`extern const bfd_target aarch64_elf64_le_vec;` is a variable in BFD.
It was somehow misused as an emulation by Android.
```
% aarch64-linux-gnu-ld -m aarch64_elf64_le_vec a.o
aarch64-linux-gnu-ld: unrecognised emulation mode: aarch64_elf64_le_vec
Supported emulations: aarch64linux aarch64elf aarch64elf32 aarch64elf32b aarch64elfb armelf armelfb aarch64linuxb aarch64linux32 aarch64linux32b armelfb_linux_eabi armelf_linux_eabi
```
Acked by Stephen Hines, who removed the flag from Android a while back.
Also change some options that have different semantics (cause confusion) in llvm-readelf mode:
-s => -S
-t => --symbols
-sd => --section-data
llvm-svn: 359651
Summary:
After rLLD344952 ("Add OUTPUT_FORMAT linker script directive support"),
using BFD names such as `elf64-x86-64-freebsd` the `OUTPUT_FORMAT`
linker script command does not work anymore, resulting in errors like:
```
ld: error: /home/dim/src/clang800-import/stand/efi/loader/arch/amd64/ldscript.amd64:2: unknown output format name: elf64-x86-64-freebsd
>>> OUTPUT_FORMAT("elf64-x86-64-freebsd", "elf64-x86-64-freebsd", "elf64-x86-64-freebsd")
>>> ^
```
To fix this, recognize a `-freebsd` suffix in BFD names, and also set
`Configuration::OSABI` to `ELFOSABI_FREEBSD` for those cases.
Add and/or update several test cases to check for the correct results of
these new `OUTPUT_FORMAT` arguments.
Reviewers: ruiu, atanasyan, grimar, hokein, emaste, espindola
Reviewed By: ruiu
Subscribers: nemanjai, javed.absar, arichardson, krytarowski, kristof.beyls, kbarton, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57283
llvm-svn: 352606
emulation.s is testing multiple architectures, which means it needs all
the corresponding backends enabled, which might not be true for all
developers (for example, I don't have PPC or MIPS enabled). Rather than
marking the entire test as unsupported for such developers, split it up
per backend to get better testing granularity.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53544
llvm-svn: 344986
Fangrui Song