Every target we support has support for assembly that looks like
a = b - c
.long a
What is special about MachO is that the above combination suppresses the
production of a relocation.
With this change we avoid producing the intermediary labels when they don't
add any value.
llvm-svn: 220256
X86 code to lower VSELECT messed a bit with the bits set in the mask of VSELECT
when it knows it can be lowered into BLEND. Indeed, only the high bits need to be
set for those and it optimizes those accordingly.
However, when the mask is a compile time constant, the lowering will be handled
by the generic optimizer and those modifications will generate bad code in the
generic optimizer.
This patch fixes that by preventing the optimization if the VSELECT will be
handled by the generic optimizer.
<rdar://problem/18675020>
llvm-svn: 220242
This patch improves support for commutative instructions in the x86 memory folding implementation by attempting to fold a commuted version of the instruction if the original folding fails - if that folding fails as well the instruction is 're-commuted' back to its original order before returning.
Updated version of r219584 (reverted in r219595) - the commutation attempt now explicitly ensures that neither of the commuted source operands are tied to the destination operand / register, which was the source of all the regressions that occurred with the original patch attempt.
Added additional regression test case provided by Joerg Sonnenberger.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5818
llvm-svn: 220239
The previous code had a few problems, motivating the choices here.
1. It could create instructions clobbering CPSR, but the incoming MachineInstr
didn't reflect this. A potential source of corruption. This is why the patch
has a new PseudoInst for before lowering.
2. Similarly, there was some code to handle the incoming instruction not being
ARMCC::AL, but this would have caused massive problems if it was actually
invoked when a complex offset needing more than one instruction was requested.
3. It wasn't designed to handle unaligned pointers (or offsets). These should
probably be minimised anyway, but the code needs to deal with them properly
regardless.
4. It had some rather dubious ad-hoc code to avoid calling
emitThumbRegPlusImmediate, a function which should be designed to do precisely
this job.
We seem to cover the common cases correctly now, and hopefully can enhance
emitThumbRegPlusImmediate to handle any extra optimisations we need to add in
future.
llvm-svn: 220236
The current instruction selection patterns for SMULW[BT] and SMLAW[BT]
are incorrect. These instructions multiply a 32-bit and a 16-bit value
(both signed) and return the top 32 bits of the 48-bit result. This
preserves the 16 bits of overflow, whereas the patterns they currently
match truncate the result to 16 bits then sign extend.
To select these instructions, we would need to match an ISD::SMUL_LOHI,
a sign extend, two shifts and an or. There is no way to match SMUL_LOHI
in an instruction pattern as it defines multiple values, so this would
have to be done in C++. I have raised
http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=21297 to cover allowing correct
selection of these instructions.
This fixes http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=19396
llvm-svn: 220196
This function can, for some offsets from the SP, split one instruction
into two. Since it re-uses the original instruction as the first
instruction of the result, we need ensure its result register is not
marked as dead before we use it in the second instruction.
llvm-svn: 220194
We recently discovered an issue that reinforces what a good idea it is
to always specify -mcpu in our code generation tests, particularly for
-mattr=+vsx. This patch ensures that all tests that specify
-mattr=+vsx also specify -mcpu=pwr7 or -mcpu=pwr8, as appropriate.
Some of the uses of -mattr=+vsx added recently don't make much sense
(when specified for -mtriple=powerpc-apple-darwin8 or -march=ppc32,
for example). For cases like this I've just removed the extra VSX
test commands; there's enough coverage without them.
llvm-svn: 220173
Patch by Bill Seurer; some comment formatting changes by me.
There are a few PowerPC test cases for FastISel support that currently
fail with VSX support enabled. The temporary workaround under
discussion in http://reviews.llvm.org/D5362 helps, but the tests still
fail because they specify -fast-isel-abort, and the VSX workaround
punts back to SelectionDAG. We have plans to fix FastISel permanently
for VSX, but until that's in place these tests are preventing us from
enabling VSX by default. Therefore we are adding -mattr=-vsx to these
tests until the full support is ready.
llvm-svn: 220172
The VSX testing variant in test/CodeGen/PowerPC/fma.ll had to be
disabled because of unexpected behavior on many of the builders. I
tracked this down to a situation that occurs when the VSX attribute is
enabled for a target that disables the MI early scheduling pass. This
patch adds -mcpu=pwr7 to make this predictable. The other issue will
be addressed separately.
llvm-svn: 220171
The previous tests claimed to test constant offsets in the function name,
but the tests weren't actually testing them.
