This removes the primary remaining API producing `TerminatorInst` which
will reduce the rate at which code is introduced trying to use it and
generally make it much easier to remove the remaining APIs across the
codebase.
Also clean up some of the stragglers that the previous mechanical update
of variables missed.
Users of LLVM and out-of-tree code generally will need to update any
explicit variable types to handle this. Replacing `TerminatorInst` with
`Instruction` (or `auto`) almost always works. Most of these edits were
made in prior commits using the perl one-liner:
```
perl -i -ple 's/TerminatorInst(\b.* = .*getTerminator\(\))/Instruction\1/g'
```
This also my break some rare use cases where people overload for both
`Instruction` and `TerminatorInst`, but these should be easily fixed by
removing the `TerminatorInst` overload.
llvm-svn: 344504
DominatorTreeBase::getNode does not modify its parameter and this change
allows callers that only have access to const pointers to use it without
casting.
Reviewers: kuhar, dblaikie, chandlerc
Reviewed By: dblaikie
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48231
llvm-svn: 334892
Summary: This patch adds a PDT constructor from Function and lets codes previously using a local class to do this use PostDominatorTree class directly.
Reviewers: davide, kuhar, grosser, dberlin
Reviewed By: kuhar
Author: NutshellySima
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46709
llvm-svn: 333102
Summary:
Currently the order of blocks returned by `IDF::calculate` can be
non-deterministic. This was discovered in several attempts to enable
SSAUpdaterBulk for JumpThreading (which led to miscompare in bootstrap between
stage 3 and stage4). Originally, the blocks were put into a priority queue with
a depth level as their key, and this patch adds a DFSIn number as a second key
to specify a deterministic order across blocks from one level.
The solution was suggested by Daniel Berlin.
Reviewers: dberlin, davide
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46646
llvm-svn: 332167
Removes verifyDomTree, using assert(verify()) everywhere instead, and
changes verify a little to always run IsSameAsFreshTree first in order
to print good output when we find errors. Also adds verifyAnalysis for
PostDomTrees, which will allow checking of PostDomTrees it the same way
we check DomTrees and MachineDomTrees.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41298
llvm-svn: 326315
Summary:
It's generally not safe to perform multiple DomTree updates without using the incremental API.
Although it is supposed to work in this particular case, the testcase is misleading/confusing, and it's better to remove it.
Reviewers: dberlin, brzycki, davide, grosser
Reviewed By: davide
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42333
llvm-svn: 323058
Summary:
This patch attempts to fix the DomTree incremental insertion bug found here [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35969 | PR35969 ]] .
When performing an insertion into a piece of unreachable CFG, we may find the same not at different levels. When this happens, the node can turn out to be affected when we find it starting from a node with a lower level in the tree. The level at which we start visitation affects if we consider a node affected or not.
This patch tracks the lowest level at which each node was visited during insertion and allows it to be visited multiple times, if it can cause it to be considered affected.
Reviewers: brzycki, davide, dberlin, grosser
Reviewed By: brzycki
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42231
llvm-svn: 322993
Summary:
This patch teaches PostDominatorTree about infinite loops. It is built on top of D29705 by @dberlin which includes a very detailed motivation for this change.
What's new is that the patch also teaches the incremental updater how to deal with reverse-unreachable regions and how to properly maintain and verify tree roots. Before that, the incremental algorithm sometimes ended up preserving reverse-unreachable regions after updates that wouldn't appear in the tree if it was constructed from scratch on the same CFG.
This patch makes the following assumptions:
- A sequence of updates should produce the same tree as a recalculating it.
- Any sequence of the same updates should lead to the same tree.
- Siblings and roots are unordered.
The last two properties are essential to efficiently perform batch updates in the future.
When it comes to the first one, we can decide later that the consistency between freshly built tree and an updated one doesn't matter match, as there are many correct ways to pick roots in infinite loops, and to relax this assumption. That should enable us to recalculate postdominators less frequently.
