Now in libcxx and clang, all the coroutine components are defined in
std::experimental namespace.
And now the coroutine TS is merged into C++20. So in the working draft
like N4892, we could find the coroutine components is defined in std
namespace instead of std::experimental namespace.
And the coroutine support in clang seems to be relatively stable. So I
think it may be suitable to move the coroutine component into the
experiment namespace now.
This patch would make clang lookup coroutine_traits in std namespace
first. For the compatibility consideration, clang would lookup in
std::experimental namespace if it can't find definitions in std
namespace. So the existing codes wouldn't be break after update
compiler.
And in case the compiler found std::coroutine_traits and
std::experimental::coroutine_traits at the same time, it would emit an
error for it.
The support for looking up std::experimental::coroutine_traits would be
removed in Clang16.
Reviewed By: lxfind, Quuxplusone
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108696
This reverts commit 2d7fba5f95.
The patch was reverted because it caused regression with rocThrust
due to ambiguity of template specialization.
For details please see https://reviews.llvm.org/D109496
The #pragma directives push_macro/pop_macro and include_alias may influence the #include / import directives encountered by dependency scanning tools like clang-scan-deps.
This patch ensures that those directives are not removed during source code minimization.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112088
A resolution to the ambiguity issues created by P0522, which is a DR solving
CWG 150, did not come as expected, so we are just going to accept the change,
and watch how users digest it.
For now we deprecate the flag with a warning, and make it on by default.
We don't remove the flag completely in order to give users a chance to
work around any problems by disabling it.
Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
Reviewed By: rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109496
This patch adds a new preprocessor extension ``#pragma clang final``
which enables warning on undefinition and re-definition of macros.
The intent of this warning is to extend beyond ``-Wmacro-redefined`` to
warn against any and all alterations to macros that are marked `final`.
This warning is part of the ``-Wpedantic-macros`` diagnostics group.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108567
Specify the C and C++ standards explicitly for this test. This avoids
failures for drivers that default to older standards.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109857
\x{XXXX} \u{XXXX} and \o{OOOO} are accepted in all languages mode
in characters and string literals.
This is a feature proposed for both C++ (P2290R1) and C (N2785). The
papers have been seen by both committees but are not yet adopted into
either standard. However, they do have support from both committees.
This patch adds `#pragma clang restrict_expansion ` to enable flagging
macros as unsafe for header use. This is to allow macros that may have
ABI implications to be avoided in headers that have ABI stability
promises.
Using macros in headers (particularly public headers) can cause a
variety of issues relating to ABI and modules. This new pragma logs
warnings when using annotated macros outside the main source file.
This warning is added under a new diagnostics group -Wpedantic-macros
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107095
This implements P2362, which has not yet been approved by the
C++ committee, but because wide-multi character literals are
implementation defined, clang might not have to wait for WG21.
This change is also being applied in C mode as the behavior is
implementation-defined in C as well and there's no benefit to
having different rules between the languages.
The other part of P2362, making non-representable character
literals ill-formed, is already implemented by clang
The interesting bit about that triple isn't the architecture, it's the
fact that ps4 implies C99 as the standard rather than a newer C mode.
Specify the language standard rather than the triple so the test is a
bit more general.
This adds the Unicode 13 data for XID_Start and XID_Continue.
The definition of valid identifier is changed in all C++ modes
as P1949 (https://wg21.link/p1949) was accepted by WG21 as a defect
report.
This patch adds `#pragma clang deprecated` to enable deprecation of
preprocessor macros.
The macro must be defined before `#pragma clang deprecated`. When
deprecating a macro a custom message may be optionally provided.
Warnings are emitted at the use site of a deprecated macro, and can be
controlled via the `-Wdeprecated` warning group.
This patch takes some rough inspiration and a few lines of code from
https://reviews.llvm.org/D67935.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106732
The feature was implemented in D99005, but we forgot to add the test
macro.
Reviewed By: Quuxplusone
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104984
This completes the series implementing p1099, by adding the feature
macro and updating the web page.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102242
Like other sanitizers, enable __has_feature(coverage_sanitizer) if clang
has enabled at least one SanitizerCoverage instrumentation type.
Because coverage instrumentation selection is not handled via normal
-fsanitize= (and thus not in SanitizeSet), passing this information
through to LangOptions required propagating the already parsed
-fsanitize-coverage= options from CodeGenOptions through to LangOptions
in FixupInvocation().
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103159
WG14 adopted N2626 at the meetings this week. This commit adds support
for using ' as a digit separator in a numeric literal which is
compatible with the C++ feature.
Set the default wchar_t type on z/OS, and unsigned as the default.
Reviewed By: hubert.reinterpretcast, fanbo-meng
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87624
Aligned allocation is not supported on z/OS. This patch sets -faligned-alloc-unavailable as default in z/OS toolchain.
Reviewed By: abhina.sreeskantharajan, hubert.reinterpretcast
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87611
D52774 fixed a bug with typo correction of includes, but didn't add
a test.
D65907 then broke recovery of typo correction of includes again,
because it extracted the code that writes to Filename to a separate
function that took the parameter not by reference.