Clone the tests, and do testing of all combinations of the following:
1) with/without constant pointer offset
2) 32/64-bit addressing modes
3) Usage and non-usage of the return value from the atomicrmw
Reviewed-by: Matt Arsenault <matthew.arsenault@amd.com>
llvm-svn: 220103
The function name now matches what it's actually testing.
Signed-off-by: Aaron Watry <awatry@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Arsenault <matthew.arsenault@amd.com>
llvm-svn: 220102
TL;DR: Indexing maps with [] creates missing entries.
The long version:
When selecting lifetime intrinsics, we index the *static* alloca map with the AllocaInst we find for that lifetime. Trouble is, we don't first check to see if this is a dynamic alloca.
On the attached example, this causes a dynamic alloca to create an entry in the static map, and returns 0 (the default) as the frame index for that lifetime. 0 was used for the frame index of the stack protector, which given that it now has a lifetime, is coloured, and merged with other stack slots.
PEI would later trigger an assert because it expects the stack protector to not be dead.
This fix ensures that we only get frame indices for static allocas, ie, those in the map. Dynamic ones are effectively dropped, which is suboptimal, but at least isn't completely broken.
rdar://problem/18672951
llvm-svn: 220099
With VSX enabled, LLVM crashes when compiling
test/CodeGen/PowerPC/fma.ll. I traced this to the liveness test
that's revised in this patch. The interval test is designed to only
work for virtual registers, but in this case the AddendSrcReg is
physical. Since there is already a walk of the MIs between the
AddendMI and the FMA, I added a check for def/kill of the AddendSrcReg
in that loop. At Hal Finkel's request, I converted the liveness test
to an assert restricted to virtual registers.
I've changed the fma.ll test to have VSX and non-VSX variants so we
can test both kinds of multiply-adds.
llvm-svn: 220090
When the input to a store instruction was a zero vector, the backend
always selected a normal vector store regardless of the non-temporal
hint. This is fixed by this patch.
This fixes PR19370.
llvm-svn: 220054
We should be talking about the number of source elements, not the number of destination elements, given we know at this point that the source and dest element numbers are not the same.
While we're at it, avoid writing to std::vector::end()...
Bug found with random testing and a lot of coffee.
llvm-svn: 220051
Currently the VSX support enables use of lxvd2x and stxvd2x for 2x64
types, but does not yet use lxvw4x and stxvw4x for 4x32 types. This
patch adds that support.
As with lxvd2x/stxvd2x, this involves straightforward overriding of
the patterns normally recognized for lvx/stvx, with preference given
to the VSX patterns when VSX is enabled.
In addition, the logic for permitting misaligned memory accesses is
modified so that v4r32 and v4i32 are treated the same as v2f64 and
v2i64 when VSX is enabled. Finally, the DAG generation for unaligned
loads is changed to just use a normal LOAD (which will become lxvw4x)
on P8 and later hardware, where unaligned loads are preferred over
lvsl/lvx/lvx/vperm.
A number of tests now generate the VSX loads/stores instead of
lvx/stvx, so this patch adds VSX variants to those tests. I've also
added <4 x float> tests to the vsx.ll test case, and created a
vsx-p8.ll test case to be used for testing code generation for the
P8Vector feature. For now, that simply tests the unaligned load/store
behavior.
This has been tested along with a temporary patch to enable the VSX
and P8Vector features, with no new regressions encountered with or
without the temporary patch applied.
llvm-svn: 220047
v2: use dyn_cast
fixup comments
v3: use cast
Reviewed-by: Matt Arsenault <arsenm2@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Vesely <jan.vesely@rutgers.edu>
llvm-svn: 220044
Patch by Bill Seurer; committed on his behalf.
