Commit Graph

17 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Mehdi Amini be0a7e9f27 Adjust "end namespace" comment in MLIR to match new agree'd coding style
See D115115 and this mailing list discussion:
https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2021-December/154199.html

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115309
2021-12-08 06:05:26 +00:00
Alexander Belyaev f89bb3c012 [mlir] Move bufferization-related passes to `bufferization` dialect.
[RFC](https://llvm.discourse.group/t/rfc-dialect-for-bufferization-related-ops/4712)

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114698
2021-11-30 09:58:47 +01:00
Mogball a54f4eae0e [MLIR] Replace std ops with arith dialect ops
Precursor: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110200

Removed redundant ops from the standard dialect that were moved to the
`arith` or `math` dialects.

Renamed all instances of operations in the codebase and in tests.

Reviewed By: rriddle, jpienaar

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110797
2021-10-13 03:07:03 +00:00
Sumesh Udayakumaran b2af2aeea6 [mlir] Mode for explicitly controlling the fusion kind
New mode option that allows for either running the default fusion kind that happens today or doing either of producer-consumer or sibling fusion. This will also be helpful to minimize the compile-time of the fusion tests.

Reviewed By: bondhugula, dcaballe

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110102
2021-09-27 20:37:42 +03:00
cwz920716 500d4c45ba [MLIR] Use memref.copy ops in BufferResultsToOutParams pass.
Both copy/alloc ops are using memref dialect after this change.

Reviewed By: silvas, mehdi_amini

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109480
2021-09-15 02:59:30 +00:00
Haruki Imai 000a05fd1a [mlir] Normalize dynamic memrefs with a map of tiled-layout.
Steps for normalizing dynamic memrefs for tiled layout map
1. Check if original map is tiled layout. Only tiled layout is supported.
2. Create normalized memrefType. Dimensions that include dynamic dimensions
   in the map output will be dynamic dimensions.
3. Create new maps to calculate each dimension size of new memref.
   In tiled layout, the dimension size can be calculated by replacing
    "floordiv <tile size>" with "ceildiv <tile size>" and
    "mod <tile size>" with "<tile size>".
4. Create AffineApplyOp to apply the new maps. The output of AffineApplyOp is
   dynamicSizes for new AllocOp.
5. Add the new dynamic sizes in new AllocOp.

This patch also set MemRefsNormalizable trant in CastOp and DimOp since
they used with dynamic memrefs.

Reviewed By: bondhugula

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97655
2021-05-24 08:39:36 +05:30
Julian Gross e2310704d8 [MLIR] Create memref dialect and move dialect-specific ops from std.
Create the memref dialect and move dialect-specific ops
from std dialect to this dialect.

Moved ops:
AllocOp -> MemRef_AllocOp
AllocaOp -> MemRef_AllocaOp
AssumeAlignmentOp -> MemRef_AssumeAlignmentOp
DeallocOp -> MemRef_DeallocOp
DimOp -> MemRef_DimOp
MemRefCastOp -> MemRef_CastOp
MemRefReinterpretCastOp -> MemRef_ReinterpretCastOp
GetGlobalMemRefOp -> MemRef_GetGlobalOp
GlobalMemRefOp -> MemRef_GlobalOp
LoadOp -> MemRef_LoadOp
PrefetchOp -> MemRef_PrefetchOp
ReshapeOp -> MemRef_ReshapeOp
StoreOp -> MemRef_StoreOp
SubViewOp -> MemRef_SubViewOp
TransposeOp -> MemRef_TransposeOp
TensorLoadOp -> MemRef_TensorLoadOp
TensorStoreOp -> MemRef_TensorStoreOp
TensorToMemRefOp -> MemRef_BufferCastOp
ViewOp -> MemRef_ViewOp

The roadmap to split the memref dialect from std is discussed here:
https://llvm.discourse.group/t/rfc-split-the-memref-dialect-from-std/2667

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98041
2021-03-15 11:14:09 +01:00
Mehdi Amini f9dc2b7079 Separate the Registration from Loading dialects in the Context
This changes the behavior of constructing MLIRContext to no longer load globally
registered dialects on construction. Instead Dialects are only loaded explicitly
on demand:
- the Parser is lazily loading Dialects in the context as it encounters them
during parsing. This is the only purpose for registering dialects and not load
them in the context.
- Passes are expected to declare the dialects they will create entity from
(Operations, Attributes, or Types), and the PassManager is loading Dialects into
the Context when starting a pipeline.

