Summary:
I recently found that the variable naming wasn't working as expected with containers that are data members. The new index always received the name "Elem" (or equivalent) regardless of the container's name.
The check was assuming that the container's declaration was a VarDecl, which cannot be converted to a FieldDecl (a data member), and then it could never retrieve its name.
This also fixes some cases where the check failed to find the container at all (so it didn't do any fix) because of the same reason.
Reviewers: klimek
Subscribers: cfe-commits, alexfh
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14289
llvm-svn: 251943
Summary: The previous change was focused in detecting when a non-const object was used in a constant way. Looks like I forgot the most important and trivial case: when the object is already constant. Failing to detect this cases results in compile errors, due to trying to bind a constant object to a non-const reference in the range-for statement. This change should fix that.
Reviewers: klimek
Subscribers: alexfh, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14282
llvm-svn: 251940
Summary:
Now, it detects that several kinds of usages are can't modify the elements. Examples:
-When an usage is a call to a const member function or operator of the element.
-If the element is used as an argument to a function or constructor that takes a const-reference or a value.
-LValue to RValue conversion, if the element is a fundamental type (which allows the use of most of the builtin operators).
Reviewers: klimek
Subscribers: cfe-commits, alexfh
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14198
llvm-svn: 251808
Summary: The check was assuming that a definition of a function always has a body, but a declaration that explicitly defaults or deletes a function is a definition too.
Reviewers: alexfh
Subscribers: klimek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14238
llvm-svn: 251807
Summary: When traversing the parent map, the check assumed that all the nodes would be either Stmt or Decl. After r251101, this is no longer true: there can be TypeLoc and NestedNameSpecifierLoc nodes.
Reviewers: alexfh
Subscribers: klimek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14229
llvm-svn: 251803
Summary:
When applying this check to the unit tests, it would hit an assertion:
llvm/tools/clang/lib/Lex/Lexer.cpp:1056: clang::SourceLocation clang::Lexer::getSourceLocation(const char*, unsigned int) const: Assertion `PP && "This doesn't work on raw lexers"' failed.
Reviewers: klimek, LegalizeAdulthood, alexfh
Subscribers: cfe-commits, alexfh
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14204
llvm-svn: 251792
Summary: the check will now warn when the user provided definitions of this functions is equivalent to the explicitly defaulted ones.
Reviewers: klimek
Subscribers: klimek, cfe-commits, alexfh
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14145
llvm-svn: 251788
Summary: If the size of the type is above a certain bound, we'll take a const reference. This bound can be set as an option. For now, the default value is 16 bytes.
Reviewers: klimek
Subscribers: alexfh, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14176
llvm-svn: 251694
This check for clang-tidy looks for function with zero arguments declared as (void) and removes the unnecessary void token.
int foo(void);
becomes
int foo();
The check performs no formatting of the surrounding context but uses the lexer to look for the token sequence "(", "void", ")" in the prototype text. If this sequence of tokens is found, a removal is issued for the void token only.
Patch by Richard Thomson!
(+fixed tests, moved the check to the modernize module)
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7639
llvm-svn: 251475
I totally forgot that char can be defined as unsigned on some platforms.
Now I made explicit mention of signed type where necessary in tests.
Also fixed '//RUN: ' header of cxx98 test to correct format.
llvm-svn: 251244
Summary:
This is another check that I ported to clang-tidy from colobot-lint tool.
As previously discussed on cfe-dev mailing list, this is one of those
checks that I think is general and useful enough for contribution to
clang-tidy.
This patch contains implementation of check taken from colobot-lint, but
it is extended a great deal, including FixIt hints for automated
refactoring, exhaustive testcases, and user documentation.
Reviewers: sbenza, aaron.ballman, alexfh
Subscribers: Eugene.Zelenko
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13635
llvm-svn: 251235
Summary: using "auto" on a loop that iterates over ints is kind of an overkill. Use the real type name instead.
Reviewers: klimek
Subscribers: alexfh, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13982
llvm-svn: 251015
Summary: Take into account the current LangOptions the check has to add back the template argument.
Reviewers: klimek
Subscribers: alexfh, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13983
llvm-svn: 251013
With this, site specific lit configs can inject parameters into the
test scripts if they need site specific parameters.
Next up: enable check_clang_tidy to take a resource dir to enable
non-standard locations for builtin includes.
llvm-svn: 251010
Summary:
This check flags all calls to c-style vararg functions and all use
of va_list, va_start and va_arg.
Passing to varargs assumes the correct type will be read. This is
fragile because it cannot generally be enforced to be safe in the
language and so relies on programmer discipline to get it right.
This rule is part of the "Type safety" profile of the C++ Core
Guidelines, see
https://github.com/isocpp/CppCoreGuidelines/blob/master/CppCoreGuidelines.md#-type8-avoid-reading-from-varargs-or-passing-vararg-arguments-prefer-variadic-template-parameters-instead
This commits also reverts
"[clang-tidy] add cert's VariadicFunctionDefCheck as cppcoreguidelines-pro-type-vararg-def"
because that check makes the SFINAE use of vararg functions impossible.