These test cases generate slightly different code sequences when VSX
is activated and thus fail. The update turns off VSX explicitly for
the existing checks and then adds a second set of checks for most of
them that test the VSX instruction output.
llvm-svn: 220019
The bug is in ARMConstantIslands::createNewWater where the upper bound of the
new water split point is computed:
// This could point off the end of the block if we've already got constant
// pool entries following this block; only the last one is in the water list.
// Back past any possible branches (allow for a conditional and a maximally
// long unconditional).
if (BaseInsertOffset + 8 >= UserBBI.postOffset()) {
BaseInsertOffset = UserBBI.postOffset() - UPad - 8;
DEBUG(dbgs() << format("Move inside block: %#x\n", BaseInsertOffset));
}
The split point is supposed to be somewhere between the machine instruction that
loads from the constant pool entry and the end of the basic block, before branch
instructions. The code above is fine if the basic block is large enough and
there are a sufficient number of instructions following the machine instruction.
However, if the machine instruction is near the end of the basic block,
BaseInsertOffset can point to the machine instruction or another instruction
that precedes it, and this can lead to convergence failure.
This commit fixes this bug by ensuring BaseInsertOffset is larger than the
offset of the instruction following the constant-loading instruction.
rdar://problem/18581150
llvm-svn: 220015
Summary:
Backends can use setInsertFencesForAtomic to signal to the middle-end that
montonic is the only memory ordering they can accept for
stores/loads/rmws/cmpxchg. The code lowering those accesses with a stronger
ordering to fences + monotonic accesses is currently living in
SelectionDAGBuilder.cpp. In this patch I propose moving this logic out of it
for several reasons:
- There is lots of redundancy to avoid: extremely similar logic already
exists in AtomicExpand.
- The current code in SelectionDAGBuilder does not use any target-hooks, it
does the same transformation for every backend that requires it
- As a result it is plain *unsound*, as it was apparently designed for ARM.
It happens to mostly work for the other targets because they are extremely
conservative, but Power for example had to switch to AtomicExpand to be
able to use lwsync safely (see r218331).
- Because it produces IR-level fences, it cannot be made sound ! This is noted
in the C++11 standard (section 29.3, page 1140):
```
Fences cannot, in general, be used to restore sequential consistency for atomic
operations with weaker ordering semantics.
```
It can also be seen by the following example (called IRIW in the litterature):
```
atomic<int> x = y = 0;
int r1, r2, r3, r4;
Thread 0:
x.store(1);
Thread 1:
y.store(1);
Thread 2:
r1 = x.load();
r2 = y.load();
Thread 3:
r3 = y.load();
r4 = x.load();
```
r1 = r3 = 1 and r2 = r4 = 0 is impossible as long as the accesses are all seq_cst.
But if they are lowered to monotonic accesses, no amount of fences can prevent it..
This patch does three things (I could cut it into parts, but then some of them
would not be tested/testable, please tell me if you would prefer that):
- it provides a default implementation for emitLeadingFence/emitTrailingFence in
terms of IR-level fences, that mimic the original logic of SelectionDAGBuilder.
As we saw above, this is unsound, but the best that can be done without knowing
the targets well (and there is a comment warning about this risk).
- it then switches Mips/Sparc/XCore to use AtomicExpand, relying on this default
implementation (that exactly replicates the logic of SelectionDAGBuilder, so no
functional change)
- it finally erase this logic from SelectionDAGBuilder as it is dead-code.
Ideally, each target would define its own override for emitLeading/TrailingFence
using target-specific fences, but I do not know the Sparc/Mips/XCore memory model
well enough to do this, and they appear to be dealing fine with the ARM-inspired
default expansion for now (probably because they are overly conservative, as
Power was). If anyone wants to compile fences more agressively on these
platforms, the long comment should make it clear why he should first override
emitLeading/TrailingFence.
