without a frame pointer when unwind may happen.
This is a workaround for a bug in the way we emit the CFI directives for
frameless unwind information. See PR25614.
llvm-svn: 255175
During selection DAG legalization, extractelement is replaced with a load
instruction. To do this, a temporary store to the stack is used unless an
existing store is found that can be re-used.
If re-using a store, the chain going out of the store must be replaced by
the one going out of the new load (this ensures that any stores that must
take place after the store happens after the load, else the value might
be overwritten before it is loaded).
The problem is, if the extractelement index is dependent on the store
replacing the chain will introduce a cycle in the selection DAG (the load
uses the index, and by replacing the chain we will make the index dependent
on the load).
To fix this, if the index is dependent on the store, the store is skipped.
This is conservative as we may end up creating an unnecessary extra store
to the stack. However, the situation is not expected to occur very often.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15330
llvm-svn: 255114
On AVX and AVX2, BROADCAST instructions can load a scalar into all elements of a target vector.
This patch improves the lowering of 'splat' shuffles of a loaded vector into a broadcast - currently the lowering only works for cases where we are splatting the zero'th element, which is now generalised to any element.
Fix for PR23022
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15310
llvm-svn: 255061
Currently, vectors of halfs end up as ConstantVectors, but there isn't
a good reason they can't be ConstantDataVectors. This should save some
memory.
llvm-svn: 254991
It's strange to duplicate the logic for emitting FP values into
emitGlobalConstantDataSequential, and it's even stranger that we end
up printing the verbose assembly comments differently between the two
paths. Just call into emitGlobalConstantFP rather than crudely
duplicating its logic.
llvm-svn: 254988
The 2-element vector case shows a surprising bug: we failed to
eliminate ops on undefs, so there are 4 fmax calls even though
there can only be 2 valid elements in the inputs.
llvm-svn: 254920
FP logic instructions are supported in DQ extension on AVX-512 target.
I use integer operations instead.
Added tests.
I also enabled FABS in this patch in order to check ANDPS.
The operations are FOR, FXOR, FAND, FANDN.
The instructions, that supported for 512-bit vector under DQ are:
VORPS/PD, VXORPS/PD, VANDPS/PD, FANDNPS/PD.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15110
llvm-svn: 254913
Patterns were missing for KNL target for <8 x i32>, <8 x float> masked load/store.
This intrinsic comes with all legal types:
<8 x float> @llvm.masked.load.v8f32(<8 x float>* %addr, i32 align, <8 x i1> %mask, <8 x float> %passThru),
but still requires lowering, because VMASKMOVPS, VMASKMOVDQU32 work with 512-bit vectors only.
All data operands should be widened to 512-bit vector.
The mask operand should be widened to v16i1 with zeroes.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15265
llvm-svn: 254909
Summary:
We are inserting both Scope and SP into the Seen map and check whether
it was already there in which case we skip the validation (the idea
being that we already checked this Subprogram before). However,
if (Scope == SP) as MDNodes, then inserting the Scope, will trigger
the Seen check causing us to incorrectly not validate this !dbg
attachment. Fix this by not performing the SP Seen check if Scope == SP
Reviewers: pcc, dexonsmith, dblaikie
Subscribers: dblaikie, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14697
llvm-svn: 254887
Also, switch to x86-64 because once we can lower these to something
more reasonable, there will be less noise in the checks. And add
AVX runs because those will be different than SSE.
llvm-svn: 254879
This removes the code path that generate "synchronous" (only correct at call site) CFA.
We will probably want to re-introduce it once we are capable of emitting different
.eh_frame and .debug_frame sections.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14948
llvm-svn: 254874
These instructions are not supported by all CPUs in 64-bit mode. Emitting them
causes Chromium to crash on start-up for users with such chips.
(GCC puts these instructions behind -msahf on 64-bit for the same reason.)