This patch is pretty conservative when it comes to incremental updates on reverse-unreachable regions and ends up recalculating the whole tree in many cases. It should be possible to improve the performance in many cases, if we decide that it's important enough.
That being said, my experiments showed that reverse-unreachable are very rare in the IR emitted by clang when bootstrapping clang. Here are the statistics I collected by analyzing IR between passes and after each removePredecessor call:
```
# functions: 52283
# samples: 337609
# reverse unreachable BBs: 216022
# BBs: 247840796
Percent reverse-unreachable: 0.08716159869015269 %
Max(PercRevUnreachable) in a function: 87.58620689655172 %
# > 25 % samples: 471 ( 0.1395104988314885 % samples )
... in 145 ( 0.27733680163724345 % functions )
```
Most of the reverse-unreachable regions come from invalid IR where it wouldn't be possible to construct a PostDomTree anyway.
I would like to commit this patch in the next week in order to be able to complete the work that depends on it before the end of my internship, so please don't wait long to voice your concerns :).
Reviewers: dberlin, sanjoy, grosser, brzycki, davide, chandlerc, hfinkel
Reviewed By: dberlin
Subscribers: nhaehnle, javed.absar, kparzysz, uabelho, jlebar, hiraditya, llvm-commits, dberlin, david2050
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35851
llvm-svn: 310940
Remove the second part of the TODO comment that highlighted an issue with
possibly connecting all nodes to the exit of the CFG. This caused concerns
with Jakub Kuderski regarding its feasability, hence we remove it. Such
points are better discussed outside of CFG. If connecting all nodes makes
sense and what the impact is is currently part of an active review discussion.
llvm-svn: 309919
Summary:
This patch makes LoopDeletion use the incremental DominatorTree API.
We modify LoopDeletion to perform the deletion in 5 steps:
1. Create a new dummy edge from the preheader to the exit, by adding a conditional branch.
2. Inform the DomTree about the new edge.
3. Remove the conditional branch and replace it with an unconditional edge to the exit. This removes the edge to the loop header, making it unreachable.
4. Inform the DomTree about the deleted edge.
5. Remove the unreachable block from the function.
Creating the dummy conditional branch is necessary to perform incremental DomTree update.
We should consider using the batch updater when it's ready.
Reviewers: dberlin, davide, grosser, sanjoy
Reviewed By: dberlin, grosser
Subscribers: mzolotukhin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35391
llvm-svn: 309850
Summary:
As we are in the process of changing the behavior of how the post-dominator tree
is computed, make sure we have some more test coverage in this area.
Current inconsistencies:
- Newly unreachable nodes are not added as new roots, in case the PDT is updated
but not rebuilt.
- Newly unreachable loops are not added to the CFG at all (neither when
building from scratch nor when updating the CFG). This is inconsistent with
the fact that unreachables are added to the PDT, but unreachable loops not.
On the other side, PDT relationships are not loosened at the moment in
cases where new unreachable loops are built.
This commit is providing additional test coverage for
https://reviews.llvm.org/D35851
Reviewers: dberlin, kuhar
Reviewed By: kuhar
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36107
llvm-svn: 309684
This fixes a minor bug in insertion to a reachable node that caused
DominatorTree.InsertDeleteExhaustive flakiness. The patch also adds
a new testcase for this exact failure.
llvm-svn: 308074
The DominatorTree.InsertDeleteExhaustive uses a RNG with a
constant seed to generate different sequences of updates. The test
fails on some buildbots and this patch disables it for now.
llvm-svn: 308070
Summary:
This patch implements incremental edge deletions.
It also makes DominatorTreeBase store a pointer to the parent function. The parent function is needed to perform full rebuilts during some deletions, but it is also used to verify that inserted and deleted edges come from the same function.
Reviewers: dberlin, davide, grosser, sanjoy, brzycki
Reviewed By: dberlin
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35342
llvm-svn: 308062
Summary:
This patch introduces incremental edge insertions based on the Depth Based Search algorithm.
Insertions should work for both dominators and postdominators.
