The is a followup of D116965 to split the calendar header. This is a
preparation to add the formatters for the chrono header.
The code is only moved no other changes have been made.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc, philnik
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122995
This patch changes the requirement for getting the declaration of the
assertion handler from including <__assert> to including any public
C++ header of the library. Note that C compatibility headers are
excluded because we don't implement all the C headers ourselves --
some of them are taken straight from the C library, like assert.h.
It also adds a generated test to check it. Furthermore, this new
generated test is designed in a way that will make it possible to
replace almost all the existing test-generation scripts with this
system in upcoming patches.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122506
This change is the basis for a further refactoring where I'm going to
split up the various implementations we have in __threading_support to
make that code easier to understand.
Note that I had to make __convert_to_timespec a template to break
circular dependencies. Concretely, we never seem to use it with anything
other than ::timespec, but I am wary of hardcoding that assumption as
part of this change, since I suspect there's a reason for going through
these hoops in the first place.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116944
I didn't split the calendar bits more than this because there was little
benefit to doing it, and I know our calendar support is incomplete.
Whoever picks up the missing calendar bits can organize these headers
at their leisure.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116965
We've stopped doing it in libc++ for a while now because these names
would end up rotting as we move things around and copy/paste stuff.
This cleans up all the existing files so as to stop the spreading
as people copy-paste headers around.
These are not standard methods, neither libstdc++ nor MSVC STL provide
them.
In practice, one of them was untested and the other one was only used in
one single test.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113027
Several parts in the `chrono` synopsis for C++20 are not yet
implemented. The current recommendation is that things are added to the
synopsis when implemented -- not beforehand. As such, remove the
not-yet-implemented parts to avoid confusion.
Reviewed By: ldionne, Quuxplusone, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111922
`weekday` has a static member function `__weekday_from_days` which is
not part of the mandated public interface of `weeekday` according to the
standard. Since it is only used internally in the constructors of
`weekday`, let's make it private.
Reviewed By: ldionne, Mordante, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112072
All supported compilers provide support for inline variables in C++17 now.
Also, as a fly-by fix, replace some uses of _LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR by just
constexpr.
The only exception in this patch is `std::ignore`, which is provided
prior to C++17. Since it is defined in an anonymous namespace, it always
has internal linkage anyway, so using an inline variable there doesn't
provide any benefit. Instead, `inline` was removed entirely on `std::ignore`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110243
There is a lot more we can do, in particular in <type_traits>, but this
removes some workarounds that were gated on checking a specific compiler
version.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108923
As mandated by the Standard's various synopses, e.g. [iterator.synopsis].
Searching the TeX source for '#include' is a good way to find all of these
mandates.
The new tests are all autogenerated by utils/generate_header_inclusion_tests.py.
I was SHOCKED by how many mandates there are, and how many of them
libc++ wasn't conforming with.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99309
The namespace is unnecessary, and libc++ style is not to include it on type names.
(As opposed to function names, where qualification affects ADL; and in certain
function signatures where `std::` and `_VSTD::` might be mangled differently.
This is none of those situations.)
Currently, vendor-specific availability markup is enabled by default.
This means that even when building against trunk libc++, the headers
will by default prevent you from using some features that were not
released in the dylib on your target platform. This is a source of
frustration since people building libc++ from sources are usually not
trying to use some vendor's released dylib.
For that reason, I've been thinking for a long time that availability
annotations should be off by default, which is the primary change that
this commit enables.
In addition, it reworks the implementation to make it easier for new
vendors to add availability annotations for their platform, and it
refreshes the documentation to reflect the current state of the codebase.
Finally, a CMake configuration option is added to control whether
availability annotations should be turned on for the flavor of libc++
being created. The intent is for vendors like Apple to turn it on, and
for the upstream libc++ to leave it off (the default).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90843
This effectively implements the resolution of LWG3231, which mandates
that calling year_month_day_last::day() on an invalid year_month_day_last
is unspecified behavior. Before this change, it was undefined behavior.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81477
This reverts commit 0c148430cf, which added an assertion in day().
The Standard doesn't allow day() to crash -- instead it says that the
result is unspecified.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70346
Summary:
This LWG issue states that the result of `year_month_day_last::day()` is implementation defined if `ok()` is `false`.
However, from user perspective, calling `day()` in this situation will lead to a (possibly difficult to find) crash.
Hence, I have added an assertion to warn user at least when assertions are enabled.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70346
Summary:
This LWG issue states that the result of `year_month_day_last::day()` is implementation defined if `ok()` is `false`.
However, from user perspective, calling `day()` in this situation will lead to a (possibly difficult to find) crash.
Hence, I have added an assertion to warn user at least when assertions are enabled.
I am however not aware of the libc++ stand on the desired behaviour.
Reviewers: ldionne, mclow.lists, EricWF, #libc
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Subscribers: christof, dexonsmith, libcxx-commits
Tags: #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70346
Summary:
This avoids symbols being accidentally exported from the dylib when they
shouldn't. The next step is to use a pragma to apply hidden visibility
to all declarations (unless otherwise specified), which will allow us
to drop the per-declaration hidden visibility attributes we currently
have.
This also has the nice side effect of making sure the dylib exports the
same symbols regardless of the optimization level.
PR38138
Reviewers: EricWF, mclow.lists
Subscribers: mgorny, christof, jkorous, dexonsmith, libcxx-commits
Tags: #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62868
llvm-svn: 368703
_LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS is only really needed on types with a vtable.
And on Windows it doesn't work with types that have only inline methods.
This patch removes the unneeded attributes.
llvm-svn: 356637
Summary:
Also add the corresponding XFAILs to tests that require filesystem.
The approach taken to mark <filesystem> as unavailable in this patch
is to mark all the header as unavailable using #pragma clang attribute.
Marking each declaration using the attribute is more intrusive and
does not provide a lot of value right now because pretty much everything
in <filesystem> requires dylib support, often transitively.
This is an alternative to https://reviews.llvm.org/D59093.
A similar (but partial) patch was already applied in r356558.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF, serge-sans-paille
Subscribers: christof, jkorous, dexonsmith, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59224
llvm-svn: 356616
to reflect the new license. These used slightly different spellings that
defeated my regular expressions.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351648
Revert r344535 "Wrap up the new chrono literals in an #ifdef..."
Revert r344546 "Mark a couple of test cases as 'C++17-only'..."
Some of the buildbot failures were masked by another error,
and this one was probably missed.
llvm-svn: 344580
Mark de Wever