This patch adds FeatureLAHFSAHF, enables it by default for 32-bit targets
and modern CPUs, and changes X86InstrInfo::copyPhysReg back to the lowering
from before r244503 when the instructions are not available.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15240
llvm-svn: 254793
This commit adds a new target-independent calling convention for C++ TLS
access functions. It aims to minimize overhead in the caller by perserving as
many registers as possible.
The target-specific implementation for X86-64 is defined as following:
Arguments are passed as for the default C calling convention
The same applies for the return value(s)
The callee preserves all GPRs - except RAX and RDI
The access function makes C-style TLS function calls in the entry and exit
block, C-style TLS functions save a lot more registers than normal calls.
The added calling convention ties into the existing implementation of the
C-style TLS functions, so we can't simply use existing calling conventions
such as preserve_mostcc.
rdar://9001553
llvm-svn: 254737
Add new x86 pass which replaces address calculations in load or store instructions with def register of existing LEA (must be in the same basic block), if the LEA calculates address that differs only by a displacement. Works only with -Os or -Oz.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13294
llvm-svn: 254712
Summary:
computeRegisterLiveness and analyzePhysReg are currently getting
confused about liveness in some cases, breaking copyPhysReg's
calculation of whether AX is dead in some cases. Work around this issue
temporarily by assuming that AX is always live.
See detail in: https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=25033#c7
And associated bugs PR24535 PR25033 PR24991 PR24992 PR25201.
This workaround makes the code correct but slightly inefficient, but it
seems to confuse the machine instr verifier which now things EAX was
undefined in some cases where it's being conservatively saved /
restored.
Reviewers: majnemer, sanjoy
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15198
llvm-svn: 254680
Code generation often exposes redundant physical register copies through
virtual registers such as:
%vreg = COPY %PHYSREG
...
%PHYSREG = COPY %vreg
There are cases where no intervening clobber of %PHYSREG occurs, and the
later copy could therefore be removed. In some cases this further allows
us to remove the initial copy.
This patch contains a motivating example which comes from the x86 build
of Chrome, specifically cc::ResourceProvider::UnlockForRead uses
libstdc++'s implementation of hash_map. That example has two tests live
at the same time, and after machine sinking LLVM has confused itself
enough and things spilling EFLAGS is a great idea even though it's
never restored and the comparison results are both live.
Before this patch we have:
DEC32m %RIP, 1, %noreg, <ga:@L>, %noreg, %EFLAGS<imp-def>
%vreg1<def> = COPY %EFLAGS; GR64:%vreg1
%EFLAGS<def> = COPY %vreg1; GR64:%vreg1
JNE_1 <BB#1>, %EFLAGS<imp-use>
Both copies are useless. This patch tries to eliminate the later copy in
a generic manner.
dec is especially confusing to LLVM when compared with sub.
I wrote this patch to treat all physical registers generically, but only
remove redundant copies of non-allocatable physical registers because
the allocatable ones caused issues (e.g. when calling conventions weren't
properly modeled) and should be handled later by the register allocator
anyways.
The following tests used to failed when the patch also replaced allocatable
registers:
CodeGen/X86/StackColoring.ll
CodeGen/X86/avx512-calling-conv.ll
CodeGen/X86/copy-propagation.ll
CodeGen/X86/inline-asm-fpstack.ll
CodeGen/X86/musttail-varargs.ll
CodeGen/X86/pop-stack-cleanup.ll
CodeGen/X86/preserve_mostcc64.ll
CodeGen/X86/tailcallstack64.ll
CodeGen/X86/this-return-64.ll
This happens because COPY has other special meaning for e.g. dependency
breakage and x87 FP stack.
Note that all other backends' tests pass.
Reviewers: qcolombet
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15157
llvm-svn: 254665
Summary:
These ADJCALLSTACK markers don't generate code, but they keep dynamic
alloca code that calls chkstk out of the prologue.
This slightly pessimizes inalloca calls by preventing some register copy
coalescing, but I can live with that.