Test Plan: make check-all, no functional change
Reviewers: jfb, t.p.northover
Subscribers: aemerson, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5474
llvm-svn: 219957
When the constant divisor was larger than 32bits, then the optimized code
generated for the AArch64 backend would emit the wrong code, because the shift
was defined as a shift of a 32bit constant '(1<<Lg2(divisor))' and we would
loose the upper 32bits.
This fixes rdar://problem/18678801.
llvm-svn: 219934
Summary:
In order to support big endian targets for the BuildPairF64 nodes we
just need to swap the low/high pair registers. Additionally, for the
ExtractElementF64 nodes we have to calculate the correct stack offset
with respect to the node's register/operand that we want to extract.
Reviewers: dsanders
Reviewed By: dsanders
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5753
llvm-svn: 219931
In AVX512f we support 64x2 and 32x8 inserts via matching them to 32x4 and 64x4
respectively. These are matched by "Alt" Pat<>'s (Alt stands for alternative
VTs).
Since DQ has native support for these intructions, I peeled off the non-"Alt"
part of the baseclass into vinsert_for_size_no_alt. The DQ instructions are
derived from this multiclass. The "Alt" Pat<>'s are disabled with DQ.
Fixes <rdar://problem/18426089>
llvm-svn: 219874
The SelectDS1Addr1Offset complex pattern always tries to store constant
lds pointers in the offset operand and store a zero value in the addr operand.
Since the addr operand does not accept immediates, the zero value
needs to first be copied to a register.
This newly created zero value will not go through normal instruction
selection, so we need to manually insert a V_MOV_B32_e32 in the complex
pattern.
This bug was hidden by the fact that if there was another zero value
in the DAG that had not been selected yet, then the CSE done by the DAG
would use the unselected node for the addr operand rather than the one
that was just created. This would lead to the zero value being selected
and the DAG automatically inserting a V_MOV_B32_e32 instruction.
llvm-svn: 219848
This is mostly a copy of the existing FastISel GEP code, but we have to
duplicate it for AArch64, because otherwise we would bail out even for simple
cases. This is because the standard fastEmit functions don't cover MUL at all
and ADD is lowered very inefficientily.
The original commit had a bug in the add emit logic, which has been fixed.
llvm-svn: 219831
Summary:
Fixes a FIXME in MachineSinking. Instead of using the simple heuristics in
isPostDominatedBy, use the real MachinePostDominatorTree and MachineLoopInfo.
The old heuristics caused instructions to sink unnecessarily, and might create
register pressure.
This is the second try of the fix. The first one (D4814) caused a performance
regression due to failing to sink instructions out of loops (PR21115). This
patch fixes PR21115 by sinking an instruction from a deeper loop to a shallower
one regardless of whether the target block post-dominates the source.
Thanks Alexey Volkov for reporting PR21115!
Test Plan:
Added a NVPTX codegen test to verify that our change prevents the backend from
over-sinking. It also shows the unnecessary register pressure caused by
over-sinking.
Added an X86 test to verify we can sink instructions out of loops regardless of
the dominance relationship. This test is reduced from Alexey's test in PR21115.
Updated an affected test in X86.
Also ran SPEC CINT2006 and llvm-test-suite for compilation time and runtime
performance. Results are attached separately in the review thread.
Reviewers: Jiangning, resistor, hfinkel
Reviewed By: hfinkel
Subscribers: hfinkel, bruno, volkalexey, llvm-commits, meheff, eliben, jholewinski
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5633
llvm-svn: 219773
Peephole optimization that generates a single conditional branch
for csinc-branch sequences like in the examples below. This is
possible when the csinc sets or clears a register based on a condition
code and the branch checks that register. Also the condition
code may not be modified between the csinc and the original branch.
Examples:
1. Convert csinc w9, wzr, wzr, <CC>;tbnz w9, #0, 0x44
to b.<invCC>
2. Convert csinc w9, wzr, wzr, <CC>; tbz w9, #0, 0x44
to b.<CC>
rdar://problem/18506500
llvm-svn: 219742
Patch to provide shuffle decodes and asm comments for the sse pslldq/psrldq SSE2/AVX2 byte shift instructions.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5598
llvm-svn: 219738
Rafael Espindola