This is a union of these commits:
* R600/SI: Enable more tests for VI which need no changes
* R600/SI: Enable V_BCNT tests for VI
Differences:
- v_bcnt_..._e32 -> _e64
- s_load_dword* inline offset is in bytes instead of dwords
* R600/SI: Enable all tests for VI which use S_LOAD_DWORD
The inline offset is changed from dwords to bytes.
* R600/SI: Enable LDS tests for VI
Differences:
- the s_load_dword inline offset changed from dwords to bytes
- the tests checked very little on CI, so they have been fixed to check all
instructions that "SI" checked
* R600/SI: Enable lshr tests for VI
* R600/SI: Fix divrem64 tests
- "v_lshl_64" was missing "b" before "64"
- added VI-NOT checks
* R600/SI: Enable the SI.tid test for VI
* R600/SI: Enable the frem test for VI
Also, the frem_f64 checking is added for CI-VI.
* R600/SI: Add VI tests for rsq.clamped
llvm-svn: 228830
Doesn't seem necessary anymore. I think this was mostly compensating for
not enabling WQM for texture sampling instructions.
v2: Add test coverage
Reviewed-by: Tom Stellard <tom@stellard.net>
llvm-svn: 228373
If whole quad mode isn't enabled for these, the level of detail is
calculated incorrectly for pixels along diagonal triangle edges, causing
artifacts.
v2: Use a TSFlag instead of lots of switch cases
v3: Add test coverage
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=88642
Reviewed-by: Tom Stellard <tom@stellard.net>
llvm-svn: 228372
We should be setting UnrollingPreferences::MaxCount to MAX_UINT instead
of UnrollingPreferences::Count.
Count is a 'forced unrolling factor', while MaxCount sets an upper
limit to the unrolling factor.
Setting Count to MAX_UINT was causing the loop in the testcase to be
unrolled 15 times, when it only had a maximum of 4 iterations.
llvm-svn: 228303
The llvm.SI.end.cf intrinsic is used to mark the end of if-then blocks,
if-then-else blocks, and loops. It is responsible for updating the
exec mask to re-enable threads that had been masked during the preceding
control flow block. For example:
s_mov_b64 exec, 0x3 ; Initial exec mask
s_mov_b64 s[0:1], exec ; Saved exec mask
v_cmpx_gt_u32 exec, s[2:3], v0, 0 ; llvm.SI.if
do_stuff()
s_or_b64 exec, exec, s[0:1] ; llvm.SI.end.cf
The bug fixed by this patch was one where the llvm.SI.end.cf intrinsic
was being inserted into the header of loops. This would happen when
an if block terminated in a loop header and we would end up with
code like this:
s_mov_b64 exec, 0x3 ; Initial exec mask
s_mov_b64 s[0:1], exec ; Saved exec mask
v_cmpx_gt_u32 exec, s[2:3], v0, 0 ; llvm.SI.if
do_stuff()
LOOP: ; Start of loop header
s_or_b64 exec, exec, s[0:1] ; llvm.SI.end.cf <-BUG: The exec mask has the
same value at the beginning of each loop
iteration.
do_stuff();
s_cbranch_execnz LOOP
The fix is to create a new basic block before the loop and insert the
llvm.SI.end.cf there. This way the exec mask is restored before the
start of the loop instead of at the beginning of each iteration.
llvm-svn: 228302
v2i32, i32, trunc i32 to i16, and truc i32 to i8 stores are legal for
all address spaces. We had marked them as custom in order to lower
them for the private address space, but this is no longer necessary.
This enables lowering of misaligned stores of these types in the
DAGLegalizer.
llvm-svn: 228189
This can happen when a REV instruction is commuted.
The trick is not to define the _vi versions of instructions, which has these
consequences:
- code generation will always fail if a pseudo cannot be lowered
(very useful to catch bugs where an unsupported instruction somehow makes
it to the printer)
- ability to query if a pseudo can be lowered, which is done in commuteOpcode
to prevent REV from commuting to non-REV on VI
Tested-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
llvm-svn: 227990
This fixes a hang when using an empty geometry shader.
v2: - don't add s_nop when followed by s_waitcnt
- comestic changes
Tested-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
llvm-svn: 227986
This is true for SI only. CI+ supports unaligned memory accesses,
but this requires driver support, so for now we disallow unaligned
accesses for all GCN targets.
llvm-svn: 227822
Add tests for the various combines. This should
always be at least cycle neutral on all subtargets for f64,
and faster on some. For f32 we should prefer selecting
v_mad_f32 over v_fma_f32.
llvm-svn: 227484
We used to do this promotion during DAG legalization, but this
caused an infinite loop in ExpandUnalignedLoad() because it assumed
that i64 loads were legal if i64 was a legal type.
It also seems better to report i64 loads as legal, since they actually
are and we were just promoting them to simplify our tablegen files.
llvm-svn: 226945
v2: add and enable tests for SI
Signed-off-by: Jan Vesely <jan.vesely@rutgers.edu>
Reviewed-by: Matt Arsenault <Matthew.Arsenault@amd.com>
llvm-svn: 226881
This fixes it for SI. It also removes the pattern
used previously for Evergreen for f32. I'm not sure
if the the new R600 output is better or not, but it uses
1 fewer instructions if BFI is available.
llvm-svn: 226682
We don't have a good way of legalizing this if the frame index offset
is more than the 12-bits, which is size of MUBUF's offset field, so
now we store the frame index in the vaddr field.
llvm-svn: 226584
Don't do the v4i8 -> v4f32 combine if the load will need to
be expanded due to alignment. This stops adding instructions
to repack into a single register that the v_cvt_ubyteN_f32
instructions read.
llvm-svn: 225926
Now that the source and destination types can be specified,
allow doing an expansion that doesn't use an EXTLOAD of the
result type. Try to do a legal extload to an intermediate type
and extend that if possible.
This generalizes the special case custom lowering of extloads
R600 has been using to work around this problem.
This also happens to fix a bug that would incorrectly use more
aligned loads than should be used.
llvm-svn: 225925
Only do for f32 since I'm unclear on both what this is expecting
for the refinement steps in terms of accuracy, and what
f64 instruction actually provides.
llvm-svn: 225827
Speculating things is generally good. SI+ has instructions for these
for 32-bit values. This is still probably better even with the expansion
for 64-bit values, although it is odd that this callback doesn't have
the size as a parameter.
llvm-svn: 225822
Tom Stellard