Reviewers: qcolombet
Subscribers: hans, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15200
llvm-svn: 254645
On FMA targets, we can avoid having to load a constant to negate a float/double multiply by instead using a FNMSUB (-(X*Y)-0)
Fix for PR24366
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14909
llvm-svn: 254495
(This is the second attempt to submit this patch. The first caused two assertion
failures and was reverted. See https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=25687)
The patch in http://reviews.llvm.org/D13745 is broken into four parts:
1. New interfaces without functional changes (http://reviews.llvm.org/D13908).
2. Use new interfaces in SelectionDAG, while in other passes treat probabilities
as weights (http://reviews.llvm.org/D14361).
3. Use new interfaces in all other passes.
4. Remove old interfaces.
This patch is 3+4 above. In this patch, MBB won't provide weight-based
interfaces any more, which are totally replaced by probability-based ones.
The interface addSuccessor() is redesigned so that the default probability is
unknown. We allow unknown probabilities but don't allow using it together
with known probabilities in successor list. That is to say, we either have a
list of successors with all known probabilities, or all unknown
probabilities. In the latter case, we assume each successor has 1/N
probability where N is the number of successors. An assertion checks if the
user is attempting to add a successor with the disallowed mixed use as stated
above. This can help us catch many misuses.
All uses of weight-based interfaces are now updated to use probability-based
ones.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14973
llvm-svn: 254377
and the follow-up r254356: "Fix a bug in MachineBlockPlacement that may cause assertion failure during BranchProbability construction."
Asserts were firing in Chromium builds. See PR25687.
llvm-svn: 254366
The patch in http://reviews.llvm.org/D13745 is broken into four parts:
1. New interfaces without functional changes (http://reviews.llvm.org/D13908).
2. Use new interfaces in SelectionDAG, while in other passes treat probabilities
as weights (http://reviews.llvm.org/D14361).
3. Use new interfaces in all other passes.
4. Remove old interfaces.
This patch is 3+4 above. In this patch, MBB won't provide weight-based
interfaces any more, which are totally replaced by probability-based ones.
The interface addSuccessor() is redesigned so that the default probability is
unknown. We allow unknown probabilities but don't allow using it together
with known probabilities in successor list. That is to say, we either have a
list of successors with all known probabilities, or all unknown
probabilities. In the latter case, we assume each successor has 1/N
probability where N is the number of successors. An assertion checks if the
user is attempting to add a successor with the disallowed mixed use as stated
above. This can help us catch many misuses.
All uses of weight-based interfaces are now updated to use probability-based
ones.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14973
llvm-svn: 254348
We currently output FMA instructions on targets which support both FMA4 + FMA (i.e. later Bulldozer CPUS bdver2/bdver3/bdver4).
This patch flips this so FMA4 is preferred; this is for several reasons:
1 - FMA4 is non-destructive reducing the need for mov instructions.
2 - Its more straighforward to commute and fold inputs (although the recent work on FMA has reduced this difference).
3 - All supported targets have FMA4 performance equal or better to FMA - Piledriver (bdver2) in particular has half the throughput when executing FMA instructions.
Its looks like no future AMD processor lines will support FMA4 after the Bulldozer series so we're not causing problems for later CPUs.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14997
llvm-svn: 254339
The MachineVerifier wants to check that the register operands of an
instruction belong to the instruction's register class. RIP-relative
control flow instructions violated this by referencing RIP. While this
was fixed for SysV, it was never fixed for Win64.
llvm-svn: 254315
We could already recognise shuffle(FSUB, FADD) -> ADDSUB, this allow us to recognise shuffle(FADD, FSUB) -> ADDSUB by commuting the shuffle mask prior to matching.
llvm-svn: 254259
Added FMADD/FMSUB/FNMADD/FNMSUB tests for all types
Added load folding tests for 512-bit vectors
NOTE: Many of the AVX512 FMA instructions don't yet commute/fold correctly
As discussed on D14909
llvm-svn: 254232
generated for _mm_losd_s{s,d}() intrinsics and used in scalar FMAs generated
for FMA intrinsics _mm_f{madd,msub,nmadd,nmsub}_s{s,d}().