This changes simplifies the configuration of the registration: a compiler only
need to load the dialect for the IR it will emit, and the optimizer is
self-contained and load the required Dialects. For example in the Toy tutorial,
the compiler only needs to load the Toy dialect in the Context, all the others
(linalg, affine, std, LLVM, ...) are automatically loaded depending on the
optimization pipeline enabled.

To adjust to this change, stop using the existing dialect registration: the
global registry will be removed soon.

1) For passes, you need to override the method:

virtual void getDependentDialects(DialectRegistry &registry) const {}

and registery on the provided registry any dialect that this pass can produce.
Passes defined in TableGen can provide this list in the dependentDialects list
field.

2) For dialects, on construction you can register dependent dialects using the
provided MLIRContext: `context.getOrLoadDialect<DialectName>()`
This is useful if a dialect may canonicalize or have interfaces involving
another dialect.

3) For loading IR, dialect that can be in the input file must be explicitly
registered with the context. `MlirOptMain()` is taking an explicit registry for
this purpose. See how the standalone-opt.cpp example is setup:

  mlir::DialectRegistry registry;
  registry.insert<mlir::standalone::StandaloneDialect>();
  registry.insert<mlir::StandardOpsDialect>();

Only operations from these two dialects can be in the input file. To include all
of the dialects in MLIR Core, you can populate the registry this way:

  mlir::registerAllDialects(registry);

4) For `mlir-translate` callback, as well as frontend, Dialects can be loaded in
the context before emitting the IR: context.getOrLoadDialect<ToyDialect>()

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85622
2020-08-19 01:19:03 +00:00
Mehdi Amini e75bc5c791 Revert "Separate the Registration from Loading dialects in the Context"
This reverts commit d14cf45735.
The build is broken with GCC-5.
2020-08-19 01:19:03 +00:00
Mehdi Amini d14cf45735 Separate the Registration from Loading dialects in the Context
This changes the behavior of constructing MLIRContext to no longer load globally
registered dialects on construction. Instead Dialects are only loaded explicitly
on demand:
- the Parser is lazily loading Dialects in the context as it encounters them
during parsing. This is the only purpose for registering dialects and not load
them in the context.
- Passes are expected to declare the dialects they will create entity from
(Operations, Attributes, or Types), and the PassManager is loading Dialects into
the Context when starting a pipeline.

This changes simplifies the configuration of the registration: a compiler only
need to load the dialect for the IR it will emit, and the optimizer is
self-contained and load the required Dialects. For example in the Toy tutorial,
the compiler only needs to load the Toy dialect in the Context, all the others
(linalg, affine, std, LLVM, ...) are automatically loaded depending on the
optimization pipeline enabled.

To adjust to this change, stop using the existing dialect registration: the
global registry will be removed soon.

1) For passes, you need to override the method:

virtual void getDependentDialects(DialectRegistry &registry) const {}

and registery on the provided registry any dialect that this pass can produce.
Passes defined in TableGen can provide this list in the dependentDialects list
field.

2) For dialects, on construction you can register dependent dialects using the
provided MLIRContext: `context.getOrLoadDialect<DialectName>()`
This is useful if a dialect may canonicalize or have interfaces involving
another dialect.

3) For loading IR, dialect that can be in the input file must be explicitly
registered with the context. `MlirOptMain()` is taking an explicit registry for
this purpose. See how the standalone-opt.cpp example is setup:

  mlir::DialectRegistry registry;
  registry.insert<mlir::standalone::StandaloneDialect>();
  registry.insert<mlir::StandardOpsDialect>();

Only operations from these two dialects can be in the input file. To include all
of the dialects in MLIR Core, you can populate the registry this way:

  mlir::registerAllDialects(registry);

4) For `mlir-translate` callback, as well as frontend, Dialects can be loaded in
the context before emitting the IR: context.getOrLoadDialect<ToyDialect>()

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85622
2020-08-18 23:23:56 +00:00
Mehdi Amini d84fe55e0d Revert "Separate the Registration from Loading dialects in the Context"
This reverts commit e1de2b7550.
Broke a build bot.
2020-08-18 22:16:34 +00:00
Mehdi Amini e1de2b7550 Separate the Registration from Loading dialects in the Context
This changes the behavior of constructing MLIRContext to no longer load globally
registered dialects on construction. Instead Dialects are only loaded explicitly
on demand:
- the Parser is lazily loading Dialects in the context as it encounters them
during parsing. This is the only purpose for registering dialects and not load
them in the context.
- Passes are expected to declare the dialects they will create entity from
(Operations, Attributes, or Types), and the PassManager is loading Dialects into
the Context when starting a pipeline.