Reviewers: dberlin, grosser, davide, sanjoy, brzycki
Reviewed By: dberlin
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35341
llvm-svn: 308054
Summary:
DominatorTreeBase used to have IsPostDominators (bool) member to indicate if the tree is a dominator or a postdominator tree. This made it possible to switch between the two 'modes' at runtime, but it isn't used in practice anywhere.
This patch makes IsPostDominator a template argument. This way, it is easier to switch between different algorithms at compile-time based on this argument and design external utilities around it. It also makes it impossible to incidentally assign a postdominator tree to a dominator tree (and vice versa), and to further simplify template code in GenericDominatorTreeConstruction.
Reviewers: dberlin, sanjoy, davide, grosser
Reviewed By: dberlin
Subscribers: mzolotukhin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35315
llvm-svn: 308040
This reverts commit r306907 and reapplies the patches in the title.
The patches used to make one of the
CodeGen/ARM/2011-02-07-AntidepClobber.ll test to fail because of a
missing null check.
llvm-svn: 306919
This reverts commit r306894.
Revert "[Dominators] Add NearestCommonDominator verification"
This reverts commit r306893.
Revert "[Dominators] Keep tree level in DomTreeNode and use it to find NCD and answer dominance queries"
This reverts commit r306892.
llvm-svn: 306907
Summary:
This patch makes DomTreeNodes keep their level (depth) in the DomTree. By having this information always available, it is possible to speedup and simplify findNearestCommonDominator and certain dominance queries.
In the future, level information will be also needed to perform incremental updates.
My testing doesn't show any noticeable performance differences after applying this patch. There may be some improvements when other passes are thought to use the level information.
Reviewers: dberlin, sanjoy, chandlerc, grosser
Reviewed By: dberlin
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34548
llvm-svn: 306892
Summary:
DFS InOut numbers currently get eagerly computer upon DomTree construction. They are only needed to answer dome dominance queries and they get invalidated by updates and recalculations. Because of that, it is faster in practice to compute them lazily when they are actually needed.
Clang built without this patch takes 6m 45s to boostrap on my machine, and with the patch applied 6m 38s.
Reviewers: sanjoy, dberlin, chandlerc
Reviewed By: dberlin
Subscribers: davide, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34296
llvm-svn: 306778
This removes a quadratic behavior in assert-enabled builds.
GVN propagates the equivalence from a condition into the blocks guarded by the
condition. E.g. for 'if (a == 7) { ... }', 'a' will be replaced in the block
with 7. It does this by replacing all the uses of 'a' that are dominated by
the true edge.
For a switch with N cases and U uses of the value, this will mean N * U calls
to 'dominates'. Asserting isSingleEdge in 'dominates' make this N^2 * U
because this function checks for the uniqueness of the edge. I.e. traverses
each edge between the SwitchInst's block and the cases.
The change removes the assert and makes 'dominates' works correctly in the
presence of non-unique edges.
This brings build time down by an order of magnitude for an input that has
~10k cases in a switch statement.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33584
llvm-svn: 304721
I've taken the approach from the LoopInfo test:
* Rather than running in the pass manager just build the analyses manually
* Split out the common parts (makeLLVMModule, runWithDomTree) into helpers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33617
llvm-svn: 304061
In some cases StructurizeCfg updates root node, but dominator info
remains unchanges, it causes crash when expensive checks are enabled.
To cope with this problem a new method was added to DominatorTreeBase
that allows adding new root nodes, it is called in StructurizeCfg to
put dominator tree in sync.
This change fixes PR27488.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28114
llvm-svn: 291530
At the same time, fixes InstructionsTest::CastInst unittest: yes
you can leave the IR in an invalid state and exit when you don't
destroy the context (like the global one), no longer now.
This is the first part of http://reviews.llvm.org/D19094
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 266379
The personality routine currently lives in the LandingPadInst.
This isn't desirable because:
- All LandingPadInsts in the same function must have the same
personality routine. This means that each LandingPadInst beyond the
first has an operand which produces no additional information.