Reviewer: David Kreitzer
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14762
llvm-svn: 254140
to a simple type when lowering a truncating store of a vector type. In this
case for an EVT we'll return Expand as we should in all of the cases anyhow.
The testcase triggered at the one in VectorLegalizer::LegalizeOp, inspection
found the rest.
llvm-svn: 254061
It was wrong order of operands (from intrinsic to DAG node).
I added more strict type specification for instruction selection.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14942
llvm-svn: 254059
This caused PR25607 and also caused Chromium to crash on start-up.
(Also had to update test/CodeGen/X86/avx-splat.ll, which was committed
after shrink wrapping was enabled.)
llvm-svn: 254044
X86 needs to use its own FMA opcodes, preventing the standard FNEG(FMA) pattern table recognition method used by other platforms. This patch adds support for lowering FNEG(FMA(X,Y,Z)) into a single suitably negated FMA instruction.
Fix for PR24364
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14906
llvm-svn: 254016
This patch fixes the following issues:
1. Fix the return type of X86psadbw: it should not be the same type of inputs.
For vNi8 inputs the output should be vMi64, where M = N/8.
2. Fix the return type of int_x86_avx512_psad_bw_512 accordingly.
3. Fix the definiton of PSADBW, VPSADBW, and VPSADBWY accordingly.
4. Adjust the return type when building a DAG node of X86ISD::PSADBW type.
5. Update related tests.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14897
llvm-svn: 254010
We had duplicated definitions for the same hardware '[v]movq' instructions. For example with SSE:
def MOVZQI2PQIrr : RS2I<0x6E, MRMSrcReg, (outs VR128:$dst), (ins GR64:$src),
"mov{d|q}\t{$src, $dst|$dst, $src}", // X86-64 only
[(set VR128:$dst, (v2i64 (X86vzmovl (v2i64 (scalar_to_vector GR64:$src)))))],
IIC_SSE_MOVDQ>;
def MOV64toPQIrr : RS2I<0x6E, MRMSrcReg, (outs VR128:$dst), (ins GR64:$src),
"mov{d|q}\t{$src, $dst|$dst, $src}",
[(set VR128:$dst, (v2i64 (scalar_to_vector GR64:$src)))],
IIC_SSE_MOVDQ>, Sched<[WriteMove]>;
As shown in the test case and PR25554:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=25554
This causes us to miss reusing an operand because later passes don't know these 'movq' are the same instruction.
This patch deletes one pair of these defs.
Sadly, this won't fix the original test case in the bug report. Something else is still broken.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14941
llvm-svn: 253988
The patch in http://reviews.llvm.org/D13745 is broken into four parts:
1. New interfaces without functional changes.
2. Use new interfaces in SelectionDAG, while in other passes treat probabilities
as weights.
3. Use new interfaces in all other passes.
4. Remove old interfaces.
This the second patch above. In this patch SelectionDAG starts to use
probability-based interfaces in MBB to add successors but other MC passes are
still using weight-based interfaces. Therefore, we need to maintain correct
weight list in MBB even when probability-based interfaces are used. This is
done by updating weight list in probability-based interfaces by treating the
numerator of probabilities as weights. This change affects many test cases
that check successor weight values. I will update those test cases once this
patch looks good to you.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14361
llvm-svn: 253965
This patch detects the AVG pattern in vectorized code, which is simply
c = (a + b + 1) / 2, where a, b, and c have the same type which are vectors of
either unsigned i8 or unsigned i16. In the IR, i8/i16 will be promoted to
i32 before any arithmetic operations. The following IR shows such an example:
%1 = zext <N x i8> %a to <N x i32>
%2 = zext <N x i8> %b to <N x i32>
%3 = add nuw nsw <N x i32> %1, <i32 1 x N>
%4 = add nuw nsw <N x i32> %3, %2
%5 = lshr <N x i32> %N, <i32 1 x N>
%6 = trunc <N x i32> %5 to <N x i8>
and with this patch it will be converted to a X86ISD::AVG instruction.