This changes simplifies the configuration of the registration: a compiler only
need to load the dialect for the IR it will emit, and the optimizer is
self-contained and load the required Dialects. For example in the Toy tutorial,
the compiler only needs to load the Toy dialect in the Context, all the others
(linalg, affine, std, LLVM, ...) are automatically loaded depending on the
optimization pipeline enabled.

To adjust to this change, stop using the existing dialect registration: the
global registry will be removed soon.

1) For passes, you need to override the method:

virtual void getDependentDialects(DialectRegistry &registry) const {}

and registery on the provided registry any dialect that this pass can produce.
Passes defined in TableGen can provide this list in the dependentDialects list
field.

2) For dialects, on construction you can register dependent dialects using the
provided MLIRContext: `context.getOrLoadDialect<DialectName>()`
This is useful if a dialect may canonicalize or have interfaces involving
another dialect.

3) For loading IR, dialect that can be in the input file must be explicitly
registered with the context. `MlirOptMain()` is taking an explicit registry for
this purpose. See how the standalone-opt.cpp example is setup:

  mlir::DialectRegistry registry;
  mlir::registerDialect<mlir::standalone::StandaloneDialect>();
  mlir::registerDialect<mlir::StandardOpsDialect>();

Only operations from these two dialects can be in the input file. To include all
of the dialects in MLIR Core, you can populate the registry this way:

  mlir::registerAllDialects(registry);

4) For `mlir-translate` callback, as well as frontend, Dialects can be loaded in
the context before emitting the IR: context.getOrLoadDialect<ToyDialect>()
2020-08-18 21:14:39 +00:00
Mehdi Amini 25ee851746 Revert "Separate the Registration from Loading dialects in the Context"
This reverts commit 2056393387.

Build is broken on a few bots
2020-08-15 09:21:47 +00:00
Mehdi Amini 2056393387 Separate the Registration from Loading dialects in the Context
This changes the behavior of constructing MLIRContext to no longer load globally registered dialects on construction. Instead Dialects are only loaded explicitly on demand:
- the Parser is lazily loading Dialects in the context as it encounters them during parsing. This is the only purpose for registering dialects and not load them in the context.
- Passes are expected to declare the dialects they will create entity from (Operations, Attributes, or Types), and the PassManager is loading Dialects into the Context when starting a pipeline.

This changes simplifies the configuration of the registration: a compiler only need to load the dialect for the IR it will emit, and the optimizer is self-contained and load the required Dialects. For example in the Toy tutorial, the compiler only needs to load the Toy dialect in the Context, all the others (linalg, affine, std, LLVM, ...) are automatically loaded depending on the optimization pipeline enabled.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85622
2020-08-15 08:07:31 +00:00
Mehdi Amini ba92dadf05 Revert "Separate the Registration from Loading dialects in the Context"
This was landed by accident, will reland with the right comments
addressed from the reviews.
Also revert dependent build fixes.
2020-08-15 07:35:10 +00:00
Mehdi Amini ebf521e784 Separate the Registration from Loading dialects in the Context
This changes the behavior of constructing MLIRContext to no longer load globally registered dialects on construction. Instead Dialects are only loaded explicitly on demand:
- the Parser is lazily loading Dialects in the context as it encounters them during parsing. This is the only purpose for registering dialects and not load them in the context.
- Passes are expected to declare the dialects they will create entity from (Operations, Attributes, or Types), and the PassManager is loading Dialects into the Context when starting a pipeline.

This changes simplifies the configuration of the registration: a compiler only need to load the dialect for the IR it will emit, and the optimizer is self-contained and load the required Dialects. For example in the Toy tutorial, the compiler only needs to load the Toy dialect in the Context, all the others (linalg, affine, std, LLVM, ...) are automatically loaded depending on the optimization pipeline enabled.
2020-08-14 09:40:27 +00:00
River Riddle 1834ad4a69 [mlir][Pass] Update the PassGen to generate base classes instead of utilities
Summary:
This is much cleaner, and fits the same structure as many other tablegen backends. This was not done originally as the CRTP in the pass classes made it overly verbose/complex.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77367
2020-04-07 14:08:52 -07:00