Reviewers: alexfh, sbenza, bkramer, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13787
llvm-svn: 250939
Summary:
Add a check that replaces empty bodies of special member functions with '= default;'.
For now, it is only implemented for the default constructor and the destructor, which are the easier cases.
The copy-constructor and the copy-assignment operator cases will be implemented later.
I applied this check to the llvm code base and found 627 warnings (385 in llvm, 9 in compiler-rt, 220 in clang and 13 in clang-tools-extra).
Applying the fixes didn't break any build or test, it only caused a -Wpedantic warning in lib/Target/Mips/MipsOptionRecord.h:33 becaused it replaced
virtual ~MipsOptionRecord(){}; to virtual ~MipsOptionRecord()= default;;
Reviewers: klimek
Subscribers: george.burgess.iv, Eugene.Zelenko, alexfh, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13871
llvm-svn: 250897
Summary:
This check flags all access to members of unions. Passing unions as a
whole is not flagged.
Reading from a union member assumes that member was the last one
written, and writing to a union member assumes another member with a
nontrivial destructor had its destructor called. This is fragile because
it cannot generally be enforced to be safe in the language and so relies
on programmer discipline to get it right.
This rule is part of the "Type safety" profile of the C++ Core
Guidelines, see
https://github.com/isocpp/CppCoreGuidelines/blob/master/CppCoreGuidelines.md#-type7-avoid-accessing-members-of-raw-unions-prefer-variant-instead
Reviewers: alexfh, sbenza, bkramer, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13784
llvm-svn: 250537
Summary: Prevent clang-tidy from discarding fixes that are in different files but happen to have the same file offset.
Reviewers: klimek, bkramer
Subscribers: bkramer, alexfh, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13810
llvm-svn: 250523
Summary: modernize-make-unique now correctly supports the different kinds of list initialization.
Reviewers: klimek
Subscribers: cfe-commits, alexfh
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13590
llvm-svn: 250283
Summary:
This check flags all usage of pointer arithmetic, because it could lead
to an
invalid pointer.
Subtraction of two pointers is not flagged by this check.
Pointers should only refer to single objects, and pointer arithmetic is
fragile and easy to get wrong. array_view is a bounds-checked, safe type
for accessing arrays of data.
This rule is part of the "Bounds safety" profile of the C++ Core
Guidelines, see
https://github.com/isocpp/CppCoreGuidelines/blob/master/CppCoreGuidelines.md#-bounds1-dont-use-pointer-arithmetic-use-array_view-instead
Depends on D13313
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13311
llvm-svn: 250116
Summary:
This check flags all usages of static_cast, where a base class is casted
to a derived class.
In those cases, a fixit is provided to convert the cast to a
dynamic_cast.
Use of these casts can violate type safety and cause the program to
access a variable that is actually of type X to be accessed as if it
were of an unrelated type Z.
This rule is part of the "Type safety" profile of the C++ Core
Guidelines, see
https://github.com/isocpp/CppCoreGuidelines/blob/master/CppCoreGuidelines.md#-type2-dont-use-static_cast-downcasts-use-dynamic_cast-instead
Depends on D13313
Reviewers: alexfh, sbenza, bkramer, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13368
llvm-svn: 250098
Summary: Add the second template argument to the unique_ptr mock, and update the matcher so that it only matches against cases where the second argument is the default.
Reviewers: klimek
Subscribers: alexfh, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13433
llvm-svn: 249305
Summary: Now that we prioritize copying trivial types over using const-references where possible, I found some cases where, after the transformation, the loop was using the address of the local copy instead of the original object.
Reviewers: klimek
Subscribers: alexfh, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13431
llvm-svn: 249300
Summary:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=24960
modernize-use-nullptr would hit an assertion in some cases involving macros and initializer lists, due to finding a node with more than one parent (the two forms of the initializer list).
However, this doesn't mean that the replacement is incorrect, so instead of just rejecting this case I tried to find a way to make it work. Looking at the semantic form of the InitListExpr made sense to me (looking at both forms results in false negatives) but I am not sure of the things that we can miss by skipping the syntactic form.
Reviewers: klimek
Subscribers: cfe-commits, alexfh
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13246
llvm-svn: 249291
This diff requires http://reviews.llvm.org/D13079 to be applied first. I wasn't sure about how to make patch series in Phabricator, and I wanted to keep the two separate for clarity.
It looks like that most cases can be supported with this patch. I'm not totally sure about the actual coverage though. I think that the matchers are very generic, but I'm still not totally fluent with the AST.
Patch by Beren Minor!
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13081
llvm-svn: 248996
Angel Garcia Gomez