The pattern recognition is done when combining instructions just before type
legalization during instruction selection. We do it here because after type
legalization, it is much more difficult to do pattern recognition based
on many instructions that are doing type conversions. Therefore, for
target-specific instructions (like X86ISD::AVG), we need to take care of type
legalization by ourselves. However, as X86ISD::AVG behaves similarly to
ISD::ADD, I am wondering if there is a way to legalize operands and result
types of X86ISD::AVG together with ISD::ADD. It seems that the current design
doesn't support this idea.
Tests are added for SSE2, AVX2, and AVX512BW and both i8 and i16 types of
variant vector sizes.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14761
llvm-svn: 253952
Caller saved regs differ between SysV and Win64. Use the tail call available set to scavenge from.
Refactor register info to create new helper to get at tail call GPRs. Added a new test case for windows. Fixed up a number of X64 tests since now RCX is preferred over RDX on SysV.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14878
llvm-svn: 253927
autogenerated.
Also update existing test cases which appear to be generated by it and
weren't modified (other than addition of the header) by rerunning it.
llvm-svn: 253917
ISERT_SUBVECTOR for i1 vectors may be done with shifts, when we insert into the lower part, or into the upper part, on into all-zero vector.
CONCAT_VECTORS uses ISERT_SUBVECTOR.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14815
llvm-svn: 253819
MachineInstrBuilder::addDisp can already add an immediate or global address MO with an adjusted offset, this patch adds support for constant pool indices as well.
All remaining MO types still assert - there are a number of other types that could support adjusted offsets but I have no test cases at this time.
Required to fix a regression in D13988 found by Mikael Holmén during stress testing (test case attached).
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14867
llvm-svn: 253795
It turns out we have a number of places that just grab the first type attached to a register class for various reasons. This is fine unless for some reason that type isn't legal on the current target, such as for SSE1 which doesn't support v16i8/v8i16/v4i32/v2i64 - all of which were included before 4f32 in the class.
Given that this is such a rare situation I've just re-ordered the types and placed the float types first.
Fix for PR16133
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14787
llvm-svn: 253773
Now that the register allocator knows about the barriers on funclet
entry and exit, testing has shown that this is unnecessary.
We still demote PHIs on unsplittable blocks due to the differences
between the IR CFG and the Machine CFG.
llvm-svn: 253619
This is another step towards allowing SimplifyCFG to speculate harder, but then have
CGP clean things up if the target doesn't like it.
Previous patches in this series:
http://reviews.llvm.org/D12882http://reviews.llvm.org/D13297
D13297 should catch most expensive ops, but speculation of cttz/ctlz requires special
handling because of weirdness in the intrinsic definition for handling a zero input
(that definition can probably be blamed on x86).
For example, if we have the usual speculated-by-select expensive op pattern like this:
%tobool = icmp eq i64 %A, 0
%0 = tail call i64 @llvm.cttz.i64(i64 %A, i1 true) ; is_zero_undef == true
%cond = select i1 %tobool, i64 64, i64 %0
ret i64 %cond
There's an instcombine that will turn it into:
%0 = tail call i64 @llvm.cttz.i64(i64 %A, i1 false) ; is_zero_undef == false
This CGP patch is looking for that case and despeculating it back into:
entry:
%tobool = icmp eq i64 %A, 0
br i1 %tobool, label %cond.end, label %cond.true
cond.true:
%0 = tail call i64 @llvm.cttz.i64(i64 %A, i1 true) ; is_zero_undef == true
br label %cond.end
cond.end:
%cond = phi i64 [ %0, %cond.true ], [ 64, %entry ]
ret i64 %cond
This unfortunately may lead to poorer codegen (see the changes in the existing x86 test),
but if we increase speculation in SimplifyCFG (the next step in this patch series), then
we should avoid those kinds of cases in the first place.
The need for this patch was originally mentioned here:
http://reviews.llvm.org/D7506
with follow-up here:
http://reviews.llvm.org/D7554
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14630
llvm-svn: 253573
Copying one mask register to another under BW should be done with kmovq instruction, otherwise we can loose some bits.