Fix that, and also don't repeat the slash normalization computation
and fix both lookup and regular file name after recovery.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79595
See PR45812 for motivation.
No explicit test since I couldn't figure out how to get the
current disk drive in lower case into a form in lit where I could
mkdir it and cd to it. But the change does have test coverage in
that I can remove the case normalization in lit, and tests failed
on several bots (and for me locally if in a pwd with a lower-case
drive) without that normalization prior to this change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79531
Currently, normalize() for posix replaces backslashes to slashes, except
that two backslashes in sequence are kept as-is.
clang calls normalize() to convert \ to / is microsoft compat mode. This
generally works well, but a path like "c:\\foo\\bar.h" with two
backslashes doesn't work due to the exception in normalize().
These paths happen naturally on Windows hosts with e.g.
`#include __FILE__`, and them not working on other hosts makes it
more difficult to write tests for this case.
The special case has been around without justification since this code
was added in r203611 (since then moved around in r215241 r215243). No
integration tests fail if I remove it.
Try removing the special case.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79265
The approach in D30000 assumes that the '/' returned by path::begin()
is the first element for absolute paths, but that's not true on
Windows.
Also, on Windows backslashes in include lines often end up escaped
so that there are two of them. Having backslashes in include lines
is undefined behavior in most cases and implementation-defined
behavior in C++20, but since clang treats it as normal repeated
path separators, the diagnostic should too.
Unbreaks -Wnonportable-include-path for absolute paths on Windows,
and unbreaks it on non-Windows in the case of absolute paths with
repeated directory separators.
This affects e.g. the `#include __FILE__` technique if the file
passed to clang has the wrong case for the drive letter. Before:
C:\src\llvm-project>bin\clang-cl.exe c:\src\llvm-project\test.cc
c:\\src\\llvm-project\\test.cc(4,10): warning: non-portable path to file
'"c\\srccllvm-projectctest.cc.'; specified path differs in case from
file name on disk [-Wnonportable-include-path]
^
Now:
C:\src\llvm-project> out\gn\bin\clang-cl c:\src\llvm-project\test.cc
c:\\src\\llvm-project\\test.cc(4,10): warning: non-portable path to file
'"C:\\src\\llvm-project\\test.cc"'; specified path differs in case from
file name on disk [-Wnonportable-include-path]
^
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79223
user interface and documentation, and update __cplusplus for C++20.
WG21 considers the C++20 standard to be finished (even though it still
has some more steps to pass through in the ISO process).
The old flag names are accepted for compatibility, as usual, and we
still have lots of references to C++2a in comments and identifiers;
those can be cleaned up separately.
Summary:
As discussed in http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2019-October/063459.html
the overflow of the souce locations (limited to 2^31 chars) can generate all sorts of
weird things (bogus warnings, hangs, crashes, miscompilation and correct compilation).
In debug mode this assert would fail. So it might be a good start, as in PR42301,
to detect the failure and exit with a proper error message.
Reviewers: rsmith, thakis, miyuki
Reviewed By: miyuki
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70183
Now with concepts support merged and mostly complete, we do not need -fconcepts-ts
(which was also misleading as we were not implementing the TS) and can enable
concepts features under C++2a. A warning will be generated if users still attempt
to use -fconcepts-ts.
We don't yet advertise init capture packs, because I found some bugs
while testing it. We reject-valid and then crash on both of these:
template<int ...a> auto x = [...y = a] {};
template<int ...a> auto x = [y = a...] {};
This reapplies: 8ff85ed905
Original commit message:
As a follow-up to my initial mail to llvm-dev here's a first pass at the O1 described there.
This change doesn't include any change to move from selection dag to fast isel
and that will come with other numbers that should help inform that decision.
There also haven't been any real debuggability studies with this pipeline yet,
this is just the initial start done so that people could see it and we could start
tweaking after.
Test updates: Outside of the newpm tests most of the updates are coming from either
optimization passes not run anymore (and without a compelling argument at the moment)
that were largely used for canonicalization in clang.
Original post:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-April/131494.html
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65410
This reverts commit c9ddb02659.
This change doesn't include any change to move from selection dag to fast isel
and that will come with other numbers that should help inform that decision.
There also haven't been any real debuggability studies with this pipeline yet,
this is just the initial start done so that people could see it and we could start
tweaking after.
Test updates: Outside of the newpm tests most of the updates are coming from either
optimization passes not run anymore (and without a compelling argument at the moment)
that were largely used for canonicalization in clang.
Original post:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-April/131494.html
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65410
Add a 'leak_sanitizer' feature akin to existing '*_sanitizer' features
to let programmers switch code paths accounting for leak sanitizers
being enabled.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67719
llvm-svn: 372527
This is mostly the same as the
[[clang::require_constant_initialization]] attribute, but has a couple
of additional syntactic and semantic restrictions.
In passing, I added a warning for the attribute form being added after
we have already seen the initialization of the variable (but before we
see the definition); that case previously slipped between the cracks and
the attribute was silently ignored.
llvm-svn: 370972
Chris Bieneman