- There is ongoing work to introduce EH IR constructs other than
LandingPadInst. Moving the personality routine off of any one
particular Instruction and onto the parent function seems a lot better
than have N different places a personality function can sneak onto an
exceptional function.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10429
llvm-svn: 239940
The patch is generated using clang-tidy misc-use-override check.
This command was used:
tools/clang/tools/extra/clang-tidy/tool/run-clang-tidy.py \
-checks='-*,misc-use-override' -header-filter='llvm|clang' \
-j=32 -fix -format
http://reviews.llvm.org/D8925
llvm-svn: 234679
LLVM's include tree and the use of using declarations to hide the
'legacy' namespace for the old pass manager.
This undoes the primary modules-hostile change I made to keep
out-of-tree targets building. I sent an email inquiring about whether
this would be reasonable to do at this phase and people seemed fine with
it, so making it a reality. This should allow us to start bootstrapping
with modules to a certain extent along with making it easier to mix and
match headers in general.
The updates to any code for users of LLVM are very mechanical. Switch
from including "llvm/PassManager.h" to "llvm/IR/LegacyPassManager.h".
Qualify the types which now produce compile errors with "legacy::". The
most common ones are "PassManager", "PassManagerBase", and
"FunctionPassManager".
llvm-svn: 229094
* Use StringRef instead of std::string&
* Return a std::unique_ptr<Module> instead of taking an optional module to write
to (was not really used).
* Use current comment style.
* Use current naming convention.
llvm-svn: 215989
This compiles with no changes to clang/lld/lldb with MSVC and includes
overloads to various functions which are used by those projects and llvm
which have OwningPtr's as parameters. This should allow out of tree
projects some time to move. There are also no changes to libs/Target,
which should help out of tree targets have time to move, if necessary.
llvm-svn: 203083
can be used by both the new pass manager and the old.
This removes it from any of the virtual mess of the pass interfaces and
lets it derive cleanly from the DominatorTreeBase<> template. In turn,
tons of boilerplate interface can be nuked and it turns into a very
straightforward extension of the base DominatorTree interface.
The old analysis pass is now a simple wrapper. The names and style of
this split should match the split between CallGraph and
CallGraphWrapperPass. All of the users of DominatorTree have been
updated to match using many of the same tricks as with CallGraph. The
goal is that the common type remains the resulting DominatorTree rather
than the pass. This will make subsequent work toward the new pass
manager significantly easier.
Also in numerous places things became cleaner because I switched from
re-running the pass (!!! mid way through some other passes run!!!) to
directly recomputing the domtree.
llvm-svn: 199104
directory. These passes are already defined in the IR library, and it
doesn't make any sense to have the headers in Analysis.
Long term, I think there is going to be a much better way to divide
these matters. The dominators code should be fully separated into the
abstract graph algorithm and have that put in Support where it becomes
obvious that evn Clang's CFGBlock's can use it. Then the verifier can
manually construct dominance information from the Support-driven
interface while the Analysis library can provide a pass which both
caches, reconstructs, and supports a nice update API.
But those are very long term, and so I don't want to leave the really
confusing structure until that day arrives.
llvm-svn: 199082
are part of the core IR library in order to support dumping and other
basic functionality.
Rename the 'Assembly' include directory to 'AsmParser' to match the
library name and the only functionality left their -- printing has been
in the core IR library for quite some time.
Update all of the #includes to match.
All of this started because I wanted to have the layering in good shape
before I started adding support for printing LLVM IR using the new pass
infrastructure, and commandline support for the new pass infrastructure.
llvm-svn: 198688
When a block is unreachable, asking its dom tree descendants should
return the empty set. However, the computation of the descendants
was causing a segmentation fault because the dom tree node we get
from the basic block is initially NULL.
Fixed by adding a test for a valid dom tree node before we iterate.
The patch also adds some unit tests to the existing dom tree tests.
llvm-svn: 196099
Chandler Carruth