Copying 8 bits under DQ may be done with kmovb.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14812
llvm-svn: 253563
The lowering patterns for X86ISD::VZEXT_MOVL for 128-bit to 256-bit vectors were just copying the lower xmm instead of actually masking off the first scalar using a blend.
Fix for PR25320.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14151
llvm-svn: 253561
The masked intrinsics support all integer and floating point data types. I added the pointer type to this list.
Added tests for CodeGen and for Loop Vectorizer.
Updated the Language Reference.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14150
llvm-svn: 253544
Note, this was reviewed (and more details are in) http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20151109/312083.html
These intrinsics currently have an explicit alignment argument which is
required to be a constant integer. It represents the alignment of the
source and dest, and so must be the minimum of those.
This change allows source and dest to each have their own alignments
by using the alignment attribute on their arguments. The alignment
argument itself is removed.
There are a few places in the code for which the code needs to be
checked by an expert as to whether using only src/dest alignment is
safe. For those places, they currently take the minimum of src/dest
alignments which matches the current behaviour.
For example, code which used to read:
call void @llvm.memcpy.p0i8.p0i8.i32(i8* %dest, i8* %src, i32 500, i32 8, i1 false)
will now read:
call void @llvm.memcpy.p0i8.p0i8.i32(i8* align 8 %dest, i8* align 8 %src, i32 500, i1 false)
For out of tree owners, I was able to strip alignment from calls using sed by replacing:
(call.*llvm\.memset.*)i32\ [0-9]*\,\ i1 false\)
with:
$1i1 false)
and similarly for memmove and memcpy.
I then added back in alignment to test cases which needed it.
A similar commit will be made to clang which actually has many differences in alignment as now
IRBuilder can generate different source/dest alignments on calls.
In IRBuilder itself, a new argument was added. Instead of calling:
CreateMemCpy(Dst, Src, getInt64(Size), DstAlign, /* isVolatile */ false)
you now call
CreateMemCpy(Dst, Src, getInt64(Size), DstAlign, SrcAlign, /* isVolatile */ false)
There is a temporary class (IntegerAlignment) which takes the source alignment and rejects
implicit conversion from bool. This is to prevent isVolatile here from passing its default
parameter to the source alignment.
Note, changes in future can now be made to codegen. I didn't change anything here, but this
change should enable better memcpy code sequences.
Reviewed by Hal Finkel.
llvm-svn: 253511
This patch adds support for vector constant folding of integer/float comparisons.
This requires FoldConstantVectorArithmetic to support scalar constant operands (in this case ISD::CONDCASE). In future we should be able to support other scalar constant types as necessary (and possibly start calling FoldConstantVectorArithmetic for all node creations)
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14683
llvm-svn: 253504
If a section is rw, it is irrelevant if the dynamic linker will write to
it or not.
It looks like llvm implemented this because gcc was doing it. It looks
like gcc implemented this in the hope that it would put all the
relocated items close together and speed up the dynamic linker.
There are two problem with this:
* It doesn't work. Both bfd and gold will map .data.rel to .data and
concatenate the input sections in the order they are seen.
* If we want a feature like that, it can be implemented directly in the
linker since it knowns where the dynamic relocations are.
llvm-svn: 253436
When looking for the best successor from the outer loop for a block
belonging to an inner loop, the edge probability computation can be
improved so that edges in the inner loop are ignored. For example,
suppose we are building chains for the non-loop part of the following
code, and looking for B1's best successor. Assume the true body is very
hot, then B3 should be the best candidate. However, because of the
existence of the back edge from B1 to B0, the probability from B1 to B3
can be very small, preventing B3 to be its successor. In this patch, when
computing the probability of the edge from B1 to B3, the weight on the
back edge B1->B0 is ignored, so that B1->B3 will have 100% probability.
if (...)
do {
B0;
... // some branches
B1;
} while(...);
else
B2;
B3;
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10825
llvm-svn: 253414
Quentin Colombet