &,clang::FunctionProtoTypeLoc,clang::CXXRecordDecl *,unsigned int,Fn)'
with
[
Fn=clang::Sema::SubstFunctionDeclType::<lambda_756edcbe7bd5c7584849a6e3a1491735>
]
c:\bb-win7\ninja-clang-i686-msc17-r\llvm-project\clang\lib\sema\TreeTransform.h(4532): or 'clang::QualType clang::TreeTransform<Derived>::TransformFunctionProtoType<clang::Sema::SubstFunctionDeclType::<lambda_756edcbe7bd5c7584849a6e3a1491735>>(clang::TypeLocBuilder &,clang::FunctionProtoTypeLoc,clang::CXXRecordDecl *,unsigned int,Fn)'
with
[
Derived=`anonymous-namespace'::TemplateInstantiator,
Fn=clang::Sema::SubstFunctionDeclType::<lambda_756edcbe7bd5c7584849a6e3a1491735>
]
while trying to match the argument list '(clang::TypeLocBuilder, clang::FunctionProtoTypeLoc, clang::CXXRecordDecl *, unsigned int, clang::Sema::SubstFunctionDeclType::<lambda_756edcbe7bd5c7584849a6e3a1491735>)'
1. http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-commits/Week-of-Mon-20140915/115011.html
2. http://bb.pgr.jp/builders/ninja-clang-i686-msc17-R/builds/10515/steps/build_clang_tools_1/logs/stdio
llvm-svn: 218058
The reasoning is that this construct is accepted by all compilers and valid in
C++11, so it doesn't seem like a useful warning to have enabled by default.
Building with -pedantic, -Wbind-to-temporary-copy, or -Wc++98-compat still
shows the warning.
The motivation is that I built re2, and this was the only warning that was
emitted during the build. Both changing re2 to fix the warning and detecting
clang and suppressing the warning in re2's build seem inferior than just giving
the compiler a good default for this warning.
Also move the cxx98compat version of this warning to CXX98CompatPedantic, and
update tests accordingly.
llvm-svn: 218008
than the type of a function declaration). We previously didn't instantiate
these at all! This also covers the pathological case where the only mention of
a parameter pack is within the exception specification; this gives us a second
way (other than alias templates) to reach the horrible state where a type
contains an unexpanded pack, but its canonical type does not.
llvm-svn: 217995
"protected scope" is very unhelpful here and actively confuses users. Instead,
simply state the nature of the problem in the diagnostic: we cannot jump from
here to there. The notes explain nicely why not.
llvm-svn: 217293
use __thiscall. (This doesn't actually work for MSVC; they don't allow the
__thiscall qualifier here, but it's sufficient to demonstrate that we do
implement the intent of the DR.)
llvm-svn: 217213
before retrying the initialization to produce diagnostics. Otherwise, we may
fail to produce any diagnostics, and silently produce invalid AST in a -Asserts
build. Also add a note to this codepath to make it more clear why we were
trying to create a temporary.
llvm-svn: 217197
With targeting i686-win32,
error: 'error' diagnostics seen but not expected:
File clang/test/CXX/drs/dr5xx.cpp Line 521: implicit instantiation of undefined template 'dr547::X<void () __attribute__((thiscall)) const>'
File clang/test/CXX/drs/dr5xx.cpp Line 518: implicit instantiation of undefined template 'dr547::X<void () __attribute__((thiscall)) const>'
File clang/test/CXX/drs/dr5xx.cpp Line 518: implicit instantiation of undefined template 'dr547::X<void () __attribute__((thiscall)) const>'
error: 'note' diagnostics seen but not expected:
File clang/test/CXX/drs/dr5xx.cpp Line 516: template is declared here
File clang/test/CXX/drs/dr5xx.cpp Line 521: in instantiation of function template specialization 'dr547::f<void () __attribute__((thiscall)) const, dr547::S>' requested here
File clang/test/CXX/drs/dr5xx.cpp Line 516: template is declared here
File clang/test/CXX/drs/dr5xx.cpp Line 516: template is declared here
7 errors generated.
llvm-svn: 216841
Changes diagnostic options, language standard options, diagnostic identifiers, diagnostic wording to use c++14 instead of c++1y. It also modifies related test cases to use the updated diagnostic wording.
llvm-svn: 215982
it. Diagnose with recovery if it appears after a function parameter that was
obviously supposed to be a parameter pack. Otherwise, warn if it immediately
follows a function parameter pack, because the user most likely didn't intend
to write a parameter pack followed by a C-style varargs ellipsis.
This warning can be syntactically disabled by using ", ..." instead of "...".
llvm-svn: 215408
Clang forgot that '++s.m' was a bitfield l-value and permit it's address
to be taken; this would crash at CodeGen-time.
Instead, propagate the object-kind when we see the prefix
increment/decrement.
This fixes PR20496.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4733
llvm-svn: 214386
This tweaks the diagnostic wording slighly, and adds a fixit on a note.
An alternative would be to add the fixit directly on the diagnostic, see
the review thread linked to from the bug for a few notes on that approach.
llvm-svn: 213725
Because references must be initialized using some evaluated expression, they
must point to something, and a callee can assume the reference parameter is
dereferenceable. Taking advantage of a new attribute just added to LLVM, mark
them as such.
Because dereferenceability in addrspace(0) implies nonnull in the backend, we
don't need both attributes. However, we need to know the size of the object to
use the dereferenceable attribute, so for incomplete types we still emit only
nonnull.
llvm-svn: 213386
We've decided to make the core rewriter class and PP rewriters mandatory.
They're only a few hundred lines of code in total and not worth supporting as a
distinct build configuration, especially since doing so disables key compiler
features.
This reverts commit r213150.
Revert "clang/test: Introduce the feature "rewriter" for --enable-clang-rewriter."
This reverts commit r213148.
Revert "Move clang/test/Frontend/rewrite-*.c to clang/test/Frontend/Rewriter/"
This reverts commit r213146.
llvm-svn: 213159
C++ [basic.start.main]p1: "It shall have a return type of type int"
ISO C is also clear about this, so only accept 'int' with qualifiers in GNUMode
C.
llvm-svn: 212171
elements from {}, rather than value-initializing them. This permits calling an
initializer-list constructor or constructing a std::initializer_list object.
(It would also permit initializing a const reference or rvalue reference if
that weren't explicitly prohibited by other rules.)
llvm-svn: 210091
We should treat tentative definitions as undefined for the purpose of
ODR-use linkage checking.
This broke somewhere around r149731 when tests were disabled.
Note that test coverage for these diagnostics is generally lacking due to a
separate issue (PR19910: Don't suppress unused/undefined warnings when there
are errors).
llvm-svn: 209996
Summary:
Naming the destructor using a typedef-name for the class-name is
well-formed.
This fixes PR19620.
Reviewers: rsmith, doug.gregor
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3583
llvm-svn: 209319
The conventional form is '<action> to silence this warning'.
Also call the diagnostic an 'issue' rather than a 'message' because the latter
term is more widely used with reference to message expressions.
llvm-svn: 209052
Richard Smith