This is causing a failure in the llvm-clang-x86_64-expensive-checks-win
buildbot, and I can't reproduce it locally, so reverting until I can work out
what is wrong.
llvm-svn: 319654
This adds a "invalid operands for instruction" diagnostic for
instructions where there is an instruction encoding with the correct
mnemonic and which is available for this target, but where multiple
operands do not match those which were provided. This makes it clear
that there is some combination of operands that is valid for the current
target, which the default diagnostic of "invalid instruction" does not.
Since this is a very general error, we only emit it if we don't have a
more specific error.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36747
llvm-svn: 319649
This converts the ARM AsmParser to use the new assembly matcher error
reporting mechanism, which allows errors to be reported for multiple
instruction encodings when it is ambiguous which one the user intended
to use.
By itself this doesn't improve many error messages, because we don't have
diagnostic text for most operand types, but as we add that then this will allow
more of those diagnostic strings to be used when they are relevant.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31530
llvm-svn: 314779
Some ARM FPUs only have 16 double-precision registers, rather than the
normal 32. LLVM represents this with the D16 target feature. This is
currently used by CodeGen to avoid using high registers when they are
not available, but the assembler and disassembler do not.
I fix this in the assmebler and disassembler rather than the
InstrInfo.td files, as the latter would require a large number of
changes everywhere one of the floating-point instructions is referenced
in the backend. This solution is similar to the one used for
co-processor numbers and MSR masks.
llvm-svn: 221341
This prevents us from silently accepting invalid instructions on (for example)
Cortex-M4 with just single-precision VFP support.
No tests for the extra Pat Requires because they're essentially assertions: the
affected code should have been lowered to libcalls before ISel.
rdar://problem/15302004
llvm-svn: 193354
The fused multiply instructions were added in VFPv4 but are still NEON
instructions, in particular they shouldn't be available on a Cortex-M4 not
matter how floaty it is.
llvm-svn: 193342
predicates.
Also remove NEON2 since it's not really useful and it is confusing. If
NEON + VFP4 implies NEON2 but NEON2 doesn't imply NEON + VFP4, what does it
really mean?
rdar://10139676
llvm-svn: 154480
1. The new instruction itinerary entries are not properly described.
2. The asm parser can't handle vfms and vfnms.
3. There were no assembler, disassembler test cases.
4. HasNEON2 has the wrong assembler predicate.
rdar://10139676
llvm-svn: 154456
Andre Vieira