Commit Graph

2 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Piotr Sobczak 265e94e657 [AMDGPU] Extend buffer intrinsics with swizzling
Summary:
Extend cachepolicy operand in the new VMEM buffer intrinsics
to supply information whether the buffer data is swizzled.
Also, propagate this information to MIR.

Intrinsics updated:
int_amdgcn_raw_buffer_load
int_amdgcn_raw_buffer_load_format
int_amdgcn_raw_buffer_store
int_amdgcn_raw_buffer_store_format
int_amdgcn_raw_tbuffer_load
int_amdgcn_raw_tbuffer_store
int_amdgcn_struct_buffer_load
int_amdgcn_struct_buffer_load_format
int_amdgcn_struct_buffer_store
int_amdgcn_struct_buffer_store_format
int_amdgcn_struct_tbuffer_load
int_amdgcn_struct_tbuffer_store

Furthermore, disable merging of VMEM buffer instructions
in SI Load/Store optimizer, if the "swizzled" bit on the instruction
is on.

The default value of the bit is 0, meaning that data in buffer
is linear and buffer instructions can be merged.

There is no difference in the generated code with this commit.
However, in the future it will be expected that front-ends
use buffer intrinsics with correct "swizzled" bit set.

Reviewers: arsenm, nhaehnle, tpr

Reviewed By: nhaehnle

Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, arphaman, jfb, Petar.Avramovic, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68200

llvm-svn: 373491
2019-10-02 17:22:36 +00:00
Jay Foad 6c0204c794 [AMDGPU] Mark s_barrier as having side effects but not accessing memory.
Summary:
This fixes poor scheduling in a function containing a barrier and a few
load instructions.

Without this fix, ScheduleDAGInstrs::buildSchedGraph adds an artificial
edge in the dependency graph from the barrier instruction to the exit
node representing live-out latency, with a latency of about 500 cycles.
Because of this it thinks the critical path through the graph also has
a latency of about 500 cycles. And because of that it does not think
that any of the load instructions are on the critical path, so it
schedules them with no regard for their (80 cycle) latency, which gives
poor results.

Reviewers: arsenm, dstuttard, tpr, nhaehnle

Subscribers: kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67218

llvm-svn: 371192
2019-09-06 10:07:28 +00:00